Register  |   Log In  |  
Sign up to our weekly newsletter    
Empire Magazine and iPad
Follow Me on Pinterest YouTube Tumblr Viber
Trending On Empire
The Big 2015 Movie Preview
The 50 Best Films Of 2014
Review Of The Year 2014
Subscribe to Empire!
Save up to 63%
Halo 5 Guardians
The Master Chief returns
Unmissable 5 Stars
Excellent 4 Stars
Good 3 Stars
Poor 2 Stars
Tragic 1 Star

Click poster to enlarge
More posters to select

Daniel Radcliffe
Ciaran Hinds
Janet McTeer
Roger Allam.
James Watkins.
Jane Goldman.
Running Time
TBC minutes

4 Star Empire Rating
2 Star Empire Rating
Intern, The
3 Star Empire Rating
Beasts Of No Nation
4 Star Empire Rating
Nightmare, The
3 Star Empire Rating

5 Star Empire Rating
Man With A Movie Camera
5 Star Empire Rating
Salt Of The Earth, The
5 Star Empire Rating
Song Of The Sea
5 Star Empire Rating
Look Of Silence, The
5 Star Empire Rating

The Woman In Black
Harry Potter And Even More Chambers Of Secrets

submit to reddit

Young solicitor Arthur Kipps (Radcliffe) is sent to clear up the affairs of a recently deceased woman who lived in a remote house. When he arrives he finds that the house holds something even more frightening than paperwork.

The Woman In Black
Browse more images »
Though it was published in 1983, The Woman In Black has come to be regarded almost as a classic of Victorian ghost story-telling. While it’s obviously not of that era — the ’80s only really tallying with Victorian times in that people expended rather too much effort getting dressed and the poor had a pretty awful time — Susan Hill’s short novel is very much of the style and mood of tales like The Turn Of The Screw or Oh, Whistle, And I’ll Come To You, My Lad. It’s a little bit stately and completely terrifying through use of language and very simple suggestion, rather than anything gory. The story of a solicitor being traumatised by death and secrets in a remote village has the core ingredients of vengeful ghost, big creaky building, sceptical protagonist and unremittingly miserable weather. The book has sold in enormous numbers; been adapted into a stage play which has been running in the West End for approximately 4,762 years (okay, 23); been the basis of multiple radio plays and, in 1989, was adapted for a successful TV special (viewable on YouTube, if you’re prepared to squint for 100 minutes). It is, in short, a story much told. This latest is a match for any previous telling.

James Watkins’ Woman In Black is not a particularly faithful interpretation of the book, at least not in terms of the order of events. It has rearranged and omitted all over the place, though the major elements remain: the fog with an apparent mind of its own, the dog, the most upsetting rocking chair in the history of literature. But absolute fealty to its source isn’t especially vital as long as it works on its own terms and stays true to at least the spirit of the original story. This it very much does.

Scripted by Jane Goldman (Kick-Ass, X-Men: First Class), who brings a great deal of her own invention to Hill’s story, the film begins with one significant change. Where the novel’s Arthur Kipps is happily married, full of enthusiasm and optimism, keen to be a father, the film’s Kipps is a widower. His wife died giving birth to their son, whom Kipps adores but evidently doesn’t particularly enjoy (the child draws his father with a big, frowny face), and he is troubled by visions of her. That changes Kipps’ path substantially. In the book he is a contented man sent on an apparently menial task and gradually brought down by the terrifying things he witnesses in a haunted house. Here, he’s a hollow man trying to achieve some kind of contentment by battling internal and external ghosts. It’s bold, but it works. The utter lack of happiness in any of the characters adds to the bleakness of the story and, cinematically at least, without the benefit of narration, a character seeking something is perhaps more compelling than a character who has everything to lose.

The actions of The Woman In Black, the ghost of Eel Marsh House, have also been somewhat altered. Goldman and Watkins’ take on the village of Crythin Gifford is rather like Summerisle in The Wicker Man, with a small, isolated community of permanently edgy folk who hold a secret — a secret they keep very poorly by staring accusingly at the stranger in their midst and dropping heavy, yet still oblique, hints about not going up to the big dark house where big dark things happen. It’s no spoiler to say that The Woman In Black has a curious, violent hold over the people of the village, but the way in which that manifests itself has been ramped up in the movie. This Woman In Black is more determinedly evil, a more ambitious class of deathly spirit.

Daniel Radcliffe seems initially too young to be playing a solicitor with a four year-old son, even if he is permanently stubbled for extra manliness, but it’s solid casting. He’s considerably more youthful than any of the adults in Crythin Gifford, which adds to his outsider status and enhances the fact that others know so much more than him. Anyway, it’s set in Victorian times and everyone was younger then. All the old people were dead. Radcliffe plays a challenging role well, frequently with nothing to react against as he tiptoes around Eel Marsh House waiting for something horrible to happen. He’s got good eyes for looking terrified: huge and always a little bit aghast, even in repose. Elsewhere in the cast, Ciarán Hinds is strong as Sam Daily, a landowner who utterly eschews the ghostly myth until it becomes impossible to do so, while Janet McTeer, in a largely invented role as his wife, who has reacted to the death of her child by treating a pair of dogs like tiny quadrupedal people, almost beats the ghost for absolute creepiness.

The most vital aspect of any depiction of The Woman In Black is that it be consistently unsettling. This is part horror film, but more ghost story. It’s not enough to make the audience jump; they have to feel their flesh crawl almost constantly. Watkins has measured it just right. Eden Lake showed that he could well handle the threat of violence; this shows he can also handle threat that can’t be defined. Every scene has a suggestion that something is lurking, watching, waiting for the right time to reveal itself. For all the time Kipps is in the sprawling house (brilliantly, ominously lit for maximum heebie-jeebies) you’re given no opportunity to relax. Some of the growing tension is paid off with a cathartic shock, but it’s even more unsettling when the shock never comes. The anxiety builds and builds until you can hardly bear it as Kipps edges further into the shadows. You will likely spend a great deal of the running time cowered so far into your seat that you’re virtually horizontal. Actual glimpses of the ghost are used sparingly, a split-second of her appearing in a distant doorway or peeking through a zoetrope being far more unsettling than getting a proper chance to look at her in all her rotting haggardness. If anything, she could have been shown less. The few times when The Woman In Black is on screen for more than a couple of seconds dilute the horror. A screen monster is always scarier when you can’t fully describe it.

If there’s a misstep, it’s in the new ending. Without wanting to give away anything at all, it has been decided that there should be some attempt at redemption, for everyone. It dissipates a good deal of the fear that has been built up to this stage, and though still reasonably satisfying, is not needed. It certainly hasn’t improved on the ending of the novel, which doesn’t seek any resolutions and is all the more despairing for it. Hill’s was an ending that haunts you long after, whereas this wraps up quite neatly. A shame as it puts a quite mundane cap on a film that has up until now not fallen back on the obvious or familiar. That said, you’ll almost certainly still leave the cinema in need of a very stiff drink and a lie-down in a brightened room.

Check behind the doors. Switch on all the lights. You won’t be sleeping soundly for a while.

Reviewed by Olly Richards

Write Your Review
To write your review please login or register.

Your Reviews

Average user rating for The Woman In Black
Empire Star Rating

RE: WHY!!!!!!!!!??????

I don't think so, I think she was just continuing with her vengeance. What I wanted to know is why you'd continue to live in that village if you had kids. MOVE AWAY! ... More

Posted by Timon at 13:18, 13 February 2012 | Report This Post

RE: WHY!!!!!!!!!??????

**** MAJOR SPOILER DISCUSSED BELOW **** So, one thing I'm not too sure about the end is..... Was she helping him by doing what she did, given his loss and financial situation (despite having his son)? Despite the 'forgive' reference at the end I think she was, but would be interested to hear other people's views. ... More

Posted by piginapoke at 13:16, 13 February 2012 | Report This Post

RE: WHY!!!!!!!!!??????

L: guysalisbury This is supposed to be a horror / ghost story. So make it bloody 15 or 18 and scare the shit out of me. t's a 12 because it isn't violent, or gory, and has no swearing in it. None of that stuff means it isn't scary. Go and watch the original Haunting or The Innocents. And then grow up. ... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by Osric at 09:58, 13 February 2012 | Report This Post

RE: creepy

Scariest Scottish Widow advert ever. Very well done film. ... More

Posted by Timon at 09:36, 13 February 2012 | Report This Post

RE: WHY!!!!!!!!!??????

** ONE MILD SPOILER ** L: guysalisbury When I heard that Jane Goldman was writing the script And that james Watkins was directing I got very excited about this. I love scary movies and had heard a few people say that this I very creepy. So why the f*ck has it got a 12a rating? If this film is suitable for a 12 year old and his or her mum, how scary can it be?! I wish the film studios would stop being so money grabbing and tying to accommodate everyone. This is supposed to be a hor... More

Posted by piginapoke at 11:36, 12 February 2012 | Report This Post

RE: loved it

Excellent, scary film. 5/5 I'd say. Jane Goldman is a great writer. The creeping horror of it was very well crafted, the usual shocks here and there but all restrained and even the end didn't succumb to major FX. I initally thought Mr. Radcliffe looked a trifle young but I got the Potter influence out of the way when he started getting spooked in the house. Lots of tension buildup but spoiled slightly by the drone of the films around us in the multiplex when things went quiet. ... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by piginapoke at 00:17, 12 February 2012 | Report This Post


In reply to evildave69 erm Mr Grint is not in this film but Daniel Radcliff is! but they were both in harry potter. ... More

Posted by Bighousewill at 13:17, 10 February 2012 | Report This Post

Previous page

Denis Villeneuve Talks Sicario
On his cartel thriller and the upcoming Blade Runner sequel

Tomorrowland: The Viewing Guide
Brad Bird talks through his sci-fi adventure, scene by scene

Empire Meets Ridley Scott
The great director on The Martian, Blade Runner 2 and the Prometheus sequels

My Movie Life: Justin Kurzel
The Macbeth director on how Rocky changed his life and the worst ever date movie

Life On Mars: Trips To The Red Planet
A dozen of cinema's Martian misadventures

All Hail Macbeth! The Scottish Play On Film
By the pricking of our thumbs, ten adaptations this way come(s)

10 Star Wars: The Force Awakens Toys You’ll Want To Own
Falcon quad copter? BB-8 Sphero? We’re already asking for pay raises…

Subscribe to Empire magazine
Empire print magazine

Delivered to your door – with exclusive subscriber only covers each month! Save money today and

Subscribe now!

Subscribe to Empire iPad edition
Empire digital magazine

Exclusive and enhanced content – get instant access via your iPad or Android device! Save money today and

Subscribe now!

Subscribe now and save up to 63%
Print, Digital & Package options available Subscribe today!
Empire's Film Studies 101 Series
Everything you ever wanted to know about filmmaking but were afraid to ask...
The Empire Digital Edition
With exclusive extras, interactive features, trailers and much more! Download now
Home  |  News  |  Blogs  |  Reviews  |  Future Films  |  Features  |  Interviews  |  Images  |  Competitions  |  Forum  |  Digital Edition  |  Podcast  |  Magazine Contact Us  |  Empire FAQ  |  Subscribe To Empire  |  Register
© Bauer Consumer Media Ltd  |  Legal Info  |  Editorial Complaints  |  Privacy Policy  |  Bauer Entertainment Network
Bauer Consumer Media Ltd (company number 01176085 and registered address 1 Lincoln Court, Lincoln Road, Peterborough, England PE1 2RF)