Register  |   Log In  |  
Sign up to our weekly newsletter    
Search   
Empire Magazine and iPad
Follow Me on Pinterest YouTube Tumblr
Empire
Trending On Empire
Empire's New Tom Cruise Cover
The Jameson Empire Awards 2014
Vote: The Greatest 301 Movies Of All Time!
Rebecca Hall:
My Movie Life

The actress picks the movies that shaped her
Mountain Dew Green Screen
Register Now to see X-MEN First Class!
Reviews
STAR RATINGS EXPLAINED
Unmissable 5 Stars
Excellent 4 Stars
Good 3 Stars
Poor 2 Stars
Tragic 1 Star

POSTER ART
Click poster to enlarge
More posters to select

FILM DETAILS
Certificate
15
Cast
Mickey Rourke
Jason Statham
Forest Whitaker
Jet Li
Dolph Lundgren
Eric Roberts
Steve Austin
Sylvester Stallone.
Directors
Sylvester Stallone.
Screenwriters
Sylvester Stallone.
Running Time
108 minutes

LATEST FILM REVIEWS
You & Me Forever
4 Star Empire Rating
An Episode In The Life Of An Iron Picker
4 Star Empire Rating
Cupcakes
3 Star Empire Rating
Looking For Light: Jane Brown
3 Star Empire Rating
Informant, The
2 Star Empire Rating



5 STAR REVIEWS
Rebel Without A Cause
5 Star Empire Rating
Calvary
5 Star Empire Rating
Wake In Fright
5 Star Empire Rating
Stranger By The Lake
5 Star Empire Rating
Whatever Happened To Baby Jane?
5 Star Empire Rating

The Expendables
The A-ged Team


submit to reddit


Plot
On a tiny island in the Gulf Of Mexico, a team of grizzled mercenaries, led by Barney Ross (Stallone), take on a rogue CIA agent-turned-ruthless drug lord (Roberts) and his puppet general’s army — with, naturally, a vengeance.


Review
The Expendables
Browse more images »
In 2030, the indomitable Sly Stallone, along with the surviving members of the eight-strong action ensemble which make up his titular team, will unite with the common goal of wiping out, once and for all, the dreaded Meatloaf Night at their nursing home. Until then, there’s The Expendables, the action movie equivalent of a Rock & Roll Hall Of Fame ‘super group’, or one of those Doctor Who episodes where all the old Doctors turn up in the same show. (With Eric Roberts, late of the unloved Doctor Who movie, as the villain, the illusion is almost complete.)

If The Expendables had been made a decade ago — and if Steven Seagal and Jean-Claude Van Damme had answered Stallone’s casting call, as the likes of Dolph Lundgren and Arnold Schwarzenegger did — the film could have been a poignant, life-imitates-art examination of a group of once-great action heroes, finding themselves washed up, out of step with the touchy-feely times — like Space Cowboys, but for meatheads. After all, we live in a world in which the movies’ biggest action heroes are played by pantywaists like Robert Downey Jr. and Christian Bale, proper ac-tors whose biggest muscles are inside their heads. If nothing else, such a film would have given much-needed employment to its dole-drawing stars.

As it turns out, things haven’t quite worked out that way: although the title of Arnie’s 1993 flop, Last Action Hero, seemed unintentionally prescient, the past decade has been good to the ’80s action stars. The careers of The Expendables, you might say, have proved anything but. Stallone has gone the distance, largely thanks to Rocky Balboa, a critical and commercial hit; Rourke parlayed an Oscar-nominated comeback (The Wrestler) into a meaty villain role in a hit franchise (Iron Man 2); Steven Seagal sent himself up — at least, we think he was in on the ‘joke’ — in an Orange ad; even Jean-Claude Van Damme, the once-proud “Muscles From Brussels” pulled off an exercise in postmodern existentialism in the film that bore his initials, and — Gott im Himmel! — Ah-nuld was elected, and then re-elected, Governor of Kah-lifornia, and is a constitutional amendment away from a tilt at the White House.They are, however, “getting too old for this shit”. Clive James once described Arnie as looking like “a condom filled with walnuts” — now it’s the other way round. Perhaps that’s why Stallone (64) has recruited young upstarts like Jason Statham (38) and Jet Li (47) to accompany fellow fossils-with-muscles Lundgren (52), Bruce Willis (55), Rourke (57) and Arnie (63) to take down the bad guys (and possibly the insurance premiums). If only Sly had spent less time on the phone to his mates, and more on the script.

Instead it seems that, having assembled his dream cast — and thrown in wrestler ‘Stone Cold’ Steve Austin and Ultimate Fighting Champion Randy Couture for the ‘kids’ — Stallone clearly felt that such fuddy-duddy film staples as story, characterisation and dialogue that makes sense were, well, expendable. Sure, there’s some direct-to-video-level plotting (see above), and an attempt at creating motivation for Stallone and his fellow cigar-chompers to care — in a nutshell, “The general’s daughter is a hottie” — but that’s really as far as it goes. As the film lurches from scene to scene, one becomes increasingly convinced that not only is everyone making it up as they go along (director Stallone shares a screenwriting credit, so it’s entirely plausible), but that Sly could only convince his cast to jump on board if he agreed to very specific, and often very strange, demands: ‘I want a scene where I kick Jet Li’s ass.’ ‘I want to blow up a dock from the open-air gun turret of a giant seaplane.’ ‘I want to meet Charisma Carpenter, can you fix us up?’ (And apparently, in the case of the much-ballyhooed on-screen team-up between Stallone, Schwarzenegger and Willis, ‘I want a scene with all the verbal and visual fireworks of a Planet Hollywood annual general meeting circa 1993.’)

That said, The Expendables does what it says on the tin: it delivers a super-size portion of bone-cracking, bullet-spraying, muscle-flexing, head-exploding action, thankfully with the kind of tongue-in-cheek ironic distance which was fatally absent from Stallone’s last directorial outing, the ill-advised, ill-fated Rambo. Although the set-pieces are hardly on a par with the man-fires-tank-falling-out-of-plane antics of the all-new A-Team, the fight scenes prove that the almost-all-old ‘E’-Team can still cut it when push comes literally to shove.

If nothing else, it gives the audience a chance to answer the perennial question, who would win a no-holds-barred fight between Dolph Lundgren and Jet Li?


Verdict
More The Wild Geese than The Wild Bunch, The Expendables is not a wasted opportunity, but more one not fully exploited. For action fans raised on Commando and Cobra, the ensemble cast and ’80s-style violence will be pure wish-fulfilment — but even they could have wished for something better.


Reviewed by Genevieve Harrison


Related Reviews
Sounds
Expendables, The
 

Write Your Review
To write your review please login or register.

Your Reviews

Average user rating for The Expendables
Empire Star Rating

RE: the return on the 80s action movie

Watched this a second time and liked it a lot more after the initial hype had worn off and reality had set in. Single best thing about this film? Dolph Lundgren/Gunner (or is it Gunnar?) He actually comes across as a credible flawed character. He has some awesome lines "Dont talk to me cockroach!" & "bring it Happy Feet!". He is superb in this. This film would have been better without Stallone in it if you ask me. ... More

Posted by sroey at 13:21, 14 September 2010 | Report This Post


RE: DOES EXACTLY WHAT IT SAYS ON THE TIN......

The Expendables (AKA "Fuck it! Lets Blow Shit Up!") is loud, brainless, and like Piranha, massively entertaining. It knows exactly what it is and makes no excuses for it, gleefully delivering on the action front. I loved it! 4 stars. ... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by skeletonjack at 18:18, 08 September 2010 | Report This Post


RE: DOES EXACTLY WHAT IT SAYS ON THE TIN......

I finally saw the Expendables the other night and I have to say it was exactly as I expected, a good throwback to the action films of yesteryear. One thing I didn't like was the constant close ups, I wasn't in the biggest screen at Cineworld and a lot of the time it became a bit of a blur but I know this will be fine when I watch it on BD. I really enjoyed it but thought that the Expendables would have been a bit more, you know expendable and bite the dust? ... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by D-ToX at 12:34, 07 September 2010 | Report This Post


RE: DOES EXACTLY WHAT IT SAYS ON THE TIN......

A load of old twat. Could have been better if you could see what was going on in the action scenes, cut too fast. ... More

Posted by kargon at 14:21, 03 September 2010 | Report This Post


RE: DOES EXACTLY WHAT IT SAYS ON THE TIN......

I knew The Expendables was going to be disappointing, but that was ridiculous . . . although the action was unreal, just not unreal enough to make up for the shit bits in between and they were really shit ... More

Posted by musht at 00:51, 31 August 2010 | Report This Post


RE: It's no Picasso?

L: the anomaly L: Dr Lenera The Expendables does pretty much what it says on the tin. You know it's going to be a throwback to the 80s action movie and for the most part it doesn't disappoint. Testosterone to the max as tough guys slaughter tons of extras and blow lots of shit up while throwing amusing banter around as they do it. When I say tough guys, I mean probably the greatest cast in action movie history, and Sylvestre Stallone deserves great credit for getting so many acti... More

Posted by Dr Lenera at 11:24, 29 August 2010 | Report This Post


RE: It's no Picasso?

L: Dr Lenera The Expendables does pretty much what it says on the tin. You know it's going to be a throwback to the 80s action movie and for the most part it doesn't disappoint. Testosterone to the max as tough guys slaughter tons of extras and blow lots of shit up while throwing amusing banter around as they do it. When I say tough guys, I mean probably the greatest cast in action movie history, and Sylvestre Stallone deserves great credit for getting so many action stars together and pu... More

Posted by the anomaly at 10:24, 29 August 2010 | Report This Post


RE: It's no Picasso?

Good review,i'd agree with the most of it. Only criticism:using the term "what it says on the tin" ... More

Posted by BOHEMIANBOB at 19:20, 26 August 2010 | Report This Post


RE: It's no Picasso?

L: pete_traynor L: Piles No images allowed in these threads? Damn! i1014.photobucket.com/albums/af270/Weertangel/double-fa cepalm.jpg/quote] Just try img] bookending the link. That usually works for me sp; Reviews, Movie News and Future Films don't allow pictures. Has something to do with the fact that the content of the threads shows up on the main page... ... More

Posted by grucl at 09:33, 26 August 2010 | Report This Post


RE: It's no Picasso?

The Expendables,well the plot is not that original, but who care's,as the cast was fantastic,so Stallone can give himself a big pat on the back for getting so many iconic action heroes/actors onto the screen together and actually making it work. Though the much hyped cameo of two particular people was short lived,IE two minutes it was hilarious,great fun and well scripted.This is a high octane, unbelievably explosive, funny, blood thirsty, proper balls out action movie,that would not have... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by evil bill at 21:27, 25 August 2010 | Report This Post


RE: It's no Picasso?

The Expendables does pretty much what it says on the tin. You know it’s going to be a throwback to the 80s action movie and for the most part it doesn’t disappoint. Testosterone to the max as tough guys slaughter tons of extras and blow lots of shit up while throwing amusing banter around as they do it. When I say tough guys, I mean probably the greatest cast in action movie history, and Sylvestre Stallone deserves great credit for getting so many action stars together and pulling off what prob... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by Dr Lenera at 21:03, 25 August 2010 | Report This Post


RE: It's no Picasso?

L: Piles No images allowed in these threads? Damn! i1014.photobucket.com/albums/af270/Weertangel/double-fa cepalm.jpg/quote] Just try img] bookending the link. That usually works for me ... More

Posted by pete_traynor at 15:47, 25 August 2010 | Report This Post


RE: It's no Picasso?

No images allowed in these threads? Damn! http://i1014.photobucket.com/albums/af270/Weertangel/do uble-facepalm.jpg ... More

Posted by Piles at 15:27, 25 August 2010 | Report This Post


RE: This isn't Shakesspeare ladz....

PA was clearly expecting Dostoevsky out of Robin Hood. ... More

Posted by Deviation at 15:13, 25 August 2010 | Report This Post


RE: This isn't Shakesspeare ladz....

L: Piles L: clownfoot L: Pigeon Army L: Piles I like a bunch of films that were made over the past ten years that aren't meant to be Shakespeare; ood/quote] Just want to take a break from saying 'you're right, Piles', to say - you're an idiot, and I hope you burn in fiscal conservative hell for liking ood I second this for the inclusion of Dodgeball. A poor man's version of BASEketball does not a funny film make... ote] WHAT WERE YOU GUYS EXPECTING WITH OO... More

Posted by clownfoot at 14:53, 25 August 2010 | Report This Post


RE: The Expendables

ditto, The Losers definitely wins it for me too! Especially for the during-credits 'Petunias' scene :D ... More

Posted by Guinevere at 14:36, 25 August 2010 | Report This Post


RE: This isn't Shakesspeare ladz....

L: clownfoot L: Pigeon Army L: Piles I like a bunch of films that were made over the past ten years that aren't meant to be Shakespeare; ood/quote] Just want to take a break from saying 'you're right, Piles', to say - you're an idiot, and I hope you burn in fiscal conservative hell for liking ood I second this for the inclusion of Dodgeball. A poor man's version of BASEketball does not a funny film make... ote] WHAT WERE YOU GUYS EXPECTING WITH OOD DODGEBALL..... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by Piles at 14:17, 25 August 2010 | Report This Post


RE: This isn't Shakesspeare ladz....

L: Pigeon Army L: Piles I like a bunch of films that were made over the past ten years that aren't meant to be Shakespeare; ood/quote] Just want to take a break from saying 'you're right, Piles', to say - you're an idiot, and I hope you burn in fiscal conservative hell for liking ood sp; I second this for the inclusion of Dodgeball. A poor man's version of BASEketball does not a funny film make... ... More

Posted by clownfoot at 13:44, 25 August 2010 | Report This Post


RE: This isn't Shakesspeare ladz....

L: Piles  I like a bunch of films that were made over the past ten years that aren't meant to be Shakespeare; ood/quote] Just want to take a break from saying 'you're right, Piles', to say - you're an idiot, and I hope you burn in fiscal conservative hell for liking ood ... More

Posted by Pigeon Army at 13:38, 25 August 2010 | Report This Post


RE: The Expendables

A fun film with some cracking moments, Terry Crews shotgun/basketball court brawl. But from what it was hyped and touted as being, it's a massive disappointment. They could have done so much more with the cast. For a film that professes to be a 'men on a mission' film we barely get to see any of the team until the end. The much vaunted scene in the church was painful with some horrible wooden dialogue. Plus for a supposed 80's action movie homage, where are they quotable one-liners in the ... More

Posted by fletch666 at 12:45, 25 August 2010 | Report This Post


RE: This isn't Shakesspeare ladz....

L: Barneyross1 It's a few meatheads running about looking tough, jumping, exploding and shooting the bad guys...that's why people are watching it....just dumb-ass acting fun...Stallone didn't make this under any illusions ...it's just action hokum..it's no Die Hard, Rambo II, or Predator...it's just Expendables? hy on earth are you posting your review in single sentences over about fifty posts? Listen, I know it's not /i]to be Shakespeare, and that's fair enough. I like a bunch of ... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by Piles at 12:35, 25 August 2010 | Report This Post


RE: This isn't Shakesspeare ladz....

L: Barneyross1 It's a few meatheads running about looking tough, jumping, exploding and shooting the bad guys...that's why people are watching it....just dumb-ass acting fun...Stallone didn't make this under any illusions ...it's just action hokum..it's no Die Hard, Rambo II, or Predator...it's just Expendables? hy do you keep double posting? It's unnecessary. ... More

Posted by Pigeon Army at 12:01, 25 August 2010 | Report This Post


RE: It is what it is....nothing more...nothing less

L: Marwood Rubbish. I was up for an 80s homage but either Sly didn't quite know how to handle it in the end or his original vision just degenerated into a DTV style action fest. The action was mostly great although I'm now officially fed up with shaky cam action scenes and spastic editing, too often it makes the scenes bloody difficult to follow and imo so far only Paul Greengrass and his DP on the Bourne films have been able to make it work on extended action scenes. However in... More

Posted by Qwerty Norris at 11:26, 25 August 2010 | Report This Post


RE: It is what it is....nothing more...nothing less

Rubbish. I was up for an 80s homage but either Sly didn't quite know how to handle it in the end or his original vision just degenerated into a DTV style action fest. The action was mostly great although I'm now officially fed up with shaky cam action scenes and spastic editing, too often it makes the scenes bloody difficult to follow and imo so far only Paul Greengrass and his DP on the Bourne films have been able to make it work on extended action scenes. However in this the third a... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by Marwood at 09:35, 25 August 2010 | Report This Post


RE: It is what it is....nothing more...nothing less

Mmmm,a few points... Rourke was a bit embarassing-think he thought he was in a serious movie-from the guy who did Iron Man 2. DH4 better than this-maybe,they're a bit different to be fair,and the action here is far more realistic.A bit more of Bruce Willis would have swung it maybe. You did it again Barney ... More

Posted by BOHEMIANBOB at 09:26, 25 August 2010 | Report This Post


Previous pageMore user comments


CURRENT HIGHLIGHTS
20 Not-So-Super-Men That Won't Star In A Film Any Time Soon
Forget your Batmen, your Spider-Men and your Ant-Men… Meet 3-D Man (and his pals)

The Making Of Locke: A Filmmaker's Journey
Steven Knight takes us through six pitstops (via Heston Services)

The 10 Most Exciting Movies At Cannes 2014
Empire's pick of the Croisette's finest

Tom Hardy: A Viewer's Guide
The essential, the recommended, the one for the fans... and the one to avoid

Ten Things To Know About The Spooks Movie
Under the hood of The Greater Good

Who’s In Spider-Man’s Sinister Six?
A bluffer’s guide to the planned spin-off from the Amazing Spider-films

14 YouTube Videos Every Game Of Thrones Fan Should Have Watched By Now
From goats singing the theme tune to every death in under three minutes

Subscribe to Empire iPad edition
Get The Empire iPad Edition Today

Subscribe and save money on annual digital subscription

Subscribe today
Buy single issues

Subscribe to Empire magazine
Get Limited Edition Collectable X-Men Art Cards

Subscribe today and get 6 issues of Empire plus a set of collectable X-Men Art Cards for only £20!

Subscribe today

Get 12 Issues Of Empire For Just £25
Receive limited edition subscribers-only covers every month Subscribe today!
Empire's Film Studies 101 Series
Everything you ever wanted to know about filmmaking but were afraid to ask...
The Empire iPad Edition
With exclusive extras, interactive features, trailers and much more! Download now
Home  |  News  |  Blogs  |  Reviews  |  Future Films  |  Features  |  Interviews  |  Images  |  Competitions  |  Forum  |  iPad  |  Podcast  |  Magazine Contact Us  |  Empire FAQ  |  Subscribe To Empire  |  Register
© Bauer Consumer Media Ltd  |  Legal Info  |  Privacy Policy  |  Bauer Entertainment Network
Bauer Consumer Media Ltd (company number 01176085 and registered address 1 Lincoln Court, Lincoln Road, Peterborough, England PE1 2RF)