Register  |   Log In  |  
Sign up to our weekly newsletter    
Search   
Empire Magazine and iPad
Follow Me on Pinterest YouTube Tumblr Viber
Empire
Trending On Empire
The Big 2015 Movie Preview
The 50 Best Films Of 2014
Review Of The Year 2014
Download Ex Machina
Before the DVD release on 8th June
Win Premiere Tickets
To see Mission: Impossible in Vienna.
Reviews
STAR RATINGS EXPLAINED
Unmissable 5 Stars
Excellent 4 Stars
Good 3 Stars
Poor 2 Stars
Tragic 1 Star

POSTER ART
Click poster to enlarge
More posters to select

FILM DETAILS
Certificate
18
Cast
Colin Farrell
Ralph Fiennes
Brendan Gleeson
Clemence Poesy.
Directors
Screenwriters
Running Time
107 minutes

LATEST FILM REVIEWS
Magic Mike XXL
2 Star Empire Rating
Dear White People
4 Star Empire Rating
Man With A Movie Camera
5 Star Empire Rating
Hot Pursuit
3 Star Empire Rating
Cub
4 Star Empire Rating



5 STAR REVIEWS
Man With A Movie Camera
5 Star Empire Rating
Salt Of The Earth, The
5 Star Empire Rating
Song Of The Sea
5 Star Empire Rating
Look Of Silence, The
5 Star Empire Rating
Mad Max: Fury Road
5 Star Empire Rating

In Bruges
Visit beautiful Belgium for waffles, beer and hitmen


submit to reddit


Plot
Ray (Farrell) and Ken (Gleeson), two foul-mouthed Irish hitmen, lie low in the medieval Belgian town of Bruges to evade the police after a botched job back home. While awaiting instructions from their furious boss Harry (Fiennes), Ken braces himself for the worst...


Review
In Bruges
Browse more images »

In Bruges is not for everyone. Like its characters, it’s unruly, foul-mouthed and has a weird sense of humour and no concept of good behaviour. But even if those caveats whet your appetite, there’s another hurdle to overcome: the dread phrase “British gangster movie”. In America, Martin McDonagh’s genre-stretching film already made a cautious bow at the box office, alienating some higher-brow critics who sniffed at its wayward and irresponsible tone but finding a surprising amount of support from grassroots cinemagoers, despite a very limited release.

It’s a strange film. Going into it, there are all kinds of questions you might be asking yourself - isn’t this just Sexy Beast meets Pulp Fiction? Isn’t Brendan Gleeson a bit above this kind of thing? What is Colin Farrell famous for anyway? - but, coming out, all that remains are the positives. In fact, one online review - posted on Metacritic.com by user “Kristina” - accidentally nails its perverse charm while trying to slam it. “Bad acting, unlikeable and underdeveloped characters, bizarre and stupid situations, too much blood, ridiculous ending,” she raged. But it wasn’t all bad news. “My husband and I were both disappointed in this movie,” she concluded, “but the one good thing about it was that we learned something about Bruges and would like to visit there someday.”

This barbed compliment would no doubt amuse writer-director McDonagh, and, more to the point, sounds like something one of his characters might say. Once you’ve seen the film (and you must, even if just to disagree with this very, very positive review) hopefully it’ll amuse you too, thinking of the individual who fidgeted and tutted through 100 minutes of swearing, violence and profane epistemology - not to mention rampant class-A drug and dwarf abuse - and after all that still fancied a nice city break. It’s fittingly bathetic too, because, though it superficially takes place in the same cartoon underworld as Lock, Stock and its offspring, In Bruges has more in common with a Mike Leigh film than any of Guy Ritchie’s.

Part of the reason for this is that McDonagh’s background, like Leigh’s, is in theatre, which explains both In Bruges’ weakness and strengths. Like a good stage play, McDonagh’s film explores character through dialogue as well as action, and though this makes it somewhat static - even taking into consideration its frenzied, blood-spattered showdown - In Bruges is able to sneak in some heavyweight questions under the radar.

Though it speaks of contract-killing and cocaine-dealing, scoring and whoring, this surprisingly thoughtful film leaves plenty of ideas to be mulled over later, particularly those involving notions of audience identification. In Bruges is a film no Hollywood studio would ever make; it’s a film in which not one single foregrounded character - even the duplicitous love interest (the otherwise adorable Poésy) - is worthy of our sympathy, but by its enigmatic ending it has us, if not cheering them on, then definitely accepting them, and maybe even feeling genuine, if misplaced, affection for them.

The key line arrives a little way into the movie. Ray and Ken have arrived in Bruges and, while Ken is enjoying the majesty of the local architecture, Ray is behaving like a petulant teen. “If I’d grown up on a farm and was retarded, Bruges might impress me,” he sulks. “But I didn’t, so it doesn’t.” Though funny, this kind of banter isn’t exactly new in the general field of gangster movies, let alone the UK kind or its rarefied fish-out-of-water subgenre (see - or rather don’t - the Brighton-set Circus). However, when Ray looks across the town’s cobbled courtyard, where a camera crew is shooting, the film gets a much-needed jolt. Diverting from the smart-arse blueprint, Ray suddenly becomes a child again, his face melting with delight. “They’re filming midgets!” he squeals.

Here, we enter the first of the film’s carefully laid minefields. The politics of the vertically challenged are as complex as they’ve ever been, so without wishing to offend people of size, we’ll stick with the film’s terminology for now (although Ray is told that “midgets” prefer the word “dwarf”). Jimmy, the “little fella” being filmed - an incredibly game Jordan Prentice, whose early starring role in Howard The Duck (1986) suggests that he may actually be physically incapable of embarrassment - is a curveball thrown so elegantly by McDonagh that his fall from grace coincides smoothly with our growing fondness for Ray and Ken. During the film’s hilarious lads’-night-out scene, it takes us a while to realise that Jimmy, even to those who saw Peter Dinklage’s unsentimental performance in The Station Agent, isn’t just some afflicted victim to be pitied, he’s a flesh-and-blood guy like everyone else. And he’s a total arse.

Of the central pair, at first we’re drawn to the avuncular Ken rather than the goofy, irritating Ray. But once his terrible secret is revealed, Ray suddenly seems more vulnerable, perhaps even more romantic, than his thug shell suggests. It’s partly in the writing, but more importantly it’s in Colin Farrell’s sad, scared eyes, in a performance that reminds us that he actually hasn’t really had a chance to do much of this kind of thing over the past eight years or so. He’s joined armies and led them, played US cops and robbers, but with the exception of 2003’s Intermission he hasn’t done a human comedy, let alone the black kind, and the results here suggest he ought to do quite a bit more.

But Farrell isn’t carrying this engagingly digressive caper alone, and Gleeson makes the perfect foil, simultaneously despairing of, and caring for, his troubled, trigger-happy sidekick. While Farrell fits the stereotypical profile of the hip young gunslinger, Gleeson is the very antithesis, but just when you’re getting used to this offbeat casting, McDonagh plays his trump card. If you haven’t seen Ben Kingsley in Sexy Beast, the payoff will be more effective, but even if you have, Ralph Fiennes’ performance as grouchy crime boss Harry is still something to be savoured. With a Peter Cook drawl and dressed in Essex slacks and slip-ons, Harry is the true snake amid this already unsavoury ensemble, phoning Ken with his secret mission in Bruges while Ray is supposedly in the toilet (“Is he having a poo or a wee?” the oily Harry rather creepily asks).

With its three protagonists in place, In Bruges begins its frantic final act, which is where some of its artfully packed contents start to spill out, and the simple pleasures of its character studies give way to overexcited intrigue, tragedy and an inevitable climactic shoot-out. Still, this is a minor gripe about a film which takes a genre that shouldn’t be allowed any more, never mind encouraged, and fashions something provocative and original in its thinking.

Despite some deliberate nods to medieval theosophy, and a coda that’s more arthouse than grindhouse, In Bruges isn’t exactly Samuel Beckett’s Get Carter - let’s face it, if Samuel Beckett had written Get Carter, Carter wouldn’t have turned up, would he? But to fill that existential gap, both literally and figuratively, this savvy, punk-rock pistol opera will do very nicely indeed.


Verdict
With In Bruges, the British gangster movie gets a Croydon facelift. It may not be new, but it’s a wonderfully fresh take on a familiar genre: fucked-up, far-out and very, very funny.


Reviewed by Damon Wise

Write Your Review
To write your review please login or register.

Your Reviews

Average user rating for In Bruges
Empire Star Rating

RE: In a Bungle

L: hatebox Funny, for most it's the other way round - the trailer looked God-awful but the film turned out to be a gem. Anyway, I liked it enough but it definitely helped having a few buddies in the cinema who were in the mood to laugh after a few pints. usually swim upstream, not intentionally of course. Some times, being around certain people who enjoy the film can make one more appreciative of a film. Or certainly relax when the audience laughs or reacts otherwise to a scene. ... More

Posted by Emyr Thy King at 02:15, 10 June 2009 | Report This Post


RE: In a Bungle

L: Emyr Thy King I shall be discordant and voice my disappointment with the film. When I originally saw the trailer for the film, I had high hopes. Funny, for most it's the other way round - the trailer looked God-awful but the film turned out to be a gem. Anyway, I liked it enough but it definitely helped having a few buddies in the cinema who were in the mood to laugh after a few pints. ... More

Posted by hatebox at 21:09, 09 June 2009 | Report This Post


In a Bungle

7"]*Spoilersze="7"]* shall be discordant and voice my disappointment with the film. When I originally saw the trailer for the film, I had high hopes. I was intrigued by what seemingly was a funny premise involving two hitmen on/from a bungled kill job that for whatever reason, were residing in the eponymous town. However, the film is a strange mix of black comedy and drama. Whilst the combination of such genres does not equate an immediate failure it does present a far more difficult challenge ... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by Emyr Thy King at 03:55, 09 June 2009 | Report This Post


RE:

I liked the First and Second acts more than the Third. I dont know the third act is a bit jarring especially when you know who takes the plunge. I guess it is a credit to the screenplay because I really cared for both main characters and was really expecting a different ending, i wanted a different ending. The jokes were subtle and hilarious. The acting was very good indeed. The directing superb. rial]]......4/5.....] ... More

Posted by wgamador at 13:22, 17 March 2009 | Report This Post


RE: In Bruges

Just got round to watching this with the missus and we both really enjoyed it.  Good performances, great/quotable dialogue and well paced.  A film i can see myself going back to.   L: Indio The acting was uniformly excellent (although maybe Ralph Fiennes portrayal of Harry seemed to be veering into 'Sir' Ben Kingsley Sexy Beast territory on more than one occasion sp; Exactly what i thought, it was uncanny at times.     ... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by Mr Grady at 00:30, 17 March 2009 | Report This Post


RE: Overrated

I wasn't that bothered about this film initially but when I saw it I thought it was brilliant. The comedy is genious and the characters work so well together. It actually makes me want to visit it just for a giggle!! So glad they won an award at the BAFTAs. Absolute genious ... More

Posted by Lillybunny at 12:35, 10 February 2009 | Report This Post


RE: Overrated

Really the only reason why I watched this movie was because Colin Farrell was in it. The city of Bruges is this beautiful yet haunting place of medieval times, with old world canals and architecture. It gives the movie it's uniqueness. I expected more of a thriller with more cat and mouse, then two hitmen wondering around Bruges waiting for the next assignment. I did think the Colin Farrell and Brendan Gleeson had great performances though. I thought they played well off each other in a kind of... More

Posted by JoeyPottr at 05:33, 10 February 2009 | Report This Post


RE: one word

wow ... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by m_er at 01:33, 08 February 2009 | Report This Post


RE: IN BRUGES

I really enjoyed this film. It was funny but at times very moving, and the performances were great. It is good to see Colin Farrell back in a film worthy of his talent, rather than rubbish like Alexander. ... More

Posted by TellThatMickHeJust at 16:18, 06 November 2008 | Report This Post


IN BRUGES

L: Gimli The Dwarf L: dracovir Totally loved it.  Well scripted, well acted, well paced.  Everyone did their job in service to the story, no scene-stealing or scenery-chewing (which I half expected after seeing the trailer), some genuinely funny humor with some strong human characters.  I cannot find any real fault in the film.  Totally offbeat and excellent.  It's great that someone has the guts to show some everyday un-pc humour in a film.  The non-PC j... More

Posted by El Becks at 18:07, 14 October 2008 | Report This Post


RE: In Bruges

Farrell was great and Fiennes showed he can add a touch a fun to his serious image.   But its Gleeson who always makes a film ,He is just ace as the Wolrd weary Hitman  who just wants to see the sights.   It would be nice if he got more lead roles like The General and this but whos complaining when the film is this good 8.5/10 ... More

Posted by filmburner30 at 13:12, 17 September 2008 | Report This Post


RE: In Bruges

L: Magenta L: surveyofsociety 's performance didn't surprise me one biteen all of his films from Ordinary Decent Criminal to Miami Vice and I always thought he was a brilliant actor. Them tabloid years that he indulged in and had his agent cook up did him more harm than good with regard his credibility but hey it got him parts and money! He was the best thing about Cassandra's Dream and I'm curious to see this new one with Ed Norton. Also he's just finished 2 films this year -... More

Posted by Sad Professor at 04:14, 16 September 2008 | Report This Post


RE: In Bruges

L: surveyofsociety 's performance didn't surprise me one biteen all of his films from Ordinary Decent Criminal to Miami Vice and I always thought he was a brilliant actor. Them tabloid years that he indulged in and had his agent cook up did him more harm than good with regard his credibility but hey it got him parts and money! He was the best thing about Cassandra's Dream and I'm curious to see this new one with Ed Norton. Also he's just finished 2 films this year - Triage about a ... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by Magenta at 17:07, 15 September 2008 | Report This Post


RE: In Bruges

Farrell's performance didn't surprise me one bit. I'd seen all of his films from Ordinary Decent Criminal to Miami Vice and I always thought he was a brilliant actor. Them tabloid years that he indulged in and had his agent cook up did him more harm than good with regard his credibility but hey it got him parts and money!   He was the best thing about Cassandra's Dream and I'm curious to see this new one with Ed Norton. Also he's just finished 2 films this year - Triage about a trou... More

Posted by Sad Professor at 16:51, 15 September 2008 | Report This Post


RE: In Bruges

i love this film about 300 times funnier than i expected. "your an inanimate FUCKING object" must be the best insult ever ... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by RedCandle at 16:20, 15 September 2008 | Report This Post


RE: In Bruges

es is in my opinion one of the best films out this year. Its different to other films ive seen recently in that its not afraid to pull any punches in the political correctness area. At all. This is what makes In Bruges such an enjoyable film, as the foul mouthed charaters make the swearing  and violence very funny. Colin Farrell does well as the troubled hitman Ray, as does Brandon Gleesons portrayal of Ken who although he kills people, happens to be a nice guy. My favourite... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by Dapper Dan Man at 16:10, 15 September 2008 | Report This Post


RE: In Bruges - Brilliant

An offbeat thriller with a vicious streak of black humour, making for a slightly uneven but very entertaining watch. Farrell, Gleeson and Fiennes are all on top form and whilst the comedy and violence don't always sit comfortably together, this is still refreshingly un-PC and well worth catching up with. 8/10 ... More

Posted by MOTH at 09:27, 15 September 2008 | Report This Post


RE: In Bruges - Brilliant

Saw In Bruges last night and loved it! A total surprise because it got patchy reviews, so I considered it a 'have a punt' movie…and as a confirmed Farrel-phobe I wasn't expecting much. Farrel, though, was by far the best character, got all the best lines and made the film – and I NEVER thought I'd say that. It was described as Father Ted with guns earlier in this post, which I thought was pretty apt.   The only thing I'd didn't like was the ending. It seemed too neat (ie: what ha... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by rupert303 at 20:04, 18 August 2008 | Report This Post


RE: In Bruges - Brilliant

Watched this again on DVD this weekend, forgot just how good it is, sure to be in my top 10 at the end of the year and I think its rewatchability factor will be pretty high. My girlfriend really enjoyed it too. I especially love the perfect balance between comedy and tragedy that Martin McDonagh strikes with this also. ... More

Posted by badassmofo at 12:05, 18 August 2008 | Report This Post


In Bruges - Brilliant

Cracking Film. Watched it over the Weekend. Loved Farrell and Gleeson Bouncing off other. Loved the Park Scene. Farrell Should deffinately do more like this. Well worth a watch. ... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by livewire at 11:22, 18 August 2008 | Report This Post


RE: Overrated

L: jace007 want a kickass flick that doesn't leave a bitter taste in the mouth, go and watch NEVER BACK DOWNast it doesn't pretend to be anything more than it is. sm=happy07.gif] Just made my day. ... More

Posted by Mr Underhill at 22:19, 16 August 2008 | Report This Post


RE: Overrated

It's a brilliant film, right up my alley.  The comedy moments are surreal yet not ridiculous and I imagine I'll be quoting it forever.   Brendan Gleeson is, as always, fantastic however Colin Farrell is the standout.  His layered portrayal of Ray - a man who is most of the time a child in adult's clothes and at other times a victim of horrific inner demons - is masterful.  To be honest it's a performance I didn't believe Farrell had in him, now we know what Kevin Spacey ... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by Vito_Andolini at 08:12, 15 August 2008 | Report This Post


RE: Overrated

"i do want him dead I want him fackin crucified but it still doesn't change the fact that he stitched you up like a blind fackin gay boy does it?" that, was ] good! been meaning to watch it for a while, had no idea what it was about and yeah, fucking great.. ... More

Posted by maffew at 19:25, 14 August 2008 | Report This Post


RE: In Bruges

saw this when it first came out and again recently. quality movie. i thought it was brilliantly dark and funny. the language used is everyday normal language. people do swear that much in real life, that includes the c*nt word. so many funny scenes. i have to say the bit with the americans and the tower had me pissing myself laughing. excellant cast. brendan gleeson is one of the most underrated actors of his generation. colin farrell was excellant and fiennes looked like he was having the time... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by audidiesel at 00:50, 08 June 2008 | Report This Post


RE: In Bruges

Terrific little film. Gleeson's always good value but the real delights were seeing Farrell finally raise his game back up to "Tigerland" levels, and Fiennes actually having lots of fun in his role - he can be SO serious. I really liked how un-PC it is - not many films dare to show dead kids these days - and how the banter flew as quickly as the violence.   And having visited Bruges several times, I can quite categorically state that it is anything but a shithole. ... More

Posted by RJNeb2 at 12:22, 20 May 2008 | Report This Post


More user comments


CURRENT HIGHLIGHTS
100 Greatest Movie Characters
Your all-time favourite heroes and villains exclusively revealed!

Bonfire Of The Vanities: When Personal Projects Go Wrong
15 hubristic horrors that went straight to movie jail

Podcast 167: Emily Mortimer, Robert Sheehan, Corin Hardy
It's the live Edinburgh special round 2!

The 15 Most Exciting Games Of E3
The greatest games currently winging their way towards a console near you

Distribution Denied! 25 Films You Can't Get On DVD
The movies that have never seen the transfer to digital disc

Hollywood Jackanory: Stars Reading Things Out Of Context
From Ian McKellen vs. One Direction to Hugh Jackman vs. baking innuendos

Before And After: How 10 Books Changed On Their Way To Becoming Movies
...And how their authors reacted

Subscribe to Empire magazine
Empire print magazine

Delivered to your door – with exclusive subscriber only covers each month!

Subscribe and save 44%

Subscribe to Empire iPad edition
Empire digital magazine

Exclusive and enhanced content – get instant access via your iPad or Android device

Subscribe and save 44%

Subscribe now and save up to 67%
Print, Digital & Package options available Subscribe today!
Empire's Film Studies 101 Series
Everything you ever wanted to know about filmmaking but were afraid to ask...
The Empire Digital Edition
With exclusive extras, interactive features, trailers and much more! Download now
Home  |  News  |  Blogs  |  Reviews  |  Future Films  |  Features  |  Interviews  |  Images  |  Competitions  |  Forum  |  Digital Edition  |  Podcast  |  Magazine Contact Us  |  Empire FAQ  |  Subscribe To Empire  |  Register
© Bauer Consumer Media Ltd  |  Legal Info  |  Editorial Complaints  |  Privacy Policy  |  Bauer Entertainment Network
Bauer Consumer Media Ltd (company number 01176085 and registered address 1 Lincoln Court, Lincoln Road, Peterborough, England PE1 2RF)