Register  |   Log In  |  
Sign up to our weekly newsletter    
Search   
Empire Magazine and iPad
Follow Me on Pinterest YouTube Tumblr
Empire
Trending On Empire
Empire's New Tom Cruise Cover
The Jameson Empire Awards 2014
Vote: The Greatest 301 Movies Of All Time!
Rebecca Hall:
My Movie Life

The actress picks the movies that shaped her
Mountain Dew Green Screen
Register now to see X-Men: First Class!
Reviews
STAR RATINGS EXPLAINED
Unmissable 5 Stars
Excellent 4 Stars
Good 3 Stars
Poor 2 Stars
Tragic 1 Star

POSTER ART
Click poster to enlarge
More posters to select

FILM DETAILS
Certificate
TBC
Cast
Tom Cruise
Meryl Streep
Michael Pena
Derek Luke
Andrew Garfield
Robert Redford.
Directors
Robert Redford.
Screenwriters
Matthew Michael Carnahan.
Running Time
minutes

LATEST FILM REVIEWS
You & Me Forever
4 Star Empire Rating
An Episode In The Life Of An Iron Picker
4 Star Empire Rating
Cupcakes
3 Star Empire Rating
Looking For Light: Jane Bown
3 Star Empire Rating
Exhibition
4 Star Empire Rating



5 STAR REVIEWS
Rebel Without A Cause
5 Star Empire Rating
Calvary
5 Star Empire Rating
Wake In Fright
5 Star Empire Rating
Stranger By The Lake
5 Star Empire Rating
Whatever Happened To Baby Jane?
5 Star Empire Rating

Lions For Lambs
Redford tries to talk it out


submit to reddit


Plot
A senator (Cruise) unveils a new Afghan war strategy to reporter Roth (Streep). A professor (Redford) talks to student Todd (Garfield). And two soldiers (Peña and Luke) fight to stay alive?


Review
Lions For Lambs
Browse more images »

Robert Redford’s rep as a Hollywood liberal may sink this film, right out of the gate. Sight unseen, US pundits are accusing it of an anti-Bush bias, and with audiences avoiding Iraq and Afghanistan films in droves, a movie that not only discusses the War On Terror but does very little else is never going to beat Titanic at the box office. But this is more balanced than pre-reviews would have you believe, and more about asking questions than offering trite answers.

The three-stranded plot is simple. A senator (Tom Cruise) announces a new war strategy for Afghanistan to a veteran reporter (Meryl Streep). Two soldiers (Michael Peña and Derek Luke) implement those new orders and land in serious peril. And a professor of political science (Robert Redford) tries to motivate a young student (Andrew Garfield) to engage in classes. Two thirds of the film, therefore, is pure talk - Redford’s professor barely stirs from his chair; Streep’s reporter and Cruise’s Senator Jasper Irving have a sit-down interview. Even the soldiers are pinned in one spot. It could almost be a stage play.

But Michael Matthew Carnahan’s script and Redford’s assured direction have the smarts to make the static seem kinetic. The back-and-forth between Cruise and Streep, in particular, is electric; this will, if there’s any justice, see Cruise finally win an Oscar. Perhaps spurred on by working opposite the screen’s most accomplished actress, the world’s biggest star is on Magnolia form, bringing that almost creepy charisma to bear as a highly influential senator.

There is a clear critique of modern politics - Cruise makes assertions on a par with Blair’s 45-minute claim without offering proof, vaguely acknowledges past mistakes while repeating them, and displays fury at the adversaries who refuse to play by his rules. But Streep’s character isn’t blameless either, compromised by the media’s early cheerleading for the Iraq War and her inability to effectively question the party line.

More surprising is how well newcomer Andrew Garfield matches Redford, the novice convincing as a feckless student whose surfer dude mannerisms conceal a keen mind. Redford’s don, worn down but not out by apathetic students, tries to galvanise Garfield’s Todd into action by telling him about soldiers Ernest and Arian, now serving in Afghanistan.

If there’s any part of the film that’s unbalanced, it’s the portrayal of these two paragons - hard-working scholarship boys who go off to war because they want to do good. There’s been a tendency in recent years to lionise the common soldier which, while properly laying the blame on the political management, risks offering an unrealistic look at the experience of war: it’s hard to imagine Platoon, say, being made in the current climate. But Peña and Luke bring enough chemistry to their roles to add an emotional edge while avoiding being mere ciphers. Ultimately, they are scared kids lost in a foreign country, a reminder of the human life put at risk by high ideals and political mistakes. The moral seems to be that, whichever side of the political divide you’re on, you owe it to people like these to make the right choices.


Verdict
A smart, accessible, surprisingly balanced look at our dysfunctional world. Compelling stuff.


Reviewed by Helen O'Hara

Write Your Review
To write your review please login or register.

Your Reviews

Average user rating for Lions For Lambs
Empire Star Rating

RE: RE:

That would mean Empire operate differently to the broadsheets then, which are read by far more people and therefore should have more reason to highlight films on wider releases. Their critics, however, often choose high-quality, smaller films to lead with, irrespective of how many people can see the film. I remember reading the Guardian take on Lives of Others (if Empire had it as their film of the week I’d retract this part of the point) and making the decision there and then to travel out of ... More

Posted by Axel Foley at 17:05, 05 November 2007 | Report This Post


RE: RE:

Well, (and this has been discussed in depth elsewhere) quite often when a small film blows us away we do focus on it - see, for example, Once recently. But we don't think we're doing a service to readers to focus most of our attentions on films that lots of people can't see, because they don't show at cinemas near them. Not to mention the fact that Lions for Lambs (to get back on topic for a minute) isn't a turkey, and that all it got in the mag was that one page review. ... More

Posted by Helen OHara at 12:34, 05 November 2007 | Report This Post


RE:

L: Helen OHara The "Film of the Week" calculation is partly based on assessing which film most people have a chance to see. It's not just about star ratings. But it is NOT based on stars or money or cowardice, and in our considered opinion Lions for Lambs is not tosh, so please moderate your language. And how clever of you to bring up The Phantom Menace. I bet no one's thought to beat us with that stick in at least, oh, five minutes. Well done you on never making a mistake in the hea... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by fierce-hairdo at 10:30, 05 November 2007 | Report This Post


In your considered opinion Lions for Lambs is tosh??? that's confusing. Surely Into The Wild should be film of the week then...i mean a road trip across america with Emile Hersch sounds more accessible to me than a lecture on Afghanistan from crinkly Redford! ... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by jimibadboi7 at 10:08, 05 November 2007 | Report This Post


RE: Why film of the week??? Empire cowards

The "Film of the Week" calculation is partly based on assessing which film most people have a chance to see. It's not just about star ratings. But it is NOT based on stars or money or cowardice, and in our considered opinion Lions for Lambs is tosh, so please moderate your language.   And how clever of you to bring up The Phantom Menace. I bet no one's thought to beat us with that stick in at least, oh, five minutes. Well done you on never making a mistake in the heat of the moment. ... More

Posted by Helen OHara at 09:43, 05 November 2007 | Report This Post


Why film of the week??? Empire cowards

And another thing, why is this 'film of the week' when "The Band's Visit" gets 5 stars and Lions for Lambs only 4 stars??? C'mon Empire, have the courage of your convictions for once instead of just following where the money and stars are!! Here you give "The Bands Visit" a tiny review whilst writing reams about this Tom Cruise tosh, a much lesser movie. Cowards.We all remember your 'Phantom Menace" review (for shame!). ... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by fierce-hairdo at 09:34, 05 November 2007 | Report This Post


Empire gets it wrong again

A few choice quotes from Time Out's review of this film: "The politics of this film are basic beyond belief, which would be acceptable is they weren’t also so muddled and unconvincingly expressed." "‘Lions for Lambs’ – or, more accurately, ‘Politics for Dummies’" "The filmmakers must have imagined sparky, engaging conversation between these duos similar to a high-speed tennis bout between skillful pros; what emerges is more co... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by fierce-hairdo at 09:14, 05 November 2007 | Report This Post


Too much bleating not enough of a roar

Que?   Anyway I'm adding my two pence worth...   or Lambs is a film of ideas and ideals. The title derives from a WWI German general's quote relating the British generals with lambs issuing orders that sent their men (read lions) into battle and to their death. These ideas and ideals are presented via three different stories, which no matter how hard director Robert Redford attempts, do not knit together. Story one involves Tom Cruise's over-ambitious Republican senator,... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by Axel Foley at 17:55, 29 October 2007 | Report This Post


Good or bad this film maybe...

Cruise will never win an academy award. ... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by mpcdaly at 15:51, 28 October 2007 | Report This Post


Previous page


CURRENT HIGHLIGHTS
The Best Barry Norman Anecdotes From His Empire Podcast Interview
From nearly punching Robert De Niro to the real story about ‘And why not?’

Empire 300th Issue: The Directors' Cut Cover
Spielberg, Whedon, Fincher, Abrams Mann and more take over

Fired! Losing Your Job In The Movies
The lowdown on getting dismissed on film

20 Not So Super '-Men' That Won't Star In A Film Any Time Soon
Forget your Batmen, your Spider-Men and your Ant-Men… Meet 3-D Man (and his pals)

The Making Of Locke: A Filmmaker's Journey
Steven Knight takes us through six pitstops (via Heston Services)

Tom Hardy: A Viewer's Guide
The essential, the recommended, the one for the fans... and the one to avoid

Ten Things To Know About The Spooks Movie
Under the hood of The Greater Good

Subscribe to Empire iPad edition
Get The Empire iPad Edition Today

Subscribe and save money on annual digital subscription

Subscribe today
Buy single issues

Subscribe to Empire magazine
Get Limited Edition Collectable X-Men Art Cards

Subscribe today and get 6 issues of Empire plus a set of collectable X-Men Art Cards for only £20!

Subscribe today

Get 12 Issues Of Empire For Just £25
Receive limited edition subscribers-only covers every month Subscribe today!
Empire's Film Studies 101 Series
Everything you ever wanted to know about filmmaking but were afraid to ask...
The Empire iPad Edition
With exclusive extras, interactive features, trailers and much more! Download now
Home  |  News  |  Blogs  |  Reviews  |  Future Films  |  Features  |  Interviews  |  Images  |  Competitions  |  Forum  |  iPad  |  Podcast  |  Magazine Contact Us  |  Empire FAQ  |  Subscribe To Empire  |  Register
© Bauer Consumer Media Ltd  |  Legal Info  |  Privacy Policy  |  Bauer Entertainment Network
Bauer Consumer Media Ltd (company number 01176085 and registered address 1 Lincoln Court, Lincoln Road, Peterborough, England PE1 2RF)