Register  |   Log In  |  
Sign up to our weekly newsletter    
Empire Magazine and iPad
Follow Me on Pinterest YouTube Tumblr Viber
Trending On Empire
The Big 2015 Movie Preview
The 50 Best Films Of 2014
Review Of The Year 2014
100 Greatest Characters
Your all-time favourite heroes and villains
Subscribe To Empire
Sign up now and save up to 63%
Unmissable 5 Stars
Excellent 4 Stars
Good 3 Stars
Poor 2 Stars
Tragic 1 Star

Click poster to enlarge
More posters to select

Liam Neeson
Ralph Fiennes
Mads Mikkelsen
Gemma Arterton
Alexa Davalos
Sam Worthington
Danny Huston.
Louis Leterrier.
Travis Beacham
Lawrence Kasdan.
Running Time
105 minutes

Hitman: Agent 47
2 Star Empire Rating
Barely Lethal
3 Star Empire Rating
Addicted To Sheep
4 Star Empire Rating
45 Years
4 Star Empire Rating
We Are Your Friends
3 Star Empire Rating

Man With A Movie Camera
5 Star Empire Rating
Salt Of The Earth, The
5 Star Empire Rating
Song Of The Sea
5 Star Empire Rating
Look Of Silence, The
5 Star Empire Rating
Mad Max: Fury Road
5 Star Empire Rating

Clash of the Titans
Aka Freaks and Greeks...

submit to reddit

Half-man, half-god Perseus (Worthington) is raised by kindly fisher folk, but when they are killed by Hades (Fiennes) - collateral damage in the war between men and gods - he sets forth on a perilous revenge quest to find his destiny, rescue a princess and resolve his issues with his father Zeus (Neeson), king of the gods.

Clash of the Titans
Browse more images »
The ancient Greeks not only told great tales that explored the human psyche through epic adventures, they did something unprecedented in human civilization up to that point. They created their gods in man’s image. Thus the gods on Mount Olympus are a fallible and emotional lot, given to passionate outbursts, horrid tantrums, unpredictable fits of compassion and lusty urges that will not be denied.

Perseus is the result of one of Zeus’ impulsive assaults on an innocent mortal woman, which gets her executed by her enraged husband King Acrisius (Jason Flemyng, who reappears slathered in prosthetics as a relentless mutant killer henchman of Hades) and almost does for baby Perseus except Pete Postlethwaite and Elizabeth McGovern fish him out of the Aegean and adopt him. A swift passage of years and he’s bulked up into Sam Worthington, sporting a buzz cut and looking more like a US Marine than a Greek seaman.

Circumstances force him to Argos, where the decadent populace have turned their backs on the gods, provoking the wrath of the Olympians and inspiring resentful king of the Underworld Hades to plot the overthrow of his brother Zeus while they are distracted by wiping out mortals.

For reasons that are not entirely clear, Perseus then girds his loins and sets off with a platoon of Argosians who range from salty veterans (Mads Mikkelsen, Liam Cunningham) to Hans Matheson and a delicate youth (Nicholas Hoult). But they are almost indistinguishable since they all have cornrow extensions and a lot of facial hair. Costume designer Lindy Hemming was instructed not to show too much leg between their leather mini-skirts and their sandal boots, darn it, but at least they’ve been kitted out with those ab-sculpted breastplates that make them all look ripped. They have to find three obnoxious hags called the Stygian Witches so Perseus can get the answer to a Big Question, cross into the Underworld to kill the gorgon Medusa (Russian supermodel Natalia Vodianova with snake dreadlocks and looks that kill), tote her head back to Argos and surprise Hades’ ravenous monster of the deep, the Kraken, with it. That’s the idea anyway, but numbers dwindle alarmingly and in the wrong order, with the prettiest warriors mercilessly dispatched, and most of them so abruptly you are never sure who that was that just toppled into a fiery abyss or shattered into pieces. En route they battle icky giant scorpion things and hook up with nomadic guys who look like tree trunks with glowing blue eyes and ride the desert monsters. That bit is like Dune, and not in a good way.

Two things stand-out. The first is Fiennes’s hugely fun turn as a hunchbacked, raspy-voiced, bitter, twisted Hades who turns up in a fireball and a smoking cloak to wreak a spot of havoc, instill terror, make dire pronouncements and such. The on-screen reunion of Neeson and Fiennes echoes their Schindler’s List dynamic, Zeus being all handsome and kind of noble, and Hades all full-tilt nutso. Also good is fragrant Gemma Arterton’s demi-goddess Io being attached to the travelling band of warriors since she serves as a quite useful Voice of Exposition, explaining all sorts of otherwise baffling stuff.

It will have become apparent to devotees of the 1981 Clash Of The Titans, which was not very good either but is fondly remembered, that the plot in this is quite different. Even those who prefer the manlier Worthington to Harry Hamlin (so dreamy in his shorty toga) will regret the sidelining here of the Olympians, who ought to manipulate mankind like pieces on a game board but are relegated to fleeting extras. What was the point of casting Danny Huston as Poseidon, for instance, then disposing of him after one line? Despite a rather good, gnarly skeletal River Styx ferryman, the effects don’t come close to the charm of Ray Harryhausen’s creations. Bubo, Harryhausen’s mechanical owl, makes a brief cameo by way of homage, but the most magical element in a generally lunkheaded outing is winged Pegasus, the flying horse and his herd achieved beautifully.

As for the 3-D, it’s a non-event, the film having been shot normally and twiddled in post to ride the Avatar wave. It’s effective in a few bits (you can almost smell the Kraken's breath), but if you take the glasses off it doesn’t make a lot of difference most of the time.

Poorly written nonsense, but lovers of beefcake action will be happy enough with the heroes gymnastically vaulting monsters and slicing and dicing their way around the ancient world. An extra star for Ralph Fiennes, who is a god.

Reviewed by Angie Errigo

Write Your Review
To write your review please login or register.

Your Reviews

Average user rating for Clash of the Titans
Empire Star Rating

Clash Of The Titans Review

An obviously affectionate remake of the 1981 original, Louis Leterrier's Clash of the Titans doesn't offer enough visual thrills to offset the deficiencies of its script. ... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by the film man at 21:04, 05 March 2012 | Report This Post

clash of the Titans

Absolutly pooor. Weak effort. ... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by antosh25 at 10:58, 06 December 2011 | Report This Post

How do they all keep a straight face in this? ... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by UTB at 18:35, 21 August 2011 | Report This Post

RE: 3d what the???

Badum tish! ... More

Posted by DONOVAN KURTWOOD at 14:07, 07 August 2010 | Report This Post

RE: 3d what the???

L: RubberDuck This film upset me. I wanted to see the Kraken go absolutely fucking mental in Argos, and medusa be more than just a man hating 8 pinter. I had to buy God of war to destroy everything after watching this. hy would the kraken go mental in argos? did he get the wrong order given to him or something? ... More

Posted by relativelyrelative at 11:17, 07 August 2010 | Report This Post

RE: 3 stars?!?! hahaha wait ur serious?!?! haha

Just watched the Blu Ray. Enjoyable, but the whole thing feels like a giant piss-take. Especially Fiennes.  ... More

Posted by UTB at 13:52, 31 July 2010 | Report This Post

RE: 3 stars?!?! hahaha wait ur serious?!?! haha

Oh, and the Blu Ray looks amazing ... More

Posted by DONOVAN KURTWOOD at 21:50, 30 July 2010 | Report This Post

RE: 3 stars?!?! hahaha wait ur serious?!?! haha

Loved it! One of my fave movies from this year so far! Great action and FX, I'm a huge Letterier fan anyway! ... More

Posted by DONOVAN KURTWOOD at 21:47, 30 July 2010 | Report This Post

RE: 3 stars?!?! hahaha wait ur serious?!?! haha

Only redeeming feature about this film was Gemma Arterton and her legs as she was getting thrown around a abit and screaming, which she deserved for being extremely irritating. Half a star for giant scorpions too, but then half a star deducted for one randomly deciding to run into a wall. What a piece of shit. Atrocious acting on display from everyone, very bad pacing, no development or exposition, bad editing and filled completely with "what the fuck?" moments. Case in point- The three w... More

Posted by kumar at 21:15, 30 July 2010 | Report This Post

RE: Clash of the Titans

Nothing spectacular but I enjoyed it, although at times it feels like a ] guilty pleasure (particularly when Ralph Fiennes and/or Liam Neeson are on screen), looking at the cast list makes me think the running time was severely cut down, I saw Danny Huston for what was all of maybe 5 seconds but without watching the whole thing again I couldn't honestly say I spotted Alexander Siddig, Tamer Hassan or Agyness Deyn on screen (I know some of those aren't exactly megastars but they still must ha... More

Posted by Indio at 23:22, 26 July 2010 | Report This Post

RE: Clash of the Titans

I enjoyed it and I'm lookin forward to picking it up on Monday. ... More

Posted by The REAL Bozz at 12:10, 21 July 2010 | Report This Post

RE: Clash of the Titans

I could hardly believe how bad this was.  0/10.  The original would get 10/10.  ... More

Posted by MJ100AD at 00:32, 21 July 2010 | Report This Post

RE: Clash of the Titans

By now you know this is lame compared to the original. Why? The original was an adventure piece, meant for basic fun. This one is a result of what happens when directors are too involved in special effects. It is how not to make a movie. We just have a muddled mess. The characters would be okay if he would leave them alone, and not go too Hollywood in the cliches like the dead family. We have no idea who the characters are, and if they were obvious extras it might be different, but we... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by drystyx at 16:16, 18 July 2010 | Report This Post

RE: Waste of time

Not nearly as terrible as some are saying. I wasn't expecting much, but was pleasently surprised. Plotting could have been better fleshed out and structured, but it held together okay for me. Well executed action sequences, didn't try to be a mythological Matrix. The action felt gritty and grounded. The character of Perseus should have been fleshed out a bit more, but Worthington did the job, not lumbered with a wavering American accent this time. No really bad performances or dialogue. If you'... More

Posted by Sotto Voce at 09:01, 04 May 2010 | Report This Post

RE: One thing thats been bothering me

I really enjoyed it. not as charming as the original but a great action blockbuster that doesn't out stay it's welcome. 4/5 ... More

Posted by genejoke at 11:10, 18 April 2010 | Report This Post

RE: 3d what the???

expected nothing, so enjoyed delicious ham from neeson and finnes. you all had enough warning this wasn't going to be a "classic" blockbuster so, if you must go, relax and "enjoy"! 6/10 ... More

Posted by empire No. 1 at 03:48, 17 April 2010 | Report This Post

RE: Disappointing and Over Hyped

Saw this last night in 2D and it was quite a let down.   It really reminds me of Van Helsing - some interesting ideas and decent action scenes but ultimately was an overstuffed mess. Haven't seen the original since childhood although really enjoyed it, however wasn't approaching this with the reverance that (for instance) Harry Knowles has for it.   The good:   Like many others I thought the Mount Olympus scenes were some of the best and I also hope that a direct... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by Marwood at 10:39, 14 April 2010 | Report This Post

RE: Clash of the Titans 1D

I've read many "middle-ish" reviews in the mainstream press about this film, and some very negative reviews on this forum about this film it put me off going to see it, until today, when I had some spare time...went to see it in 2D as its cheaper and I prefer the improved contrast / brightness of 2D films to 3D and not have a cheap pair of glasses between my naked eyeball and the screen (I've seen several recent films in both formats in case you are wondering) I actually reall... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by hampstead bandit at 16:42, 12 April 2010 | Report This Post

Clash of the Titans 1D

L: theoriginalcynic Because it was boring as hell for two hours and the 3D added nothing to the film.  Take your glasses off and there was hadly any difference.  Kick ass is a much better film and should have been number one at the box office. I actually did take my glasses off a couple of times because I could barely tell it was in 3D. I've enjoyed the 3D of some recent films (Avatar, Alice) but this was rubbish. If you're gonna watch it, do so in 2D, it's cheaper and you won'... More

Posted by Edward Nygma at 15:22, 12 April 2010 | Report This Post

ONE star average!!! HAHAHAHA

Is this some kind of shite record? Basic new rule of thumb is Avoid-Anything-With-3D. Or anything with Danny Huston in it. Now which pussy clouts paid to see this instead of the brilliant Kick-Ass? ... More

Posted by SpiderBat at 22:13, 11 April 2010 | Report This Post

RE: Brilliant, Igorne The Negative Reviews.

Thankfully I have an Unlimited card, so I only paid another £1.50 to see this in 3D, which seemed to solely consist of making half the frame blurry. Whilst I wasn't exactly expecting of the King hoping for a fun and stupid action romp in the vein of rmerse like. Instead, it seems that people are using "but it's meant to be corny" as an excuse for just a pretty lazy, shoddy script and lacklustre effects. If this had been handed to Robert Rodriguez or even (whisper it) Michael Bay, thi... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by Donnie Murdo at 10:04, 11 April 2010 | Report This Post

RE: Brilliant, Igorne The Negative Reviews.

Am in two minds about it. Thought most of the cast was totally wasted (Polly Walker, Danny Huston, Jason Flyming, Dr Bashir), thought that it had been cut by about an hour, didn't like all the somersaults in the fight scenes and thought Medusa was a little rushed... oh and didn't like the whole Io/Perseus romance - where the hell was Andromeda?! - but I kinda liked it. I hope there's a Director's Cut because it could seriously do with some improvements (mainly on Mount Olympus). See ... More

Posted by Timon at 23:22, 10 April 2010 | Report This Post

RE: Brilliant, Igorne The Negative Reviews.

And Worthington was two hours of a brick walking around the screen who gave every impression of not having an interest in the performance he was giving. ... More

Posted by sanchia at 19:40, 10 April 2010 | Report This Post

RE: Brilliant, Igorne The Negative Reviews.

Because it was boring as hell for two hours and the 3D added nothing to the film.  Take your glasses off and there was hadly any difference.  Kick ass is a much better film and should have been number one at the box office. ... More

Posted by theoriginalcynic at 17:21, 10 April 2010 | Report This Post

RE: Missing the point.

It wasn't fun though, it was boring. It they really wanted it to be that fun they wouldn't have cast Sam Worthington, a man who makes Keanu look hyper, a man who is to acting what processed cheese is to "haute cuisine". The man played a robot, a blue alien and a demi-god and gave the exact same bland performance in all 3! That's an achievement in itself I guess. But yeah, parts of Clash of the Titans were entertaining enough but I found the whole thing ridiculously dull and unimpressive in... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by Edward Nygma at 11:44, 09 April 2010 | Report This Post

More user comments

Vanity Projects: The Musical Edition
A dozen more hits and misses from the rock and pop world

Inside The Martian: Empire Meets NASA
Prepare to science the shit out of it...

Deadpool: A Complete History
Empire's guide to The Merc With A Mouth, in comics and on screen

Evil Media: Haunted TVs, Tapes And Tunes
Ten sinister reasons to go off-grid

Spectre – Everything You Need To Know
Empire's essential briefing on James Bond's 24th outing

Exclusive Deadpool Trailer Breakdown
Director Tim Miller guides us through his crazed superhero promo

The N.W.A-Team
Empire visits the set of Straight Outta Compton

Subscribe to Empire magazine
Empire print magazine

Delivered to your door – with exclusive subscriber only covers each month! Save money today and

Subscribe now!

Subscribe to Empire iPad edition
Empire digital magazine

Exclusive and enhanced content – get instant access via your iPad or Android device! Save money today and

Subscribe now!

Subscribe now and save up to 63%
Print, Digital & Package options available Subscribe today!
Empire's Film Studies 101 Series
Everything you ever wanted to know about filmmaking but were afraid to ask...
The Empire Digital Edition
With exclusive extras, interactive features, trailers and much more! Download now
Home  |  News  |  Blogs  |  Reviews  |  Future Films  |  Features  |  Interviews  |  Images  |  Competitions  |  Forum  |  Digital Edition  |  Podcast  |  Magazine Contact Us  |  Empire FAQ  |  Subscribe To Empire  |  Register
© Bauer Consumer Media Ltd  |  Legal Info  |  Editorial Complaints  |  Privacy Policy  |  Bauer Entertainment Network
Bauer Consumer Media Ltd (company number 01176085 and registered address 1 Lincoln Court, Lincoln Road, Peterborough, England PE1 2RF)