Register  |   Log In  |  
Sign up to our weekly newsletter    
Search   
Empire Magazine and iPad
Follow Me on Pinterest YouTube Tumblr
Empire
Trending On Empire
Empire's New Tom Cruise Cover
The Jameson Empire Awards 2014
Vote: The Greatest 301 Movies Of All Time!
Rebecca Hall:
My Movie Life

The actress picks the movies that shaped her
Mountain Dew Green Screen
Register Now to see X-MEN First Class!
Reviews
STAR RATINGS EXPLAINED
Unmissable 5 Stars
Excellent 4 Stars
Good 3 Stars
Poor 2 Stars
Tragic 1 Star

POSTER ART
Click poster to enlarge
More posters to select


FILM DETAILS
Certificate
18
Cast
Bahar Soomekh
Angus MacFadyen
Dina Meyer
Shawnee Smith
Tobin Bell
Kim Roberts.
Directors
Darren Lynn Bousman.
Screenwriters
Leigh Whannell.
Running Time
minutes

LATEST FILM REVIEWS
An Episode In The Life Of An Iron Picker
4 Star Empire Rating
Cupcakes
3 Star Empire Rating
You & Me Forever
4 Star Empire Rating
Looking For Light: Jane Brown
3 Star Empire Rating
Informant, The
2 Star Empire Rating



5 STAR REVIEWS
Rebel Without A Cause
5 Star Empire Rating
Calvary
5 Star Empire Rating
Wake In Fright
5 Star Empire Rating
Stranger By The Lake
5 Star Empire Rating
Whatever Happened To Baby Jane?
5 Star Empire Rating

Saw III
Yet more torture and mayhem from Jigsaw


submit to reddit


Plot
Inventive serial killer Jigsaw strikes again, even as his health deteriorates.


Review
Saw III
Browse more images »

Though suffering from an exploding brain, torturer Jigsaw (Tobin Bell) has a doctor (Bahar Soomekh) wired to a heart monitor with orders to keep him alive or else a gadget will blow her head off.  Meanwhile, another victim (Angus MacFadyen) runs an obstacle course: three people he blames for his son’s death are trussed to killing machines, and he gets to choose between trying to save them or gloating over their murders. 
 
The Saw films are now a proper trilogy, which means you’ve no hope of picking up the plot starting here. The upside is surprisingly good acting, but this time the script (and torture devices) are more contrived, and thus less effective. Fans of hard-to-watch impromptu cranial surgery performed with power tools will be in liquidised maggoty hog heaven, though.


Verdict
It requires a stretch of the imagination too far, but there's still plenty of gore and tricksy murders here.


Reviewed by Kim Newman

Write Your Review
To write your review please login or register.

Your Reviews

Average user rating for Saw III
Empire Star Rating

Saw III

Just like Jigsaw, the storyline in the Saw series is starting to die. This would actually make a fitting conclusion, but the disappointing ending and straight-forward plot brings Saw III from a insightful thriller to basic torture-porn. Though if you like that kind if stuff, you're in for a gory treat, just don't expect anything new. ... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by norgizfox at 03:58, 13 August 2012 | Report This Post


Saw III Review

Saw III does little beyond repeating its predecessor's tropes on a mare horrific and unpleasant gorier level. ... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by the film man at 21:09, 05 January 2012 | Report This Post


Brilliant

A brilliant way to end the Saw franchise. ... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by the film man at 10:20, 10 April 2011 | Report This Post


The Series Regains Some Sharpness

After the disappointment of the second coming, not much hope was held out for the series' 3rd installment. However, clearly the filmmakers have attempted to acknowledge and rectify flaws critics pointed out in the second film. And whilst they have upped the gore and brutality stakes yet again, the story is somewhat cleverer, with an intriguing final twist and scene which was capitalized on (raped) in the sequels. Not a masterpiece, by any means, but it's a barely solid genre offering that is nev... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by blaud at 10:27, 09 March 2011 | Report This Post


Saw III: Meh.

Well I watched this film with great expectations considering the originality of the first two films but alas I was disappointed, all the film contained was traps, as elaborate as they were I still think that they are loosing the story to the gore, horror isn't all about the gore anymore, it might have been in the 80's but we want more of the why as well as how, and what there was of the story didn't really relate to the previous films. Disappointed but not turned off. ... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by LUCASLITTLEWOOD at 16:30, 10 July 2010 | Report This Post


I SAW it all before

This is right at the point when the series became boring Saw VI would have to be brialliant to make up for all that crap ... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by S1lent B0b at 20:28, 16 September 2009 | Report This Post


poor

don't waist your time like i did watching this fucking rubbish ... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by bobbyperu at 23:12, 05 November 2007 | Report This Post


poor

don't waist your time like i did watching this fucking rubbish ... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by bobbyperu at 23:12, 05 November 2007 | Report This Post


RE: saw 3

Watched this yesterday, it was miles better than the disgracefully bad Saw 2. Ok there were faults as in all horror movies, when aren't there? But the tortures were original, like the bloke with all the hooks in him and the girl frozen to death, also the bloke who nearly drowned in mushed up cows hen Saw IV out?? sp; ... More

Posted by Newander at 09:36, 12 August 2007 | Report This Post


saw 3

This film was so boring i think it made my childrens children angry. ... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by elimonator at 12:38, 16 May 2007 | Report This Post


Completely and utterly......

Disagree, with the empire review, sorry Kim Newman. This installment was much better than the bland second chapter. Although this one slightly down on story line did result to using a hell of alot of gore to excite its audience, it worked and therefor resulted in a genrally good chapter. it is good. ... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by JimBo! at 10:51, 01 March 2007 | Report This Post


SAW 3

I thought SAW 3 was rather good. THough it was not as good as the first or second it was still very enjoyable. Like Hostel theres loads of violence and the violence in this violence is simply torture. I thought the pig guts scene was just disgusting but the brain surgery was amazing. Overall i think this is really good but it should of been better. Loads better. ... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by solid snake at 17:55, 19 February 2007 | Report This Post


the worst saw in the trillogy but still quite good in places. see saw 2 its the best ... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by casino at 21:04, 18 January 2007 | Report This Post


Good but dissapointing

Better than the second which despite its premise weas absolutely shit! Saw III stretches the boundaries of your imagination a bit but its a welcome return to the twisty turny plot of the original. Some absoluetly gruesome toture devices here and that scene at the beginning where Donnie Whalberg breaks his foot with the lid of the toliet where very well done. However this excellent work is undone by over the top moments such as the brain surgery which was gruesome but so unrealistic. All in all i... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by spideyfan666 at 20:53, 18 January 2007 | Report This Post


........

i actually threw up. i'm 14 but that's not the point. this movie should've never reached the theaters. a great twist but i prefer the second one. do not let a fourth one be released. although they anounced that they'll be starting soon. i think it would've helped if you weren't alone. but i think it was alright. whatever i managed to undrestand from the plot after consentrating on being so shocked....... trully if you managed to watch this and you're younger you're simply not serious. or you tr... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by alexs at 16:37, 15 January 2007 | Report This Post


Hmmn....

Deeply dissapointed. The best bits were the flashback scenes to the missing parts of the first two films. I think they should make Saw the prequel, it would be far more interesting ... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by jerkyjudas at 00:57, 09 December 2006 | Report This Post


Hmmn....

Deeply dissapointed. The best bits were the flashback scenes to the missing parts of the first two films. I think they should make Saw the prequel, it would be far more interesting ... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by jerkyjudas at 00:57, 09 December 2006 | Report This Post


Bit harsh!

2 stars? Bit harsh I think. OK so it's not as good as the first or the second but it was OK - really thought the last 20 mins or so were good with a nice twist. And Iliked the way it linked all 3 films together. But please - no Saw 4!! ... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by trueborndjross at 20:18, 28 November 2006 | Report This Post


Bit harsh!

2 stars? Bit harsh I think. OK so it's not as good as the first or the second but it was OK - really thought the last 20 mins or so were good with a nice twist. And Iliked the way it linked all 3 films together. But please - no Saw 4!! ... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by trueborndjross at 20:18, 28 November 2006 | Report This Post


Oh yeah

Good twist though, if again slightly ridiculous. ... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by killervideotape at 19:52, 21 November 2006 | Report This Post


Saw III

Ridiculous, needlessly brutal, horrendously disgusting yet hugely and disturbingly inventive. Good acting, direction and grimy cinematography are impressive but the script leaves the real bad taste in the mouth here. No wait, its the torture. Where can horror go from here until it becomes real death? ... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by killervideotape at 19:49, 21 November 2006 | Report This Post


Bye-Bye

Hopefully we've now seen the last of the Saw franchise (although considering the box-office figures of this one, i doubt it). This one wasn't as bad as I thought it might be. Better than the second but not a patch on the originality of the first (despite Danny Glover's over the top theatrics). The acting was pretty good (up until the end when it got a bit silly - I almost laughed out loud when Jeff makes his decision) but wheras the gore in the first added to the tension and feel of the film, th... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by Iws at 10:25, 21 November 2006 | Report This Post


RE: Saw III

Shit film... not as good as the first two, the plot was a non existant yet still far too complicated shambles... the torture scenes were alright but that if we're honest, that's all the production company and director give a shit about, everything else is a side issue. It's like porn, if the shagging's good, who gives a fuck about the rest?   Will they make another? Of course... the Saw and Scary Movie franchises will just keep feeding each other in a big circle of crap. &n... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by ArtDepartmentAlbert at 01:40, 20 November 2006 | Report This Post


RE: Saw III

piss poor!! i started laughing it was that bad!! ... More

Empire User Rating

Posted by charliealonso at 12:12, 18 November 2006 | Report This Post


RE: Saw III

1st saw, ok. 2nd saw, poo. 3rd saw, very smelly poo. this is such a naff film. how anyone can say it's scary. at the cinema i work at i've had to shut the film down twice beacuse of people fainting, at bloody what that's what i want to know, it can't be the film, maybe it's our prices. where's all the intelligent horror gone, how many times must were see this same old cack. ... More

Posted by Evil.Groovy.Ash at 03:14, 16 November 2006 | Report This Post


More user comments


CURRENT HIGHLIGHTS
The Making Of Locke: A Filmmaker's Journey
Steven Knight takes us through six pitstops (via Heston Services)

The 10 Most Exciting Movies At Cannes 2014
Empire's pick of the Croisette's finest

Tom Hardy: A Viewer's Guide
The essential, the recommended, the one for the fans... and the one to avoid

Ten Things To Know About The Spooks Movie
Under the hood of The Greater Good

Who’s In Spider-Man’s Sinister Six?
A bluffer’s guide to the planned spin-off from the Amazing Spider-films

14 YouTube Videos Every Game Of Thrones Fan Should Have Watched By Now
From goats singing the theme tune to every death in under three minutes

Hollywood's Biggest Names On Their Favourite Films
Stars and directors like Nolan, Whedon, Wright and Ford on the films that inspire them

Subscribe to Empire iPad edition
Get The Empire iPad Edition Today

Subscribe and save money on annual digital subscription

Subscribe today
Buy single issues

Subscribe to Empire magazine
Get Limited Edition Collectable X-Men Art Cards

Subscribe today and get 6 issues of Empire plus a set of collectable X-Men Art Cards for only £20!

Subscribe today

Get 12 Issues Of Empire For Just £25
Receive limited edition subscribers-only covers every month Subscribe today!
Empire's Film Studies 101 Series
Everything you ever wanted to know about filmmaking but were afraid to ask...
The Empire iPad Edition
With exclusive extras, interactive features, trailers and much more! Download now
Home  |  News  |  Blogs  |  Reviews  |  Future Films  |  Features  |  Interviews  |  Images  |  Competitions  |  Forum  |  iPad  |  Podcast  |  Magazine Contact Us  |  Empire FAQ  |  Subscribe To Empire  |  Register
© Bauer Consumer Media Ltd  |  Legal Info  |  Privacy Policy  |  Bauer Entertainment Network
Bauer Consumer Media Ltd (company number 01176085 and registered address 1 Lincoln Court, Lincoln Road, Peterborough, England PE1 2RF)