Register  |   Log In  |  
Sign up to our weekly newsletter    
Search   
Empire Magazine and iPad
Follow Me on Pinterest YouTube Tumblr
Empire
Trending On Empire
The Future Of Film
The 100 Greatest Video Games
The Making Of The West Wing
Subscribe To Empire Today
Save money and get 12 issues for only £25
Go Think Big
Helping young people achieve their career dreams
Movie News

LATEST HEADLINES
TODAY
Billy Boyd To Sing The Hobbit's Closing Credits Song
Viggo Mortensen breathes a sigh of relief
Sean Bean Set For The Martian
Get your 'when does he die?' jokes out now...
Conjuring Sequel Delayed Until 2016
Another New Line horror will take its place in 2015
Eli Roth Gets Cabin Fever Again
Producing a remake of his 2002 original
More Movie News

RELATED NEWS
22 August 2014
White Bird In A Blizzard In A Trailer
Shailene Woodley loses Eva Green
More Movie News

RELATED REVIEWS
The Fault In Our Stars (2014)
Empire Star Rating
The Amazing Spider-Man 2 (2014)
Empire Star Rating
The Amazing Spider-Man 2 (2014)
Empire Star Rating
Divergent (2014)
Empire Star Rating
The Amazing Spider-Man (2012)
Empire Star Rating
More new cinemas releases
DVD & Blu-ray releases

Shailene Woodley's Mary Jane Watson Not Appearing In The Amazing Spider-Man 2
She's held back for the third instalment

20 June 2013  |  Written by Phil de Semlyen  |  Source: ComicBookMovie.com

submit to reddit

Shailene Woodley's Mary Jane Watson Not Appearing In Spider-Man 2

Surprising news from Camp Spidey, with Entertainment Weekly reporting that Shailene Woodley's Mary Jane Watson has been cut from The Amazing Spider-Man 2. In what can best be described as a 'Terrence Malick moment', Peter Parker's friend and future love interest has been left on the cutting room floor in the second instalment and will instead make her debut in part 3.

The news comes soon after Sony locked The Amazing Spider-Man 3 and 4 onto its schedule for 2016 and 2018 respectively, and is a slightly surprising turns of events. All expectation was for Mary Jane to be debuted, albeit in a small role, next year, prior to a subtantially beefier role when you-know-what happens to you-know-who.

Sanguine but disappointed, Woodley is staying philosophical. "Of course I'm bummed, but I am a firm believer in everything happening for a specific reason... Based on the proposed plot, I completely understand the need for holding off on introducing [Mary Jane] until the next film."

It's a blow for the young actress, so impressive in The Descendants, but she's toplining an adaptation of young adult sci-fi yarn Divergent and will, of course, be a major player in The Amazing Spider-Man 3.

Director Marc Webb offered greater explanation of the decision. "I made a creative decision to streamline the story and focus on Peter and Gwen and their relationship. Shailene is an incredibly talented actress", he added, "and while we only shot a few scenes with Mary Jane, we all love working with her".

With Woodley back on the bench for this one, Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone are reuniting, with Paul Giamatti, Dan DeHaan, Jamie Foxx, Sally Field, Martin Sheen, Marton Csokas, Felicity Jones, B.J. Novak, Colm Feore and Chris Cooper also appearing. It'll be in UK cinemas on April 18, 2014.


Have Your Say
To comment on this, and all articles, register for free or login now.

Star Wars: Episode VII Casting Call Leaks
If you're young, fit and talented, get your CVs to Disney
Disney Re-Scales Pete's Dragon
UPDATE: David Lowery in talks to direct his script

Your Comments

If you think Christopher`s story is super,, three weeks-ago my son in law basically brought home $5146 putting in 40 hours a month from there house and there best friend's step-aunt`s neighbour has been doing this for six months and easily made over $5146 parttime from there mac. the advice on this web-site, w­w­w.K­E­P­2.c­o­m More

Posted by eliza111 at 19:24 on 20 June 2013 | Report This Post

I agree ASM may not be perfect as superhero films go but its a hell of a lot better than them old ones with that guy I can't even remember, Garfield and Stone were perfect, I'm guessing these haters have never read a comic in the life or watched the 90's cartoon in which is just cheese fess (I mean is that not what people love about Spiderman that he doesn't take himself serious) However back to the news, I'm glad M.J is left out and glad to here they are developing the Peter/Gwen story line as More

Posted by Gazzabrook at 15:55 on 20 June 2013 | Report This Post

RE: Shailene Woodley's Mary Jane Watson Not Appearing In The Amazing Spider-Man 2
Now all they have to do is edit Andrew Garfield and his ridiculous hair out of the film.. More

Posted by Cool Breeze at 13:02 on 20 June 2013 | Report This Post

RE: Shailene Woodley's Mary Jane Watson Not Appearing In The Amazing Spider-Man 2
In my humble opinion, the Raimi trilogy was cack. I thought the Amazing Spider-Man was better than any of those 3. Not a perfect movie by any stretch of the imagination but I thought it got all the characters spot on. And if you-know-what happens to you-know-who as is rumoured, maybe streamlining the story isn't the worst idea in the world. Hopeful. More

Posted by a_man_and_his_monkey at 11:37 on 20 June 2013 | Report This Post

"Scenes with Stone and Garfield were cheesy and lamey" Um, hi there... you must be new, let me introduce you to Spider-Man. OF COURSE THEY'RE CHEESY! He's a nervous kid who can't handle himself in conversations with people he finds attractive. They captured that, and the humour elements of Spidey, far better in the new films than they did in the Raimi trilogy More

Posted by mafiaduck at 10:57 on 20 June 2013 | Report This Post

Sounds like they might be finding it hard to juggle all of the new characters they're introducing. Hopefully dealing with it like this early on will avoid mistakes made in Raimi's last wed slinger gig. More

Posted by shadozfest at 10:47 on 20 June 2013 | Report This Post

Didn't see anything special about the 'AMAZING' spiderman vs Tobey Maguire/Sam Raimi version. The Garfield & Stone scenes in particular were SO cheesy and lame...needed a bucket... The fact they are locked in to making 4 of these already smacks of desperation by Sony, and stupidity by Joe Average film-goer. More

Posted by sifter132 at 10:45 on 20 June 2013 | Report This Post

SPECIAL FEATURE
The 301 Greatest Movies Of All Time EMPIRE READERS' POLL: THE 301 GREATEST MOVIES OF ALL TIME
You turned out in your hundreds and thousands, and here are the results... Browse the full list


CURRENT HIGHLIGHTS
Empire Meets Jason Bateman And Tina Fey
The stars of This Is Where I Leave You hang out

The Scariest Film Of The Year? Jennifer Kent On The Babadook
The director talks us through her terrifying new film

10 Horror Spin-Offs We Want To See
After Annabelle, what other supporting characters deserve their own film?

Documentaries: What Happened Next
We track down and interview the stars of great non-fiction films

Your Introductory Guide To That DC Movie Slate
Suicide Squad? Cyborg? Aquaman? We explain who’s who in the DC Universe

Captain America 3, Iron Man And Civil War: Where Next For The Marvel Cinematic Universe?
What to make of today's Marvel news

Interactive Gallery: Explore Iconic Movie Spacesuits
Explore the fabric of space-time

Subscribe to Empire magazine
Get 12 Issues Of Empire For Only £25!

Get exclusive subscriber-only covers each month!

Subscribe today

Subscribe to Empire iPad edition
Get The Empire iPad Edition Today

Subscribe and save money on annual digital subscription

Subscribe today
Buy single issues

Get 12 issues of Empire for just £25!
Get the world's greatest movie magazine delivered straight to your door! Subscribe today!
Empire's Film Studies 101 Series
Everything you ever wanted to know about filmmaking but were afraid to ask...
The Empire iPad Edition
With exclusive extras, interactive features, trailers and much more! Download now
Home  |  News  |  Blogs  |  Reviews  |  Future Films  |  Features  |  Interviews  |  Images  |  Competitions  |  Forum  |  iPad  |  Podcast  |  Magazine Contact Us  |  Empire FAQ  |  Subscribe To Empire  |  Register
© Bauer Consumer Media Ltd  |  Legal Info  |  Editorial Complaints  |  Privacy Policy  |  Bauer Entertainment Network
Bauer Consumer Media Ltd (company number 01176085 and registered address 1 Lincoln Court, Lincoln Road, Peterborough, England PE1 2RF)