| RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed |
Funny that ry 3]Cars 2 the news at the same time. It only serves to remind everyone of the massive quality gulf between their predecessors... More
Posted by David Somerset at 13:48 on 16 September 2009 | Report This Post |
 |
|
|
| RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed |
Cars 2 is fine by me, given I have two under 9's who enjoyed the 1st one a lot.
I only hope the sequel has a Bugatti Veyron in it to keep my son happy.
On a related note, check out this link for free papercraft models of the cast of Cars
www.paperian.com/webdude/bl.htmp;
More
Posted by piginapoke at 09:57 on 15 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed |
L: Deviation
L: rawlinson
L: Deviation
L: rawlinson
L: Deviation
I ruined this thread.
No you didn't. PA's and Elab's posts are still just a couple up and Benskelly could easily have responded to them and overlooked your posts, the fact that he didn't tends to show he has no real response to give. Unless he wants to pull out the brilliant reasoning he tried using against me a while back - telling me that 99% of the world disagree with me for disliking Meryl Streep. ot More
Posted by rawlinson at 23:09 on 13 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed |
L: rawlinson
L: Deviation
L: rawlinson
L: Deviation
I ruined this thread.
No you didn't. PA's and Elab's posts are still just a couple up and Benskelly could easily have responded to them and overlooked your posts, the fact that he didn't tends to show he has no real response to give. Unless he wants to pull out the brilliant reasoning he tried using against me a while back - telling me that 99% of the world disagree with me for disliking Meryl Streep. ote]
Surely no More
Posted by Deviation at 23:08 on 13 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed |
L: Deviation
L: rawlinson
L: Deviation
I ruined this thread.
No you didn't. PA's and Elab's posts are still just a couple up and Benskelly could easily have responded to them and overlooked your posts, the fact that he didn't tends to show he has no real response to give. Unless he wants to pull out the brilliant reasoning he tried using against me a while back - telling me that 99% of the world disagree with me for disliking Meryl Streep. ote]
Surely not everybody in the More
Posted by rawlinson at 23:05 on 13 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed |
L: rawlinson
L: Deviation
I ruined this thread.
No you didn't. PA's and Elab's posts are still just a couple up and Benskelly could easily have responded to them and overlooked your posts, the fact that he didn't tends to show he has no real response to give. Unless he wants to pull out the brilliant reasoning he tried using against me a while back - telling me that 99% of the world disagree with me for disliking Meryl Streep. ote]
Surely not everybody in the world like More
Posted by Deviation at 22:55 on 13 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed |
L: Deviation
I ruined this thread.
sp;
No you didn't. PA's and Elab's posts are still just a couple up and Benskelly could easily have responded to them and overlooked your posts, the fact that he didn't tends to show he has no real response to give. Unless he wants to pull out the brilliant reasoning he tried using against me a while back - telling me that 99% of the world disagree with me for disliking Meryl Streep. More
Posted by rawlinson at 22:37 on 13 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed |
L: benskelly
I apologize for my animated debate on the topic of Cars.
I can see now that I should have been discussing relevant things like "George Lucas fucking a lamp", the differences between pervy and sexy, and covering somebody with beauty juice.
I now understand the high standard of discussion here and how inappropriate my comments were.
sp;
I ruined this thread.
And I'm pretty sure PA and elab would still argue with you, since you didn't answer More
Posted by Deviation at 18:36 on 13 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed |
I apologize for my animated debate on the topic of Cars.
I can see now that I should have been discussing relevant things like "George Lucas fucking a lamp", the differences between pervy and sexy, and covering somebody with beauty juice.
I now understand the high standard of discussion here and how inappropriate my comments were. More
Posted by benskelly at 17:27 on 13 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed |
But they will, like they will get what beauty juice means. More
Posted by Deviation at 02:14 on 13 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed |
That's asking a lot. More
Posted by Pigeon Army at 02:13 on 13 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed |
L: Pigeon Army
Actually, the word PERVY is a common joke on this forum. That's the first time I've encountered SEXY, and I've been in quite a few threads. Besides, the ordinary definition of SEXY is i]different to PERVY.
So there.
sp;
They will still get it. More
Posted by Deviation at 02:06 on 13 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed |
Actually, the word PERVY is a common joke on this forum. That's the first time I've encountered SEXY, and I've been in quite a few threads. Besides, the ordinary definition of SEXY is i]different to PERVY.
So there.
More
Posted by Pigeon Army at 02:02 on 13 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed |
L: Pigeon Army
L: Deviation
L: Pigeon Army
L: Deviation
Lucas fucking a lamp.
SEXY!
reserved so Devi doesn't alter it later to cover his arse.
Qouted to show how PA can't get irony.
rony has no bearing when things can be taken out of context. /quote]
Yeah but the word SEXY is a common joke in this forum, you poeple might use that prejudice to understand that's it a joke. More
Posted by Deviation at 01:57 on 13 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed |
L: Deviation
L: Pigeon Army
L: Deviation
Lucas fucking a lamp.
SEXY!
reserved so Devi doesn't alter it later to cover his arse.
Qouted to show how PA can't get irony.
rony has no bearing when things can be taken out of context. More
Posted by Pigeon Army at 01:53 on 13 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed |
Woody in Brokeback Mountain 2? More
Posted by Timmy_Brisby_05 at 01:52 on 13 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed |
L: Pigeon Army
L: Deviation
Lucas fucking a lamp.
SEXY!
reserved so Devi doesn't alter it later to cover his arse.
sp;
Qouted to show how PA can't get irony. More
Posted by Deviation at 01:46 on 13 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed |
L: Deviation
Lucas fucking a lamp.
SEXY!
reserved so Devi doesn't alter it later to cover his arse.
More
Posted by Pigeon Army at 01:43 on 13 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed |
That's one of the few occasions where someone saying "pervy" would be warranted.
More
Posted by FritzlFan at 01:31 on 13 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed |
L: Pigeon Army
L: rawlinson
L: elab49
I've now accepted those quotes will follow me to my dying breath in this place. ote]
But I think in a good way because it is a great description of the film, and for one of the most disturbing porn movies of all time.ote]
/quote]
Lucas fucking a lamp.
SEXY! More
Posted by Deviation at 01:28 on 13 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed |
L: rawlinson
L: elab49
I've now accepted those quotes will follow me to my dying breath in this place. ote]
But I think in a good way because it is a great description of the film, and for one of the most disturbing porn movies of all time.ote]
More
Posted by Pigeon Army at 01:21 on 13 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed |
L: elab49
I've now accepted those quotes will follow me to my dying breath in this place. ote]
But I think in a good way because it is a great description of the film, and an idea for one of the most disturbing porn movies of all time. More
Posted by rawlinson at 20:35 on 12 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed |
L: benskelly
Why do I get singled out for "taking pops" when the other poster did the same to me, and with just as much if not more "heated" energy?? I didn't call anybody names, so what's the problem? ho took pops at you? I don't see anyone having aligned themselves against you for the purpose of belittling or mocking you, and I think that shows remarkable restraint when you bust out lines like -
er poster is right - and I think he explained the use of the word "pretentious" p More
Posted by Pigeon Army at 12:09 on 12 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed |
I do find it rather odd - particularly for this film - how many people in this thread seem unable to accept people don't like Cars not because of a trailer reaction (I didn't see a trailer so I've no idea what the reaction was to), their political principles, the cash taken at the box office or because mummy (or inexplicably the Daily Mail) told them to. But just as that opinion was undoubtedly formed because you saw the film and liked it (at least I've not suggested you brainlessly like a More
Posted by elab49 at 11:52 on 12 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed |
L: crazymoviesdude
Also, anyone who comments that Cars has less heart than any other Pixat film, is a little confused, and may have watched a different cut or a different movie entirely. If anything (and it is still one of the 'worse' Pixar movies) it has more heart than most. sp;
Thank you for telling myself and anyone else who thinks it's heartless and soulless that we're "confused". Because if it wasn't for you making things really simple then I would have just thought that More
Posted by rawlinson at 10:02 on 12 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed |
I'll make this all really simple.
Cars is a great movie.
Pixar make fantastic-amazing-awesome movies.
Whilst it beats all else, it's one of Pixar's weakest.
Anyone who says that it's worse than any Dreamworks movie, is just trying to create a fuss. (I realise no one here has said that, but it's just a for-instance)
Also, anyone who comments that Cars has less heart than any other Pixat film, is a little confused, and may have watched a different cut or a different movie entir More
Posted by crazymoviesdude at 08:52 on 12 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed |
L: elab49
Benskelly, no-one is trying to change opinions, it's a movie news thread. They're just /b] expressing them. Not entirely sure what line you mean - if it is 'glossy and soulless', then I'm afraid you're wrong about where it comes from (and apologies for that - it is a bit of an in-joke based on old reviews in my sig and it would probably have been fairer to make that clear).
That said, Cars is hardly worth getting unnecessarily heated and taking pops at other posters.&n More
Posted by benskelly at 02:08 on 12 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed |
L: Deviation
L: target
L: Deviation
L: elab49
L: benskelly
Well, I agree with being civil. (ahem) But maybe he just means that saying a movie that made $461,983,149 in worldwide gross is only liked by a "minority" could be perceived as a) presumptuous b) pretentious and/or c) completely inaccurate. I'm not as fond of Finding Nemo - doesn't change that it was a huge hit.
Pretending to what exactly, since the word has inexplicably been included there. More
Posted by rawlinson at 00:59 on 12 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed |
L: target
L: Deviation
L: elab49
L: benskelly
Well, I agree with being civil. (ahem) But maybe he just means that saying a movie that made $461,983,149 in worldwide gross is only liked by a "minority" could be perceived as a) presumptuous b) pretentious and/or c) completely inaccurate. I'm not as fond of Finding Nemo - doesn't change that it was a huge hit.
Pretending to what exactly, since the word has inexplicably been included there. I'd genuinely like More
Posted by Deviation at 00:39 on 12 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed |
Benskelly, no-one is trying to change opinions, it's a movie news thread. They're just /b] expressing them. Not entirely sure what line you mean - if it is 'glossy and soulless', then I'm afraid you're wrong about where it comes from (and apologies for that - it is a bit of an in-joke based on old reviews in my sig and it would probably have been fairer to make that clear).
That said, Cars is hardly worth getting unnecessarily heated and taking pops at other posters.
More
Posted by elab49 at 23:00 on 11 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed |
L: elab49
L: benskelly
L: elab49
L: benskelly
Well, I agree with being civil. (ahem) But maybe he just means that saying a movie that made $461,983,149 in worldwide gross is only liked by a "minority" could be perceived as a) presumptuous b) pretentious and/or c) completely inaccurate. I'm not as fond of Finding Nemo - doesn't change that it was a huge hit.
Pretending to what exactly, since the word has inexplicably been included there. I'd genuinely like More
Posted by benskelly at 19:55 on 11 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed |
L: Deviation
L: elab49
L: benskelly
Well, I agree with being civil. (ahem) But maybe he just means that saying a movie that made $461,983,149 in worldwide gross is only liked by a "minority" could be perceived as a) presumptuous b) pretentious and/or c) completely inaccurate. I'm not as fond of Finding Nemo - doesn't change that it was a huge hit.
Pretending to what exactly, since the word has inexplicably been included there. I'd genuinely like to know.
More
Posted by target at 18:57 on 11 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed |
L: benskelly
L: evildave69
f you who didn't like Cars. get over yourselves.ood work Adrian, of course you're right. The people who don't like Cars (erm, the majority I think), don't like it because they think they are better than it. Is that what you're suggesting?
Now fair enough if you like it, that's perfectly fine by me but I don't think any of the 'dislikers' here are going to start assuming that you're a self-important tit just because you're in the minority of people who like More
Posted by Adrian at 15:54 on 11 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: RE: |
I liked Cars but thought it was the weakest Pixar film since "a bug's life".
If they want to make a sequel to one of their films why not "the incredibles"? More
Posted by JagLover at 13:52 on 11 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: RE: |
L: Pigeon Army
L: rawlinson
L: Pigeon Army
The idea that anyone at Pixar finds Larry the Cable Guy to be anything more than an excruciatingly unfunny human being => me silently weeping.
Isn't it more a case of knowing he's popular and sells to a certain audience than anyone at Pixar finding him funny? Although why anyone in the audience would find him funny is beyond me. It still amazes me that people from the South don't get incredibly offended by the ridiculous Southern More
Posted by rawlinson at 13:31 on 11 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: RE: |
L: rawlinson
L: Pigeon Army
The idea that anyone at Pixar finds Larry the Cable Guy to be anything more than an excruciatingly unfunny human being => me silently weeping.
Isn't it more a case of knowing he's popular and sells to a certain audience than anyone at Pixar finding him funny? Although why anyone in the audience would find him funny is beyond me. It still amazes me that people from the South don't get incredibly offended by the ridiculous Southern stereotype created More
Posted by Pigeon Army at 13:21 on 11 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed |
L: benskelly
L: elab49
L: benskelly
Well, I agree with being civil. (ahem) But maybe he just means that saying a movie that made $461,983,149 in worldwide gross is only liked by a "minority" could be perceived as a) presumptuous b) pretentious and/or c) completely inaccurate. I'm not as fond of Finding Nemo - doesn't change that it was a huge hit.
Pretending to what exactly, since the word has inexplicably been included there. I'd genuinely like to know.
More
Posted by elab49 at 13:16 on 11 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: RE: |
L: Pigeon Army
The idea that anyone at Pixar finds Larry the Cable Guy to be anything more than an excruciatingly unfunny human being => me silently weeping.
sp;
Isn't it more a case of knowing he's popular and sells to a certain audience than anyone at Pixar finding him funny? Although why anyone in the audience would find him funny is beyond me. It still amazes me that people from the South don't get incredibly offended by the ridiculous Southern stereotype created by a man bor More
Posted by rawlinson at 12:24 on 11 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: Hollywood, UK |
Cars Schmars. Bring on The Incredibles 2! More
Posted by David Somerset at 10:19 on 11 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| Hollywood, UK |
Regardless of ephemeral "quibbles" about plot and actors and voices in a movie that will only be “in release” for six weeks anyway. The idea to merge US and UK Cinema is absolutely genius of vision; both economies are struggling. Disney is a forerunner in acknowledging the entertainment industry as merely being cog in the wheel of an overall global economy.
The United States and all of its resources can no longer remain a completely insular nation.
DISNEY under th More
Posted by GFT at 03:35 on 11 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed |
L: elab49
L: benskelly
Well, I agree with being civil. (ahem) But maybe he just means that saying a movie that made $461,983,149 in worldwide gross is only liked by a "minority" could be perceived as a) presumptuous b) pretentious and/or c) completely inaccurate. I'm not as fond of Finding Nemo - doesn't change that it was a huge hit.
Pretending to what exactly, since the word has inexplicably been included there. I'd genuinely like to know.
Cash receipts are More
Posted by benskelly at 01:51 on 11 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed |
L: elab49
L: benskelly
Well, I agree with being civil. (ahem) But maybe he just means that saying a movie that made $461,983,149 in worldwide gross is only liked by a "minority" could be perceived as a) presumptuous b) pretentious and/or c) completely inaccurate. I'm not as fond of Finding Nemo - doesn't change that it was a huge hit.
Pretending to what exactly, since the word has inexplicably been included there. I'd genuinely like to know.
Cash receipts are More
Posted by Deviation at 21:31 on 10 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed |
L: benskelly
Well, I agree with being civil. (ahem) But maybe he just means that saying a movie that made $461,983,149 in worldwide gross is only liked by a "minority" could be perceived as a) presumptuous b) pretentious and/or c) completely inaccurate. I'm not as fond of Finding Nemo - doesn't change that it was a huge hit.
sp;
Pretending to what exactly, since the word has inexplicably been included there. I'd genuinely like to know.
Cash receipts are cou More
Posted by elab49 at 21:24 on 10 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed |
spend the time and investment on Cars 2 on an Incredibles sequel, but heh ho More
Posted by JIm R at 21:08 on 10 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed |
L: evildave69
f you who didn't like Cars. get over yourselves.ood work Adrian, of course you're right. The people who don't like Cars (erm, the majority I think), don't like it because they think they are better than it. Is that what you're suggesting?
Now fair enough if you like it, that's perfectly fine by me but I don't think any of the 'dislikers' here are going to start assuming that you're a self-important tit just because you're in the minority of people who like it. Of course eve More
Posted by benskelly at 20:34 on 10 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed |
f you who didn't like Cars. get over yourselves.ood work Adrian, of course you're right. The people who don't like Cars (erm, the majority I think), don't like it because they think they are better than it. Is that what you're suggesting?
Now fair enough if you like it, that's perfectly fine by me but I don't think any of the 'dislikers' here are going to start assuming that you're a self-important tit just because you're in the minority of people who like it. Of course everyone is welcome to More
Posted by evildave69 at 20:03 on 10 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| Uhm, Disagree With Everybody |
Monsters, Inc and Finding Nemo are my least favorite Pixars - they're just too "kiddie-ish" for my tastes. I think Cars is fantastic fun with a great message and is truly one of the most beautiful LOOKING films they have ever done. I just don't get the conventional wisdom "disappointment" with this film, I really don't. It kinda' mystifies me. I think it started when the first trailer was not well-received and then the movie was delayed - in my opinion that was when this thing started and every More
Posted by benskelly at 19:56 on 10 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed |
Give Mader a whole movie thereafter! More
Posted by Timmy_Brisby_05 at 19:14 on 10 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| Thank heavens! |
For those of us with small people obsessed by Cars, the news of a sequel is more than welcome. Just wish it would come out before 2011. Still, I'll have a chance to watch the first one another couple of thousand times before the sequel is out. More
Posted by geekgirl23 at 18:48 on 10 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| A Cars fan writes |
Yep.. i'm actually looking forward to this. and those of you who didn't like Cars. get over yourselves. Kids like cars and those of us who like cars like Cars.
Also, agreed that Brosnan's most likely for hte Bond (though I wouldn't discount Moore or Dalton)
My guess for the Queen is Rolls Royce Silver Ghost. More
Posted by Adrian at 17:52 on 10 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| If It's Gonna Be A Bond... |
It'll be Brosnan. First time since, well, Cars really, that I'm not excited about an upcoming Pixar movie. But maybe with a new director, it might have something more. No disrespect to Lasseter, but he just seemed to love the world of Cars far more than I ever could. More
Posted by chizmund at 16:58 on 10 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| Bad move |
From a studio that that has only ever done one sequel I'm suprised that they decided their next move to do a sequel to one of their biggest mistakes make Monsters Inc. 2 instead of this scrap metal. More
Posted by S1lent B0b at 16:57 on 10 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| Hmm |
Yeah, I'm in a agreement with everyone else here. Cars wasn't bad, but was overlong and nowhere near deserving of all the gushing it gets from John Lasseter.
As for Finn McMissile, they've just done Timothy Dalton so he's out. I insist on George Lazenby. More
Posted by The Tingler at 15:54 on 10 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
|
Altough still superior to most other studios' CG output, Cars is still the weakest of the Pixar bunch and the therefore the one that least deserves a sequel. The idea of talking cars has been done to death and the rather soft moralising of the first film is not something which needs repeating. Still, if there's one studio who can improve on the original, it's got to be Pixar. I just don't think it's worth it. More
Posted by evildave69 at 15:19 on 10 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| What's with... |
...the hanging asterisk? More
Posted by RogueElement at 15:03 on 10 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| Meh.... |
Seems weird that the one Pixar film that was never a 'must see' film gets a sequel. That said it's the only Pixar film I haven't seen so I can't really talk. Toy Story 2, The Incredibles (where's the sequel here eh) and Ratatouille are my favourites. More
Posted by Blyman at 15:03 on 10 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: |
An Aston Martin named Finn McMissile who acts like a British secret agent => me interested.
Mater involved in a storyline with said Aston Martin => me not interested.
The idea that anyone at Pixar finds Larry the Cable Guy to be anything more than an excruciatingly unfunny human being => me silently weeping.
More
Posted by Pigeon Army at 14:26 on 10 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
|
Could this be Pixar's first big mistake?
The Cars Short that played recently ("Tokyo Mater") was dreadful, and lets face it, the character of Mater is probably Pixars worst. I was amazed when I heard a sequel was being made (despite actually enjoying Cars), and this news doesn't really do anything other than hit home what a bad idea this seems. More
Posted by skeletonjack at 14:19 on 10 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| Silly Pixar |
Sounds as bad as you can expect from a sequel to one of their worst flicks.
Oh well. Toy Story 3 FTW! More
Posted by Ethanial at 14:10 on 10 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
|
Well, sounds like an awful lot to cram in, even if it is nearly 2 hours like the first. Any new information is always a reason to rejoice, and I'm still super-psyched for another Pixar movie. More
Posted by crazymoviesdude at 13:47 on 10 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
|
eh... *shrugs* Wasn't actually a fan of Cars so the sequel doesn't do much for me. More
Posted by nclowe at 13:43 on 10 September 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| |
