Register  |   Log In  |  
Sign up to our weekly newsletter    
Search   
Empire Magazine and iPad
Follow Me on Pinterest YouTube Tumblr
Empire
Trending On Empire
The Future Of Film
The 100 Greatest Video Games
Robin Williams: The Big Interview
Kevin Feige:
My Movie Life

The Marvel supremo's pick of the flicks
Want To Be An Empire Journalist?
Find out how here
Movie News

LATEST HEADLINES
TODAY
International Trailer For John Woo's The Crossing Debuts
Take your first look at what could be the Chinese Titanic
More Movie News

RELATED NEWS
11 August 2014
Justin Theroux Talks Zoolander 2
'It looks like it actually might be starting to get up and running''
More Movie News

RELATED FUTURE FILMS
Night At The Museum: Secret Of The Tomb
19 December 2014
More Future Films

RELATED REVIEWS
The Internship (2013)
Empire Star Rating
The Big Year (2011)
Empire Star Rating
Cars 2 (2011)
Empire Star Rating
Cars 2 (2011)
Empire Star Rating
Hall Pass (2011)
Empire Star Rating
More new cinemas releases
DVD & Blu-ray releases

Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed
With Brit secret agent Finn McMissile

10 September 2009  |  Written by Helen O'Hara  

submit to reddit

At this morning's Disney presentation in London's Leicester Square, John Lasseter gave us some fresh new details about the plot of the upcoming Cars 2, due in summer 2011, including the news that a large section of the plot will focus on Larry the Cable Guy's Mater.

The story sees Lightning McQueen (Owen Wilson), his pit team and new pit boss Mater head around the world for the Race of Champions, to take place in five different countries and involve the champions of different disciplines like Formula One and rally driving. First up is a race in Tokyo, starting at Mount Fuji and heading downtown; then there's a German race through the Black Forest; then "Porto Corsa" in Italy, which is based partly on the Monte Carlo Grand Prix; then a 24-hour race around Paris (so somewhat like Le Mans then) and finally a thrilling climax in London, approaching Buckingham Palace (where the guards appear to be Land Rovers).

But all this racing is not the only focus. Mater, who we know from the series of cartoon shorts Mater's Tall Tales (more on that in our blog in a minute) is prone to exaggeration, gets involved in a "Hitchcockian" case of mistaken identity, saves the life of a British secret agent called Finn McMissile (who looks a heck of a lot like an Aston Martin) and becomes embroiled in a huge spy thriller. Only no-one believes him. That too comes to a head at Buckingham Palace.

Along the way there are towtruck-abroad pictures to be taken at the Oktoberfest in Germany (where Mater wears "Materhosen") and harassing the aforementioned Palace Guards.

Cars 2 is being directed by Ratatouille producer Brad Lewis in his Pixar-directing debut. We're told that all the familiar voices will be returning, but we weren't told who would be voicing Finn McMissile. Still, if the studio aren't in talks with one of the former Bonds, we'd be amazed.

Check out more from Lasseter in our blog of today's announcements here.


Have Your Say
To comment on this, and all articles, register for free or login now.

Jeff Bridges In Talks For True Grit
Coen Brothers remake moves forward
Todd Field Accepts The Creed Of Violence
Update: He's got the funds to make it

Your Comments

RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed
Funny that ry 3]Cars 2 the news at the same time. It only serves to remind everyone of the massive quality gulf between their predecessors... More

Posted by David Somerset at 13:48 on 16 September 2009 | Report This Post

RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed
Cars 2 is fine by me, given I have two under 9's who enjoyed the 1st one a lot. I only hope the sequel has a Bugatti Veyron in it to keep my son happy.   On a related note, check out this link for free papercraft models of the cast of Cars www.paperian.com/webdude/bl.htmp;   More

Posted by piginapoke at 09:57 on 15 September 2009 | Report This Post

RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed
L: Deviation L: rawlinson L: Deviation L: rawlinson L: Deviation I ruined this thread. No you didn't. PA's and Elab's posts are still just a couple up and Benskelly could easily have responded to them and overlooked your posts, the fact that he didn't tends to show he has no real response to give. Unless he wants to pull out the brilliant reasoning he tried using against me a while back - telling me that 99% of the world disagree with me for disliking Meryl Streep. ot More

Posted by rawlinson at 23:09 on 13 September 2009 | Report This Post

RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed
L: rawlinson L: Deviation L: rawlinson L: Deviation I ruined this thread. No you didn't. PA's and Elab's posts are still just a couple up and Benskelly could easily have responded to them and overlooked your posts, the fact that he didn't tends to show he has no real response to give. Unless he wants to pull out the brilliant reasoning he tried using against me a while back - telling me that 99% of the world disagree with me for disliking Meryl Streep. ote] Surely no More

Posted by Deviation at 23:08 on 13 September 2009 | Report This Post

RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed
L: Deviation L: rawlinson L: Deviation I ruined this thread. No you didn't. PA's and Elab's posts are still just a couple up and Benskelly could easily have responded to them and overlooked your posts, the fact that he didn't tends to show he has no real response to give. Unless he wants to pull out the brilliant reasoning he tried using against me a while back - telling me that 99% of the world disagree with me for disliking Meryl Streep. ote] Surely not everybody in the More

Posted by rawlinson at 23:05 on 13 September 2009 | Report This Post

RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed
L: rawlinson L: Deviation I ruined this thread. No you didn't. PA's and Elab's posts are still just a couple up and Benskelly could easily have responded to them and overlooked your posts, the fact that he didn't tends to show he has no real response to give. Unless he wants to pull out the brilliant reasoning he tried using against me a while back - telling me that 99% of the world disagree with me for disliking Meryl Streep. ote]   Surely not everybody in the world like More

Posted by Deviation at 22:55 on 13 September 2009 | Report This Post

RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed
L: Deviation I ruined this thread. sp; No you didn't. PA's and Elab's posts are still just a couple up and Benskelly could easily have responded to them and overlooked your posts, the fact that he didn't tends to show he has no real response to give. Unless he wants to pull out the brilliant reasoning he tried using against me a while back - telling me that 99% of the world disagree with me for disliking Meryl Streep. More

Posted by rawlinson at 22:37 on 13 September 2009 | Report This Post

RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed
L: benskelly I apologize for my animated debate on the topic of Cars.  I can see now that I should have been discussing relevant things like "George Lucas fucking a lamp", the differences between pervy and sexy, and covering somebody with beauty juice.  I now understand the high standard of discussion here and how inappropriate my comments were. sp; I ruined this thread.   And I'm pretty sure PA and elab would still argue with you, since you didn't answer More

Posted by Deviation at 18:36 on 13 September 2009 | Report This Post

RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed
I apologize for my animated debate on the topic of Cars.  I can see now that I should have been discussing relevant things like "George Lucas fucking a lamp", the differences between pervy and sexy, and covering somebody with beauty juice.  I now understand the high standard of discussion here and how inappropriate my comments were. More

Posted by benskelly at 17:27 on 13 September 2009 | Report This Post

RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed
But they will, like they will get what beauty juice means. More

Posted by Deviation at 02:14 on 13 September 2009 | Report This Post

RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed
That's asking a lot. More

Posted by Pigeon Army at 02:13 on 13 September 2009 | Report This Post

RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed
L: Pigeon Army Actually, the word PERVY is a common joke on this forum. That's the first time I've encountered SEXY, and I've been in quite a few threads. Besides, the ordinary definition of SEXY is i]different to PERVY. So there. sp; They will still get it.   More

Posted by Deviation at 02:06 on 13 September 2009 | Report This Post

RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed
Actually, the word PERVY is a common joke on this forum. That's the first time I've encountered SEXY, and I've been in quite a few threads. Besides, the ordinary definition of SEXY is i]different to PERVY. So there. More

Posted by Pigeon Army at 02:02 on 13 September 2009 | Report This Post

RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed
L: Pigeon Army L: Deviation L: Pigeon Army L: Deviation Lucas fucking a lamp. SEXY! reserved so Devi doesn't alter it later to cover his arse. Qouted to show how PA can't get irony. rony has no bearing when things can be taken out of context. /quote]   Yeah but the word SEXY is a common joke in this forum, you poeple might use that prejudice to understand that's it a joke. More

Posted by Deviation at 01:57 on 13 September 2009 | Report This Post

RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed
L: Deviation L: Pigeon Army L: Deviation Lucas fucking a lamp. SEXY! reserved so Devi doesn't alter it later to cover his arse. Qouted to show how PA can't get irony. rony has no bearing when things can be taken out of context. More

Posted by Pigeon Army at 01:53 on 13 September 2009 | Report This Post

RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed
Woody in Brokeback Mountain 2? More

Posted by Timmy_Brisby_05 at 01:52 on 13 September 2009 | Report This Post

RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed
L: Pigeon Army L: Deviation Lucas fucking a lamp. SEXY! reserved so Devi doesn't alter it later to cover his arse. sp; Qouted to show how PA can't get irony. More

Posted by Deviation at 01:46 on 13 September 2009 | Report This Post

RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed
L: Deviation Lucas fucking a lamp. SEXY! reserved so Devi doesn't alter it later to cover his arse. More

Posted by Pigeon Army at 01:43 on 13 September 2009 | Report This Post

RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed
That's one of the few occasions where someone saying "pervy" would be warranted. More

Posted by FritzlFan at 01:31 on 13 September 2009 | Report This Post

RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed
L: Pigeon Army L: rawlinson L: elab49 I've now accepted those quotes will follow me to my dying breath in this place. ote] But I think in a good way because it is a great description of the film, and for one of the most disturbing porn movies of all time.ote] /quote]   Lucas fucking a lamp.   SEXY! More

Posted by Deviation at 01:28 on 13 September 2009 | Report This Post

RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed
L: rawlinson L: elab49 I've now accepted those quotes will follow me to my dying breath in this place. ote] But I think in a good way because it is a great description of the film, and for one of the most disturbing porn movies of all time.ote] More

Posted by Pigeon Army at 01:21 on 13 September 2009 | Report This Post

RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed
L: elab49 I've now accepted those quotes will follow me to my dying breath in this place. ote]   But I think in a good way because it is a great description of the film, and an idea for one of the most disturbing porn movies of all time. More

Posted by rawlinson at 20:35 on 12 September 2009 | Report This Post

RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed
L: benskelly Why do I get singled out for "taking pops" when the other poster did the same to me, and with just as much if not more "heated" energy?? I didn't call anybody names, so what's the problem?  ho took pops at you? I don't see anyone having aligned themselves against you for the purpose of belittling or mocking you, and I think that shows remarkable restraint when you bust out lines like - er poster is right - and I think he explained the use of the word "pretentious" p More

Posted by Pigeon Army at 12:09 on 12 September 2009 | Report This Post

RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed
I do find it rather odd - particularly for this film - how many people in this thread seem unable to accept people don't like Cars not because of a trailer reaction (I didn't see a trailer so I've no idea what the reaction was to), their political principles, the cash taken at the box office or because mummy (or inexplicably the Daily Mail) told them to. But just as that opinion was undoubtedly formed because you saw the film and liked it (at least I've not suggested you brainlessly like a More

Posted by elab49 at 11:52 on 12 September 2009 | Report This Post

RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed
L: crazymoviesdude Also, anyone who comments that Cars has less heart than any other Pixat film, is a little confused, and may have watched a different cut or a different movie entirely. If anything (and it is still one of the 'worse' Pixar movies) it has more heart than most. sp; Thank you for telling myself and anyone else who thinks it's heartless and soulless that we're "confused". Because if it wasn't for you making things really simple then I would have just thought that More

Posted by rawlinson at 10:02 on 12 September 2009 | Report This Post

RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed
I'll make this all really simple. Cars is a great movie. Pixar make fantastic-amazing-awesome movies. Whilst it beats all else, it's one of Pixar's weakest. Anyone who says that it's worse than any Dreamworks movie, is just trying to create a fuss. (I realise no one here has said that, but it's just a for-instance) Also, anyone who comments that Cars has less heart than any other Pixat film, is a little confused, and may have watched a different cut or a different movie entir More

Posted by crazymoviesdude at 08:52 on 12 September 2009 | Report This Post

RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed
L: elab49 Benskelly, no-one is trying to change opinions, it's a movie news thread. They're just /b] expressing them. Not entirely sure what line you mean - if it is 'glossy and soulless', then I'm afraid you're wrong about where it comes from (and apologies for that - it is a bit of an in-joke based on old reviews in my sig and it would probably have been fairer to make that clear). That said, Cars is hardly worth getting unnecessarily heated and taking pops at other posters.&n More

Posted by benskelly at 02:08 on 12 September 2009 | Report This Post

RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed
L: Deviation L: target L: Deviation L: elab49 L: benskelly Well, I agree with being civil. (ahem)  But maybe he just means that saying a movie that made $461,983,149 in worldwide gross is only liked by a "minority" could be perceived as a) presumptuous b) pretentious and/or c) completely inaccurate.  I'm not as fond of Finding Nemo - doesn't change that it was a huge hit. Pretending to what exactly, since the word has inexplicably been included there. More

Posted by rawlinson at 00:59 on 12 September 2009 | Report This Post

RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed
L: target L: Deviation L: elab49 L: benskelly Well, I agree with being civil. (ahem)  But maybe he just means that saying a movie that made $461,983,149 in worldwide gross is only liked by a "minority" could be perceived as a) presumptuous b) pretentious and/or c) completely inaccurate.  I'm not as fond of Finding Nemo - doesn't change that it was a huge hit. Pretending to what exactly, since the word has inexplicably been included there. I'd genuinely like More

Posted by Deviation at 00:39 on 12 September 2009 | Report This Post

RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed
Benskelly, no-one is trying to change opinions, it's a movie news thread. They're just /b] expressing them. Not entirely sure what line you mean - if it is 'glossy and soulless', then I'm afraid you're wrong about where it comes from (and apologies for that - it is a bit of an in-joke based on old reviews in my sig and it would probably have been fairer to make that clear).   That said, Cars is hardly worth getting unnecessarily heated and taking pops at other posters.   More

Posted by elab49 at 23:00 on 11 September 2009 | Report This Post

RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed
L: elab49 L: benskelly L: elab49 L: benskelly Well, I agree with being civil. (ahem)  But maybe he just means that saying a movie that made $461,983,149 in worldwide gross is only liked by a "minority" could be perceived as a) presumptuous b) pretentious and/or c) completely inaccurate.  I'm not as fond of Finding Nemo - doesn't change that it was a huge hit. Pretending to what exactly, since the word has inexplicably been included there. I'd genuinely like More

Posted by benskelly at 19:55 on 11 September 2009 | Report This Post

RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed
L: Deviation L: elab49 L: benskelly Well, I agree with being civil. (ahem)  But maybe he just means that saying a movie that made $461,983,149 in worldwide gross is only liked by a "minority" could be perceived as a) presumptuous b) pretentious and/or c) completely inaccurate.  I'm not as fond of Finding Nemo - doesn't change that it was a huge hit. Pretending to what exactly, since the word has inexplicably been included there. I'd genuinely like to know. More

Posted by target at 18:57 on 11 September 2009 | Report This Post

RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed
L: benskelly L: evildave69 f you who didn't like Cars. get over yourselves.ood work Adrian, of course you're right. The people who don't like Cars (erm, the majority I think), don't like it because they think they are better than it. Is that what you're suggesting? Now fair enough if you like it, that's perfectly fine by me but I don't think any of the 'dislikers' here are going to start assuming that you're a self-important tit just because you're in the minority of people who like More

Posted by Adrian at 15:54 on 11 September 2009 | Report This Post

RE: RE:
I liked Cars but thought it was the weakest Pixar film since "a bug's life".   If they want to make a sequel to one of their films why not "the incredibles"? More

Posted by JagLover at 13:52 on 11 September 2009 | Report This Post

RE: RE:
L: Pigeon Army L: rawlinson L: Pigeon Army The idea that anyone at Pixar finds Larry the Cable Guy to be anything more than an excruciatingly unfunny human being => me silently weeping. Isn't it more a case of knowing he's popular and sells to a certain audience than anyone at Pixar finding him funny? Although why anyone in the audience would find him funny is beyond me. It still amazes me that people from the South don't get incredibly offended by the ridiculous Southern More

Posted by rawlinson at 13:31 on 11 September 2009 | Report This Post

RE: RE:
L: rawlinson L: Pigeon Army The idea that anyone at Pixar finds Larry the Cable Guy to be anything more than an excruciatingly unfunny human being => me silently weeping. Isn't it more a case of knowing he's popular and sells to a certain audience than anyone at Pixar finding him funny? Although why anyone in the audience would find him funny is beyond me. It still amazes me that people from the South don't get incredibly offended by the ridiculous Southern stereotype created More

Posted by Pigeon Army at 13:21 on 11 September 2009 | Report This Post

RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed
L: benskelly L: elab49 L: benskelly Well, I agree with being civil. (ahem)  But maybe he just means that saying a movie that made $461,983,149 in worldwide gross is only liked by a "minority" could be perceived as a) presumptuous b) pretentious and/or c) completely inaccurate.  I'm not as fond of Finding Nemo - doesn't change that it was a huge hit. Pretending to what exactly, since the word has inexplicably been included there. I'd genuinely like to know. More

Posted by elab49 at 13:16 on 11 September 2009 | Report This Post

RE: RE:
L: Pigeon Army The idea that anyone at Pixar finds Larry the Cable Guy to be anything more than an excruciatingly unfunny human being => me silently weeping. sp; Isn't it more a case of knowing he's popular and sells to a certain audience than anyone at Pixar finding him funny? Although why anyone in the audience would find him funny is beyond me. It still amazes me that people from the South don't get incredibly offended by the ridiculous Southern stereotype created by a man bor More

Posted by rawlinson at 12:24 on 11 September 2009 | Report This Post

RE: Hollywood, UK
Cars Schmars. Bring on The Incredibles 2! More

Posted by David Somerset at 10:19 on 11 September 2009 | Report This Post

Hollywood, UK
Regardless of ephemeral "quibbles" about plot and actors and voices in a movie that will only be “in release” for six weeks anyway. The idea to merge US and UK Cinema is absolutely genius of vision; both economies are struggling. Disney is a forerunner in acknowledging the entertainment industry as merely being cog in the wheel of an overall global economy. The United States and all of its resources can no longer remain a completely insular nation. DISNEY under th More

Posted by GFT at 03:35 on 11 September 2009 | Report This Post

RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed
L: elab49 L: benskelly Well, I agree with being civil. (ahem)  But maybe he just means that saying a movie that made $461,983,149 in worldwide gross is only liked by a "minority" could be perceived as a) presumptuous b) pretentious and/or c) completely inaccurate.  I'm not as fond of Finding Nemo - doesn't change that it was a huge hit. Pretending to what exactly, since the word has inexplicably been included there. I'd genuinely like to know. Cash receipts are More

Posted by benskelly at 01:51 on 11 September 2009 | Report This Post

RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed
L: elab49 L: benskelly Well, I agree with being civil. (ahem)  But maybe he just means that saying a movie that made $461,983,149 in worldwide gross is only liked by a "minority" could be perceived as a) presumptuous b) pretentious and/or c) completely inaccurate.  I'm not as fond of Finding Nemo - doesn't change that it was a huge hit. Pretending to what exactly, since the word has inexplicably been included there. I'd genuinely like to know. Cash receipts are More

Posted by Deviation at 21:31 on 10 September 2009 | Report This Post

RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed
L: benskelly Well, I agree with being civil. (ahem)  But maybe he just means that saying a movie that made $461,983,149 in worldwide gross is only liked by a "minority" could be perceived as a) presumptuous b) pretentious and/or c) completely inaccurate.  I'm not as fond of Finding Nemo - doesn't change that it was a huge hit. sp; Pretending to what exactly, since the word has inexplicably been included there. I'd genuinely like to know.   Cash receipts are cou More

Posted by elab49 at 21:24 on 10 September 2009 | Report This Post

RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed
spend the time and investment on Cars 2 on an Incredibles sequel, but heh ho More

Posted by JIm R at 21:08 on 10 September 2009 | Report This Post

RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed
L: evildave69 f you who didn't like Cars. get over yourselves.ood work Adrian, of course you're right. The people who don't like Cars (erm, the majority I think), don't like it because they think they are better than it. Is that what you're suggesting? Now fair enough if you like it, that's perfectly fine by me but I don't think any of the 'dislikers' here are going to start assuming that you're a self-important tit just because you're in the minority of people who like it. Of course eve More

Posted by benskelly at 20:34 on 10 September 2009 | Report This Post

RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed
f you who didn't like Cars. get over yourselves.ood work Adrian, of course you're right. The people who don't like Cars (erm, the majority I think), don't like it because they think they are better than it. Is that what you're suggesting? Now fair enough if you like it, that's perfectly fine by me but I don't think any of the 'dislikers' here are going to start assuming that you're a self-important tit just because you're in the minority of people who like it. Of course everyone is welcome to More

Posted by evildave69 at 20:03 on 10 September 2009 | Report This Post

Uhm, Disagree With Everybody
Monsters, Inc and Finding Nemo are my least favorite Pixars - they're just too "kiddie-ish" for my tastes. I think Cars is fantastic fun with a great message and is truly one of the most beautiful LOOKING films they have ever done. I just don't get the conventional wisdom "disappointment" with this film, I really don't. It kinda' mystifies me. I think it started when the first trailer was not well-received and then the movie was delayed - in my opinion that was when this thing started and every More

Posted by benskelly at 19:56 on 10 September 2009 | Report This Post

RE: Cars 2 Plot Details Revealed
Give Mader a whole movie thereafter! More

Posted by Timmy_Brisby_05 at 19:14 on 10 September 2009 | Report This Post

Thank heavens!
For those of us with small people obsessed by Cars, the news of a sequel is more than welcome. Just wish it would come out before 2011. Still, I'll have a chance to watch the first one another couple of thousand times before the sequel is out. More

Posted by geekgirl23 at 18:48 on 10 September 2009 | Report This Post

A Cars fan writes
Yep.. i'm actually looking forward to this. and those of you who didn't like Cars. get over yourselves. Kids like cars and those of us who like cars like Cars. Also, agreed that Brosnan's most likely for hte Bond (though I wouldn't discount Moore or Dalton) My guess for the Queen is Rolls Royce Silver Ghost. More

Posted by Adrian at 17:52 on 10 September 2009 | Report This Post

If It's Gonna Be A Bond...
It'll be Brosnan. First time since, well, Cars really, that I'm not excited about an upcoming Pixar movie. But maybe with a new director, it might have something more. No disrespect to Lasseter, but he just seemed to love the world of Cars far more than I ever could. More

Posted by chizmund at 16:58 on 10 September 2009 | Report This Post

Bad move
From a studio that that has only ever done one sequel I'm suprised that they decided their next move to do a sequel to one of their biggest mistakes make Monsters Inc. 2 instead of this scrap metal. More

Posted by S1lent B0b at 16:57 on 10 September 2009 | Report This Post

Hmm
Yeah, I'm in a agreement with everyone else here. Cars wasn't bad, but was overlong and nowhere near deserving of all the gushing it gets from John Lasseter. As for Finn McMissile, they've just done Timothy Dalton so he's out. I insist on George Lazenby. More

Posted by The Tingler at 15:54 on 10 September 2009 | Report This Post

Altough still superior to most other studios' CG output, Cars is still the weakest of the Pixar bunch and the therefore the one that least deserves a sequel. The idea of talking cars has been done to death and the rather soft moralising of the first film is not something which needs repeating. Still, if there's one studio who can improve on the original, it's got to be Pixar. I just don't think it's worth it. More

Posted by evildave69 at 15:19 on 10 September 2009 | Report This Post

What's with...
...the hanging asterisk? More

Posted by RogueElement at 15:03 on 10 September 2009 | Report This Post

Meh....
Seems weird that the one Pixar film that was never a 'must see' film gets a sequel. That said it's the only Pixar film I haven't seen so I can't really talk. Toy Story 2, The Incredibles (where's the sequel here eh) and Ratatouille are my favourites. More

Posted by Blyman at 15:03 on 10 September 2009 | Report This Post

RE:
An Aston Martin named Finn McMissile who acts like a British secret agent => me interested. Mater involved in a storyline with said Aston Martin => me not interested. The idea that anyone at Pixar finds Larry the Cable Guy to be anything more than an excruciatingly unfunny human being => me silently weeping. More

Posted by Pigeon Army at 14:26 on 10 September 2009 | Report This Post

Could this be Pixar's first big mistake? The Cars Short that played recently ("Tokyo Mater") was dreadful, and lets face it, the character of Mater is probably Pixars worst. I was amazed when I heard a sequel was being made (despite actually enjoying Cars), and this news doesn't really do anything other than hit home what a bad idea this seems. More

Posted by skeletonjack at 14:19 on 10 September 2009 | Report This Post

Silly Pixar
Sounds as bad as you can expect from a sequel to one of their worst flicks. Oh well. Toy Story 3 FTW! More

Posted by Ethanial at 14:10 on 10 September 2009 | Report This Post

Well, sounds like an awful lot to cram in, even if it is nearly 2 hours like the first. Any new information is always a reason to rejoice, and I'm still super-psyched for another Pixar movie. More

Posted by crazymoviesdude at 13:47 on 10 September 2009 | Report This Post

eh... *shrugs* Wasn't actually a fan of Cars so the sequel doesn't do much for me. More

Posted by nclowe at 13:43 on 10 September 2009 | Report This Post

SPECIAL FEATURE
The 301 Greatest Movies Of All Time EMPIRE READERS' POLL: THE 301 GREATEST MOVIES OF ALL TIME
You turned out in your hundreds and thousands, and here are the results... Browse the full list


CURRENT HIGHLIGHTS
Empire's Gone Girl Review
Our official verdict on David Fincher's adaptation of the best-selling novel

The Future Of Film: The Streaming Services Will Be Major Studios
(Or how Hollywood will have to start worrying about Netflix)

The Empire Podcast #129: Liam Neeson Interview
Plus Max Irons, Sam Claflin, Douglas Booth, Holliday Grainger and Jessica Brown Findlay drop by to talk The Riot Club

The Future Of Film: We'll Be Watching Films In Virtual Reality
Immerse cinema aims to become the must-have experience for the filmgoers of the future

The Future Of Film: Cinema Will Cross The Uncanny Valley
The future of VFX, from believable digital humans to underwater mocap

The Future Of Film: There Will Be Another Indie Golden Age
Independent producers are growing from micro-budgets to something a lot bigger

Shut Up, World! Gary Busey Is Talking!
Strap yourselves in and meet a true Hollywood original.

Subscribe to Empire magazine
Get 6 Issues Of Empire For Only £15!

Get exclusive subscriber-only covers each month!

Subscribe today

Subscribe to Empire iPad edition
Get The Empire iPad Edition Today

Subscribe and save maney on annual digital subscription

Subscribe today
Buy single issues

Get 6 issues of Empire for just £15!
Get the world's greatest movie magazine delivered straight to your door! Subscribe today!
Empire's Film Studies 101 Series
Everything you ever wanted to know about filmmaking but were afraid to ask...
The Empire iPad Edition
With exclusive extras, interactive features, trailers and much more! Download now
Home  |  News  |  Blogs  |  Reviews  |  Future Films  |  Features  |  Interviews  |  Images  |  Competitions  |  Forum  |  iPad  |  Podcast  |  Magazine Contact Us  |  Empire FAQ  |  Subscribe To Empire  |  Register
© Bauer Consumer Media Ltd  |  Legal Info  |  Editorial Complaints  |  Privacy Policy  |  Bauer Entertainment Network
Bauer Consumer Media Ltd (company number 01176085 and registered address 1 Lincoln Court, Lincoln Road, Peterborough, England PE1 2RF)