| IMPACTANTE! |
estoy deseando que salga el teaser trailer!!! :D More
Posted by Cloriant at 19:59 on 21 April 2009 | Report This Post |
 |
|
|
| The Book |
I liked the first half of the book, but the rest was so soppy I wanted to vomit, so I hope Jackson brings the drama back into the final half. Like the look of the pic though. More
Posted by Pipkin3 at 16:38 on 21 April 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| i'm from norristown |
where this movie/book takes place More
Posted by finchlikesoasis at 16:36 on 21 April 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| mark wahlberg's acting |
i hope to god wahlberg can pull it of but i keep having nightmares about the happening.still i'm sure jackson wouldn't have picked him if he didn't think he could do it and he was on fire in the departed so let's cross everything and hope for the best More
Posted by bungalow69 at 23:47 on 20 April 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| mark wahlberg's acting |
i hope to god wahlberg can pull it of but i keep having nightmares about the happening.still i'm sure jackson wouldn't have picked him if he didn't think he could do it and he was on fire in the departed so let's cross everything and hope for the best More
Posted by bungalow69 at 23:24 on 20 April 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| mark wahlberg's acting |
i hope to god wahlberg can pull it of but i keep having nightmares about the happening.still i'm sure jackson wouldn't have picked him if he didn't think he could do it and he was on fire in the departed so let's cross everything and hope for the best More
Posted by bungalow69 at 23:18 on 20 April 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
|
I liked the book...i love Peter Jackson..i hate Marky Mark! More
Posted by markasmarv at 20:40 on 20 April 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: HOW LONG HAS THIS BEEN IN PRODUCTION? |
not sure if it is enou]ORIGINAL: elab49
I'm still not convinced. I dislike the book, the casting of the father is problematic. But I do like Jackson. I'm just not sure if it is enough to get me to part with my cinema £s for this.
'm reading the book now, and I love it. Though I agree that the casting of Wahlberg as the father is problematic. I don't think he can pull off the type of emotion he's character tries to evoke, I just don't see Wahlberg as that sort of actor.
More
Posted by near at 19:39 on 20 April 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: RE: |
Looks like heaven still looks like it always looks like. More
Posted by Proudfoot at 18:49 on 20 April 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: |
If I get to heaven & find out its run by Empire!! Well, I'll know I am in hell!!! More
Posted by Monkeyshaver at 16:31 on 20 April 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
|
As much a fan I am of LOTR, I cant see this being any good. The book was dull and drawn out (something Jackson is very familiar with) and the casting is ALL wrong. Rachel Weisz and Saorsie Ronan are the only good things about this film More
Posted by lona_no_friends at 16:26 on 20 April 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: who cares about the watermark? |
Believe me...I've read the script and Heaven will look nothing like that in the film. I think this pic is just for promo purposes or for the poster to convey the "heavenly" aspect to people. More
Posted by Roark17 at 15:16 on 20 April 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| who cares about the watermark? |
a bit of an over reaction to the watermark lads. feel the matter of more importance is the current form of Mark Whalberg. Having watched Max Payne the other day, I just can't get over how bad he was in it!he'd acting was terrible, and the seen where he's tryin to cry when some lad is talkin shit about his wife an kid, is the most cringing scene i'v ever seen him in (iv seen the scene where he talks to the plant in the happening). So i pursume this film will involve crying an gettin emitional, so More
Posted by gavoconnor at 14:58 on 20 April 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| Watermark... |
Totally over the top watermark.... FAIL!
"pick up the 20th birthday issue of Empire when it hits on Thursday, or pre-order it here."
Or just wait until it becomes available as a PDF on a torrent site... LOL More
Posted by keYserSOze2008 at 13:12 on 20 April 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| OH WOW!! We can now visit empireonline.com for all the latest mvie news? |
If yer worried about people nabbing the pic and not giving ye credit a small logo in the bottom right would have done fine. More
Posted by shanewire at 13:02 on 20 April 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: World Exclusive: First Lovely Bones Pic |
Who's the face in the clouds supposed to be?
Oh, and will Jackson make this twice as long as it needs to be, as he did with his bloated version of "King Kong"?
More
Posted by My name is Legion at 12:51 on 20 April 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: HOW LONG HAS THIS BEEN IN PRODUCTION? |
Peter Jackson has already made the films that he will be remembered for. It's all down hill from now on. More
Posted by boredbluekoala at 12:39 on 20 April 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: |
Charming.
Empire! Such cheek watermarking an exclusive! You should have left it out as you usually do so other sites and bloggers can rip it off without giving credit! More
Posted by C.C.C.P. at 12:20 on 20 April 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: |
I love how you had to put the watermark on there.
Any more crap like that and you can kiss your posting rights goodbye. - Neth
More
Posted by uheiberg at 12:07 on 20 April 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: HOW LONG HAS THIS BEEN IN PRODUCTION? |
I'm sure it'll get loads of critical acclaim, so many critics are insanely generous towards this man. More
Posted by Tech_Noir at 11:49 on 20 April 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: HOW LONG HAS THIS BEEN IN PRODUCTION? |
I'm still not convinced. I dislike the book, the casting of the father is problematic. But I do like Jackson. I'm just not sure if it is enough to get me to part with my cinema £s for this. More
Posted by elab49 at 11:33 on 20 April 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: HOW LONG HAS THIS BEEN IN PRODUCTION? |
L: boredbluekoala
And as for Heaven, yawn. Doesn't look any different in that shot from any other depiction of religious fantasy. Jackson is now Kubrick, taking far far far too long to produce a pic that shoulda been released ages ago. It will flop.
sp;
I think that's a little harsh. It probably wont flop. If anything, it will probably be a success due to the cast and fans of the book.
I put a lot of trust in to Jackson as a film maker as he (generally) delivers top films.
As for t More
Posted by I am Tetsuo at 11:27 on 20 April 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| Beautiful |
This looks like it will take on more of the style of Heavenly Creatures, which is no bad thing. To my (limited) knowledge, the reason this has taken so lond is that Jackson wasn't being shackled by a mjot studio and therefore took his time in PP - and he has been busy with a few other things.............I know it is another thread but whilst I'm fine with the Hobbit spanning the 2 films, I will be bitterly disappointed if there isn't a little bit of bridging if only to allow for the 'return' of More
Posted by Halfling at 11:16 on 20 April 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: HOW LONG HAS THIS BEEN IN PRODUCTION? |
L: boredbluekoala
And as for Heaven, yawn. Doesn't look any different in that shot from any other depiction of religious fantasy. Jackson is now Kubrick, taking far far far too long to produce a pic that shoulda been released ages ago. It will flop.
sp;
And if Jackson is Kubrick, despite being a flop it was be revisited and universally celebrated in years to come.
What an idiotic statement. More
Posted by The Todge at 11:08 on 20 April 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| HOW LONG HAS THIS BEEN IN PRODUCTION? |
And as for Heaven, yawn. Doesn't look any different in that shot from any other depiction of religious fantasy. Jackson is now Kubrick, taking far far far too long to produce a pic that shoulda been released ages ago. It will flop. More
Posted by boredbluekoala at 09:08 on 20 April 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
|
I hope Peter Jackson managed to dig out some acting talent from Mark Wahlberg otherwise this bit of casting is going to seriously f**k up what should be a good adaption. The book was marvellous. More
Posted by steveg66 at 08:57 on 20 April 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: World Exclusive: First Lovely Bones Pic |
The watermark has to be there to protect the exclusive though. There are plenty of movie sites and blogs out there reporting on it already - so until they can do the cheeky scan from the magazine itself, they gotta have a big, f*ck-off Empire logo on it! More
Posted by Acho at 08:55 on 20 April 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| Watermark |
Good Lord!!!! that watermark just totally ruins the picture. More
Posted by Roark17 at 03:16 on 20 April 2009 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| |
