| RE: Why all the negativity? |
Man, those two could practically fight with their sideburns. More
Posted by cold_one at 12:37 on 13 March 2008 | Report This Post |
 |
|
|
| RE: Why all the negativity? |
t doesn't look like sabertooth it's just liev schrieber with long sideburns and wearing olive green military gear. More
Posted by anakin solo at 12:03 on 13 March 2008 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: Why all the negativity? |
Pics of Sabretooth.
www.aintitcool.com/node/35842 More
Posted by Woger at 09:24 on 05 March 2008 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: Why all the negativity? |
comes down to it in the end it's still going to end up being named as the fourth xmen/wolverine movies because that was what they were anyway. More
Posted by anakin solo at 13:29 on 04 March 2008 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: Why all the negativity? |
tting more stupid the more i hear about it. More
Posted by anakin solo at 13:27 on 04 March 2008 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| Why all the negativity? |
Recall, if you will, that the characters announced thus far all directly relate to Wolverine's Weapon X arc - yes it's a number of characters, but it's not unreasonable considering they're all involved with that storyline.
The only one that is confusing to me is Gambit. Aside from that potential mis-step, I see no reason to crown this an "X-Men 4" until further notice. More
Posted by nbratten at 21:05 on 25 February 2008 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| deadpool? |
This is not going to be a good film, the only thing that might be good about it is that deadpool might be in it. More
Posted by anakin solo at 14:01 on 25 February 2008 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| more cast than X-men 3 |
and in a film about one guy. enough said. More
Posted by jonny-w at 19:21 on 22 February 2008 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| whos next, Nick Fury? |
how many mutants are going to be in this OK so we have Wolfie, obviously, Gambit, Silver More
Posted by OPtimusPrIMEruLES at 19:16 on 22 February 2008 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| Blade Trinity all over again? |
X-Men 4? Don't you mean Wolverine 4, as the other 3 were basically glory pieces for that psycho with claws. The X-Men had a tendency to win fights not only because they trained all the time but because they fought as a team something which never really happened in the movie.
This film will probably be as well handled as Cyclops' death, genius piece of writing there, so well done... More
Posted by fish that roared at 19:12 on 22 February 2008 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: |
L: MattCaine
Idiots? Harsh, but fair, or just harsh? :)
No we don't know anything yet, but, as a Wolverine fan, I'd like the movie to be about him.
And, I just feel that too many cameos etc, will confuse non X-man fans, of be shoe-horned in a horribly cheesy way...
I just want the my favourite ball of barely surpressed rage to be the star, bub!
agree. And Blade 3 IS a cracking example. Lets hope they ARE cameos and not supporting cast or it'll turn into X-Men Origins: W More
Posted by jimoakley666 at 13:33 on 22 February 2008 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
|
Idiots? Harsh, but fair, or just harsh? :)
No we don't know anything yet, but, as a Wolverine fan, I'd like the movie to be about him.
And, I just feel that too many cameos etc, will confuse non X-man fans, of be shoe-horned in a horribly cheesy way...
I just want the my favourite ball of barely surpressed rage to be the star, bub!
More
Posted by MattCaine at 13:15 on 22 February 2008 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| YEAH!!!! |
A LOT OF PEOPLE THAT I LIKE IS IN THIS MOVIE!! WILL.I.AM!!! More
Posted by TheHunkIsSprunk at 13:13 on 22 February 2008 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
|
Wthell, how many mutants are in this thing? Need more screentime for Gambit! More
Posted by Bluehawk at 12:25 on 22 February 2008 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
|
WHAT PART OF CAMEOS DONT YOU IDIOTS UNDERSTAND? It means they will appear for a short amount of time, and as no one actually knows what the story of this flick is going to be. So how about you wait until we have at least some sort of storyline before you go into fanboy mode and tear it too pieces. More
Posted by clarkkent at 12:21 on 22 February 2008 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: Told ya |
This is me being very nerdy...
Weapon X
Fueled by the betrayal, Nord became one of the most efficient covert operatives in Germany. In the 1960s, his exploits caught the attention of the CIA, who offered him a spot in the clandestine Team X. He agreed, and at this time, changed his name to David North. As a part of Team X, he was one of several mutant operatives the government experimented on and utilized. Each member unknowingly received false memory implants, and North received an aging s More
Posted by jimoakley666 at 10:53 on 22 February 2008 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| Told ya |
I said there would be a story of Mavrick / Agent Zero cast. He is a mutant though. And German to boot. Christopher Nord, Agent Zero, Ability to absorb kinetic energy, Force blasts, Accelerated healing factor, No discernible scent, Anti-healing factor corrosive. Can you see where this is going?
And as for the hobbit, he's playing Beak. Barnell Bohusk. He actually looks the part in a funny way...
http://www.marvel.com/universe/Beak More
Posted by jimoakley666 at 10:46 on 22 February 2008 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: Blade Trinity all over again? |
at least Monagan has a decent power....but another character? More
Posted by kumar at 10:23 on 22 February 2008 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| Blade Trinity all over again? |
MattCaine is spot on. Let's call this X-Men 4!! In the early days, Wolverine was a mysterious character, but Marvel have diluted his history to the point that he's no longer enigmatic or special. In a film about Wolverine, I want to see him in the spotlight. What are the odds this turns into Blade Trinity, with the main character relegated to the background? More
Posted by ButchCassidy at 10:18 on 22 February 2008 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| RE: Too mant Mutants!? |
im getting pretty excited about this movie now, i never saw x3 as i didnt want ratner to spoil my love of bryan singers films (still cant believe he ponced off to make one of the dullest superhero flicks of all time having just made the most exhilarating) so im wanting another dose of wolverine... More
Posted by pgtipsp at 10:08 on 22 February 2008 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| Too mant Mutants!? |
Um... I think there's already way too many mutant cameos turning up in this movie!
Is it about Wolverine, or is it about Weapon X?
Even the comics spoilt Wolvies uniquness with too many Weapon X's, XII's, etc and the never ending parade of 'Mutant's with healinfg factors'.
May as well call this movie X-Men 4. : (
More
Posted by MattCaine at 09:56 on 22 February 2008 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
|
bird? i thought it was beak More
Posted by HoboCop at 08:22 on 22 February 2008 | Report This Post |
|
|
|
| |
