|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
John Moore is busy, which comes as something of a surprise. It's the day after his new movie, A Good Day To Die Hard, has screened for the first time, so Empire expects to find the 42-year-old Irishman kicking back. Maybe even sitting on a beach, earning 20 per cent. That's not even remotely the case. Instead, we find Moore deep in the bowels of the John Ford dubbing theatre on the Fox lot in LA where, surrounded by his trusted editing team, he's going over two separate versions of the movie, which takes Bruce Willis' John McClane to Moscow, ultimately teaming up with his son, Jack (Jai Courtney) in order to take down some Russian terrorists. One version of the movie is Moore's Director's Cut, which will be substantially longer than the 97 minute-long theatrical version, with the Moscow-levelling car chase around "30%" longer. The second - which has caused some contentiousness over here - is the 12A version that Fox have requested specifically to play in the UK (the version that will play in the US is filled with swearing and splashes of claret, and is R-rated). On screen, we watch as someone has a gun put to his head, and his brains promptly blown out. "That won't be in the UK," says Moore, half-laughing, half-sighing. No wonder - he has about ten days left to finish both versions, as well as embark upon a press tour that will boost his air miles, but eat up his time. Still, he takes 30 minutes out to retire to a sofa and have a chat with Empire about the trials and tribulations of dying hard... Warning: one of Moore's answers contains a spoiler - which you can read by highlighting the text. ![]() You must be exhausted. (Laughs) Yeah. They pick a release date for the movie and then you back into it. To be honest, Bruce had wanted to make this movie for about three years. Maybe about four. He came right off number four and was like, "That was kind of fun, let's do another one." And he knew he wanted it to be about the son. There were a lot of iterations and a lot of stories. At one point the son was going to be in the Special Forces in Afghanistan and there was an Islamic terrorist plot, and I think Mamma Mia 2 had an Islamic terrorist plot at some point. There was a lot of toing and froing about that.
The plot stuff, he was never going to let it be a cutesy recall to anything the other Die Hards have done. I was asked the other day by a lazy journalist what influence Die Hard had on other action movies and I said, "None, you fucking wish it had." Die Hard is a fucking amazingly good script. Don't bless that garbage by associating it with fucking Die Hard, by putting it in that heap with action movies. I don't know if we've succeeded or failed on this one, but know that we tried and Bruce was like, "Try harder, try harder" up until the moment you shoot it. I wasn't exaggerating when I said you'd be on set and he'd be like, "This is ok, but..." And I'd be like, but you agreed that last night. His whole thing was, "But that was last night..."
[Spoilers follow - highlight text below to reveal the answer] We had to walk up and tell Sebastian Koch, "You're the bad guy." He was like, what the fuck are you talking about? I'm Komarov. "Yeah, no, you're the bad guy." And he was excited - who doesn't want to play the bad guy? There was a moment when it was a great idea, but how the fuck do we implement it? Does he know? Does she know? Hang on, maybe it still fucking doesn't make any sense!" (Laughs) "If he planned this and wait a minute, the daughter's in on it too, it makes sense, she's putting one over on Chagarin, the whole thing was a construct. Phew!" There was a crack pipe hit of "he's the bad guy", but not all scripts are created equal, and we could have annoyed the audience on the drive home. It was tough, man. We're Rubik's Cubing it and hoping desperately that it all clicks. That's crucial for Die Hard. [End of spoilers] If Die Hard were to ever take its foot off the gas in terms of its responsibility to be a really well-plotted movie, that would be it, it's gone, the franchise would go down in flames. We can blow shit up all day, it's great, it's expensive and the bar's getting higher, but there are going to be teams of men ready, willing and able to do it. But is the script good? Is the plot worthy of a Die Hard? I say thank God for Bruce and that he still has the star power. There's not even a hint of him doing it for the paycheck. He's still Bruce.
His whole thing, talking to me during the movie, was dignity, as long as we do it with dignity. I think he was genuinely concerned - don't you dare make me look stupid or ridiculous. We pushed it. We have men jumping out of windows, never really advisable but within the canon of Die Hard, where he is a notable window-jumper, you might scrape by. We'll take a bit of heat, we'll get beat up a little for it, but I hope more people than not will give you that one, because it's a little referential but deferentially so. I hope we haven't fucking ruined it and gone cheap. I hope we were cautious enough about that. It's why Bruce would never say, "Shoot the glass." The Jack character would be like, "Stop filming!" And he looks in the camera and goes, you know, "From the 1988 film, Die Hard."
If he thinks of something, it's going to be McClane-esque with a 25-year study of it. If I think of something McClane-esque, it'll be with the consciousness of a fan. Am I going to be the wildlife photographer saying, here comes the snow leopard, let's film him, or shall we fake it in the studio? The approach was to take one constant, Bruce as McClane and he knows what to do, and put the rest around that. I'm confident that that was the smart thing to do. It also made sure he brought his A game, and the contract was I'll film it, you do your thing and I'll give you as much direction as you want, but know that I won't let you down.
What I'm proud about is we held our nerve. "And right at the end, the son goes "˜Yippee-ki-yay'!" Seriously, go fucking kill yourself if that's your pitch. There were times when ideas like that had to be taken out the back and strangled and drowned, because it's a flighty idea and it's suddenly in the room. Jack McClane has not seen Die Hard. He has not seen the film! But Bruce is the guy at the nightclub with the rope: "Sorry mate, you're not getting in tonight." So was he difficult? You bet your life he was. Was he demanding? Abso-fucking-lutely. And thank God for him, because there are a lot of people who think it's great, but their names aren't up there. A Good Day To Die Hard is in cinemas on February 14.
Interview by Chris Hewitt
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| Home | News | Blogs | Reviews | Future Films | Features | Interviews | Images | Competitions | Forum | iPad | Podcast | Magazine | Contact Us | Empire FAQ | Subscribe To Empire | Register | |||||||||
| © Bauer Consumer Media | Terms And Conditions | Our Data Promise To You | Bauer Entertainment Network | ||||||||||
| Bauer Consumer Media. Company number 1176085 (England). Registered Office: 21 Holborn Viaduct, London EC1A 2DY |