Register  |   Log In  |  
Sign up to our weekly newsletter    
Follow us on   
Search   
Forum Home Register for Free! Log In Moderator Tickets FAQ Users Online

The Queen

 
Logged in as: Guest
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Film Forums] >> Film Reviews >> The Queen Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
The Queen - 12/9/2006 4:40:31 PM   
Empire Admin

 

Posts: 26334
Joined: 29/6/2005
Post your comments on this article
Post #: 1
Waaaay more than your usual telly flick. - 12/9/2006 4:40:42 PM   
phaeton


Posts: 214
Joined: 4/10/2005
From: London
Really excellent: it won't just be your mum who'll like it that's for sure. Not as convinced by Mirren's performance though, was too much like watching Helen Mirren delight in playing Helen Mirren and she "assumes" the Queen's way of speaking during her speech to the nation in such an abrupt way that it's a bit like Dead Ringers. Sheen for Oscar though.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 2
- 13/9/2006 7:53:13 AM   
skeletonjack


Posts: 1297
Joined: 30/9/2005
Saw this at a preview last night. I thought it was good with some excellent performances: Helen Mirren was superb as was Michael Sheen as Tony Blair. The only actor who didn't quite click for me was James Cromwell. An interesting little film, though I do feel it is probably better suited for the small screen.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 3
a personal view - 15/9/2006 4:30:25 PM   
janeguthrietate

 

Posts: 2
Joined: 2/10/2005
From: east renfrewshire, scotland
Helen Mirren's impersonation, as that was in essence what it was, was superb. The rest, not so su[erb at all. I would give this a 2 star rating only. The story was morer than a little flawed. To try to say the Queen was more emotionally distraught at an animal's death than Diana's takes it too far. The referral that Charles would be the future King of ENGLAND incensed me. Queen Elizabeth is in fact, the FIRST in Scotland, not the Second. If Charles takes over, he is King of England, SCOTLAND, NORTHERN IRELAND AND WALES. And people wonder why some Scots, not me, are wanting independence??? This helps their cause. I support a united Great Britain and Northern Ireland totally . This film has put this back by years. Too much was left out. What was in was often conjecture. Too many liberties. Overhyped, overstarred.........you will see for yourselves when you go. Good to Fair. No better.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 4
a personal view - 15/9/2006 4:30:38 PM   
janeguthrietate

 

Posts: 2
Joined: 2/10/2005
From: east renfrewshire, scotland
Helen Mirren's impersonation, as that was in essence what it was, was superb. The rest, not so su[erb at all. I would give this a 2 star rating only. The story was morer than a little flawed. To try to say the Queen was more emotionally distraught at an animal's death than Diana's takes it too far. The referral that Charles would be the future King of ENGLAND incensed me. Queen Elizabeth is in fact, the FIRST in Scotland, not the Second. If Charles takes over, he is King of England, SCOTLAND, NORTHERN IRELAND AND WALES. And people wonder why some Scots, not me, are wanting independence??? This helps their cause. I support a united Great Britain and Northern Ireland totally . This film has put this back by years. Too much was left out. What was in was often conjecture. Too many liberties. Overhyped, overstarred.........you will see for yourselves when you go. Good to Fair. No better.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 5
RE: a personal view - 16/9/2006 8:46:00 PM   
felix sore foot


Posts: 322
Joined: 21/7/2006
From: Renfrewshire
The performances were excellent pretty much throughout, Michael Sheen showing immense versatility after his turn as Kenneth Williams on BBC3 earlier this year. The story does lack a lot, especially as it depicts her maj as the one taking all the decisions to avoid contact with her subjects. We surely know enough about the House of Windsor to know that matters of protocol are not hers to make alone and just how much HAS changed since Diana's death? Very little.
As much as I enjoyed this film, I agree that it would probably be more at home on MORE4 than at the local fleapit. But it was an entertaining 97 minutes, reservations aside.

_____________________________

nothing worth knowing can be understood with the mind

(in reply to janeguthrietate)
Post #: 6
The Queen - 17/9/2006 1:51:18 AM   
Philconcannon

 

Posts: 135
Joined: 30/9/2005
From: London
Where were you on August 30th 1997? The day Princess Diana died in a car crash has become a milestone day in recent British history, the day a nation mourned not only the loss of a princess, but also the loss of a celebrity and icon. The momentous seven days which followed saw the country turn itself inside-out with grief, an unprecedented outpouring of emotion which brought life in this country to a standstill. Millions of inconsolable people flocked to London, mountains of wreaths were laid at Buckingham palace, and Elton John made some adjustments to his Candle in the Wind. It was a strange, strange time.

But during all the hullabaloo, there were a few notable people who were conspicuous by their absence. The Royal Family were staying in Scotland at the time of Diana's death, and while London was being overwhelmed with mourners, they refused to break protocol and make any public declarations on the matter. As the days went on, the silence from the Royals was deafening. Newspapers openly demanded some reaction from The Queen, the public were dismayed that there was no flag at half-mast over the palace, and national confidence in the Monarchy was being eroded by the day. While new Prime Minister Tony Blair took advantage of the nation's mood to cement his popularity, the Royal Family was facing its biggest crisis in years.

Diana's death, and the craziness which followed it, are the focus of Stephen Frears' hugely enjoyable The Queen. Scripted by Peter Morgan, the film successfully recreates the weird atmosphere which enveloped Britain at that time, and it allows us a peek behind the scenes to give us an idea of what exactly was going on in the corridors of power when some tough decisions were being made.

Frears opens the film on May 2nd, on the day Tony Blair (Michael Sheen) came to power with a landslide victory. The Queen (Helen Mirren) makes no attempt to disguise her suspicion at Blair's talk of 'modernisation', and their first meeting after his victory is a wonderfully tetchy encounter in which Her Majesty lets this young upstart know where he stands in no uncertain terms. But after Diana's death, modernisation quickly becomes the crux of the issue. The Queen believes in tradition, believes that things should be done a certain way, but she had never before dealt with an situation like this, and she quickly discovers that her views are completely out of touch with the mood of the nation.

By contrast, New Labour judges the prevailing atmosphere perfectly, and with Alistair Campbell (Mark Bazeley) manipulating events they manage to spin this enormous event to their advantage. The film becomes a complex battle of wills between the government and the monarchy; Blair urges The Queen to make some gesture of grief to satisfy the baying crowds, but she refuses to back down. Diana was no longer a member of The Royal Family, she reasons, why should this be anything more than a private matter? Why should she drop everything and rush to London before she has tended to the well-being of her grandsons? She is supported by The Duke of Edinburgh (James Cromwell), but Prince Charles (Alex Jennings) disagrees with her refusal to compromise, and he allies himself with Blair in a bid to win her round.

Both The Queen and Blair were trying to find their way through uncharted waters during this time, and Frears' reconstruction of a tense and sensitive period is smart and evocative. With judicious use of archive news footage he reminds us of the remarkable scenes which occurred around Buckingham Palace, and the splicing of the actors into this footage is smooth and effective. Frears' direction here is low-key and unobtrusive; he simply does what he can to allow Peter Morgan's gem of a screenplay to shine. He is also smart enough to realise that his cast are good enough to carry the film, and he's dead right about that.

This is by far the most intimate and audacious film portrait of a living monarch, and Helen Mirren has the intimidating task of bringing this intensely private woman to life. The Queen is depicted as strong-willed and reserved, but also witty and sarcastic on occasion; she keeps a tight rein on her emotions, and in one touching scene the film allows her to shed a few tears, but only with her back to the camera, refusing to articulate the real reason behind the incident. Mirren takes the role and works wonders with it. With a wig and a bit of padding she looks uncannily like Her Majesty, and she gives a performance which goes beyond mimicry, she breathes life into a woman we have only really seen from a distance and makes her a complex, fully-rounded human being.

Mirren will undoubtedly be in the frame when awards season comes around, but Michael Sheen's hilarious portrayal of Tony Blair deserves some recognition too. Sheen has been here before with Frears, he played Blair in the 2003 TV drama The Deal, which focused on the Prime Minister's relationship with Gordon Brown, and he reprises his role in The Queen with great relish. His Blair is bouncy, twitchy and eager-to-please, but he also possesses a keen sense of public relations and a steely determination to guide The Queen into new territory. Sheen nails the Blair mannerisms and voice, but like Mirren he generates a whole person beyond the public image. The two main characters in this power play couldn't be more different, and their central conflict is utterly compelling.

The supporting cast is brilliantly chosen too. James Cromwell is a hoot as a grouchy Prince Philip, and he gets big laughs with many of his lines, particularly when he dismisses the guest list for Diana's funeral as "a chorus line of soap stars and homosexuals”. Mark Bazeley wears a permanent smirk as a sly and sneaky Alistair Campbell, Alex Jennings adds an unexpected note of emotion to his role as Charles, and Roger Allam is excellent as The Queen's aide, whose loyalties waver when he realises the weight of public opinion is turning against the Monarchy. As well as being a smart and incisive look at the private sides of public figures, this is also one of the year's funniest films, with some lovely gags tossed into the mix. My favourite came up when Blair was told that Gordon Brown was on the telephone for him, and he replied with "tell him to hang on”. He's still waiting, Tony.

Eventually, The Queen came to London, made a speech, and life went back to normal. What The Queen gives us is a thought-provoking look at what a torrid time this must have been for the Royals. The public were quick to dismiss the Monarchy as cruel and unfeeling when they failed to put their grief on display for all to see, but who's to say they weren't suffering themselves as they experienced a seismic shift in public perception, threatening hundreds of years of tradition which their lives had been built upon?

There are a few flaws here and there, such as an occasional lapse into obvious metaphor and a clumsily handled outburst by Blair late on, but so much of the film is a triumph, and it feels churlish to quibble over minor details when we are presented with a British film of this rare quality. The Queen puts a human face on the Monarchy and tells the story in a balanced, intelligent and ultimately quite moving fashion. In their first scene together The Queen tells Blair that she has seen ten Prime Ministers come and go before him, and with Blair calling it a day next year she'll soon be able to chalk up number eleven. The Queen is still there, for better or for worse, and one can only have respect for the way she handled herself in these difficult times. As she says during the film, "this is how we do things in this country. Quietly, with dignity”.

< Message edited by Philconcannon -- 15/10/2006 6:26:12 PM >

(in reply to felix sore foot)
Post #: 7
RE: Jewel in the Crown - 21/9/2006 5:15:57 PM   
Cruisecontroller


Posts: 4381
Joined: 28/4/2006
No nothing to do with Graheme Norton or John Humphries. Instead the working relationship between Tony Blair from when he became Prime Minster and her Majesty through the most difficult week of her reign when Princess Diana died and how they dealt and resolved the fallout from the publics response.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Philconcannon

Alex Jennings adds an unexpected note of emotion to his role as Charles,



That is the only thing I disagree with you about this otherwise excellent film I thought Alex Jennings was the worst thing in it.  His performance for me was impossible to take seriously like a bad Michael Yarwood impression. Mind you the actor from Six Feet Under who played the Duke of Edinburgh didn`t look anything like him either but at least his verbal impression and mannerisms were spot on like the actor who played but didn`t look anything like Alastair Campbill! They didn`t exactly do those two people any favours though showing the Duke to be very rude and grumpy and Alastair Campbell to be cynical to a horrible extent.

The film could have been a poor mans extended Rory Bremmner or Dead Ringers sketch but apart from the above points was overall a really good film. If it wasn`t for Alex Jennings Prince Charles I would have given this five stars but alas it has to be four.

It shows both sides very well regarding the publics grief at the loss of a Princess most of the public adored and on the other hand an important reminder that the Windsors were along with the Spencers and her close friends grieving too and needed time away to do so in private. However for the Windsors do so without any statements or expressions of sadness was a terrible misjudgement and no matter how powerful the Queen is as Sovereign at the end of the day she serves us and if we ain`t happy with her she has to get her act together! Helen Mirrin alone makes this unmissable as her performance is uncanny, sympathatic and moving as The Queen. She has certainly served her public image well and most will I`m sure be more understanding of her behaviour after seeing this (don`t think the same can be said for the Duke of Edinburgh though!). Micheal Sheen is almost as good as Tony Blair and does his public image no harm and as much good as the Queens. I also enjoyed Helen McCroy as a cheeky quitely anti Monarchist Cherie Blair and Sylvia Sims as a lovable amusing Queen Mother.  

To understand what the situation was like for the public and everyone else involved at the time and as entertainment this is really good but I don`t think we should take for granted that the conversations shown were as seen. Alot of possibly imagined or dilebrately satrical dialogue is more likely the case here. A must see though! 

_____________________________

MyDVDCollection.http://www.empireonline.com/myempire/mydvdcollection.asp?UID=49319

Last five movies seen & rated by me.

1. Star Trek: Into Darkness. 5/5
2. I`m So Excited. 3/5
3. Iron Man 3. 4/5
4. Olympus Has Fallen. 4/5
5. Oblivon. 3/5

(in reply to Philconcannon)
Post #: 8
RE: Jewel in the Crown - 22/9/2006 12:01:09 AM   
Stillwater


Posts: 1649
Joined: 30/9/2005
I bet a lot of people are going to miss out on this movie because of what they think the subject matter will be.  I myself remember upon seeing the poster a few months ago sniggering to myself and thinking why the hell would you want to see that.  This film is however actually quite excellent, Helen Mirrin is fabulous in her portrayal as the Queen and the supporting cast is excellent too.  If you are interested in seeing an indepth look at the relationship between the govt and the Queen then this is great for that.  I also liked how the movie did not portray Tony Blair as an anti-monarchist and instead emphasised his level of respect for the Queen.

in response to the animal thing - although its probably unlikely that the Queen was more upset about a stag than Diana, lets do remember that the Queen and Diana did not get along whatsoever.

Jane - im scottish too but you are NITPICKING about irrelevant little details

_____________________________

Forum Innuendo Champion 2009

"great art is about conflict and pain and guilt and longing and love disguised as sex, and sex disguised as love..."

" There is a tide in the affairs of men. Which taken at the flood, leads on to fortune; Omitted, all the voyage of their life Is bound in shallows and in miseries "

(in reply to Cruisecontroller)
Post #: 9
RE: Jewel in the Crown - 22/9/2006 3:54:52 PM   
Monkeyshaver

 

Posts: 4734
Joined: 30/9/2005
From: La Planete Des Singe
Didn’t have any interest in reliving all that hoopla about the nation mourning the death of Diana. But the legendary Sylvia Sims plays the Queen Mum!! Gotta see this now!

_____________________________

Monkeyshaver is currently watching Doctor Who on the office TV.

(in reply to Stillwater)
Post #: 10
RE: Jewel in the Crown - 22/9/2006 4:20:47 PM   
matty_b


Posts: 12861
Joined: 19/10/2005
From: Outpost 31 calling McMurtle.
Very enjoyable, and surprisingly funny in places. Mirren is wonderful as is Michael Sheen as Blair. I actually laughed out loud when I first saw him because he'd nailed the voice and mannerisms so perfectly - although he also looked strangely like Simon Pegg.

It's very well directed too - not overly showy, but there's a lot of subtle differences drawn between the life of the Windsors and the life of the Blairs simply through minute adjustments of cinematography and mise-en-scene and there's a brilliant use of Diana footage where Diana's face is frozen mid-turn, seemingly smirking at the Queen. The only false note is struck at the end with Blair's outburst at Alistair Campbell (an excellent performance by Mark Bazeley), but otherwise it's an excellent look at one of the most famous weeks in British history from an unusual perspective. Is it balanced fairly? Well, Charles gets a surprisingly positive spin and Blair is made to look like a bumbler at times, but it's not really about the politics, it's about survival.

_____________________________

quote:

ORIGINAL: Cool Breeze
Mattyb is a shining example of what the perfect Empire Forum member is.


(in reply to Monkeyshaver)
Post #: 11
RE: Jewel in the Crown - 27/9/2006 11:23:17 AM   
Empitomezzo


Posts: 1763
Joined: 24/10/2005
From: London
On the 1st of September 1997, the world saw tragedy. In the turmoil that followed, Princess Diana’s death was blamed on the Media, the driver, and an entire array of others, before the upset and ill-meant malaise of the public was turned sneeringly to the Royal Family. In this film, we get a glimpse of what life was like inside Buckingham Palace, and whether The Queen (played here by Helen Mirren) was being cold and uncaring, or, if she was the one who was suffering most of all.
 
Director Stephen Frears recreates one week in 1997 with intelligent, deft strokes. The presentation of Princess Diana is artfully done in news snippets and archive footage, which brilliantly demonstrates the high impact her being had on people. The design of The Queen’s home and her surroundings are convincing without being overly showy, and the Alexandre Desplat score is by turns dark, sad, and grand, perfectly summarizing the mindset of those involved.
 
But the film belongs to Helen Mirren, who takes on of her most challenging roles and showing us that behind the Queen lay a person, and one with feelings. In her role as the reigning lady, she is the epitome of suppressed disappointment and hurt. The Queen chose not to make a parade of her feelings in response to Diana’s death, and, though the nation hated her for it, we learn here that it is not because she did not care, but because she honestly thought it the right thing to do.
 
As a young and newly elected Tony Blair with big aspirations and an even bigger grin, Michael Sheen is freakishly good as the Prime Minister. His performance shows a likable side of the prime minister in his refusal to side with the public over the denouncement of The Queen for her actions, and his attempts to make The Queen limit the damage that she has made is the basis for a very insightful story.
 
Other delights in this film come in some high-brow one-liners and some other good performances, but the best thing about it is how it manages to make you think, and even empathise with a group of people that you never saw yourself giving a toss about. At under 100 minutes, The Queen is funny, pointed and highly intelligent, showing that, as always, there are two sides to every story.

_____________________________

http://zummer.blogspot.com/

(in reply to matty_b)
Post #: 12
RE: The Queen - 30/9/2006 9:10:05 PM   
Timon


Posts: 14545
Joined: 30/9/2005
From: Bristol
An excellent film with Martin Sheen's portrayal of Blair scarily accurate. All the cast I felt were spot on especially James Cromwell importing the right level of bluster and general incompetence as the Duke Of Edinburgh, but as the title suggests this film is about The Queen and Helen Mirren's performance is stunning to say the least.

While public opinion may have been against her, it is hard to imagine what must have been going through her head that week. Being bought up to be "quiet and dignified", the public's tendenacy for open grief is something that she was completely unprepared for and suprised by especially for a woman who she was never particularly fond of.

This isn't the damming portrayal of the Royal Family that many reviewers may have you believe and instead firmly walks the line between the Royal Family's faux pas and the new PM's desire to do the right thing and help the Royals in this unprecedented affair.

An astounding film and one of the most poignant i've seen this year.

_____________________________

"I put no stock in religion. By the word 'religion', I have seen the lunacy of fanatics of every denomination be called 'The Will of God'. Holiness is in right action and courage on behalf of those who cannot defend themselves."

Twitter: @timonsingh

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 13
great film - 1/10/2006 2:44:51 PM   
vivlitherland


Posts: 110
Joined: 7/5/2006
From: York
saw it last fri and thought it was excellent
the performances were pretty amazing especially Helen Mirren and i thought that guy who played tony blair was perfect
but i did think they made cherie blair out to be a lady macbeth type. is that correct? who knows.
nearly cried about five times but then again i seem to cry at nearly every film.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 14
An audience with The Queen - 1/10/2006 3:54:19 PM   
02PARSIM

 

Posts: 73
Joined: 6/9/2006
From: Ipswich
The Queen was a movie that I never pictured myself going to watch on the cinema, sure I'd probably have watched it when it came around on TV, but it just seemed a little bit more of a movie designed to go straight to television rather than to go onto your local multiplex. However, as I entered the cinema I discovered the two movies that I wanted to see, World Trade Center and Click, were either not showing due to technical difficulties or were already fully booked. As I have seen most of the other movies on the cinema at that time the only other one still showing was The Queen. Admiteddly I was still reluctant to fork out my money to see it but eventually I gave in and decided to see whether the movie was going to be brilliant or the dullest thing I have ever seen. Well I can now safely say that The Queen is an extremely good movie featuring one of the best performance I have seen of the year. However, despite me enjoying the movie immensely, I still cannot say it is the best movie to have been put onto a cinema screen. Sure its brilliant, but it never seems cinema worthy if you get what I mean. Its sort of the TV drama that comes on and gets the critics raving about it. Most of these TV dramas are better than movies showing on the cinema anyway, but this movie does have that feel. Is this a problem? Well I'm not overlly sure whether I can class it as a problem or as a success.

Okay then so what is this movie all about? Well The Queen starts when Queen Elizabeth II is introduced to Tony Blair after he has been elected primeminister. We instantly see the differences between the two, the Queen is stuck in a world where her duty comes first while Blair wants to make Britain a more modern society. The movie then goes on to the week after Princess Diana's death. The death has a sudden impact on the world, people begin showing up at Buckingham Palace with flowers and condolences for the death. However, the Royal Family themselves are on holiday in Balmoral. The Queen d

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 15
A Royal Treat.... - 4/10/2006 6:36:53 PM   
n13roy

 

Posts: 81
Joined: 5/10/2005
Excellent film all round, Helen Mirren was superb here, and the whole atmosphere of the film was brilliantly directed, and superbly acted too by all concerned. A must see film for all Brits, methinks.......

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 16
RE: A Royal Treat.... - 10/10/2006 8:07:26 AM   
galvatron

 

Posts: 688
Joined: 1/10/2005
Very nice little film. Mirren is superb as is Sheen but I really enjoyed James Cromwell as Prince Phillip, I often forgot that it was him I thought his accent was superb, I'm expecting some big awards nods for some of the cast. 

(in reply to n13roy)
Post #: 17
RE: The Queen - 10/10/2006 9:15:38 AM   
Timmy_Brisby_05


Posts: 2675
Joined: 16/11/2005
From: Grim up North
It sounds interesting!

_____________________________

Bolt: [gets up and looks up at the cats] Hello, hairballs.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 18
- 11/10/2006 11:31:07 AM   
mike22

 

Posts: 5
Joined: 14/10/2005
From: ireland

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 19
Very pleasant surprise - 8/3/2007 3:41:42 PM   
fee_kh

 

Posts: 23
Joined: 5/2/2006
Saw this on the plane from South Africa. Chancces are I would have never seen it otherwise, but I am glad I did.
Just like most people who viewed the film, I remember that time vividly. And was disgusted with the actions of the Royals. We like to see them as one-dimensional and acting as we expect them to, forgetting the real life behind the scenes.
This film does an exceptional job of moving you from the one viewpoint to the other. While I started out with the reaction of 'my god they are revolting', I ended with sympathy. Sympathy for a family and not the royals.
Mirren's performance was fantastic, fully believable. Loved Sheen's description of Blair. And just like one of the other reviewers I have to wonder about the state of democracy in Britain if Mirren ruled the roost.And I would trade in Sheen for the real Blair any day.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 20
Subtle but intriguing drama - 11/3/2007 6:00:14 PM   
britesparc


Posts: 1967
Joined: 3/10/2005
From: Manchester
A movie like The Queen comes laden down with a great deal of critical baggage, and in this particular case a shelfload of awards silverware for the saintly Helen Mirren, encumbered as she is with “best performance of her career” type accolades. Thus a film which is otherwise great is rendered underwhelming and disappointing by way of inflated expectations. This is, to some degree, the case with The Queen. It’s not a bad movie by any stretch of the imagination; in fact, it’s very good, and at times pretty great. It’s just that, through no fault of its own, it became Britain’s flagship during awards season, suggesting a minor masterpiece, or at least one of the best films of the year. But one suspects The Queen was never meant to be an Oscar standard bearer; it looks and feels very much like a top-rate TV drama. That’s not a criticism; it’s just that the film probably would have worked slightly better within the confines of a More4 schedule. However, enough whinging, lest one thinks the film in any way stinks, or left me coming away feeling cheated; nothing could be farther from the truth. The Queen is, at heart, a character study, but what may not be apparent from coverage is that it’s a study of two characters: namely Mirren’s Elizabeth II, and Michael Sheen’s newly-minted PM Blair. It’s a role Blair’s played before, of course, in writer Peter Morgan’s The Deal; but the perception of the two Blairs is subtly different. Here, Blair is no opportunist or pragmatist; rather, he’s a genuinely concerned citizen who has the nation’s best interests at heart. The crux of the drama is Blair’s gently needling of Her Maj, vainly trying to persuade her to leave Balmoral and return to London, to grieve alongside her subjects. This provides meat but also one of the film’s stumbling blocks, for the frequent phone calls between Downing Street and Balmoral begin to become repetitive. The film is, perhaps, a mite too long, with perhaps a few too many highland sojourns; not to mention a few too many scenes of New Labour bitching. What prevents this becoming tiring or uninteresting, however, is in part Morgan’s script, which deftly defies our expectations and makes us shift our loyalties from scene to scene, but mainly the performances of Mirren and Sheen. Mirren really does get under the skin of the Queen, delivering a genuinely nuanced performance that elicits great sympathy, even if we ultimately don’t agree with her decision making; Sheen is very much her equal, giving Blair an integrity and an intelligence that is unusual given modern perceptions of him. Credit is also due for James Cromwell’s Phillip and Sylvia Sym’s Cherie; cracking performances all round, in truth. It’s a thought-provoking film, and it frequently makes us question not only the motives of these famous characters, but also our own opinions of them. So whilst it may not be the giant-killer some were expecting, it’s still a fascinating, surprisingly small-scale drama with – you guessed it – more than one powerhouse performance at its heart.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 21
The Queen - 26/3/2007 9:16:00 AM   
qualidad

 

Posts: 133
Joined: 22/11/2005
I'm not sure what everyone sees in this film. For me, it was a fairly dull piece of filmaking, turning some of the most intellectual people in this country into ridiculous caricatures. Helen Mirren, although good, was much better in last year's Prime Suspect whilst Martin Sheen is the stand out performance. This would have been passable as a TV movie, as it is, it fails to pass muster.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 22
The Queen - 8/4/2007 11:13:39 PM   
Dude No.9

 

Posts: 21
Joined: 30/9/2006
From: Rotherham
I enjoyed this more than I thought I would. The acting was really great all round and it captured the atmosphere of that time well from what I remember of it.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 23
- 30/6/2007 10:44:31 PM   
Nathan Jam

 

Posts: 2
Joined: 5/11/2005
I am currently watching this film and I already believe this to be one of the worst films I have ever seen. The last time I stopped watching a movie midway was Deuce Bigalo European Gigolo and I am sorely tempted to do the same here.

Helen Mirren is playing a character in a serious movie - no complaint there. Except the rest of the royal family seems to have come from a comedy of manners. To top it all, whilst everyone else tries to portray a character, Michael Sheen believes that a poor impersonation of Tony Blair will suffice.

Combine all this with a cheesy and overly sentimental soundtrack and you would have a bad movie. What makes this truly awful, however, is the direction. The camera moves in predictable patterns using every cliche to achieve its mediocre aims.

Thank God for James Cromwell as the Duke of Edinburgh who provides the few laughs.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 24
Brilliant, Honest, Insightful--All hail Mirren - 5/2/2008 6:32:39 PM   
lynnshep


Posts: 428
Joined: 17/1/2007
From: USA
One of my favorite movies from 2006--genius all the way around. Brilliant acting (not impersonation but actually character development), writing, and directing. Mirren and Sheen are phenomenal. Sheen was robbed of his Oscar.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 25
outstanding performances - 28/1/2009 11:55:35 AM   
THE DALTONATOR

 

Posts: 80
Joined: 17/2/2008
this film has amazing performances all around with helen mirren and michael sheen being the stand-outs. the film as whole is also very very good it feels at time though like a documentary or tv movie but is still interesting, gripping and enjoyable mainly helped by the actors and peter morgans screenplay

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 26
Royal Disappointment - 26/1/2011 11:09:49 AM   
neopol


Posts: 126
Joined: 9/11/2006
From: Manchester, Egland
I had been wanting to watch this since it was produced, but had not gotten around to it. So, on Christmas Eve, it appeared on TV and I watched, hoping to gain some insight into the events surrounding Diana’s untimely death in 1997, and a day which most of us share as one which we remember where we were.

But, in the end, it failed to engage me, seemingly plodding from one plot point to the next with little drama. Though Helen Mirren was fantastic as the eponymous Queen, as was Michael Sheen’s, Tony Blair, I was far less convinced by the likes of James Cromwell as Philip.

Some films of this sort can draw you into to the drama, characters and events of the subject, helping you feel part of it, as if this was a window into the private side of that public world, but sadly, this wasn’t the case. And as for the final thesis that Blair’s relationship with HRH was forged by these events and that he would have made impassioned speeches about how hard done to she was, I would find to be a little whimsical, though I could be mistaken.

I was ultimately left disappointed.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 27
But A Royal Camilla ? - 20/7/2012 5:11:30 PM   
Tony Clifton Jr

 

Posts: 4
Joined: 20/7/2012
No, she is no rose, / Nor a flower made of brass, / She is no classless lass, / No albino gorilla, / But a Royal Camilla !

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 28
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Film Forums] >> Film Reviews >> The Queen Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


 
Movie News  |  Empire Blog  |  Movie Reviews  |  Future Films  |  Features  |  Video Interviews  |  Image Gallery  |  Competitions  |  Forum  |  Magazine  |  Resources
 
Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.078