boaby
Posts: 2788
Joined: 29/12/2006 From: Aberdeenshire
|
to be fair to the media clowns, there's a difference between "great" and "all-time great". Example: Mike Tyson has knocked the bejeesus out of the latest cowering wreck to face him and has unified the seedily dismembered heavyweight championship. All-time greatness lies ahead... trainwreck. Definitely a great heavyweight, but given the sordid, grotesque and undignified shambles his career became it's fair to say he aint an all-time great. Example: Brett Favre is leading the Vikings down the field into fieldgoal range in the championship game in a season probably his last. He runs the ball out of bounds, Longwell makes the kick and Favre does a Warner. With their pass rush and a beast runner to keep Manning the elder off the field there's a fair chance the Vikes win their first Superbowl, led there by "all-time great" Favre who rides his tractor into the sunset afterwards - eschewing the inevitable Corvette. Instead the "great" Favre throws yet another bone-head interception. He comes back for another year and fades out... forever frustrated at not getting that 2nd ring and probably cursing privately to himself for his missed opportunities. True, there are some for whom "all-time greatness" is a given, or as near as damn it. Only future drug-abuse can deny Usain Bolt that, for example. Messi could do with a World Cup. Nadal, Federer and Djokovic are there already. There are, for all but the most exquisitly talented and charismatic, always opportunities to phuck things up.
_____________________________
"Aberdonians, and with some degree of purpose and right on their side, have absolute contempt for Glasgow. There is a side of Aberdonians who, let's be absolutely honest about this, feel so superior to Glasgow that you can measure it by the yard."
|