Register  |   Log In  |  
Sign up to our weekly newsletter    
Follow us on   
Search   
Forum Home Register for Free! Log In Moderator Tickets FAQ Users Online

Cars

 
Logged in as: Guest
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Film Forums] >> Film Reviews >> Cars Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Cars - 24/7/2006 7:44:57 PM   
Empire Admin

 

Posts: 26526
Joined: 29/6/2005
Post your comments on this article
Post #: 1
Olly missed the bus - 24/7/2006 7:44:57 PM   
phealy

 

Posts: 1
Joined: 30/9/2005
I know his comments are laregely echoed in other reviews, but IMO, Cars may be Pixar's funniest film since TS2. And to call it Pixar's most beautiful film is an understatement. Not only is the design behind this film gorgeous, but it's packed with more in-jokes, puns, and allusions to classic car culture than it's possible to catch in a single viewing. The main difference from earlier Pixar movies is that there is literally not a single "child" character, meaning no in-film substitute for younger audience members. But there is still a wondrous, funny world here to see if you can just go with the Flo. (Sorry about that.)

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 2
RE: Cars - 26/7/2006 3:27:42 PM   
Beckymonster


Posts: 188
Joined: 30/9/2005
Saw this at the NFT a week or so ago.  While I would not say it's Pixar's best film (that's 'The Incredibles'), it sure as heck is not their 'worst' either ('A Bug's Life').  Though I would hypothesise that even a 'bad' Pixar movie is better than 90% of the stuff that is put out at cinemas in a year. 

The story is simple, Hero goes on a (spiritual) journey.  Learns life lessons on the way.  And that's what makes this film so wonderful.  Not the lessons learned, the journey taken. 

The animation is just....  wow.  Really... WOW!  There is a scene in the first thirty minutes that for sheer action rivals Superman's 'arrival' back on the scene in Metropolis.  Jaw in lap time!;)  But it's the detail too.  Everything is car-orientated.  From the formations of rock to the plants; hell, even the bugs are tiny Beetle cars!

If you're a petrol head...  you will LOVE this movie.  This is the film that the 'Fast and Furious' films want to be when they grow up.  The sound effects are just awesome.  Make sure you see this in a cinema with a top of the range sound system, trust me on this!   
For everyone else - sit back and enjoy the ride. 

The only 'real' quibble I had was that there were not really memorable 'secondary' characters.  No Tuck and Roll (the woodlice from 'A Bugs Life), No Crush (the surfer dude turtle from 'Finding Nemo').  Guido and Luigi come close but it's only a small quibble.

Rataouille looks like it could be a return to form for the Pixar boys.  'Once you get past the gag reflex'... 

Make sure you're there in plenty of time to see 'One Man Band'.  No words, just lots of excellent music and laughs

And don't leave until the end of the credits.  Trust me on this...  especially if you're a girl!

Overall - highly recommended.  Shows up 'Over the Hedge' for the medicore film it really is. 

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 3
So glad to be proved wrong! - 27/7/2006 7:27:23 AM   
skeletonjack


Posts: 1297
Joined: 30/9/2005
This is one film I couldn't get excited about. I'm a big fan of Pixar but everything I'd seen of this from posters to trailers to stills etc left me decidedly unimpressed. Was this really going to be Pixar's first failure?
Well no actually, far from it.
I'm delighted and surprised to report I thought it was great.
Apart from the racing scenes that begin and end the movie this is just good old fashioned storytelling. It's fairly slow, talky, but always engaging and beautiful to look at. I can see younger kids becoming restless during it, as really despite it's cartoon status, this film seemed more geared (pun intended) for an adult audience than other Pixar films.
Also the end credits are great!

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 4
So glad to be proved wrong! - 27/7/2006 7:49:25 AM   
skeletonjack


Posts: 1297
Joined: 30/9/2005
This is one film I couldn't get excited about. I'm a big fan of Pixar but everything I'd seen of this from posters to trailers to stills etc left me decidedly unimpressed. Was this really going to be Pixar's first failure?
Well no actually, far from it.
I'm delighted and surprised to report I thought it was great.
Apart from the racing scenes that begin and end the movie this is just good old fashioned storytelling. It's fairly slow, talky, but always engaging and beautiful to look at. I can see younger kids becoming restless during it, as really despite it's cartoon status, this film seemed more geared (pun intended) for an adult audience than other Pixar films.
Also the end credits are great!

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 5
Cars - 29/7/2006 6:53:03 PM   
Philconcannon

 

Posts: 135
Joined: 30/9/2005
From: London
When you're as good as Pixar have been for so long, anything less than the best tends to comes as something of a disappointment. With the exception of the anodyne A Bug's Life, the studio has delivered hit after hit since 1995's Toy Story, making technological leaps and bounds with every film as well as consistently creating heartfelt stories which sparkle with wit. How long can a company keep up a success rate like that, before one of their films fall short?

Cars is the latest Pixar film with the unenviable task of maintaining their winning streak, and on first glance it's hard not to greet the film with a sense of deflation. This is not a film to rank alongside the high-water mark set by the Toy Story Pictures and The Incredibles. The story is banal, the laughs are fewer and more scattered than you might expect, and the film struggles to fully hold the interest over the course of two hours. But if that makes it sound like a stinker, then there's one thing which Cars still has in its favour - Pixar's films are so far above and beyond the CGI efforts of any other studio, even one of their weakest efforts still feels like a treat.

Cars' central storyline - an uninspired blend of Doc Hollywood and Days of Thunder - is a disappointly insipid effort, especially coming directly after Brad Bird's dazzling The Incredibles. Owen Wilson lends his voice to Lightning McQueen, a cocky young racer who is one victory away from winning the coveted Piston Cup in his rookie year on the circuit. His head is filled with images of the huge sponsorship deals, adoring fans, glamorous parties and mountains of cash which will surely follow his success. Lightning's obnoxious behaviour has driven away his crew and he doesn't have any real friends but, hey, who needs them when you're as big a star as he's about to become?

The race doesn't go entirely to plan, however, and Lightning is involved in an unprecedented three-way tie with legendary car The King and perennial second-place car Chick Hicks. A rematch between the three contenders is scheduled in California one week later, but disaster strikes for Lightning en route; he gets lost and finds himself alone on Route 66, eventually getting himself into a spot of bother in the rustic, backwater town of Radiator Springs. He's trapped there until he fixes up the damage he caused upon his arrival, and the prospect of winning the Piston Cup grows fainter by the day.

As I watched this all unfold my heart gradually started to sink. The opening section of Cars doesn't immediately engage you in the way their films so often do, and as Lightning's dreams of glory were visualised on screen in such a brash and loud fashion, I struggled to see how I could really care about these characters. This is the first Pixar film to take place in a world entirely free from humans and the initial effect is jarring. At the racetrack scene which opens the film, the cars are not simply doing the racing; they're in the stands, in the pits, commentating on the action - even the tiniest bluebottles have four wheels.

John Lasseter, directing his first film here since Toy Story 2 (along with the late Joe Ranft), is clearly passionate about cars of every shape and size, but it takes a while for the audience to feel the same way. Pixar's army of animators have a done a terrific job in anthropomorphising these vehicles - their grills and bumpers form their mouths, and the windscreen (not the headlights, a smart move) are their eyes - but even so, it takes a while for us to really believe that there's a heart and soul underneath all that metal and glass.

Things start to look up when Lightning finds himself in Radiator Springs, and the supporting cast begins to make its mark on the picture. The real star of Cars is Mater, a buck-toothed, rusty old tow-truck voiced brilliantly by US comedian Larry The Cable Guy. Mater is an innocent character, trusting to a fault, who instantly adopts Lightning as his new best friend, and it's at this point that the film finally starts to generate something resembling genuine emotion. The theme of friendship has been the main staple of Pixar's pictures, and while the moral lessons inherent in Cars aren't delivered with a great deal of subtlety, there's a heartfelt sweetness about this central pairing which is hard to resist.

Other characters are good value too. Bonnie Hunt's Sally is a sexy Porsche who wins Lightning's heart, Paul Newman plays cranky old Doc Hudson with a suitable amount of grizzled gravitas, and a lot of laughs are provided by the Ferrari-obsessed Italian pair Guido and Luigi (Tony Shalhoub and Guido Quaroni). George Carlin stars as one of Cars' most inspired creations - a multi-coloured VW van from the 60's who speaks of conspiracies in his stoner drawl and makes his own 'herbal' fuel ("the 60's weren't good to you, were they?” suggests army jeep Sarge). The detail and affection with which these characters have been brought to life is Cars' saving grace. As ever, each actor is a perfect fit for their role; and while the supporting characters may not prove as memorable as those from Toy Story or Finding Nemo, they're certainly endearing creations in their own right.

As you might expect, Lightning's stint in this dead-end town proves to be a blessing in disguise, as he begins to learn the error of his arrogant ways and starts to truly appreciate the important things in life, and the simplicity of the film's narrative arc is its biggest flaw. Lightning's dawning self-realisation feels rote, and the film's lazy pacing allows the story to get sidetracked too many times on the way to its predictable destination. At least Cars gives you plenty to look at along the way though, with this film marking yet another brilliant achievement in animation. The cars themselves all look superb, from the old rust-buckets to the gleaming Porsches and Ferraris, and the astonishing detail in the near photo-realistic surroundings is simply beautiful.

Therein may lie the problem, though. Lasseter has created this film not only to celebrate the cars he loves, but also as a nostalgic homage to the attitudes and morals of a particular time and place which he feels has been lost in today's modern world. But his desire to showcase these passions in all their splendour has robbed the film of much of its narrative drive; and there seems to be a lack of purpose to many of the scenes which help push the film's running time towards the 120-minute mark.

There is just about enough Pixar magic left in the tank to carry this film successfully over the finishing line. Cars is an extremely patchy piece of work, but Lasseter swiftly moves up the gears in the final half-hour to deliver a big race climax which is as involving as it is thrilling. Most viewers will ultimately leave the cinema satisfied, and Cars certainly is a perfectly decent slice of family entertainment; but Pixar have set themselves the highest possible benchmark, and they should be aware that films as humdrum and straightforward as this are normally the domain of the animation houses lagging behind in their rear-view mirror. At the moment, however, there seems to be little danger of Pixar being overtaken; and it's reassuring to know that they still guarantee a good time at the movies, even when they're cruising.

< Message edited by Philconcannon -- 15/10/2006 6:31:27 PM >

(in reply to skeletonjack)
Post #: 6
RE: Learning About Life in the Slow Lane - 29/7/2006 7:32:44 PM   
DJ Rob C: Mark II!


Posts: 34811
Joined: 30/9/2005
From: Christmas town
A great, and hugely enjoyable film!

Neat voice cast, great gags and a cool story..

The end-credits are cool, is there anything at the end though, cause I thought once the funny clips had finished at the start of the credits that was it... still the John Ratzenberger gag was the funniest gag I've seen all year!

_____________________________

When Gotham is ashes, you have my permission to die

Third Highest Post Count on the Forum, sad but proud!

(in reply to Philconcannon)
Post #: 7
Cars - 29/7/2006 10:57:23 PM   
Andy9063

 

Posts: 28
Joined: 29/7/2006
Just seen this movie and up to Pixars usual high standard, although the storyline was a little weak and the film was bit too long

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 8
- 30/7/2006 12:37:54 AM   
tired_geek86


Posts: 12
Joined: 4/1/2006
From: Windsor, Berkshire
Admitedly I had low expectations of this movie but, it was so funny, especially the end, got to be one of my favourites this year! You wouldn't think a movie about cars could be so entertaining and loveable. Even Jermery Clarkson makes a vocal apperance!

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 9
Must try harder - 30/7/2006 4:52:56 PM   
MickeyBricks

 

Posts: 4
Joined: 30/7/2006
Sorry Pixar, but you're a victim of your own success here. When every single film you bring out is a full on 5 star classic, this just doesn't cut the mustard. Very good isn't good enough.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 10
Cars - 30/7/2006 8:27:21 PM   
pettsy

 

Posts: 5969
Joined: 30/9/2005
I think the problem here is that Pixar have set such a high standard, people are just waiting for them to fall, or at least have a blip in quality.  While it definitely isn't Pixar at their best, it's still excellent, and much better than most kids films I've sat through this year. 

< Message edited by pettsy -- 30/7/2006 8:43:45 PM >

(in reply to MickeyBricks)
Post #: 11
- 30/7/2006 10:00:23 PM   
Q.T


Posts: 256
Joined: 7/2/2006
From: London, England
Visually orgasmic graphics (excluding the actual cars themselves) don't save this from being a below standard Pixar film. It's still very good, but we've come to expect much more from such a fantastic studio. Very good, but Pixar can give far more. Becoming wary of 'Ratatouille.'

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 12
Cars:Pixars Latest - 1/8/2006 2:10:01 PM   
messedin_thehead

 

Posts: 2
Joined: 24/2/2006
Now as a huge Pixar fan the excitment was almost unbearable, and after reading the reviews my heat sank! However after seeing Cars on friday it was exerything i expected and yet soooo much more. Yes the storyline was long winded and it was a slow film without much of the wit you come to expect from Pixar. You have to watch this at a childs perspetive and its amazing, the graphics were incredible from the aerial view of the stadium to the crowds to water splashes. Pixar really haven't let themselves down with this film it has good characters on a good storyline with incredible graphics. John Lasseter I salute you!!!!!

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 13
RE: Cars:Pixars Latest - 1/8/2006 4:19:10 PM   
James2183


Posts: 10277
Joined: 30/9/2005
I must admit, the trailers of the film leading up to its release did nothing for me. I honestly thought this would be the time Pixar would stumble and brake their 100% record (I liked A Bugs Life) and shatter the dream of the studio I had of them producing cinematic brilliance.

However, I was totally wrong. I went into the theatre today with low expectations but I am happy to say they were blown out the water. Although it doesn't reach the top of Pixar's work, it sits firmly in the middle wrestling it out with the other great films from the studio. Heart warming tale and for a film that hits 2 hours, seems to fly by. Like others have said the animation is just amazing, with the level of detail just incredible. The characters themselves are also brilliant and although there is the odd fart joke, Pixar's characters don't fall to the level of crude humour seen from other studio houses. Brilliant film for all the family.

4/5


_____________________________

Hey bub, I aint finished with you yet!

"We do not beat the reaper by living longer. We beat the reaper by living well and living fully" - Randy Pausch

(in reply to messedin_thehead)
Post #: 14
RE: Cars:Pixars Latest - 1/8/2006 4:24:03 PM   
Funkyrae


Posts: 20308
Joined: 30/9/2005
From: Just stick a pin in a map
I adored it.  Doesn't come close to either of the Toy Story films or Monsters Inc but is certainly on a par with Finding Nemo for me.

I thought the characters were  fantastically well developed, at times the animation was jaw dropping and there was enough in the way of adult humour to keep parents entertained as well as children.

I can honestly understand why it got the reviews of "car porn" but I don't think that did it any harm at all.

I can't wait for the DVD release of it.

4*

_____________________________

That's me that is!


(in reply to James2183)
Post #: 15
RE: Cars:Pixars Latest - 1/8/2006 5:13:20 PM   
MartyW


Posts: 204
Joined: 3/1/2006
From: Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom
I thought this was an alright film, i mean im a big fan of Disney Pixar but i just felt a little disappointed when leaving the cinema at the end....Like what other reviwers have been saying the visuals r indeed outstanding as we would expect from Pixar and gorgeous to look at e.g the scenaries and the whole wonderful look of the cars BUT the humour i felt was on a pretty low level, the problem was it tries so hard to be funny with all its jokes and comical one liners, that it just fails miserably, some of the dialogue was a bit crap as well. Nevertheless, i still found this to be a very enjoyable 2 hours of disney entertainment and i will definiately be awating it's release to DVD.

(in reply to Funkyrae)
Post #: 16
RE: Cars:Pixars Latest - 2/8/2006 11:58:05 AM   
Cat5


Posts: 1178
Joined: 3/10/2005
From: Newcastle
As people have said before, the mixed reviews and rather uninspiring trailers lead to a bit of trepidation when I decided to get a seat for Cars. The start also left me a bit uneasy as I wondered how well I'd be able to really get into a story of a rather arrogant car seeing as the last real car related film I'd watched was Herbie (the original, before you all cringe!) when I was a kid. You couldn't deny the amazing work that Pixar puts in to the whole setting - backgrounds are worked on with as much painstaking precision as the main characters and the stadium full of cars came to life (esp liked the Mexican wave in headlights)  - and this made it all a lot easier to get involved in the fast lane of the Cars world. Quickly the show of the Piston Cup made way for a more in-depth character in Radiator Springs, and an absolutely  breathtaking landscape that was created for the abandoned town of misfits escaping their lives and finding solace with others in the slowly dying town. This section of the film, complete with tractor tipping, the moral lesson and a bit of a love story, balanced the hectic opening with a more watchable and engaging hour before returning the lead to his previous life, but this time accompanied by his real friends and the lesson that winning isn't everything.

Personally, I really liked this film, some lovely little characters were created, like Guido and Lightning McQueen and Mater will be a memorable odd couple friends double act. It was a good film though and although I was worried about it being 2 hours and how for a Pixar film it could have been a bit too long, I have no idea where it could have been cut at all. Other highlights apart from the main film were the short 'One Man Band' (clever, funny, and again, beautiful looking) and the outtakes - they are memorable and the 'car' versions of Pixar films in the drive thru were cracking!

Another triumph for Pixar, but not amongst the instant classics.

< Message edited by Cat5 -- 2/8/2006 11:59:01 AM >


_____________________________

Frasier: So you're seeing a man?
Daphne: Only when I close my eyes and concentrate.

Elizabeth Swann: There will come a moment when you have the chance to do the right thing.
Jack Sparrow: I love those moments. I like to wave at them as they pass by

(in reply to MartyW)
Post #: 17
The Bubble Burst - 2/8/2006 1:58:12 PM   
griffithsad

 

Posts: 4
Joined: 2/8/2006
Great animation but sadly thats all it has.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 18
RE: The Bubble Burst - 2/8/2006 7:08:03 PM   
Dave B


Posts: 2761
Joined: 30/9/2005
From: Southampton
Seeing the film tonight so I don't want to read any of the reviews for fear of spoilers but is there something at the end of the credits?

_____________________________

Hey, what's with the flying jerks?

(in reply to griffithsad)
Post #: 19
Get real everybody !!!!! - 2/8/2006 8:44:57 PM   
The kUrGaN

 

Posts: 45
Joined: 22/3/2006
Visually this is STUNNING !!!! It leaves EVERYTHING by others in its wake !!! The fact that the script isn't quite up to Pixar's ridiculously high standards is a small detail that doesn't make this just a 'good' film as some would have you believe. Judged against everthing non Pixar in its genre, it's on a different planet. Judged against Pixar, visually it's the best thing they've done, script-wise it's not, but hey it's still the most watchable CG animation since Incredibles. How ridiculous of Empire to give this a '3'. This is sooooo much better than anything else around and deserves a 4.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 20
On par with a bug's life - 5/8/2006 12:12:46 PM   
Tohru_Readman


Posts: 353
Joined: 26/5/2006
From: Scotland
So it's not the best pixar film ever, but it's still great. As always the animation is wondeful a joy to behold. But the story is it aim at kids or adults, because for me it said slow down, which is not the message for sugar high kids. It's also very predictable towards the end. The film is only a little bit dissapointing due to pixar's high-standards that we have all come to expected. But it's still better than most other studio's and if I where Dreamworks I wouldn't be celebrating yet.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 21
GORGEOUS - 6/8/2006 3:00:49 PM   
omarx

 

Posts: 150
Joined: 7/10/2005
From: Somewhere that's neither here nor there
For someone who has no interest in CARS whatsoever, I think Cars really delivered on the visual front,Gorgeous animation and fantastic race sequences, I honestly sat in awe as I saw the beautifully rendered cars and scenery glide gracefully infront of my wide eyes!!! As everyone is agreeing to is the story...which has a strong central storyline, but it was diluted somehow by a silly love story that doesn't sit very well , and the supporting charachters needed a bit more effort. but all in all....I still think it is miles and miles and miles ahead of their closest rivals Dreamworks' output.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 22
- 7/8/2006 6:39:49 PM   
drunkmunky33

 

Posts: 21
Joined: 21/3/2006
From: Birmingham
lassetter's love and enthusiasm come shining through. evryones saying its slow in the middle but i think we've all come to judge pixar so highly that we're now overly critical!!! its a brilliant film, visually, comically and storyline-illy(?) and you know it!!

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 23
- 7/8/2006 9:23:49 PM   
cbreeze

 

Posts: 2
Joined: 28/11/2005
i think we are all being a little over critical here. cars is a feast for the eyes, with an opening scene that leaves you in awe for the rest of the film, which is a lot better than i thought it would be judging by the trailers. so the middle may be a bit slow, but without it we would not appreciate the heat or the feeling behind the races. 'mater' steals the show for me, he is easily the most entertaining character in 'radiator springs' and that scene with the tractor-cows was so funny, it makes up for places where the film lacked that cutting edge we now expect of pixar.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 24
RE: - 8/8/2006 10:39:23 AM   
Spider


Posts: 2077
Joined: 30/9/2005
I loved this film, probably preferred it to the Incredibles and A Bug's Life but maybe just below Monster's Inc and the rest.

From the very first frame I think the Pixar animation film has a different buzz to work from any other studio, not only do the staggering visuals shine but I felt an intensity and excitement that you just don't get from films like Madagascar or Over the Hedge.

Most people seem to be complaining about the slow middle act, for me this wasn't a problem. As usual the characters in a Pixar film were all brilliant so I just sat back and enjoyed watching them for an hour rather than having to worry about the plot being constantly moved forward.

If the film has a problem it's that the romance between McQueen and the motel owner (her name's gone) was a little shoehorned in, but as soon as these doubts crept into my mind I was blown away by the enchanting scene where the town's neon lights switch on again.

The finale is as heartwarming, exciting and satisfying as you could expect from a movie, true it is a little cosy, but show me a children's film that isn't. If Pixar keep creating movies like this, they will over take Disney as the greatest animation studio of all time.

Truely stunning visuals mixed with the usual Pixar brand of touching and hilarious characters, with exciting race scenes which would sit happily with any action film as well. 8/10

_____________________________

Rudi Manchego's Simple Rustic Wisdom:
If you look at a pebble, you will see your own face

Howard Moon: Fusion Minstrel Vince Noir: Gothic Fairy. The Boosh is Loose and it's coming at you like a shark with knees!

(in reply to cbreeze)
Post #: 25
RE: RE: - 8/8/2006 1:24:15 PM   
BenClay2005


Posts: 175
Joined: 10/11/2005
Not a bad film - looks amazing - but we all know character and story are paramount.

It has a very weak story, no genuinely funny gags and hackneyed characters. The whole "yawn" fixing the road thing was very poor, too. So what?

Also, in parts it was both too fast and too slow. So much visually crammed in - it was hard to catch your breath... The romantic stuff was dull and unnecessary (like the politcal subplot in "The Shaggy Dog" for goodness sake!)

At least it's not just another crop of CGI furballs running about pissing us all off!

It's cars instead...

< Message edited by BenClay2005 -- 8/8/2006 1:26:04 PM >


_____________________________

"Fear can hold you prisoner - hope can set you free"

(in reply to Spider)
Post #: 26
RE: RE: - 9/8/2006 10:21:11 PM   
Ali Baba

 

Posts: 37
Joined: 27/3/2006
Time was, a completely CGI film was a cinematic rarity, something that could be cherished and enjoyed as a genuinely original experience, a piece of work that represented the pinnacle of technology in the industry and could be embraced in the same way our parents and grandparents first took to regular cel-based animation. These days however, we’re lucky if a fortnight passes by without another CG film coming and going - animation is in danger of losing its magic. Pixar have done their best to distance themselves from the rabble and continue enthralling kids and adults alike, and although Cars still sees them streets ahead of the competition, neither does it see them firing on all cylinders. Even the best drivers need to look in their rear-view mirrors sometimes, and with competition hotting up, Pixar will need to kick into a higher gear if their latest picture is any indication.

Lightning McQueen (Wilson) is a hotrod racing car and an aspiring champion, a big city talent with an ego too big for his glove box. When the annual Piston Cup event ends in a three-way tie, Lightning must travel to California for a tie-breaker race in one week’s time, but falls out the back of his transporter Mack (the trusty John Ratzenberger) on the way and accidentally ends up trashing a backwater town called Radiator Springs. Under the duress of town elder Doc Hudson (Newman), Lightning is forced to endure community service until his debt has been repayed. After a while, he becomes attached to town attorney Sally (Hunt) and goofy tow-truck, Mater (Larry the Cable Guy) and starts to realise that winning isn’t always everything. It’s your classic Pixar fish-out-of-water story, imbued with the same warmth and family values we’ve come to expect over the years.

Where else could Pixar really explore? In just over ten years, they’ve delved into the toybox, to the bottom of the garden, in the bedroom cupboard and under the ocean waves to get their inspiration, but the premise of John Lasseter’s latest felt like a backfire from the start. It’s easy for us to imagine toys or fish having fun adventures when we’re not looking, but it’s an altogether bigger leap for us to invest in a talking car, much more one with a personality (the only way Lightning and friends can emote is with their large windscreen eyes and grotesquely large tongues that emerge from their bumpers). Anthromorphizing an automobile is an awkward concept at the best of times – how much can a character with no hands really do? – and you’re constantly aware of the limitations that Pixar are up against. The first time you see a character perform a three-point turn just to face another, you’ll realise this ain’t no Toy Story. You might be familiar with the story, too – it’s basically a straight up rip-off of Doc Hollywood.

Pixar movies have always felt timeless – opposed to, say, the Shrek movies from Dreamworks, the gags are purely character and situation based – but Cars represents the Disney-owned company’s first foray into the world of pop-culture references. There are only a few (‘The Jay Limo Show’ and a last reel appearance from Michael Schumacher), but they sit awkwardly amongst Pixar’s more traditional comedy, which it has to be said, is still as strong as ever. All ages are catered for; kids will get a real kick out of the tractor tipping scenes, adults will catch the references that fly over the kids’ heads (“Freebird!”) and petrol-heads will appreciate the sensational race sequences – the subject matter might not be for everyone, but there’s no denying that Pixar are pushing the technological envelope as fast and hard as it can presently be pushed. Colourful, frequently astounding and often scarily photo-real, this is as beautiful as animation gets, period.

Cars uses the old ‘winning isn’t everything’ axiom to good effect, but perhaps Ferris Bueller said it best when he remarked: “Life moves pretty fast. If you don’t stop and look around once in a while, you might miss it.” Pixar would do well to heed his advice and take a look over their shoulder; they’re not involved in a one horse race any more. While it would be impossible not to recommend Cars, it’s far from being their best and shows a few cracks in the tried-and-tested winning formula that’s served them so well up until now – most characters feel like cut-and-shut jobs of previous Pixar creations. There’s still gas in the tank and a powerful engine under the hood, but Pixar just have to make sure they are driving in the right direction next time around.

_____________________________

Movie reviews and features at www.theshiznit.co.uk - updated every week - it's not for losers.

(in reply to BenClay2005)
Post #: 27
RE: RE: - 9/8/2006 10:46:13 PM   
Hamish


Posts: 178
Joined: 30/9/2005
From: Lincs
    The return of Pixar supremo John Lasseter should have had film fans quivering in anticipation. Here is a man who has garnered respect through sheer talent, writer and director of the studio's first and most admired product "Toy Story". Strange then that Cars became the first film to inspire an uneasy feeling of doubt in the year preceding release. For once the teaser didn't have the desired effect and an end to Pixar's flawless run of output was forecast. Of course a falter in faith was to be expected at some point, the likelihood of a studio producing film after film at such high quality forever is small. It seems the first sign of cracks showing triggered the doubters to pounce.

    The falter may well come in time, but for now Pixar and Lasseter are still very much at the top of their game. Cars is a wonderful film, perhaps not their very best but still animation of the very highest quality. As we settle down in the cinema they waste no time in driving home the fact that they are the unrivalled animation giants. A trailer for their 2007 entry, the rat packed "Ratatouille", immediately catches the eye, already looking like a sure fire success. This followed almost immediately by the customary short film, "One Man Band" has immediately become my favourite Pixar short yet. It is all part of the Pixar package that has set such an incredibly high standard and results in such an enjoyable experience every time. As the film kicks in you already sport a grin of childish glee.

    Of course the first thing we notice in a Pixar film is the animation itself, showing signs of ever increasing quality. The attention to detail is mind-blowing, this time we have glorious glints, reflections and dust trails. We are plunged into a completely alien world, where cars are the only things present, yet everything is so carefully created, so effortlessly smooth and elegant, that we feel right at home. Suspension of disbelief is hardly necessary, most of the work is done for you. This time round we are treated to world class animation in vast open landscape, dusty cliffs, blue skies, beautiful waterfalls, the expertise is no longer only visible in the characters and their immediate surroundings. The animators have got themselves a stunning canvas to paint their film on, overall it is certainly the most visually arresting work they have done (although their water in Finding Nemo remains the greatest technical achievement)

    In terms of narrative simplicity is the key here, we have a relatively simple premise, slightly stereotypical characters and a key message concerning the blight of civilisation and the importance of friendship (something Pixar regularly touch upon) It is therefore forgivable to expect something bland and unoriginal, except this is Pixar we are talking about and they just don't do bland and unoriginal. Simple it may be, but the story is crafted with such care that it is never less than a joy to view. There is enough innovative might to turn such a basic framework into something full of heart and subtlety, the result is a runaway success. Despite the deceptively basic cartoon style application of eyes and mouth, it is the animator's achievement in extracting fully moving, emotive characters from these hefty, inflexible pieces of machinery that we can applaud. It is something that is taken for granted almost immediately but is, lest we forget, an achievement in itself.

    Most notably Cars is a much more leisurely paced affair that we are used to, the pace mirroring the shift in the narrative as hot rookie racer of the moment Lightning McQueen moves from the showbiz world of racing to the quiet town of Radiator Springs. While some may feel the shift is too jarring, the middle section of the film is certainly as close as Pixar have come to boring younger viewers; it makes for a slightly more mature Pixar experience. One where slightly more slowly moving events allow us to savour the story and animation at a more moderate pace. Perhaps Cars is more of a tribute to the older Pixar fans, who find joy in taking their kids to see such intelligent, multi-layered family entertainment. As a whole Cars is not exactly the full throttle, blockbuster Pixar experience, it is more of a meandering country tale with a bite. This can be seen as a negative but I prefer the conclusion that variety is the spice of life.

    In terms of characters we have a fairly mixed bunch, at first the standard Pixar hero and his arch rival. In a clever move the seen it all before, unsavoury antagonist introduced in the early stages of the film is placed to one side as the film takes an entirely different route and cunningly outwitted in the blistering, surprisingly fresh finale. He represents the uninspired side of animation, the lack of innovation with the character and his subsequent sidelining is a credit to Pixar's self awareness. Once in Radiator Springs the true stand out comes to light, Mater the buck toothed pick-up truck, instantly likeable he will sit nicely beside the other all time Pixar greats. All the biggest laughs go his way, most notably the flat out hilarious night time "tractor tipping", probably Pixar's funniest moment. While the amount of humour is more restrained than in past efforts the hit rate is just as high if not more so. Something reflective of the film as a whole, it doesn't strive to pack in as much as it's predecessors but Lasseter maintains the quality throughout, ensuring what we do get is never less than sublime.

9/10


< Message edited by Hamish -- 9/8/2006 10:49:19 PM >


_____________________________

I don't know Butchie instead.



(in reply to Ali Baba)
Post #: 28
- 11/8/2006 6:17:10 PM   
Fifer

 

Posts: 3
Joined: 22/10/2005

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 29
Visually stunning but could have done with tighter editing - 11/8/2006 6:18:25 PM   
Fifer

 

Posts: 3
Joined: 22/10/2005

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 30
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Film Forums] >> Film Reviews >> Cars Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


 
Movie News  |  Empire Blog  |  Movie Reviews  |  Future Films  |  Features  |  Video Interviews  |  Image Gallery  |  Competitions  |  Forum  |  Magazine  |  Resources
 
Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.109