BobM70
Posts: 958
Joined: 29/12/2005
|
I heard some stories about this film, mainly that it devided opinions. And now having seen it, I know why. I still do not know whether this was a bad film or a great one. And that thought alone makes it an interesting film at least. The problem is that I don't know what the writer (Brian Nelson) and director (David Slade) had in mind. -possible spoilers- The story is quite simple. It tells about a 14 year old girl who meets a 32 year old photographer on the net and after a few weeks they meet in person. The (rather annoying) wordweary Hayley goes with Jeff to his appartement and some disturbing things start happening. Like Hanneke, director of Funny Games, it seems Slade deliberately toggles with the motives of the two characters and with the sympathies of the viewer. Jeff is a normal looking bloke (uncanny resemblance to a young Kevin Kostner, by the way) who at first may or may not be a pedophile. Hayley drugs him by putting something in his drink. when Jeff wakes up he's tied to a chair and Hayley starts behaving like a little Hanniballina. So, while we all know Jeff is a perv and that he should pay for luring little girls to his appartement, Slade and Nelson do not make this man a monster. Even so: for almost 3/4 of the movie we have reasonable doubt whether he is really "that" bad. On the other hand: Hayley is such a psycho that it is impossible to even remotely like her. So while all sorts of torture ensues, we hope Jeff will break free and just kill the sick little fucker. That's where the film wrenches: because of this choice (?) we just can't feel any sympathy. Nor for Jeff because he actually is a pedophile/murderer, nor for Hayley who behaves in such a way only real psychos would appreciate. It is a bold choice and it probably works for half of the film. In the end there are some sub-plots and plotdevices that just don't work. The end itself is weak, but I guess there was no "strong" way to end this film and maybe that's it own fault because of the choice made before. Acting wise it's done very well and Slade proves himself a very talented director who gives his film a strange, European feel. Shame about the weak ending though. I give it a 7 out of 10 (*** out of *****) Bob
_____________________________
It's not how long it takes, it's who's taking you...
|