iamjacksass
Posts: 606
Joined: 4/7/2006 From: Hull
|
I've been using online rental companies from the start, I took advantage of all the free trials initially which meant i got best part of a year free and a taster of all the services. Back then I could of told you which ones outclassed the rest but with the the merging of all the companies (as has been mentioned) it's a different ball game. The big players lovefilm, screenselect and blockbuster (and their respective subsidiaries) are all first rate when you first join them, the trial period is truly a honeymoon period, all the top releases get sent out straight away and the next ones dispatched immediately upon return. Well like all honeymoon periods, the bubble bursts, you can say goodbye to most new releases and you can forget about recieving 3 discs back upon the return of 3 discs, they'll slowly send one out after a couple of days (something usually so obscure you know full well they had it in stock in the first place) and you get a trickle of discs thereafter. I know people say they don't have a problem with these services but I doubt these people are power users (I can recieve 3 discs, watch them all in a a day and send them straight back, I should easily be able to get 6 discs a week). They seem fine to a casual user but anyone else who wants to take full advantage of the advertised "unlimited" service can forget it. It really pisses me off that they hide behind these "fair use policies" and piss poor customer service, standardised email responses do not make a customer with a grievance any happier, infact it makes me furious. Unlimited should be just that, is there not a trade descriptions discrepency there? Companies shouldn't be allowed to hide behind the small print. They counter that customers who don't use the service as much should get priority, well why? I pay the same as them, nobody should be getting preferential treatment. If the comapny can't handle it's business without resorting to these practices then they should look at alternative fairer policies, ones that satisfy low and high users alike. Why should we pay for their incompetence? The only exception I know to these companies are mymoviestream, who genuinely care about the customer, high user or low, they have a system to let you know when you're likely to recieve that discs. If a disc in your list is available they will send it (why can't the other companies do this? surely their system is all automated anyway, when a disc arrives back in stock it gets scanned and put on the system, why can't the customers be privvy to this information too?). Also when they didn't have a new disc on their system (mitchell and webb situation) i emailed them and got a quick personalised (do you hear that lovefilm) response telling me they will order it, and sure enough a few days later it was in stock-brilliant customer service. I really hope this small company can stay afloat, I urge everyone to join them. I hope that someone from Empire is reading this thread, I would like to see them do a feature on online rental companies and get to the bottom of the problems highlighted here (that's if they aren't afraid of lost advertising revenue). Would be nice to see Empire get all Watchdog on their asses.
|