Silent_Bee
Posts: 20
Joined: 25/4/2006
|
Hey everyone! Hey the_jody and burgessappleton! Well, Silent Bee returns. I have seen the film twice now! And all the people i was with said "oh, it was disgusting and sick!". Generally, i do find comparisons to LOST to be quite of a similar attribute to have. As in, for me to compare Lost with Silent Hill, would be the same as anyone comparing its level of violence, script, sean beans accent. Because basically all of everybodys views are in relation to something else of a similar media. If Lost was a two hour film, except just ONE episode in story-time, then people will be equally dissapointed. Cinema today is, well, basically crap. Most films which are successful have got "hot" people in them, or are strictly overmarketed kids films. Lets see how superman will do with this new unknown actor. Toby maguire isnt tipically "hot" but a blend of others, including kirsten dunst make the film more appealing to a wider audience. Had the grudge not of had any HOT actresses etc, or well known actors, it would also be regarded as a crappy horror film with not much of an ending (not that im saying it DIDNT ;) ) If Silent Hill featured similar popular HOT actors etc, people would definately be more leniant with it, because they FEEL they have an understanding with the character already. However, with a pretty new bunch of actors (not in such popular franchises)and with sean bean only being able to act in a tiny part.. people will need to take more time to get used to them. And often, with the craziness of silent hill, people will inevitably rate the film less on that behalf aswell. Onto the cert 15 side fo things... This film was a bit too gory for a 15, and it did feature a mature theme (burning people). However, if this was all explicit imagary, it would of been given and 18. Pretty much there are gory parts, most notably it is more all out gore rather than being used in an explicit context.. For example Pyramid head, when he tears her skin off... she doesnt writhe in pain, you just see skin tear, blood, thats it. However, if it had a more EXPLICIT theme, as in if you saw her facial reactions throughout, and you saw her after she was skinned writhing in pain. this is far more explicit. With the barbed wire in the minge.. it did not show that, you saw it go up her skirt and the blood came down. If she had shouted "aah! my minge!" then this would be rather explicit meaning to where the barbed wire was going. However, she did not, and implicitly it shows just the barbed wire going up her skirt. The key to getting a 15 and 18 is the explicit and implicit nature of the film. With the monsters, like the janitor, he was barbed up.. however, it did not show him in any kind of pain, neither did it show how he got that way. If you saw him get barbed up, then hes screaming in pain because of the barbed wire... it would be SEEN in a different context. For example , some ratings say that if it isnt implict, then it is up to the viewer to understand and percieve. Like when a rude joke was told when you were a kid in a film, you wouldnt think anything of it as a kid, but then when you grow up and re-watch it you get to understand the nature of the joke and then it is the PARENT which deems the content too rude for children etc. With silent hill, easily, it is a 15. however, if you watch a film with cocaine usage, you will see that rating SHOOT up to 18. However, a body launching out barbed wire is slightly un-realistic, and thus the gore is glorified in this manner. I agree though, it should be an 18, anything with any mature nature, explicit or not, it is made that way for people to understand. And the themes displayed in the film are of a mature nature (man rapes child etc) however un-explicit this is. The ratings are messed up. Take a look at 15s from years ago, nowhere NEAR the stag they are at now! Have you noticed though, how the ratings soar up when a theme of cultural significance pops up? If say michael jackson was found guilty of molestation at the tiem silent hill was being released. i guarantee that this film would of been moved to a later date, or if not, had the parts removed with any child cruelty or references of it completely. Oh and pippa1983? Two dimensional? Please understand that the games were this way. and it was the descision of the producers, namely the director to have them act this way. It is a battle between fans of film, and fans of the game. It is a video game adaption, and almost ALL fans of the game are happy with it. WIth lord of the rings though... i just wish they could replace tolkien with jackson, so at least he could get some credit for his own work! LOL ;)
< Message edited by Silent_Bee -- 8/5/2006 10:05:08 AM >
|