Die Hard With A Vengeance

Follow @empiremagazine

Forum Home

Register for Free!

Log In

Moderator Tickets

FAQ

Users Online

Die Hard With A Vengeance

Logged in as: Guest

Printable Version

All Forums >> [Film Forums] >> Film Reviews >> Die Hard With A Vengeance

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Die Hard With A Vengeance - 18/4/2006 4:50:04 PM

Empire Admin

Posts: 26526
Joined: 29/6/2005

Post your comments on this article

Post #: 1

RE: Die Hard With A Vengeance - 18/4/2006 6:12:43 PM

linkacid

Posts: 379
Joined: 9/10/2005

Ive only seen it once I thought it was really good,a brilliant film to end to the trilligy.

< Message edited by linkacid -- 18/4/2006 6:13:45 PM >

_____________________________

Snyder: "I can smell trouble anywhere its like a sixth sense."
Giles: "No I believe thats one of the five."

(in reply to Empire Admin)

Post #: 2

RE: Die Hard With A Vengeance - 18/4/2006 8:36:26 PM

thelimey

Posts: 54
Joined: 9/10/2005
From: Southampton

Way better than Die hard 2...
By this point Willis had perfected the character, and makes an execellent double-act with Samual L Jackson. Also, Jeremy irons doing a vaguly camp accent!

_____________________________

Long live the Joss-verse.

"Kaylee, what the hell's going on in the engine room? Were there monkeys? Some terrifying space monkeys maybe got loose? "

(in reply to linkacid)

Post #: 3

RE: Die Hard With A Vengeance - 18/4/2006 9:04:47 PM

BobaJango

Posts: 7667
Joined: 31/12/2005
From: Mulder's basement

Surprisingly a third instalment in a trilogy that doesn't suck. 4/5.

_____________________________

"Don't worry. Won't insult legendary underworld solidarity by suggesting you surrender name without torture". - Rorschach (Watchmen).

(in reply to thelimey)

Post #: 4

Great end to a trili - 8/5/2006 3:01:14 PM

alistairmclean81

Posts: 33
Joined: 11/4/2006
From: Bournemouth

(in reply to Empire Admin)

Post #: 5

- 21/7/2006 10:51:27 PM

huny_monster

Posts: 75
Joined: 14/5/2006
From: Falkirk, Scotland

Its definetly rewarding, but I'm afraid it doesn't hold a candle the first.

(in reply to Empire Admin)

Post #: 6

Die Hard WAV - 6/9/2006 8:24:39 PM

KingButtMonkey

Posts: 20
Joined: 28/11/2005

Its good but certainly not as good as it could have been. Part of the plot lifts the some of the plot from Dirty Harry where Bruce Willis & Samuel L Jackson have to answer a number of phone calls and challenges across the city.

The problem for me with the film is the dodgy editing, the tense scenes such as the one in the lift and the fight with Targo are just ruined by the editing. Hopefully, there will be another to end the series on a bang.

(in reply to Empire Admin)

Post #: 7

Die Hard WAV - 6/9/2006 8:24:45 PM

KingButtMonkey

Posts: 20
Joined: 28/11/2005

(in reply to Empire Admin)

Post #: 8

Dire - 2/7/2007 8:22:58 PM

directorscut

Posts: 10007
Joined: 30/9/2005

The two hour equivalent of John McClane seeing Al Powell at the end of Die Hard and saying: "Holy shit! You're black!"

(in reply to Empire Admin)

Post #: 9

- 3/7/2007 10:37:37 PM

casino

Posts: 206
Joined: 26/5/2006

another brilliant die hard film i have given all the die hard films a ***** (five star) review, i think that this is better than number 2 but not quite as good as the original and best!!!

(in reply to Empire Admin)

Post #: 10

Very Entertaining - 8/7/2007 9:53:48 AM

SimpleSimpson92

Posts: 32
Joined: 16/6/2007
From: dwfdw

This really is a great Die Hard film, and I love how it takes a different path to what the first two did. It is a lot better than the second film, as many have stated, but it isn't quite as good as the fantastic first film. Samuel L. Jackson is cracking as the sidekick (and has one line that had me in tears of laughter), Jeremy Irons is menacingly camp as the Villain and, of course, Willis is flawless as John McClane. Action Packed, gripping and, in places, hilarious. Thankyou, Mr. McClane, you made my Day.

(in reply to Empire Admin)

Post #: 11

A Mixed Bag - 26/3/2008 2:38:42 PM

Manfrendshensindshen

Posts: 489
Joined: 14/1/2006

John McTiernan's return to the Die Hard franchise is really rather surprising in a few aspects. First of all, the obvious thing to do would be to use McTiernan's capabilities where he's best, meaning: tense, suspenseful action in a closed confinement. Secondly, one would think that John McClane's lonely wolf status would be cemented, as this was another element that made the first film the masterpiece it is.
But the filmmakers decided to dismiss both these formulae and instead try something completely new. Kudos to them. Thus Die Hard With A Vengeance is not only bathed in the glow of a hot New York summer day (and therefore the exact opposite of the first two installments' atmospherical undertones), but also quickly turns into a buddy movie by coupling Willis with Samuel L. Jackson's Zeus. And sod closed confines, why not use the whole of the city of New York?

Taking this path was a brave movie, which also alienated many expecting something more akin Die Hard In A Shopping Mall or Die Hard On Boat (oh, they'd already done that, under the name Under Siege). But it at the same time takes away some of the original's basic ingredients, lessening the impression of a 'proper' Die Hard film. Mind you, it's still leagues ahead of Renny Harlin's rehash that was Die Hard 2 and shows how McTiernan is (or was?) a much more original and intelligent director than his copycat peers. It just doesn't stand a chance against the original, and also suffers from a weak third act and a rather dull Jeremy Irons (would David Thewlis have done a better job?).

If you have to chose any sequel to the one film that rules them all, it's got to be Die Hard With A Vengeance.

(in reply to Empire Admin)

Post #: 12

Entertaining - 21/12/2008 1:27:16 PM

!xHoTRoDx!

Posts: 162
Joined: 20/12/2008

It's well better than the second one but still not as good as the first.

(in reply to Empire Admin)

Post #: 13

definately on par with original - 21/8/2009 7:15:03 PM

W.R Learmont

" border=0 align="absmiddle" width="100" height="100" />

Posts: 42
Joined: 28/7/2008

how can you say his day gets too complicated? it just gets more intense and interesting. also the on screen pair of sam l jackson and willis is brilliant. they work so well playing off each other. its a great film just slightly not as good as original yet more enjoyable id say

(in reply to Empire Admin)

Post #: 14

just as great as the first with alot more suprises - 6/5/2010 7:27:13 PM

jordan thomas

Posts: 39
Joined: 5/5/2010

definatly underrated by many critics! I think this film is so great and action packed with great chemistry between Samuel L Jackson and Bruce Willis. BRAVO

(in reply to Empire Admin)

Post #: 15

- 13/6/2010 10:18:59 PM

TheGodfather

Posts: 5125
Joined: 21/10/2005
From: Sin City

Die Hard: With A Vengeance
Seen it so many times but it`s still entertaining. The "wild goose chase", as John McClane calls it, the high pacing, the lovely villain that Jeremy Irons brings to the table and last but not least the excellent chemistry between Willis and Samuel L. Jackson: all that together make this into an over the top but truly enjoyable action flick.

7,8/10

(in reply to Empire Admin)

Post #: 16

- 14/6/2010 11:45:29 AM

willchadwick

Posts: 310
Joined: 13/3/2007

Good, nice interplay between Samuel L Jackson and Bruce Willis, and it keeps up the action beats if going a little bananas. The 'Simon Says' plot is an interesting addition to the action franchise, despite giving orders over the phone not being original. Letting it down mainly is the ham fisted racial politics which are completely ridiculous.

(in reply to Empire Admin)

Post #: 17

McClane makes a friend - 29/9/2010 8:04:43 PM

bnicholson50

Posts: 126
Joined: 25/5/2008

This is another great action film from John McTiernan. Just as good as the original and far superior than its predecessor. Whatever about empires judgement on this film, it almost universally accepted that this film is superior to both Die Hard 2 and Die Hard 4. So why did give all three films three stars?

(in reply to Empire Admin)

Post #: 18

Great Fun! - 25/3/2011 8:06:40 PM

linkinpython

Posts: 21
Joined: 19/11/2009

Much better than the rubbish die hard 2 and the reasonably good die hard 4 but doesnt hold a candle to the original. Great performances from bruce willis and samuel l jackson, awesome lines from mcclane and brilliant action makes this ONE of my favourite action films, of all time!

(in reply to Empire Admin)

Post #: 19

RE: Great Fun! - 8/5/2011 4:43:23 PM

musht

Posts: 1220
Joined: 21/1/2009
From: Oireland

This a quality Die Hard film, easily the second best film in the franchise. I love the chemistry between Willis and Jackson and even though there isn't as much McClane beating the crap out of people as I would like it's still a great watch with some great moments

_____________________________

"SAVE ME, BARRY!!"

"What the hell are Regionals!?"

(in reply to linkinpython)

Post #: 20

Die Hard With a Vengeance Review - 17/1/2012 11:40:11 PM

the film man

Posts: 598
Joined: 13/10/2010

Much better than Die Hard 2, and Samuel L. Jackson as the shop keep owner who is ordered by Jeremy Irons to help McLane makes it even better.

(in reply to Empire Admin)

Post #: 21

Gets better with age... - 5/12/2012 10:54:16 PM

kristof07

Posts: 8
Joined: 18/3/2008
From: London

Watching this now, there's a lot to be said for McTiernan's directing and the jumpy cinematography that Paul Greengrass would evolve so well in the Bourne sequels. Ultimately people have complained about the outdoor setting and the "soap opera" of McClane's life, but ultimately this is Die Hard- and what we're looking for is great sequences, some humour, a snarling bad guy, and shit blowing up in imaginative ways; and while occasionally the effects have dated badly there's still much to enjoy about what Bruce Willis does better than anyone, which is to survive in style.
Everyone who hates needs to stop complaining and enjoy it for what it is.

(in reply to Empire Admin)

Post #: 22

RE: Gets better with age... - 13/2/2013 10:38:05 PM

jackcarter

Posts: 1740
Joined: 12/1/2006

didnt this get 5/5 back in 95?

(in reply to kristof07)

Post #: 23

RE: Gets better with age... - 13/2/2013 11:38:26 PM

Darth Marenghi

Posts: 2976
Joined: 10/10/2010
From: Manchester

quote:

ORIGINAL: jackcarter

didnt this get 5/5 back in 95?

Yeah - it was also quite high on that "Films we regretted giving the 5 stars to" list in the anniversary issue.

_____________________________

Invisible Text for SPOILERS: "color=#F1F1F1" Spoiler text "/color" , then change the quotation marks to square brackets.

(in reply to jackcarter)

Post #: 24

The best since the first - 14/2/2013 10:53:55 AM

Mr Gittes

Posts: 468
Joined: 3/2/2013

Yeah, it's nothing on the original but this movie is still a hell of a ride, with Willis at his charismatic best, a terrific Samuel L Jackson as one of those few movie sidekicks who are actually awesome, and a cool baddie in the form of Jeremy Irons. Sure, he's no Rickman but you would need Darth Vader himself to follow up a villain like that. What I love about this movie is how fresh it feels yet it's still classic Die Hard.

My biggest problem with the movie is pretty much the same as everyone else's; the ending. Bit of a letdown. But still as far as threequels go, this is exceptional to say the least. A cracking action movie.

(in reply to Empire Admin)

Post #: 25

RE: Gets better with age... - 14/2/2013 12:04:58 PM

jackcarter

Posts: 1740
Joined: 12/1/2006

quote:

ORIGINAL: Darth Marenghi

quote:

ORIGINAL: jackcarter

didnt this get 5/5 back in 95?

Yeah - it was also quite high on that "Films we regretted giving the 5 stars to" list in the anniversary issue.

thats odd i always thought DH3 was considered a great film - almost on a par with the original (maybe the 5 star was partly responsible for me thinking that i dunno). certainly 2nd best by far in the series anyway (1, 3, 2, 4.0 and AGDTDH last i guess)

it definitely felt like something new after DH1/2 (and all the DH knock offs) and was good to have it tie in with Gruber. B Willis and SLJ coming off Pulp Fiction made it seem really cool at the time and also seemed to be inspired alot by the previous years Speed (no bad thing), Dirty Harry (Scorpio sending Harry around the city - there was a Starsky & Hutch episode that did the same - mustve been inspired by Dirty Harry too) and obviously felt like it couldve been Lethal Weapon 4. i do remember being disappointed with the climax though - it didnt feel right/part of the same film. and years later i found out why - they couldnt decide how to end it/reshot it. plus theres the element of McClane teaming up with a sidekick and charging around a city which seems to have been a turning point in the series inspiring 4 and 5 to do the same - leaving all the rip off films to focus on the 'Die Hard on a....' aspect. (maybe DH5 shouldve gone back to sole McClane vs terrorists in a building/plane wherever)

but the ending aside i think i was fine with it being a 5/5 and was surprised to see it downgraded to 3

< Message edited by jackcarter -- 14/2/2013 8:19:13 PM >

(in reply to Darth Marenghi)

Post #: 26

RE: Die Hard With A Vengeance - 25/2/2013 10:22:00 PM

moviebuff73

Posts: 120
Joined: 7/6/2012
From: diss

brilliant movie. samuel l jackson brings an exciting new element to the franchise.

(in reply to Empire Admin)

Post #: 27