Register  |   Log In  |  
Sign up to our weekly newsletter    
Follow us on   
Search   
Forum Home Register for Free! Log In Moderator Tickets FAQ Users Online

A Good Day To Die Hard

 
Logged in as: Guest
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Film Forums] >> Film Reviews >> A Good Day To Die Hard Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
A Good Day To Die Hard - 14/2/2013 12:07:05 AM   
Empire Admin

 

Posts: 31383
Joined: 29/6/2005
Post your comments on this article
Post #: 1
Gonna have fun watching this fall on its a$$ - 14/2/2013 1:35:39 AM   
Normal Control


Posts: 82
Joined: 11/11/2012
I noticed Kim's been reviewing some classic re-releases lately, so no way was he gonna let this piece of shit off the hook.

Bruce should retire to the scrapheap along with Arnie. They don't seem to realise it was brilliant directors in their prime who made them icons, along with us the audience. They can't just grab it back by themselves on a whim, the lazy cynical idiots.

Bruce should do us a favour and go to some desert island with his model trophy chick wife and stay the fuck there out the way. The only worthwhile thing he could ever put on film these days would be to release a celeb sex tape.

PS: is McTiernan STILL in jail? WTF?



_____________________________

"you would need three promotions to get to be an asshole!"
Post #: 2
RE: Congratulations, Mr Moore... - 14/2/2013 11:13:18 AM   
Phubbs


Posts: 656
Joined: 3/4/2012
Ah smug mode
Post #: 3
RE: A Good Day To Die Hard - 14/2/2013 11:40:13 AM   
AxlReznor

 

Posts: 1764
Joined: 2/12/2010
From: Great Britain
quote:

ORIGINAL: MonsterCat

We could have had something more interesting on our hands if Nicolas Winding Refn or Joe Cornish were hired. Shame.


Who cares about "interesting" when remake/videogame guy is so much cheaper?
Post #: 4
RE: A Good Day To Die Hard - 14/2/2013 11:44:20 AM   
James2183


Posts: 10548
Joined: 30/9/2005
Die Hard has turned into Beverly Hills Cop 3 then...

_____________________________

Hey bub, I aint finished with you yet!

"We do not beat the reaper by living longer. We beat the reaper by living well and living fully" - Randy Pausch

(in reply to AxlReznor)
Post #: 5
RE: A Good Day To Die Hard - 14/2/2013 11:47:01 AM   
AxlReznor

 

Posts: 1764
Joined: 2/12/2010
From: Great Britain
quote:

ORIGINAL: James2183

Die Hard has turned into Beverly Hills Cop 3 then...


Even with all of these negative reviews, I'd be extremely surprised if it manages to be as bad as Beverly Hills Cop 3.

(in reply to James2183)
Post #: 6
RE: A Good Day To Die Hard - 14/2/2013 11:49:15 AM   
Drooch

 

Posts: 155
Joined: 31/5/2006
Assuming this hasn't killed the series, and assuming McTiernan doesn't return, Martin Campbell's the man to direct a new Die Hard. Like McT, he understands masculinity, is an excellent director of actors, and a master of action scenes - good choreography, clear spatial relationships and sober camerawork. Think Casino Royale with an R rating.

That, and a Shane Black script, and Fox might just be able to atone for this, and the dire Die Hard 4. Murdoch has already flushed Tom Rothman, who masterminded both atrocities, as well as hiring an idiot to molest Prometheus' script, so maybe there's hope...



Post #: 7
RE: A Good Day To Die Hard - 14/2/2013 11:55:32 AM   
MonsterCat


Posts: 7949
Joined: 24/3/2011
From: St. Albans, Hertfordshire
quote:

ORIGINAL: AxlReznor

quote:

ORIGINAL: MonsterCat

We could have had something more interesting on our hands if Nicolas Winding Refn or Joe Cornish were hired. Shame.


Who cares about "interesting" when remake/videogame guy is so much cheaper?



You see, if I was the head of development of 20th Century Fox, and I wanted to keep one of my most lucrative franchises on track, I would make sure that the script is really good and I would hire a really talented director. Now, it might be a little bit more expensive than hiring hacks like Woods and Moore, but the results would totally justify that.

Given Moore's proven track record of sucking and failing, what the hell were Fox thinking when they give him the gig?

< Message edited by MonsterCat -- 14/2/2013 12:00:07 PM >


_____________________________

"I am a writer, a doctor, a nuclear physicist and a theoretical philosopher. But above all, I am a man, a hopelessly inquisitive man, just like you."

Films watched in 2013

(in reply to AxlReznor)
Post #: 8
RE: A Good Day To Die Hard - 14/2/2013 11:59:41 AM   
AxlReznor

 

Posts: 1764
Joined: 2/12/2010
From: Great Britain
Except it doesn't really matter how bad a franchise gets... if people will still go and see Transformers: Dark Of The Moon after Transformers: Revenge Of The Fallen, it's pretty much confirmation that they really don't have to give a shit about "keeping their franchises in check". They also don't care about the future... they keep on going while it makes them money, and then they'll stop and move onto something else as soon as it doesn't. That's always been the way. It leads to some shit films, which is sad, and it's pretty fucking stupid, but that's how it is.

I don't see myself liking this film, but considering how much I like Die Hard 4.0, and how much derision that gets, and how much acclaim Die Hard 2 gets when I think it's an awful film, I might just end up loving it. No intention of paying to see it, though...

< Message edited by AxlReznor -- 14/2/2013 12:02:41 PM >

(in reply to MonsterCat)
Post #: 9
RE: A Good Day To Die Hard - 14/2/2013 12:05:49 PM   
UTB


Posts: 10055
Joined: 30/9/2005

quote:

ORIGINAL: AxlReznor

quote:

ORIGINAL: MonsterCat

We could have had something more interesting on our hands if Nicolas Winding Refn or Joe Cornish were hired. Shame.


Who cares about "interesting" when remake/videogame guy is so much cheaper?



Its probably more to do with "does what he's told" than the price.


(in reply to AxlReznor)
Post #: 10
RE: A Good Day To Die Hard - 14/2/2013 12:09:37 PM   
MonsterCat


Posts: 7949
Joined: 24/3/2011
From: St. Albans, Hertfordshire
As flawed as it was, at least it looked like Len Wiseman was actually trying with Die Hard 4. It was a fun film.

I just think at one point it kinda lost sight of what makes the character of John McClane.

_____________________________

"I am a writer, a doctor, a nuclear physicist and a theoretical philosopher. But above all, I am a man, a hopelessly inquisitive man, just like you."

Films watched in 2013

(in reply to AxlReznor)
Post #: 11
RE: A Good Day To Die Hard - 14/2/2013 12:11:44 PM   
AxlReznor

 

Posts: 1764
Joined: 2/12/2010
From: Great Britain
quote:

ORIGINAL: UTB


quote:

ORIGINAL: AxlReznor

quote:

ORIGINAL: MonsterCat

We could have had something more interesting on our hands if Nicolas Winding Refn or Joe Cornish were hired. Shame.


Who cares about "interesting" when remake/videogame guy is so much cheaper?



Its probably more to do with "does what he's told" than the price.




Probably that too. One of the things in the thread about the 12A rating I couldn't understand is some people talking about the "director's vision", as if John Moore was anything more than a guy the studio hired to put their vision on the screen. I doubt he's under any illusions as to whose film it is... he's hardly a Tarantino or even a Nolan.

(in reply to UTB)
Post #: 12
RE: A Good Day To Die Hard - 14/2/2013 12:13:00 PM   
jackcarter


Posts: 1913
Joined: 12/1/2006
I donít know where I got it from but i was under the impression that if they were going to do another after 4.0, itd be back to the original - McClane sans sidekicks vs. terrorists in one place (maybe even another building), darker/more serious, hard R/18, lower budget, little-no CG etc.

it was like hed gone from a building to an airport to NYC to the whole of America so the only place to go was back to a claustrophobic location like the original. Back to basics.

Instead he takes on Russia in 4.0 part 2 (when I heard it was going to be about his action man son I got a bad vibe)

Oh well maybe they get the final part of this 2nd trilogy sort of right (like Sith)

< Message edited by jackcarter -- 14/2/2013 12:45:41 PM >

(in reply to AxlReznor)
Post #: 13
RE: A Good Day To Die Hard - 14/2/2013 12:21:12 PM   
matty_b


Posts: 14585
Joined: 19/10/2005
From: Outpost 31 calling McMurtle.
quote:

ORIGINAL: MonsterCat

quote:

ORIGINAL: AxlReznor

quote:

ORIGINAL: MonsterCat

We could have had something more interesting on our hands if Nicolas Winding Refn or Joe Cornish were hired. Shame.


Who cares about "interesting" when remake/videogame guy is so much cheaper?



You see, if I was the head of development of 20th Century Fox, and I wanted to keep one of my most lucrative franchises on track, I would make sure that the script is really good and I would hire a really talented director. Now, it might be a little bit more expensive than hiring hacks like Woods and Moore, but the results would totally justify that.

Given Moore's proven track record of sucking and failing, what the hell were Fox thinking when they give him the gig?



Ah, but that's you, who puts some thought into it.

One of my mates has been trying to persuade me and two others to come and see this with him.

"But it looks really, really shit.", I said.

"Who cares? It's DIE HARD!"

So for him, the brand beats everything else involved. And I'm guessing there will be a lot of people who will take the thinking that he does.

quote:

I just think at one point it kinda lost sight of what makes the character of John McClane.


I think that's true to the franchise in general. Each film has slowly lost sight of what was great about the first film and the character, and just turned him into an invincible Arnie-clone.

_____________________________

quote:

ORIGINAL: Cool Breeze
Mattyb is a shining example of what the perfect Empire Forum member is.


(in reply to MonsterCat)
Post #: 14
RE: A Good Day To Die Hard - 14/2/2013 12:23:56 PM   
jcthefirst


Posts: 4431
Joined: 6/10/2005
From: Bangor

quote:

ORIGINAL: matty_b

quote:

ORIGINAL: MonsterCat

quote:

ORIGINAL: AxlReznor

quote:

ORIGINAL: MonsterCat

We could have had something more interesting on our hands if Nicolas Winding Refn or Joe Cornish were hired. Shame.


Who cares about "interesting" when remake/videogame guy is so much cheaper?



You see, if I was the head of development of 20th Century Fox, and I wanted to keep one of my most lucrative franchises on track, I would make sure that the script is really good and I would hire a really talented director. Now, it might be a little bit more expensive than hiring hacks like Woods and Moore, but the results would totally justify that.

Given Moore's proven track record of sucking and failing, what the hell were Fox thinking when they give him the gig?



Ah, but that's you, who puts some thought into it.

One of my mates has been trying to persuade me and two others to come and see this with him.

"But it looks really, really shit.", I said.

"Who cares? It's DIE HARD!"

So for him, the brand beats everything else involved. And I'm guessing there will be a lot of people who will take the thinking that he does.



Like me.

I mean, it might be terrible, but it is still (technically) a Die Hard film and I'll be there.


_____________________________

@Jonny_C85

My Movie Blog | My Other Various Rantings Blog

(in reply to matty_b)
Post #: 15
RE: A Good Day To Die Hard - 14/2/2013 12:25:35 PM   
matty_b


Posts: 14585
Joined: 19/10/2005
From: Outpost 31 calling McMurtle.
There you go, blame JC if there's a part six.


Well, blame him for that and for spoiling the end of Paranormal Activity 4.

_____________________________

quote:

ORIGINAL: Cool Breeze
Mattyb is a shining example of what the perfect Empire Forum member is.


(in reply to jcthefirst)
Post #: 16
RE: A Good Day To Die Hard - 14/2/2013 12:27:32 PM   
jcthefirst


Posts: 4431
Joined: 6/10/2005
From: Bangor
Sheep everywhere.

_____________________________

@Jonny_C85

My Movie Blog | My Other Various Rantings Blog

(in reply to matty_b)
Post #: 17
RE: A Good Day To Die Hard - 14/2/2013 12:28:28 PM   
AxlReznor

 

Posts: 1764
Joined: 2/12/2010
From: Great Britain
Heh... I've never understood the people who think of the original as anything but a generic 80's action film. One of the better ones, to be sure, but considering the quality of most of them, that's not saying much. It's certainly not some kind of untouchable holy relic. And he was already doing unlikely generic action hero things in that film... but for some reason people think that because he cut his feet on glass, he was an "everyman".

(in reply to matty_b)
Post #: 18
RE: A Good Day To Die Hard - 14/2/2013 12:30:10 PM   
MonsterCat


Posts: 7949
Joined: 24/3/2011
From: St. Albans, Hertfordshire

quote:

ORIGINAL: matty_b

I think that's true to the franchise in general. Each film has slowly lost sight of what was great about the first film and the character, and just turned him into an invincible Arnie-clone.


I think one of the reasons that makes DH2 the best sequel is that the writers understood that McClane has vulnerabilities and sometimes fails. Check out the bit when the plane crashes and Col. Stewart gets the upper hand over McClane.

Die Hard 3 was a fun romp, but seem a bit half-hearted in its execution. Die Hard 4 was fine but it often strayed into a cartoonish, Neveldine/Taylor territory.

_____________________________

"I am a writer, a doctor, a nuclear physicist and a theoretical philosopher. But above all, I am a man, a hopelessly inquisitive man, just like you."

Films watched in 2013

(in reply to matty_b)
Post #: 19
RE: A Good Day To Die Hard - 14/2/2013 12:33:32 PM   
matty_b


Posts: 14585
Joined: 19/10/2005
From: Outpost 31 calling McMurtle.

quote:

ORIGINAL: AxlReznor

Heh... I've never understood the people who think of the original as anything but a generic 80's action film. One of the better ones, to be sure, but considering the quality of most of them, that's not saying much. It's certainly not some kind of untouchable holy relic. And he was already doing unlikely generic action hero things in that film... but for some reason people think that because he cut his feet on glass, he was an "everyman".


I would only count one moment as unlikely in the film - the roof jump which he undertakes as an absolute last resort and knows how potentially fatal it is. Everything else is quite stripped back - he loses his machine gun and ultimately has to rely on a bit of sticky tape to finish off the last two terrorists. It's also easy to forget just how much of the film is spent on John hiding and scurrying away from a fight while he figures out a plan.

It's this kind of measured, vulnerable approach that makes the original stand out, I think.

And what MC said about DH2.

_____________________________

quote:

ORIGINAL: Cool Breeze
Mattyb is a shining example of what the perfect Empire Forum member is.


(in reply to AxlReznor)
Post #: 20
RE: A Good Day To Die Hard - 14/2/2013 12:36:58 PM   
AxlReznor

 

Posts: 1764
Joined: 2/12/2010
From: Great Britain
A shame that DH2 is one of the most mind-numbingly boring action movies I've ever seen, then. And that it's just a remake of the original if the original were as shit as it could have been.

(in reply to matty_b)
Post #: 21
RE: A Good Day To Die Hard - 14/2/2013 12:39:10 PM   
MonsterCat


Posts: 7949
Joined: 24/3/2011
From: St. Albans, Hertfordshire
Yeah, but Axl, you think 4 is the best so far. What the fuck do you know about anything?

_____________________________

"I am a writer, a doctor, a nuclear physicist and a theoretical philosopher. But above all, I am a man, a hopelessly inquisitive man, just like you."

Films watched in 2013

(in reply to AxlReznor)
Post #: 22
RE: A Good Day To Die Hard - 14/2/2013 12:39:48 PM   
AxlReznor

 

Posts: 1764
Joined: 2/12/2010
From: Great Britain
quote:

ORIGINAL: MonsterCat

Yeah, but Axl, you think 4 is the best so far. What the fuck do you know about anything?


I know, right?

(in reply to MonsterCat)
Post #: 23
RE: A Good Day To Die Hard - 14/2/2013 12:41:08 PM   
Shifty Bench

 

Posts: 15403
Joined: 30/9/2005
From: Land of the Scots

quote:

ORIGINAL: MonsterCat
I think one of the reasons that makes DH2 the best sequel is that the writers understood that McClane has vulnerabilities and sometimes fails. Check out the bit when the plane crashes and Col. Stewart gets the upper hand over McClane.

Die Hard 3 was a fun romp, but seem a bit half-hearted in its execution. Die Hard 4 was fine but it often strayed into a cartoonish, Neveldine/Taylor territory.


Yeah....pretty much this...... *nods approvingly*


_____________________________

Extended Edition Podcast- Episode 46:Threads Of Destiny (Star Wars Fan Film)

(in reply to MonsterCat)
Post #: 24
RE: A Good Day To Die Hard - 14/2/2013 12:42:49 PM   
UTB


Posts: 10055
Joined: 30/9/2005
I suppose the issue is that since Die Hard we've had every version of it with other films. You can't put him on a bus (Speed), or a plane (Air Force One/Passenger 57), a boat (Speed 2) etc, so the enclosure gets widened in order to make it seem 'bigger' than the last. Nakatomi Building > Airport > New York City > Eastern Seaboard > Russia.


(in reply to MonsterCat)
Post #: 25
RE: A Good Day To Die Hard - 14/2/2013 12:43:27 PM   
Drooch

 

Posts: 155
Joined: 31/5/2006

quote:

ORIGINAL: AxlReznor

Heh... I've never understood the people who think of the original as anything but a generic 80's action film. One of the better ones, to be sure, but considering the quality of most of them, that's not saying much. It's certainly not some kind of untouchable holy relic. And he was already doing unlikely generic action hero things in that film... but for some reason people think that because he cut his feet on glass, he was an "everyman".


Comparing Die Hard, the best action a film, to Die Hard 4, arguably the worst, is the best way to illuminate why Die Hard is so excellent.


(in reply to AxlReznor)
Post #: 26
RE: A Good Day To Die Hard - 14/2/2013 12:48:10 PM   
AxlReznor

 

Posts: 1764
Joined: 2/12/2010
From: Great Britain
quote:

ORIGINAL: UTB

I suppose the issue is that since Die Hard we've had every version of it with other films. You can't put him on a bus (Speed), or a plane (Air Force One/Passenger 57), a boat (Speed 2) etc, so the enclosure gets widened in order to make it seem 'bigger' than the last. Nakatomi Building > Airport > New York City > Eastern Seaboard > Russia.




The sixth one is blatantly going to be One Small Step To Die Hard, in which battles terrorists in space!

(in reply to UTB)
Post #: 27
RE: A Good Day To Die Hard - 14/2/2013 12:49:51 PM   
rawlinson

 

Posts: 45002
Joined: 13/6/2008
From: Timbuktu. Chinese or Fictional.
They should put him in a bungalow. Tell me you wouldn't watch Die Hard in a Bungalow.

(in reply to UTB)
Post #: 28
RE: A Good Day To Die Hard - 14/2/2013 12:52:21 PM   
AxlReznor

 

Posts: 1764
Joined: 2/12/2010
From: Great Britain
quote:

ORIGINAL: rawlinson

They should put him in a bungalow. Tell me you wouldn't watch Die Hard in a Bungalow.


Sounds like it'd be Home Alone: Die Hard.
We've already had James Bond in Home Alone, so give it a few years.

(in reply to rawlinson)
Post #: 29
RE: A Good Day To Die Hard - 14/2/2013 12:52:53 PM   
Shifty Bench

 

Posts: 15403
Joined: 30/9/2005
From: Land of the Scots
Lest we forget, the infamous pitch meeting where someone tried to pitch to Steven E de Souza (the writer of the first two) 'Die Hard in a building.....'

_____________________________

Extended Edition Podcast- Episode 46:Threads Of Destiny (Star Wars Fan Film)

(in reply to UTB)
Post #: 30
Page:   [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Film Forums] >> Film Reviews >> A Good Day To Die Hard Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Movie News††|††Empire Blog††|††Movie Reviews††|††Future Films††|††Features††|††Video Interviews††|††Image Gallery††|††Competitions††|††Forum††|††Magazine††|††Resources
Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.266