DancingClown
Posts: 3589
Joined: 8/1/2006 From: The Lot
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Hood_Man You need to see it in context. Noticed in terms of standing out from other people submitting novels. Yes, but he's only standing out because he's famous, not necessarily because he's better at writing. Like I said I can write and write and submit until I'm blue in the face but I can't compete with the cache of celebrity in terms of getting "noticed". quote:
He isn't simply famous though, he's famous because of what he does and for the effort he put into getting there. That's what made him the star he is. And that's fair enough. But he is getting the publishing deal because he's famous, not because he's renowned for his writing skills. And while he's not the first celebrity to coast in on a publishing deal (and he won't be the last) there is no denying that "being famous" for whatever reason will get you through doors that are closed to the likes of me. And if his writing isn't up to scratch they'll just get a ghost-writer in. quote:
I don't know why you're not having more success as a writer, but if someone's work is good enough to be successful but nobody's giving it a chance then they're only robbing themselves if they don't change tactics. Well, like I said there's only so much I can do, and because I'm not famous in any respect like Frank it's going to be a lot harder for me to get my voice heard. If he can write well then fine, good luck to him, but it's still frustrating from my point of view, and many, many others who are in the same situation. We don't have fame. All we have is perseverance and patience, and that gets severely tested when others walk into publishing with little effort. And by little effort I mean little effort in the field of writing. I'm sure Frank's worked hard at his main career, obviously, but in terms of writing he's put no ground work in. He hasn't had to do the grunt work. I can't just walk into a footballing career, even if I was famous as well. And I'm confused by what you mean when you say "change tactics". Should I now pursue another career in the hopes that my celebrity will open future doors in publishing? There's a very specific process that has to be followed when submitting material to a publisher or a literary agent. It's a very formal business, pretty rigid, with little flexibility. Being famous, for whatever reason, is a significant advantage. What more do you really imagine I can do to compete with celebrities who already have their feet in several doors? quote:
I don't know why you're not having more success so I'm not going to judge, I don't know, either. All I can do is keep trying. But I can't do it like Frankie's done it. Maybe I'm crap. Let's ask Toby. quote:
and I'm sorry I've upset you, but Frank has an opportunity now that's come as a result of all the success he's earned over the years. That's what I'm saying. Quite frankly I'm running out of ways to say this, and I really don't understand the hostility I'm getting  Well, I didn't mean to sound hostile. I was more just flabbergasted at your building site job anaolgy. There's me and Frankie, vying for the job as writer. He's famous, I'm not. He's more deserving of the job because as a celebrity he's apparently made more effort, something against which I can't compete because I'm not a celebrity. It doesn't matter that I've worked hard at writing all my life, because I'm not famous I clearly can't be considered a 'go-getter'. Despite the fact his fame was garnered from the pursuit of a different occupation. That riled me somewhat, because there's a weird snobbery there. And that's weird because that's exactly what people are accusing Frankie's critics here of. quote:
I agree with this example that being famous shouldn't matter because in this example it doesn't appear to matter. It sounds like a body of work that's being judged entirely on its quality and its presentation, where's the celebrity element? Well, I was just trying to make the point that all writers who are trying to get published should be judged on the quality of their writing and their ideas and not their celebrity. And then I foolishly wanted this to be reflected in the wider world. The writers I admire have worked from the ground up. People like King, Herbert, Barker, the guys I read, who started with nothing but worked their fucking arses off. They got noticed because of their talent, not because of the immediate gimmickry of some perceived celebrity or notoriety. Herbert was actually an ad-executive before he got published. King was an English teacher. Barker was a broke play-wright. And it took them years, and in King's case, through poverty, before their persistence paid off. They didn't ride in on fame. Those guys are my inspiration, because they didn't give up. And they didn't do it any differently to what I'm doing. Even Rowling went through shit, and I'm not a fan of her work, but she is an inspiration. Frankie's a great footballer, but compared to the writers I admire he's just a chancer whose previous celebrity did the work for him. And that's not very inspiring.
_____________________________
Astronomic Tune Boy 'The town knew darkness, and darkness was enough.' "Storm just bleeewwww me away..."
|