Drooch
Posts: 129
Joined: 31/5/2006
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Discodez Point one: Have click around the article and you'll see the rules and regulations for different countries, the article states quite clearly that major studios submit different edits of the same film to different countries allowing for local laws and sensibilities. However have a look here (banned films) and you'll see, for example that Saw 3D was initially banned in Germany but was later made available in an edited version. by the way, this is the first and last time I will do your research for you. Err, if you're going to say I'm 'wrong, wrong and wrong-diddly-wrong-wrong' then the onus is on you to back that up. All you've done is throw some document at me and expect me to find your evidence in it, and then have the gall to suggest that you're doing my research for me. A child could debate better than you. Come back when you've found your supporting evidence. quote:
Point two: If you are not disputing this is how the BBFC works then what are you actually saying? why are you so against the BBFC and how come you agreed so wholeheartedly with "peter" above (by the way, i think he was taking the piss out of you, not agreeing with you, have a read again), or was this a sarcastic double bluff? Firstly, 'peter' has since confirmed that he was not 'taking the piss'. I'm against the BBFC for their complicity in British cinemas being forced to screen a heavily censored version of A Good Day To Die Hard. The nature of their complicity is offering a 'cuts advice service' to Fox during the editing process, telling them exactly what needs to be cut to achieve their desired 12A rating. Countries that don't offer this service don't get cinemas littered with censored films, I'd like the UK to do the same. quote:
Point 3: I'm telling you this because you seem to have gotten yourself into a major tizzy because the BBFC have given the new Die Hard film a 12a rating. This is the fault of the studio wanting a 12a certificate, not the BBFC telling the studio that this is the only acceptable certification and the only acceptable cut of the film that will be shown in the UK. Then you've misunderstood my position. Fox are to blame, of course, but it's the BBFC's willingness to coordinate with them, unlike other classification bodies, that makes them equally responsible for our butchered DH5.
< Message edited by Drooch -- 13/2/2013 4:06:27 PM >
|