Register  |   Log In  |  
Sign up to our weekly newsletter    
Follow us on   
Search   
Forum Home Register for Free! Log In Moderator Tickets FAQ Users Online

This Is 40

 
Logged in as: Guest
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Film Forums] >> Film Reviews >> This Is 40 Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
This Is 40 - 11/2/2013 9:22:53 AM   
Empire Admin

 

Posts: 29784
Joined: 29/6/2005
Post your comments on this article
Post #: 1
This is... AWFUL - 11/2/2013 9:22:53 AM   
J_BUltimatum

 

Posts: 144
Joined: 20/1/2007
From: Edinburgh
While much of the advertising has made this out to be a comedy it is far from that! I cam out of this bored, disappointed and would've been very angry if I had to pay for this movie (my friend paid for me to go). The only saving grace is I get to choose the next film we see!

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 2
Enjoyed this! - 11/2/2013 9:33:49 AM   
gavc1978

 

Posts: 47
Joined: 15/2/2006
From: cardiff
Thought it was surprisingly good, could have easily been crap. Slightly long, could have taken 20mins off the duration. On par with Knocked up

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 3
Enjoyed this! - 11/2/2013 9:33:51 AM   
gavc1978

 

Posts: 47
Joined: 15/2/2006
From: cardiff
Thought it was surprisingly good, could have easily been crap. Slightly long, could have taken 20mins off the duration. On par with Knocked up

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 4
toxically bloated, unsympathetic, cringeworthy - 11/2/2013 9:22:15 PM   
fireflyfox

 

Posts: 2
Joined: 2/1/2006
Overlong, horrible characters, frustrating waste of talented actors... plus all the dialogue sounds too similar. None of the humour of Knocked Up.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 5
Pot movie - 13/2/2013 4:33:21 PM   
smakris04

 

Posts: 52
Joined: 9/5/2006
I understand that it is one of these American pot smoke fun movies you have to smoke pot to laugh on but I am drug free and I live in Europe. Not my family not anyone else's would act like that. This is typical immature act comedy that somehow is supposed to make us laugh. The same goes for most recent american comedies, Bridesmaids, bad teacher, horrible bosses, ted, hangover etc. 4 stars? Empire are you smoking too?

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 6
RE: This Is 40 - 15/2/2013 9:02:09 AM   
Chief


Posts: 7778
Joined: 30/9/2005
From: Banshee
I thought it started out ropey but turned out pretty damn funny. It was a tad over long but there was definitely some funny moments.

Melissa McCarthy has the single funniest scene though, still makes me laugh thinking about it.

Maybe not 4 stars for me, more like 3.5 if that was possible.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 7
RE: This Is 40 - 15/2/2013 10:29:11 AM   
Wild about Wilder


Posts: 1657
Joined: 9/4/2010
From: Hertfordshire
Could've done with 20-30 minutes being shaved off.

(in reply to Chief)
Post #: 8
- 15/2/2013 6:50:08 PM   
wlucas

 

Posts: 6
Joined: 27/1/2011
Some funny moments and Paul Rudd is always good but it was so long and his kids were so annoying that it felt like Id spent a weekend in Judd Apatow's house during which his wife had repeatedly shown me her boobs, very weird

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 9
RE: This Is 40 - 17/2/2013 11:52:46 AM   
Indio


Posts: 7238
Joined: 3/10/2005
From: London

Thought it was OK - an improvement on Funny People, but it doesn't really have much of a plotline, it gets to the end and you just think 'hmmm....OK...'. It didn't drag but it was too long, Apatow could have cut all the scenes about Lost for starters (and probably all of the Graham Parker scenes too), but then when you're the writer/producer/director and your wife and children all have major roles, there's probably not many people that are going to be able to/have the balls to tell you your film is too long and a maybe a bit too self indulgent.

_____________________________

'Think about the future.'

(in reply to wlucas)
Post #: 10
Pretty bad. - 17/2/2013 9:08:29 PM   
tysmuse

 

Posts: 383
Joined: 24/9/2007
So smugly and snugly up its own ass that is can't see how bad it is.

Edited for Racism

< Message edited by Your Funny Uncle -- 31/5/2013 9:19:01 AM >

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 11
Lazy, lazy, lazy. - 18/2/2013 2:17:28 PM   
Loosecrew

 

Posts: 73
Joined: 6/1/2009
134 minutes with a script so good it needed ad-libs.
Note to Leslie Mann. Announcing what you're feeling all the time is not acting.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 12
A staggering lack of effort all round. - 19/2/2013 12:33:34 AM   
TheMightyBlackout


Posts: 244
Joined: 28/4/2012
From: Oxford, UK
A two and a quarter hour midlife crisis with a toilet-joke every 15 minutes. I'm actually scared for Anchorman 2.
Apatow's musician friends can't act. One of Apatow's daughters can't act.
40% amusing. 30% irritating. 30% dull.
Not good enough.

_____________________________

More reviews and rambling like that ^^^ at: >>>WorldOfBlackout.co.uk <<<

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 13
RE: A staggering lack of effort all round. - 21/2/2013 10:52:16 AM   
OPEN YOUR EYES

 

Posts: 4381
Joined: 5/2/2012
God,what a smug-fest of a film.
I also don't find Paul Rudd in any form humorous or engaging as a lead.

Plus,I don't think I've ever enjoyed a Judd Apatow film (Bridesmaids doesn't count because he produced it but he didn't direct,plus he didn't write the script either.)

(in reply to TheMightyBlackout)
Post #: 14
RE: This is 40 - 22/2/2013 6:53:05 PM   
Vadersville


Posts: 3092
Joined: 30/9/2005
I enjoyed it, although it was nowhere near the same level of Knocked Up. Think the main problem(s) was that it lacked both the narrative driving point and ensemble of different supporting characters its predecessor did. Robert Smigel's character felt like it was the leftovers of a role intended for Seth Rogen's Ben, and whilst I never expected to Katherine Heigl's Alison given the public falling out with Judd Apatow, it was a bit odd that her sister didn't even get mentioned, especially at Pete's party. Come to think of it where was their mum from Knocked Up. It's generally aimless and a tad overlong but that said the missus and I both had a good time and a few really big laugh out loud moments. It just needed a bit more of Jason Segal and a bit less Graham Parker.

_____________________________

Confusion is a way of life, not a state of mind

(in reply to OPEN YOUR EYES)
Post #: 15
Not groundbreaking, but found it really entertaining - 23/4/2013 4:37:43 PM   
djshaiguy

 

Posts: 22
Joined: 26/10/2007
From: Manchester
Couldn't agree with the review more. Definitely more Parenthood than Meet The Parents, and some really nice observational comedy of what family and relationships mean these days. If it had a stronger story, and done without the comedy interludes of Megan Fox / Chris O Dowd / Jason Segel, it could have been a better film - not that they weren't funny, they just didn't belong here.

Still really enjoyable fun though, and you come away from it feeling warm in the heart. Job done.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 16
RE: Not groundbreaking, but found it really entertaining - 2/5/2013 1:02:30 PM   
BelfastBoy

 

Posts: 582
Joined: 30/11/2005

SPOILERS ALERT!

Only just around to watching it last night. Enjoyed it, but not unconditionally, and there's nothing that would make me want to watch it again. 3* film, I'd say. My impressions:

- There isn't much of a plot, no defined 'start-middle-end', or even the dreaded three-act structure. If I'm being polite, I'd say it's 'picaresque'; if not, I'd say the structure is rambling. There isn't a satisfying conclusion, more a point where it just stops but could easily go on for another hour. Too many plot elements are left hanging without resolution - the family's financial problems, generally; does Debbie recover her stolen money?; does Pete's record label go bankrupt?; how does the pregnancy pan out?
- Paul Rudd's character hasn't changed much since Knocked Up. He's still a feckless, deceiving eejit who isn't deserving of the wife and family he has. A tacked-on moment of resolution at the end isn't enough to unravel 2+ hours of him being a selfish liar.
- Surely there's a role for Megan Fox that doesn't involve her prancing around in short dresses / her underwear / a bikini?
- Why cast Chris O'Dowd and Lena Dunham and then bury them in tiny, forgettable roles? (Ditto Jason Segel - his presence adds nothing to the film.) Melissa McCarthy pretty much steals the film though.
- Apatow's films make money, hence he can get away with being self-indulgent. But this also results in overlong, unneccessarily improvised, 'let's cast all my friends and family' films that would benefit from tighter scripting and editing.
- In many cases, the actual situations, characterisations and dialogue are believable, and the film works well as comedy-drama, as opposed to straight comedy. It isn't consistently funny enough for that, but is a bit of a let down since it's billed (however tangentially) as the semi-sequel to a much broader and funnier film.

Overall, don't expect to laugh out loud all the way through, but it's certainly worth a watch.

(in reply to djshaiguy)
Post #: 17
this is 40 - 8/6/2013 4:12:10 PM   
Conboy


Posts: 28
Joined: 7/1/2013
The Apatow/Mann clan does it again.

Light-hearted yet often bittersweet romp about turning the big 4-0 (or 38, for those still in denial). Carrying on with the Paul Rudd/Leslie Mann coupling from Knocked Up, director Judd Apatow (Mann’s real-life partner) has concocted this fun light film for all. Which even manages to drop the C-word. America is beginning to get it in terms of fresh and applicable comedy, I reckon.

Pete and Debbie are at ‘that stage’ in life – about to enter the best part, yet still in denial about everything that comes with it. Daughter Sadie is in the full throes of puberty – mood swings and total incoherence all part of that. Eight year old Charlotte is as adorable as ever, especially when she is the target of all Sadie’s misdirected hormonal angst. Adding to the hilarity are the performances of Rudd and Mann as Pete and Debbie – trying to deal with broke and estranged parents, schoolyard politics, insufficient finances and disloyal employees.

While at first the film may seem disjointed, it is high enjoyable and far too easy to identify with. A great soundtrack ensues – well done for sneaking some Wilco in at the end, truly excellent.

In a way, even the conclusion is not too Hollywoodised – almost nothing is resolved, yet the charm remains – and the resolution is not necessary in the end. Look out for a fantastic scene between an irate mother and the girls’ principal, and Debbie completely losing it at a child who cyber-bullied 13-year-old Sadie.

Fun and surprisingly pertinent for everyone, I would see this again. Something for everyone, as long as you can deal with the occasional swearing and angst.

Lovely fun and on now, so get down to your local and check it out.


< Message edited by elab49 -- 19/6/2013 9:54:04 AM >

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 18
DVD review - 17/6/2013 5:06:46 PM   
dseys

 

Posts: 180
Joined: 10/8/2012
Funny how this was downgraded to 2 poor star in the DVD review section of Empire's last issue :-)

(in reply to Conboy)
Post #: 19
RE: DVD review - 19/6/2013 6:33:06 AM   
bennyboy1971

 

Posts: 43
Joined: 4/7/2008
This is not 40.

(in reply to dseys)
Post #: 20
RE: DVD review - 19/6/2013 9:55:27 AM   
elab49


Posts: 54597
Joined: 1/10/2005

quote:

ORIGINAL: dseys

Funny how this was downgraded to 2 poor star in the DVD review section of Empire's last issue :-)


Really, why? I mean most people understand that different people reviewing the same thing might have different opinions and this isn't exactly rare. Not to mention people can change their own minds.

So why was this so unusual here?

_____________________________

Lips Together and Blow - blogtasticness and Glasgow Film Festival GFF13!

quote:

ORIGINAL: Deviation] LIKE AMERICA'S SWEETHEARTS TOO. IT MADE ME LAUGH A LOT AND THOUGHT IT WAS WITTY. ALSO I FEEL SLOWLY DYING INSIDE. I KEEP AGREEING WITH ELAB.


Annual Poll 2013 - All Lists Welcome

(in reply to dseys)
Post #: 21
RE: DVD review - 19/6/2013 10:16:24 AM   
UTB


Posts: 9869
Joined: 30/9/2005
This is probably the first film I've ever heard Mrs UTB say "It was fucking shit!!". And she has a pretty high bobbins tolerance level. And doesn't really swear often.


(in reply to elab49)
Post #: 22
RE: DVD review - 19/6/2013 10:23:47 AM   
elab49


Posts: 54597
Joined: 1/10/2005
She chose a good one to start with

_____________________________

Lips Together and Blow - blogtasticness and Glasgow Film Festival GFF13!

quote:

ORIGINAL: Deviation] LIKE AMERICA'S SWEETHEARTS TOO. IT MADE ME LAUGH A LOT AND THOUGHT IT WAS WITTY. ALSO I FEEL SLOWLY DYING INSIDE. I KEEP AGREEING WITH ELAB.


Annual Poll 2013 - All Lists Welcome

(in reply to UTB)
Post #: 23
RE: This Is 40 - 19/6/2013 1:08:24 PM   
Dannybohy


Posts: 1374
Joined: 7/1/2009
Well while this is here I might as well just say ..yeah I was pleasantly surprised! and enough charm and humor to make for a decent movie. i enjoyed it.

_____________________________

'Man of Steel!,Man of Shit!' -fairyprincess

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 24
RE: This Is 40 - 19/6/2013 3:17:22 PM   
UTB


Posts: 9869
Joined: 30/9/2005
I hope your eyebrows fall off.

(in reply to Dannybohy)
Post #: 25
RE: This Is 40 - 20/6/2013 9:12:40 AM   
Dannybohy


Posts: 1374
Joined: 7/1/2009

quote:

ORIGINAL: UTB

I hope your eyebrows fall off.


ha! Touche sir!

_____________________________

'Man of Steel!,Man of Shit!' -fairyprincess

(in reply to UTB)
Post #: 26
RE: DVD review - 20/6/2013 4:52:26 PM   
dseys

 

Posts: 180
Joined: 10/8/2012

quote:

ORIGINAL: elab49


quote:

ORIGINAL: dseys

Funny how this was downgraded to 2 poor star in the DVD review section of Empire's last issue :-)


Really, why? I mean most people understand that different people reviewing the same thing might have different opinions and this isn't exactly rare. Not to mention people can change their own minds.

So why was this so unusual here?


I didn't say it was unusual. Of course different people have different opinion, but the published review is kind of "Empire's official verdict". The magazine chose a 4 star review when the film was out in cinema and then, seeing the audience's poor reaction, picked up a 2 star review when it was out on dvd.

I don't have any problem with that. It's absolutely normal. But it's funny because it's like Empire's now saying: "You people were right, this movie is shit". The same happened with Cosmopolis.

(in reply to elab49)
Post #: 27
Watching this, you can actually feel your nails grow - 23/6/2013 6:53:58 PM   
bendoofus


Posts: 63
Joined: 25/3/2007
From: London
This is quite simply the most boring film I've seen in my life - absolutely nothing happens. I'm turning it off less than halfway through and am still regretting the time I wasted on it.

_____________________________

I feel like I'm Han Solo, you're Chewie, and she's Ben Kenobi and we're in that FUCKED UP BAR!

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 28
RE: DVD review - 23/6/2013 7:39:02 PM   
elab49


Posts: 54597
Joined: 1/10/2005

quote:

ORIGINAL: dseys


quote:

ORIGINAL: elab49


quote:

ORIGINAL: dseys

Funny how this was downgraded to 2 poor star in the DVD review section of Empire's last issue :-)


Really, why? I mean most people understand that different people reviewing the same thing might have different opinions and this isn't exactly rare. Not to mention people can change their own minds.

So why was this so unusual here?


I didn't say it was unusual. Of course different people have different opinion, but the published review is kind of "Empire's official verdict". The magazine chose a 4 star review when the film was out in cinema and then, seeing the audience's poor reaction, picked up a 2 star review when it was out on dvd.

I don't have any problem with that. It's absolutely normal. But it's funny because it's like Empire's now saying: "You people were right, this movie is shit". The same happened with Cosmopolis.



Empire don't publish a committee review for any film - the review is the review of the person who writes it for the simple reason that they might be the only person who's actually seen the film - there isn't a mass office outing to every press screening (which is pretty obvious). It might not score the same if someone else in the office wrote and argued the toss on it. That's pretty much how most magazines/newspapers work. And, sometimes, a different reviewer will do the DVD and it will get a different rating. Or even the same reviewer, not caught up in the moment, presents a more sober analysis.

Sadly, your misperception isn't as rare as it should be. And specifically? To suggest that Empire solely changed a review score because of what some random others thought of a film and to suggest, then, that the review isn't the professional opinion of a particular film critic, is really tantamount to professional libel, so you might want to rethink how you word that particular accusation. Empire have been clear in the past they have little tolerance for this type of unsubstantiated accusation. You might not have appreciated that this is what your accusation essentially is but, genuinely, think about it - film critics rely on professional reputations and you've just suggested one of them doesn't actually have opinions but just checks some an other public opinion-ometer and writes what that says.

So what you're suggesting happened? That's not what happened. An opinion changed - Empire did not change a score because of anyone else's opinion but one of their own.

_____________________________

Lips Together and Blow - blogtasticness and Glasgow Film Festival GFF13!

quote:

ORIGINAL: Deviation] LIKE AMERICA'S SWEETHEARTS TOO. IT MADE ME LAUGH A LOT AND THOUGHT IT WAS WITTY. ALSO I FEEL SLOWLY DYING INSIDE. I KEEP AGREEING WITH ELAB.


Annual Poll 2013 - All Lists Welcome

(in reply to dseys)
Post #: 29
RE: This Is 40 - 23/6/2013 7:53:49 PM   
MonsterCat


Posts: 7934
Joined: 24/3/2011
From: St. Albans, Hertfordshire
Personally, I think Empire should preface each review with: "Film is subjective, and Empire is not run by a hive mind. Thank you"

_____________________________

"I am a writer, a doctor, a nuclear physicist and a theoretical philosopher. But above all, I am a man, a hopelessly inquisitive man, just like you."

Films watched in 2013

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 30
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Film Forums] >> Film Reviews >> This Is 40 Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


 
Movie News  |  Empire Blog  |  Movie Reviews  |  Future Films  |  Features  |  Video Interviews  |  Image Gallery  |  Competitions  |  Forum  |  Magazine  |  Resources
 
Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.141