moontheloon
Posts: 6169
Joined: 30/9/2005 From: Birmingham
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: tarantinofan quote:
ORIGINAL: Goodfella quote:
On the one side the argument is that if private schools did not exist then the "good" teachers (and I use inverted commas because state schools also have good teachers though they do not have the pick of the litter) would be dispersed amongst the state schools. You realise this is complete nonsense though don't you? All teachers are trained to the same educational standards (obviously I'm discounting specalist trainings here, I'm talking about the qualifications you can obtain to become a schoolteacher and the further NVQH course you could opt to take if avaliable to you), regardless of whether they go on to teach in a state, private or public school. My mum is a qualified headteacher working in a state school. If she had the funds avaliable to her she could set up and open her own private school tomorrow, does it make her the 'pick of the litter' or the teachers she chooses to employ to run education in her school 'the pick of the litter'? No, of course not. Also don't be naive enough to think that these teachers are neccessarily any better because they choose to work in a private school. In a closed and narrow-minded environment like some of the private schools I have witnessed, I should imagine 'bad teaching' is quite a strong possibility. No I don't believe this but its an argument I have seen against private schools. Like I mentioned in a post before, the central argument is probably that state schools would improve if they existed as the only available option. I believe the idea isn't that the teachers are better because they choose to work in a private school, it's more that private schools have more money from their funds so they are able to poach teachers who may be more gifted (because even with the same training some teachers are simply better than others... not necessarily those in private schools mind) by offering them higher salaries and better benefits, because they have the money to do so while a state school can only offer what they can offer any teacher. And yes, your mum could set up her own school tomorrow, but do you really think anyone would send their kids to a school, and pay through the nose for it, if she was hiring teachers who the parents deemed average or just good. You only pay for a private education if you believe that the teaching your children will receive is better than they would get in a state school, otherwise what's the point. I don't necessarily subscribe to this viewpoint, if for no other reason than I had some absolutely amazing teachers in the fairly rough state school I went to, teachers who went the extra mile, stuck up for their students and to whom I owe an absolute debt of gratitude to. However, to say that because all teachers are trained to the same standards, to say one school could get better teachers than another is nonsense, well it simply isn't true. The proof I have is simple, think back to when you were at school, did you have teachers you thought were good and teachers who you thought were bad? I sure as hell did, and they all received the same training, some people are simply more gifted than others.
_____________________________
A man is a success if he gets up in the morning and gets to bed at night and in between he does what he wants to do
|