Mr Gittes
Posts: 443
Joined: 3/2/2013
|
Probably direction. For example, The King's Speech is a perfectly good film but I just can't watch it these days with the knowledge that Hooper won Best Director over Fincher. It aggravates me so fucking much. Another, different, example would be Captain America: First Avenger. Yeah, you could say it's got a crappy script and all that, but I quite enjoyed it because of Johnston's visuals (I do love it when a director skilfully uses widescreen). Also, even when their movies are below par, I could watch anything by Spielberg or Scorsese because their visuals are always top-notch. Overused steadicam irritates the utter crap out of me. This is my biggest gripe with Clint Eastwood and why I will never call him a great director. Unforgiven remains the biggest exception though; by far his best movie and one of my all-time favourites. However, everything else, even when it's terrific (like Mystic River, Million Dollar Baby, Changeling etc), is ruined for me because there are so many scenes where it's steadicam, steadicam, steadicam. I hate it. That is unless it's used very stylistically like with Kubrick or - you guessed it - Spielberg or Scorsese. But when it's just thrown in there where a dolly or even just a tripod would suffice, it's the epitome of visual laziness to me. It's also why I utterly loathe the Swedish sequels to The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo (hurry up and remake them too, Fincher, please!). So there you go. It would have to be direction with me.
|