jobloffski
Posts: 1837
Joined: 30/9/2005 From: elsewhere
|
Merchandising tie ins, product placement in the films (which helps fund the films meaning a relative lowering in the take needed to reach profit), international TV rights, online rentals, home retail, blah blah blah, the financial life of a film isn't solely based on the box office take alone, although obviously the life of a film after the cinema is more rosy if the box office is mega. Make a remake = internet complaints about whether it is sacrilege and ,like it or not, net nerds are very much in the minority and the louder we scream about how shit something we haven't seen is gonna be the more chance people who aren't net nerds, which is still mostly everybody are going to be encouraged to see it cos, basically, we am not cool and agreeing with us am not cool Edit, forgot to mention re-release of cleaned up versions of the original films that are either being remade, rebooted or prequelised/sequelised by the 'oldideamachine' that then seeks to make money from both the young blood and the old blade at the same time, in the hope that both will try both new and old iterations and if complaints happen afterwards, already gotchamunny, etc ,
< Message edited by jobloffski -- 23/11/2012 5:13:21 PM >
_____________________________
Yes, dreamers dream and doers do. But if dreamers DON'T dream, doers don't have anything TO do. Everything that is only here because people exist, only exists because someone thought of it., or in other words, dreamed it.
|