jobloffski
Posts: 1837
Joined: 30/9/2005 From: elsewhere
|
Read the same article from different papers (Have blocked the guy who started the thread but the reaction to his post makes it obvious he's banging the same drum that made me block him). Story seems to be, after the reaction to QOS Craig wanted out for a bit, Studio insisted not, due to contractual obligation, and should Skyfall have bombed, the contract would have been one that the studio could render worthless, so, in other words, Craig's contract amounts to something someone could wipe their ass with, if the films starring Craig went south moneywise. Being completely factual, such state of affairs apparently has to be twisted in CRAIG WANTS/WANTED TO QUIT' sensationalised bullshit that is presented as a story (it isn't) and current or something Craig said a while ago, depending on the rag you see it in. For the benefit of idiots, Craig wasn't saying as far as he is concerned someone could wipe their ass with his contract at all, or being ungrateful, just acknowledging that it was as good as toilet paper in terms of security for him in the job to people in a position to invoke clauses that required the films to be a certain level of successful for the contract to be honoured by the studio.
< Message edited by jobloffski -- 9/11/2012 6:18:49 PM >
_____________________________
Yes, dreamers dream and doers do. But if dreamers DON'T dream, doers don't have anything TO do. Everything that is only here because people exist, only exists because someone thought of it., or in other words, dreamed it.
|