jobloffski
Posts: 1837
Joined: 30/9/2005 From: elsewhere
|
Resurrection is a no no. But, 30-40 years after the fall of the empire, the LEGACY of Vader can have an effect on the galaxy, in terms of whether or not the galaxy completely trusts the motives of the son of the child and jedi murdering, galaxy oppressing attack dog of the long dead Emperor in reforming the very jedi order from which Vader emerged? It is after all, episode 7 of a saga, not the unrelated start of a new one. If continuing from what has already happened, the shadow Vader casts over the Galaxy surely seems at least a reasonable and logical context for conflict, and various trusting and otherwise views of Luke Skywalker and the jedi order (from which Vader came) and whether he should be hated for 'The Sins of the father' provides a pertinent and personalised source of character conflict for him/any descendants and danger for 'the good guys', and a 'justification' for opportunist bad guys seeking to make financial/political power capital out of sowing seeds of doubt about the goodness of the 'Sons of Skywalker'? Icons are often used to justify whatever views people have/actions they take, regardless of anything they really did in life. And a potential for a face off between those inspired by Anakin's ultimate sacrifice and those more into the power/fear his image can be said his image represents... We've had the resolution of the war between the two sides within vader/Anakin. Will we now see the war between those who aspire to his goodness, and those who are inspired by his evil, writ large across the galaxy as the impetus for conflict in Star Wars 7-9?
< Message edited by jobloffski -- 13/11/2012 1:53:55 PM >
_____________________________
Yes, dreamers dream and doers do. But if dreamers DON'T dream, doers don't have anything TO do. Everything that is only here because people exist, only exists because someone thought of it., or in other words, dreamed it.
|