manwihtheplan
Posts: 100
Joined: 11/9/2012
|
With respect I don't think you're seeing the bigger picture. The two films you mention had successful original films. Taken and Resident Evil 1 were hits so they established a fanbase. If a film establishes a decent size fanbase there's a reasonable chance a sequel can be a success. As we know, the first Judge Dredd film underperformed at the US box office. Front forward 17 years to the reboot - Dredd 3D - and the film makers use elements of Die Hard to create the storyline. This was the kiss of death for the film because: A) people were reluctant to see a new Judge Dredd film because the original film didn't establish much or any fanbase, B) the trailer sold the film as Die Hard/The Raid - a generic 'video game type plot' sci-fi film with a hero wearing a helmet. I've looked at comments from people about why Dredd 3D flopped and some people have written stuff like: "I went to see Dredd 3D and mentioned it to my friends but they weren't interested. They went to see Looper." It's very clear Dredd 3D did not interest enough regular film-goers. Why? Well, perhaps there are several reasons, perhaps it's just the cruel hand of fate decreeing Judge Dredd is a doomed film property, however, the plot - Dredd goes up a block - was not individual enough, not distinct enough, not 'wow' enough to make enough people want to see the film. When internet forums and video upload sites are full of comments like "is this film like The Raid, the premise seems like Die Hard" you know this film is in trouble because it's not carving out its own niche within the sci-fi/action genre. Every successful film needs something to distinguish it from other films in its genre. It can be anything no matter how superficial. Perhaps Resident Evil fans love seeing Milla Jovovich kicking action butt, perhaps Saw fans love seeing people killed in gruesome ways, perhaps Taken fans love seeing Liam Neeson doing his hard man routine, who knows, but there is no doubt any successful film has something distinctive - even if people argue over what that actually is (!) - to make people interested enough to want to pay to see it. I don't believe Dredd 3D does. Sure, the actual character of Judge Dredd is wonderfully distinctive but the trailers didn't manage to convince that to enough people and I don't believe the Die Hard plot made the overall film distinctive. As I've said before - the plot of Dredd 3D is Die Hard set in Dredd's world, it's not a 2000AD Judge Dredd strip set in Dredd's world. In my opinion that was an epic mistake because people will look at the trailer and think "nah, looks a bit like stuff I've seen before, I'll wait till it's on rental." If the film feels too much like other films there is no incentive for people to pay the more expensive 3D ticket prices to see it. Why should people pay 'more' to see something that feels so unoriginal? DNA Films set out to make a film that had a very similar plot to a 1980s action film, that turned out to have a plot very similar to a modern martial arts film. This was giving Dredd 3D no unique identity and pretty much killed off its box office chances or severely dented its box office chances. The likes of Sauchieboy can praise Dredd 3D till the end of time, fair enough, but they can never admit one painful truth... Had Alex Garland adapted a proper Judge Dredd story from 2000AD, not one person on the planet would be comparing Dredd 3D to The Raid/Die Hard/Escape From New York. Can't you see how reviews like this made the film seem totally unoriginal: http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2012/09/19/dredd-3d-is-gritty-love-child-robocop-anddie-hard/ All that review is saying is "this film is totally unoriginal!" The exact quote: quote:
What ensues is a hyper-violent, completely bad-ass chase film, a gritty love child of “Robocop” and “Die Hard.” So what makes Dredd 3D unique, individual? NOTHING. The review praises the film but there's nothing about the film that's fresh. It's just Robocop meets Die Hard. And? Is that it? No Dredd world imagination, satire, invention? Nope. Just Robocop and Die Hard. There you go, that review tells everyone why people had no great desire to see the film. It's just a pastiche of other films. What makes Dredd 3D stand out? Nothing.
< Message edited by manwihtheplan -- 13/10/2012 12:17:57 PM >
|