Register  |   Log In  |  
Sign up to our weekly newsletter    
Follow us on   
Search   
Forum Home Register for Free! Log In Moderator Tickets FAQ Users Online

Star Trek Sequel Title Uncovered

 
Logged in as: Guest
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Film Forums] >> Movie News >> Star Trek Sequel Title Uncovered Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Star Trek Sequel Title Uncovered - 10/9/2012 8:19:53 PM   
Empire Admin

 

Posts: 30280
Joined: 29/6/2005
Post your comments on this article
Post #: 1
So... - 10/9/2012 8:19:53 PM   
Kmadden2004

 

Posts: 122
Joined: 6/10/2005
Into Darkness + 3D glasses = pitch black

< Message edited by Kmadden2004 -- 10/9/2012 8:20:49 PM >

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 2
- 10/9/2012 8:32:23 PM   
KingButtMonkey

 

Posts: 21
Joined: 28/11/2005
Don't need to worry about darkness, there will be plenty of lens flare to go around.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 3
hurry up!! - 10/9/2012 8:34:42 PM   
BurtonWildheart

 

Posts: 40
Joined: 10/2/2011
first one was about as close to Star Wars action as you can get...bring on the sequel

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 4
- 10/9/2012 8:45:08 PM   
clarkkent

 

Posts: 761
Joined: 20/7/2006
Uhm, everything I've read about this title seems to suggest it isn't confirmed. Just saying it seems like an odd thing to report without actual confirmation.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 5
darkness - 10/9/2012 10:46:33 PM   
rudyalapag

 

Posts: 29
Joined: 12/1/2008
something "darkness" this way comes. wearing the 3D glasses will tip the dark while watching StarTrek Into Darkness. i'm beginning to love the title "dark" for movies like these: "THE DARK KNIGHT RISES" and "THE DARK KNIGHT" and saying what Darth Vader we always says: if you ever knew the power of the dark side, joining the dark side is really fun. Star Wars fame of course.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 6
LOVE - 11/9/2012 3:10:05 AM   
homersimpson_esq


Posts: 20120
Joined: 30/9/2005
From: Springfield
I like it.

Just saying.


_____________________________

That deep-browed Homer ruled as his demesne.


Bristol Bad Film Club
A place where movie fans can come and behold some of the most awful films ever put to celluloid.

(in reply to rudyalapag)
Post #: 7
RE: LOVE - 11/9/2012 3:46:24 AM   
NeoBrowser

 

Posts: 197
Joined: 1/5/2012
If Abrams 1st Star Trek is anything to go by, this will almost certainly be better than Wrath of Kahn

(in reply to homersimpson_esq)
Post #: 8
- 11/9/2012 7:39:01 AM   
herbertwest1701

 

Posts: 34
Joined: 25/8/2007
Although it might be fairly considered as jumping on the "dark sequels are cool" bandwagon, I can certainly understand their avoidance of Star Trek: Something. It's actually quite unique in that it uses the 'Star Trek' phrase in an organic way... as in Trek "into" darkness. And it feels mysterious. What might work against it is that there is supposedly still much fun and comedy in the movie.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 9
RE: - 11/9/2012 9:58:45 AM   
TwistedAnimator


Posts: 24
Joined: 25/5/2012
From: Canterbury
More of the same please!
The first film was a very pleasant surprise

(in reply to herbertwest1701)
Post #: 10
- 11/9/2012 1:25:17 PM   
Simon124

 

Posts: 134
Joined: 6/1/2007
From: London
Well, yes, using 'trek' as a verb is original in a ST movie title, but wasn't it first used in First Contact by Zephram Cochran when asking if the TNG crew were 'on some kind of star trek'?

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 11
RE: - 11/9/2012 2:06:59 PM   
film man aidy

 

Posts: 343
Joined: 8/3/2007
Cool title. Hope it equates to a great movie.

(in reply to Simon124)
Post #: 12
I Think Not!!! - 11/9/2012 3:08:14 PM   
dcrow1975

 

Posts: 2
Joined: 31/5/2012
I love Star Trek, but you can be guaranteed that this title will change before it's released, still, not as bad a title as the third part of The Hobbit.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 13
Even in Darkness, They'll be Lens Flare - 11/9/2012 10:20:59 PM   
fantastic mr ethan

 

Posts: 20
Joined: 7/8/2009
From: Kent
I guarantee it

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 14
A trek by any other name - 14/9/2012 5:14:38 PM   
theturk

 

Posts: 1
Joined: 24/3/2010
They can call it what they damn well like, just make it as good as the first.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 15
Star Trek : Attack of the Colons - 14/9/2012 7:24:08 PM   
Riaz Ali

 

Posts: 4
Joined: 1/1/2012
Star Trek : The Colon Wars
Star Trek and the Temple Of Doom
Star Trek and the Unbearable Lightness of Being
Star Trek Does Dallas

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 16
At the end of the day... - 14/9/2012 10:35:27 PM   
HighwayJoe


Posts: 107
Joined: 3/2/2009
From: Largo, MD
...the title is really the least of it. It's the sequel to one of the few re-makes/reboots I have actually enjoyed. Abrams could've called it 'Star Trek Yet Another One All Right Yeah' and I'd still be lining up to get my ticket.

For what it's worth, though, 'Into Darkness' isn't half bad.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 17
I see what he's saying... - 15/9/2012 12:07:43 AM   
Galen Muffley


Posts: 31
Joined: 24/8/2009
...but still, the title instantly brings 'Star Trekkin'' to mind. The phrasing fits. "Star Trek in-to Da-a-a-rk-ness"!...

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 18
RE: I Think Not!!! - 15/9/2012 12:19:07 AM   
Duff2k1


Posts: 3
Joined: 2/4/2010
From: MIddlesbrough
There and Back Again? i'd say that was quite an apt title

_____________________________

“I believe… whatever doesn’t kill you simply makes you…stranger.”

(in reply to dcrow1975)
Post #: 19
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Film Forums] >> Movie News >> Star Trek Sequel Title Uncovered Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


 
Movie News  |  Empire Blog  |  Movie Reviews  |  Future Films  |  Features  |  Video Interviews  |  Image Gallery  |  Competitions  |  Forum  |  Magazine  |  Resources
 
Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.172