chris kilby
Posts: 1189
Joined: 31/3/2010
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: horribleives quote:
ORIGINAL: great_badir I've gone into this in far more detail, on more than one occasion, elsewhere on the forum. So, rather than go over old ground again, if you click the FAVE FILMS link in my sig and head to page 15, scroll down a little bit and most of my problems with the film are explained there. Had a look. Interesting read and some good points. I totally disagree with most of them but well argued nonetheless. I will say though, that there were plenty of reviews and features (including an Empire one not long after the film's February '93 release) that aknowledged the movie's debt to Hong Kong cinema - and specifically its similarities to City On Fire - while still being mightily impressed by it, so I don't buy the idea that until Mills lifted the lid everyone was in the dark and had to re-evaluate their opinion. Plenty were aware of the story's influences and Tarantino's magpie tendencies from the get-go but were blown away by the movie regardless. City on Fire The Taking of Pelham 123 The Killing... And a fair few others, I expect. Everyone does this to some extent or another - everything influences everything else. Everything's connected, maaaaaaaaaaaan! Seven Stories and all that. Although, granted, Tarantino is more shameless than most when it comes to blatantly, er, homaging the work of others. Even Pulp Fiction is deliberately inspired by some of the hoariest cliches in all of crime literature - The Boxer Paid To Throw The Fight? That's Robert Ryan in The Set-Up. But look at Drive (Thief, The Driver, Le Samorai), The Dark Knight (Heat) and from Kurosawa to Riefenstahl, The Searchers to The Wizard of Oz, Laurel and Hardy to The Dambusters, you could fill a book with Star Wars' influences. Someone probably has. All films which proudly wear their influences on their half-inched sleeves. Or "haircuts" in Hollywood screenwriting parlance - as in "Speed gave Die Hard a haircut." There are rip-offs and there are rip-offs. What's that old saying again? Minor talents plagiarise, great artists steal? It all rather depends how much style, imagination and, er, originality it's done with. To the point that sometimes it's the "rip-off" which endures while uninspired "originals" are forgotten. (Even Hamlet was a "rip-off"/parody of the bloody Jacobean Revenge Tragedies which were popular at the time - The Dane's notorious "procrastination" was meant to be satirical.) The same thing can happen with cover-versions (Hound Dog) and re-makes (The Maltese Falcon). Reservoir Dogs and Star Wars might be a load of old cod, but they are served up with a lot of relish. Now there's a title for a thread: Who's The Bigger Movie Magpie/Rip-Off Artist - Lucas or Tarantino...?
|