DancingClown
Posts: 3544
Joined: 8/1/2006 From: The Lot
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: elab49 I think you may have misread the first post before your 'contribution'. Elephant Boy asked if anyone cared to make a case for their worst directors - the 3 in the first post are just his choices. The only restriction he suggests is that they've made 5 films, which is arbitrary, but fair enough. Erm, what? I think I was perfectly justified in my response thank you very much, and I have not misread the first post at all. He didn't proffer three directors that were simply his worst directors, he offered three directors that he thought were shit and seemed to want everyone else to agree with these suggestions as just prime examples, which is hugely presumptuous. quote:
Sure there must have been talk on here before about directors with a flawless series of films, but what about the opisite can you think of a director where every film he or she has ever directored has been bad? I think it would make sense to stick to those that have made at least say five fours. The two I pick off the top of my head are Joel Schumacher and Michael Bay. The fact that I and several others leapt to the defence of Schumacher exposes the somewhat flawed premise of the thread itself as surely defending a director against what others are saying is not necessarily its point? Like you, I, and several others have said, it's too subjective. Basically you just have a thread of people going "I think so and so's shite" and others saying "hey, so and so's not shit, you don't know what you're talking about!" and so on, descending no doubt into just another mindless cluster-fuck, therefore negating the thread's original, somewhat threadbare premise. I've defended Schumacher, as others have done, so I don't think there's anything wrong with my "contribution" as you so sarcastically and condescendingly called it.
_____________________________
Astronomic Tune Boy 'The town knew darkness, and darkness was enough.' "Storm just bleeewwww me away..."
|