boaby
Posts: 2788
Joined: 29/12/2006 From: Aberdeenshire
|
Someone once described civilised government as being only possible if the state has a monopoly on violence within its borders. I forget who, where and when but I'm fairly sure it was in relation to the development of states in the late medieval period. Maybe not relevant, or maybe it is. Does any one or body have a monopoly on violence in the U.S? Well, does any one or body have such a thing in any modern state? Not really. But a lot of them make a decent fist on limiting the degree of violence members of a state can inflict on others. The goal is not so much to have a monopoly on violence but to get as close as possible to no violence within a state. Unsurprisingly, a lot of states have realised that prohibiting or rigidly regulating the more destructive creations of mankind might be a plan. America is phucked up in this regard. Most people in most modern states are happy enough to elect representatives who are then given the responsibility of ensuring violence is not perpetrated against them. Americans do this electing stuff and yet wish to have the right to do the job themselves. They appear to want their own personal state over which they have a monopoly of violence and yet glorify the wider states in which they live, despite these states apparently unsuccessfully sating the desire to be an individual state. Moreover, the boundaries of these individual states are also individual. This means a lot of states whose borders overlap, monopolies no more. This desire to be a one person state that many appear to have results in an antiquated part of their sacred bit of secular paper being cherished as if it vital in order to live in freedom. It is not. What many perceive to be the solution appears to many others to be the problem. Of course, most modern states realise that seeking to eliminate the perpetration of violent acts in their jurisdiction does not require the state itself to perpetrate violence. It is the desire to have the ability to do violence in one's own state that an apparent majority of Americans have. So they themselves want the power, means and justification to dole out death, they want their States to have it, and they want their federal government to have it. Trust issues. Out of interest, I wonder what percentage of these periodic massacres occur in States with the death penalty?
_____________________________
"Aberdonians, and with some degree of purpose and right on their side, have absolute contempt for Glasgow. There is a side of Aberdonians who, let's be absolutely honest about this, feel so superior to Glasgow that you can measure it by the yard."
|