joannakanga
Posts: 3
Joined: 22/8/2012 From: Greece
|
As the story slowly unfolded, I found myself utterly fascinated. Having never heard of the story, there were no pre-conceptions about what “could’ve been and should’ve been”. Beautifully filmed and not a boring moment throughout, the seamless transition from interviews to re-enactments, “mouth-over” effects included, I thought, was a stroke of genius. Master manipulator of human frailty, Frédéric Bourdin, is almost reptilian in aspect. Although there were times during viewing when I felt a vague sympathy with the logic of his “why should I continue to con this family – I only want to be loved, they knew I was not Nicholas from the beginning”, this quickly evaporated after reading several news articles only to discover that he has stolen several hundred identities during his life. A con-artist is a con-artist. That is what he does. My main issue is with the family. I find it hard to believe that a family, any family, (no matter how uneducated / desperate to find their missing relative), would accept on say-so, a person with in-your-face glaring physical & speech discrepancies. No doubts, no questioning, no request for blood or DNA test … makes you think doesn’t it? Makes you wonder about the truth. This is my first review – I usually don’t have the time. But this time I took the time. For me this is a measure of excellence – film excellence.
|