jobloffski
Posts: 1837
Joined: 30/9/2005 From: elsewhere
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Dannybohy quote:
ORIGINAL: Rgirvan44 I know this is just me, but I got the sense that Nolan was just having fun with Rises. I doubt anyone expected TDK to be as big as it was, and that Nolan basically crammed everything he had left to say about Batman into that film. Then it exploded, and Nolan had to try and figure out a sequel. I don't see the same level of engagement as I did in Inception and TDK. What I do see, is that he is kicking back and playing with the train set. Almost in the same way Wayne seems less hung up on the world, and more fun. Coupled with that there seemed to be a desire to get away from the pitch blackness of TDK and the response it generated among fans. Bane is the total opposite of Joker, the plot could be taken from a comic book, and the grounded "realism" of the previous films takes a backseat. It is the most fun film Nolan has made, but it also feels like there was a lack of attention applied. Perhaps not to the extent, that Scott didn't pay attention to the script of Prometheus, but along those lines. Odd! I thought the characters appeared to be very much the same with the same plot to turn Gotham in on itself!... Begins was a nice idea, TDK was great but only because of Joker, which isn't great considering its a Batman movie. By the time I get into the first 10 min of TDKR i just want Batman to die, Alfred to die, Seline to die!!! its just so boring!! . Feels like he really couldn't be bothered and only made TDKR to fulfill some contract for a trilogy. [i]Why would a young boy (who was either not even born when Batman was last seen, or at most around 2 years old) be pining for the return of a local vigilante who was i widely known to be the murderer of the great White Knight DA !. Little Sicko Why do I own Batman Begins and The Dark Knight on DVD! but have no intention of buying TDKR! yet take no responsibility for that fact!.. riddle me that!! Because he had an older brother who would have been alive before Batman became 'the bad guy' and people, once they have a hero, want to believe in that hero. Older orphan brother tells little orphan brother about the Batman he looked up to, the one that saved the city.Older brother dies, Blake goes to tell little orphan about dead brother IS SURPRISED THAT LITTLE ORPHAN HAS HEARD OF BATMAN asks 'you've heard of him?' which means that yet another nit pick you throw out about the film as illogical is something the film, albeit subtly, actually has a character refer to. I dislike some films. I don't waste time calling into question the brains or taste of people who do. What is the point? What is there to gain? What is your fucking problem? Being rhetorical there. I've been a shit stirring prick about insulting people's taste in the past to get a rise too. Don't worry, you'll grow out of it.
_____________________________
Yes, dreamers dream and doers do. But if dreamers DON'T dream, doers don't have anything TO do. Everything that is only here because people exist, only exists because someone thought of it., or in other words, dreamed it.
|