Register  |   Log In  |  
Sign up to our weekly newsletter    
Follow us on   
Search   
Forum Home Register for Free! Log In Moderator Tickets FAQ Users Online

RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batman Silly?

 
Logged in as: Guest
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Film Forums] >> Film Reviews >> RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batman Silly? Page: <<   < prev  52 53 [54] 55 56   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 12/8/2012 4:30:51 PM   
cerebusboy


Posts: 1552
Joined: 1/5/2006

quote:

ORIGINAL: Fluke Skywalker


I've not actually said at any point that police commissioners get to send in the army, they get to escalate the matter to a higher power - you've just made that bit up yourself to find something to argue against. Effectively your debating with yourself - which you could do in your own mind and save me the hassle having to answer!!!



Dude, you have invoked "send in the army" as what Gordon should have said (for what feels like )dozens of times. It would take you two minutes to google "States of Emergency" "National Guard" and so on, which would provide a much better analogous fit to the DKR situation than referring to London which, as I say, has special forces, Royal Marines etc etc up the wazoo and so would indeed not need to call in regular units. Gordon has no such resources.


NB as a fan of the Glorious Glasgow Rangers, kudos on the blue text!



quote:



He never made the attempt though - it's silly to make such a big decision without escalating it.



No, because, if you're saying Gordon's actual decision was silly, then you're referring to what could have happened i.e. what, based on what we, the audience, know of Mayor Eyeliner's character, would he have done if Gordon had asked him to send in the National Guard.

quote:




When he got accurate information that there's potentially an underground army operating in the sewers obviously! You'd think after 9/11 a police commissioner would actually bother to inform someone about a situation like this



Post 9/11 realities also resulted in a reassertion and clarification of the procedures for sending in the National Guard etc.Such procedures are nation wide; it would (to riot in understatement) be very bad form to whistle-blow a potential next 9/11 on the basis of guys with machineguns And Gordon was on a sick bed after he saw some soldiers. Nolan deliberately tells us that Modine does not take him seriously. Let's say - based on the INFORMATION WE THE AUDIENCE HAVE ON GORDON/MAYOR EYELINER etc - what do you think would have happened if Gordon HAD phoned Mayor Eyeliner from his hospital bed? Mayor Eyeliner would have said something like "Gordon, you're concussed, babbling wild rumours about armies in the sewer, I can't risk my credibility with the greater government... I've ambitions to be President Eyeliner one day!" and so All the stuff with Matthew Modine is deliberately put there to show us what way the political wind is blowing. This is a complacent ''peace time''. Gordon lacks a proper ''army'' (and people wonder why DKR is accused of right-wing subtext )

And you're ignoring the point about timescale. If Mayor Eyeliner had phoned up the National Guard dude en route to the football game it would still have been too late. And if he'd phoned up the day before (say) then they wouldn't have acted without more proof, so the end effect would have been the same.


quote:

ORIGINAL: cerebusboy

Hey, if you think this is bad, check out the Batman v Bane ( ) style, 549 message strong Jim Gordon's Dry-Cleaning/DKR plot holes thread http://www.comicsalliance.com/2012/07/27/dark-knight-rises-sound-fury-theme-story-review-batman-plot-holes/

quote:


Jesus are you actually debating Jim Gordon's drycleaning? At least this thread relates to a major plot point



The guy maintains that Gordon would never have forgotten the speech in his pocket because he would definitely have cleaned his suit! When I pointed out that people don't dry clean suits weekly, let alone every few days, he claimed that the daily brushing-off-stains form of suit cleaning, posited as the universal norm, would definitely involve removal of items from the pocket ergo Bane finding the speech is a plot hole. Now however he's claiming that Gordon definitely has a different suit on in the Sewer scene when compared to Harvey Dent Day, so he must have transferred the speech, which is implausible! I'm wondering if it would be sad for me to go and see Dark Knight Rises for a fourth time and pay special attention to Gordon's clothing in order to settle the debate

(in reply to Fluke Skywalker)
Post #: 1591
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 12/8/2012 4:38:50 PM   
cerebusboy


Posts: 1552
Joined: 1/5/2006

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lazarus munkey


quote:

ORIGINAL: cerebusboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lazarus munkey


quote:

ORIGINAL: Fluke Skywalker


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lazarus munkey


quote:

ORIGINAL: Fluke Skywalker


[
And we have to remember that for many years Nicholson's Joker was the definitive one.


The only competition was the tv one.
I never understood the fuss over Nicholson's performance. It's good but hampered by the mess of a film around it in which it doesn't sit particularly comfortably. Then again, I've never understood the fuss over Burton.


Burton is slightly overrated I agree - his Sweeney Todd movie was great though but I find a lot of his movies a bit soulless - I think his Batman ones are some of his best.

He's like Ridley Scott; a visualist capable of greatness but utterly dependant on the quality of the script. I really like Edward Scissorhands, Big Fish and Corpse Bride and a couple of others have been ok but all of his films have an air of chaos about them.



'Visualist' always seemed a weird term to use in the pejorative sense in regard to a director though. Film is a visual medium. Would we damn a poet for being "wordy" ?



Visualist wasn't a pejorative, just a description of where their talents lie. Film is a visual medium but not solely, if an understanding of visuals was the only skill a director needed, Tarsem would be the greatest director of all time.

Incidentally, yes, you could damn a poet for being too wordy.



How exactly? ''Wordy'' isn't the same thing as florid or purple or needlessly verbose. Post-Hemingway hard-boiled type prose is at least as affected as the writing of (say) Edmund White. And, anyway, as a great poet (famously featured in a pish film) once wrote:

What but tall tales, the luck of verbal playing,
Can trick his lying nature into saying
That love, or truth, in any serious sense,
Like orthodoxy, is a reticence?



(in reply to Lazarus munkey)
Post #: 1592
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 12/8/2012 4:41:12 PM   
cerebusboy


Posts: 1552
Joined: 1/5/2006

quote:

ORIGINAL: chris kilby




Yeah, I think I tried to steer this thread away from all the police-trapped-underground shit about ten pages ago. So good luck with that!




Hey, it's not my fault Fluke Skywalker won't listen to reason!!


(in reply to chris kilby)
Post #: 1593
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 12/8/2012 4:49:32 PM   
cerebusboy


Posts: 1552
Joined: 1/5/2006

quote:

ORIGINAL: cerebusboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Dr Lenera


quote:




It's funny when Tim Burton points out that he got slagged for his Bat-movies being too dark and the much darker Nolan gets critically acclaimed


And very sad too, considering Burton's are so much better.



Really? I like Batman Returns, but it's hardly free from Blockbuster tropes, whereas Ledger's Joker makes Nicholson's Joker look like a predictable Blockbuster Movie Villain.




To elaborate on that, Batman movies, by their nature, tend to need to have supervillians with big destroy-the-city plans. In Dark Knight, the Joker does indeed have such a plan, but Nolan very skillfully uses it to explore serious themes. In Batman Returns, we get Shreck building a giant power plant which is actually a capacitor ( a plot point soon abandoned), the Penguin running for Mayor because he blackmails Shreck (!), the Penguin copying out all the names of Gotham's first-born sons (by hand! Or at least flipper. How many millions of people is that?), the Penguin planning to capture all these kids by assuming that everyone will be at Max Shreck's ball (man, must be some amount of babysitters in Gotham city!), the Penguin then deciding to destroy the city with his army of rocket-launcher wielding penguins, not to mention turning the Batmobile into an "H-Bomb on wheels" (which takes Batman about 2 minutes to disarm), and actually remotely driving the Batmobile by an arcade style car (that presumably he had his clowns make up?) , as well as framing Batman by getting a poodle to steal his computerised Batarang. And so on. Why have one ridiculous plan when you can have a bunch of 'em?

(in reply to cerebusboy)
Post #: 1594
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 12/8/2012 5:29:01 PM   
cerebusboy


Posts: 1552
Joined: 1/5/2006

quote:

ORIGINAL: chris kilby


Yeah, I think I tried to steer this thread away from all the police-trapped-underground shit about ten pages ago. So good luck with that!




Here, this'll cheer you up!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AE1ct5yEuVY

(in reply to chris kilby)
Post #: 1595
RE: The Dark Knight Rises - 12/8/2012 7:17:49 PM   
spamandham

 

Posts: 481
Joined: 27/11/2008
Is it my imagination or did batman not appear that much in this hopefully final film.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 1596
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 12/8/2012 7:20:05 PM   
Fluke Skywalker


Posts: 9540
Joined: 23/4/2006
From: the dark side of the sun
quote:

ORIGINAL: cerebusboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Fluke Skywalker


I've not actually said at any point that police commissioners get to send in the army, they get to escalate the matter to a higher power - you've just made that bit up yourself to find something to argue against. Effectively your debating with yourself - which you could do in your own mind and save me the hassle having to answer!!!



Dude, you have invoked "send in the army" as what Gordon should have said (for what feels like )dozens of times.

Er weren't we discussing you saying this : 'Again: POLICE COMMISIONERS DO NOT GET TO SEND IN THE ARMY. ' You're rather naughtily removing your own original comment to skew what we're talking about.

I said he should have escalated it and the higher ups would have made the decision (in a logical world) to back up Gordon with some extra firepower and bodies, at no point did I say Gordon has access to the army and you know it which is why you sneakily failed to include your own quote and not-so-subtly change this part of the discussion

It would take you two minutes to google "States of Emergency" "National Guard" and so on, which would provide a much better analogous fit to the DKR situation than referring to London which, as I say, has special forces, Royal Marines etc etc up the wazoo and so would indeed not need to call in regular units. Gordon has no such resources.

Any US city post 9/11 would have access to these resources if things got bad enough - that is if you actually bother to tell anyone you've got a problem. The reason we're debating is this because Gordon saw this as serious enough to call up every single cop in the city, but not inform any higher powers. Doesn't ring true at all. What Nolan should have done was insert a short scene with Gordon getting the brush off from the Mayor


NB as a fan of the Glorious Glasgow Rangers, kudos on the blue text!

I like using that colour but have now changed to this one for the sake of clarity

quote:



He never made the attempt though - it's silly to make such a big decision without escalating it.



No, because, if you're saying Gordon's actual decision was silly, then you're referring to what could have happened i.e. what, based on what we, the audience, know of Mayor Eyeliner's character, would he have done if Gordon had asked him to send in the National Guard.


Regardless of the mayor's attitude you'd expect someone like Gordon to at least have a crack - the fact that he didn't makes it silly.

quote:





When he got accurate information that there's potentially an underground army operating in the sewers obviously! You'd think after 9/11 a police commissioner would actually bother to inform someone about a situation like this



Post 9/11 realities also resulted in a reassertion and clarification of the procedures for sending in the National Guard etc.Such procedures are nation wide; it would (to riot in understatement) be very bad form to whistle-blow a potential next 9/11 on the basis of guys with machineguns

It's a situation which requires a large force of armed individuals (i.e Gothams entire cop force). You'd expect someone higher up to be informed.

And Gordon was on a sick bed after he saw some soldiers. Nolan deliberately tells us that Modine does not take him seriously. Let's say - based on the INFORMATION WE THE AUDIENCE HAVE ON GORDON/MAYOR EYELINER etc - what do you think would have happened if Gordon HAD phoned Mayor Eyeliner from his hospital bed? Mayor Eyeliner would have said something like "Gordon, you're concussed, babbling wild rumours about armies in the sewer, I can't risk my credibility with the greater government... I've ambitions to be President Eyeliner one day!"

Had he done that it would have laid my mind partially to rest - but it still wouldn't have explained why you'd leave a city without a police force. The fact Gordon didn't even try is a crap job by Nolan.

And you're ignoring the point about timescale. If Mayor Eyeliner had phoned up the National Guard dude en route to the football game it would still have been too late. And if he'd phoned up the day before (say) then they wouldn't have acted without more proof, so the end effect would have been the same.

But this is the fatal flaw in the plotting - if Mayor Eyeliner had been told about it, then escalated it to a national level, in the meantime the bridges would have been blown and every single policeman would have been available to take on Bane That would blow a hole in Bane's takeover of the city, hence Nolan could not allow this to happen. That is why all the cops were sent underground and such a serious situation was not escalated to a higher level. Because in a logical series of events Bane would have at the very least Gotham's police force to deal with if not the National Guard and US Army to boot


quote:

ORIGINAL: cerebusboy

Hey, if you think this is bad, check out the Batman v Bane ( ) style, 549 message strong Jim Gordon's Dry-Cleaning/DKR plot holes thread http://www.comicsalliance.com/2012/07/27/dark-knight-rises-sound-fury-theme-story-review-batman-plot-holes/

quote:


Jesus are you actually debating Jim Gordon's drycleaning? At least this thread relates to a major plot point



The guy maintains that Gordon would never have forgotten the speech in his pocket because he would definitely have cleaned his suit! When I pointed out that people don't dry clean suits weekly, let alone every few days, he claimed that the daily brushing-off-stains form of suit cleaning, posited as the universal norm, would definitely involve removal of items from the pocket ergo Bane finding the speech is a plot hole. Now however he's claiming that Gordon definitely has a different suit on in the Sewer scene when compared to Harvey Dent Day, so he must have transferred the speech, which is implausible! I'm wondering if it would be sad for me to go and see Dark Knight Rises for a fourth time and pay special attention to Gordon's clothing in order to settle the debate


To be fair Bane getting a hold of the speech wasn't even something that was even remotely on my radar!



< Message edited by Fluke Skywalker -- 12/8/2012 7:29:11 PM >

(in reply to cerebusboy)
Post #: 1597
RE: The Dark Knight Rises - 12/8/2012 7:23:30 PM   
cerebusboy


Posts: 1552
Joined: 1/5/2006

quote:

ORIGINAL: spamandham

Is it my imagination or did batman not appear that much in this hopefully final film.



Imagination.

Helpfully yours,


(in reply to spamandham)
Post #: 1598
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 12/8/2012 8:10:22 PM   
chris kilby

 

Posts: 1189
Joined: 31/3/2010
quote:

ORIGINAL: cerebusboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Fluke Skywalker


I've not actually said at any point that police commissioners get to send in the army, they get to escalate the matter to a higher power - you've just made that bit up yourself to find something to argue against. Effectively your debating with yourself - which you could do in your own mind and save me the hassle having to answer!!!



Dude, you have invoked "send in the army" as what Gordon should have said (for what feels like )dozens of times. It would take you two minutes to google "States of Emergency" "National Guard" and so on, which would provide a much better analogous fit to the DKR situation than referring to London which, as I say, has special forces, Royal Marines etc etc up the wazoo and so would indeed not need to call in regular units. Gordon has no such resources.


NB as a fan of the Glorious Glasgow Rangers, kudos on the blue text!



quote:



He never made the attempt though - it's silly to make such a big decision without escalating it.



No, because, if you're saying Gordon's actual decision was silly, then you're referring to what could have happened i.e. what, based on what we, the audience, know of Mayor Eyeliner's character, would he have done if Gordon had asked him to send in the National Guard.

quote:




When he got accurate information that there's potentially an underground army operating in the sewers obviously! You'd think after 9/11 a police commissioner would actually bother to inform someone about a situation like this



Post 9/11 realities also resulted in a reassertion and clarification of the procedures for sending in the National Guard etc.Such procedures are nation wide; it would (to riot in understatement) be very bad form to whistle-blow a potential next 9/11 on the basis of guys with machineguns And Gordon was on a sick bed after he saw some soldiers. Nolan deliberately tells us that Modine does not take him seriously. Let's say - based on the INFORMATION WE THE AUDIENCE HAVE ON GORDON/MAYOR EYELINER etc - what do you think would have happened if Gordon HAD phoned Mayor Eyeliner from his hospital bed? Mayor Eyeliner would have said something like "Gordon, you're concussed, babbling wild rumours about armies in the sewer, I can't risk my credibility with the greater government... I've ambitions to be President Eyeliner one day!" and so All the stuff with Matthew Modine is deliberately put there to show us what way the political wind is blowing. This is a complacent ''peace time''. Gordon lacks a proper ''army'' (and people wonder why DKR is accused of right-wing subtext )

And you're ignoring the point about timescale. If Mayor Eyeliner had phoned up the National Guard dude en route to the football game it would still have been too late. And if he'd phoned up the day before (say) then they wouldn't have acted without more proof, so the end effect would have been the same.


quote:

ORIGINAL: cerebusboy

Hey, if you think this is bad, check out the Batman v Bane ( ) style, 549 message strong Jim Gordon's Dry-Cleaning/DKR plot holes thread http://www.comicsalliance.com/2012/07/27/dark-knight-rises-sound-fury-theme-story-review-batman-plot-holes/

quote:


Jesus are you actually debating Jim Gordon's drycleaning? At least this thread relates to a major plot point



The guy maintains that Gordon would never have forgotten the speech in his pocket because he would definitely have cleaned his suit! When I pointed out that people don't dry clean suits weekly, let alone every few days, he claimed that the daily brushing-off-stains form of suit cleaning, posited as the universal norm, would definitely involve removal of items from the pocket ergo Bane finding the speech is a plot hole. Now however he's claiming that Gordon definitely has a different suit on in the Sewer scene when compared to Harvey Dent Day, so he must have transferred the speech, which is implausible! I'm wondering if it would be sad for me to go and see Dark Knight Rises for a fourth time and pay special attention to Gordon's clothing in order to settle the debate


Um, I don't wish to throw petrol on the flames of an already beyond-pointless argument... But didn't Gordon put that speech on the inside pocket of the anorak he wears on top of his suit? Now I'm no expert on anoraks (I'm a crobie coat/hoodie combo man, meself) but there's bound to be someone round 'ere who can tell us all how often they launder said garment...

PS: Is it just me, or does there seem tae be a helluva lot ae us 'Weegies roon' here?


< Message edited by chris kilby -- 12/8/2012 8:32:05 PM >

(in reply to cerebusboy)
Post #: 1599
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 12/8/2012 8:17:46 PM   
cerebusboy


Posts: 1552
Joined: 1/5/2006

quote:

ORIGINAL: chris kilby
But didn't Gordon put that speech on the inside pocket of the anorak he wears on top of his suit? Now I'm no expert on anoraks (I'm a crobie coat/hoodie combo man, meself) but there's bound to be someone round 'ere who can tell us all how often they launder said garment...

PS: Is it just me, or does there see tae be a helluva lot ae us 'Weegies roon' here?



Anorak? Gordon's not an internet geek !

We arra people!

(in reply to chris kilby)
Post #: 1600
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 12/8/2012 8:32:00 PM   
cerebusboy


Posts: 1552
Joined: 1/5/2006

quote:

ORIGINAL: Fluke Skywalker

quote:

ORIGINAL: cerebusboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Fluke Skywalker


I've not actually said at any point that police commissioners get to send in the army, they get to escalate the matter to a higher power - you've just made that bit up yourself to find something to argue against. Effectively your debating with yourself - which you could do in your own mind and save me the hassle having to answer!!!



Dude, you have invoked "send in the army" as what Gordon should have said (for what feels like )dozens of times.

Er weren't we discussing you saying this : 'Again: POLICE COMMISIONERS DO NOT GET TO SEND IN THE ARMY. ' You're rather naughtily removing your own original comment to skew what we're talking about.

I said he should have escalated it and the higher ups would have made the decision (in a logical world) to back up Gordon with some extra firepower and bodies, at no point did I say Gordon has access to the army and you know it which is why you sneakily failed to include your own quote and not-so-subtly change this part of the discussion

It would take you two minutes to google "States of Emergency" "National Guard" and so on, which would provide a much better analogous fit to the DKR situation than referring to London which, as I say, has special forces, Royal Marines etc etc up the wazoo and so would indeed not need to call in regular units. Gordon has no such resources.

Any US city post 9/11 would have access to these resources if things got bad enough - that is if you actually bother to tell anyone you've got a problem. The reason we're debating is this because Gordon saw this as serious enough to call up every single cop in the city, but not inform any higher powers. Doesn't ring true at all. What Nolan should have done was insert a short scene with Gordon getting the brush off from the Mayor


NB as a fan of the Glorious Glasgow Rangers, kudos on the blue text!

I like using that colour but have now changed to this one for the sake of clarity

quote:



He never made the attempt though - it's silly to make such a big decision without escalating it.



No, because, if you're saying Gordon's actual decision was silly, then you're referring to what could have happened i.e. what, based on what we, the audience, know of Mayor Eyeliner's character, would he have done if Gordon had asked him to send in the National Guard.


Regardless of the mayor's attitude you'd expect someone like Gordon to at least have a crack - the fact that he didn't makes it silly.

quote:





When he got accurate information that there's potentially an underground army operating in the sewers obviously! You'd think after 9/11 a police commissioner would actually bother to inform someone about a situation like this



Post 9/11 realities also resulted in a reassertion and clarification of the procedures for sending in the National Guard etc.Such procedures are nation wide; it would (to riot in understatement) be very bad form to whistle-blow a potential next 9/11 on the basis of guys with machineguns

It's a situation which requires a large force of armed individuals (i.e Gothams entire cop force). You'd expect someone higher up to be informed.

And Gordon was on a sick bed after he saw some soldiers. Nolan deliberately tells us that Modine does not take him seriously. Let's say - based on the INFORMATION WE THE AUDIENCE HAVE ON GORDON/MAYOR EYELINER etc - what do you think would have happened if Gordon HAD phoned Mayor Eyeliner from his hospital bed? Mayor Eyeliner would have said something like "Gordon, you're concussed, babbling wild rumours about armies in the sewer, I can't risk my credibility with the greater government... I've ambitions to be President Eyeliner one day!"

Had he done that it would have laid my mind partially to rest - but it still wouldn't have explained why you'd leave a city without a police force. The fact Gordon didn't even try is a crap job by Nolan.

And you're ignoring the point about timescale. If Mayor Eyeliner had phoned up the National Guard dude en route to the football game it would still have been too late. And if he'd phoned up the day before (say) then they wouldn't have acted without more proof, so the end effect would have been the same.

But this is the fatal flaw in the plotting - if Mayor Eyeliner had been told about it, then escalated it to a national level, in the meantime the bridges would have been blown and every single policeman would have been available to take on Bane That would blow a hole in Bane's takeover of the city, hence Nolan could not allow this to happen. That is why all the cops were sent underground and such a serious situation was not escalated to a higher level. Because in a logical series of events Bane would have at the very least Gotham's police force to deal with if not the National Guard and US Army to boot


quote:

ORIGINAL: cerebusboy

Hey, if you think this is bad, check out the Batman v Bane ( ) style, 549 message strong Jim Gordon's Dry-Cleaning/DKR plot holes thread http://www.comicsalliance.com/2012/07/27/dark-knight-rises-sound-fury-theme-story-review-batman-plot-holes/

quote:


Jesus are you actually debating Jim Gordon's drycleaning? At least this thread relates to a major plot point



The guy maintains that Gordon would never have forgotten the speech in his pocket because he would definitely have cleaned his suit! When I pointed out that people don't dry clean suits weekly, let alone every few days, he claimed that the daily brushing-off-stains form of suit cleaning, posited as the universal norm, would definitely involve removal of items from the pocket ergo Bane finding the speech is a plot hole. Now however he's claiming that Gordon definitely has a different suit on in the Sewer scene when compared to Harvey Dent Day, so he must have transferred the speech, which is implausible! I'm wondering if it would be sad for me to go and see Dark Knight Rises for a fourth time and pay special attention to Gordon's clothing in order to settle the debate


To be fair Bane getting a hold of the speech wasn't even something that was even remotely on my radar!





Dude, your excessive bright colours are making things a bit hard to follow! You're the Joel Schumaker of email formatting

I don't want to do a (Cable-style!) trawl through all the old messages, but you referred repeatedly to sending in the army. Did you do so knowing that Gordon could not so, and if so why did we have analogies about London etc rather than discussing the facts about chain of command in US contexts

You claim that there should have been a scene of Gordon taking things further. But you also seem to take at least some of my points on the nature of Gordon and Mayor Eyeliners character. If Gordon DID inform Mayor Eyeliner, then do you not thing that Mayor Eyeliner would have told him not to do anything until he knows more? Furthermore, do you not think that GORDON would know that that would be Mayor Eyeliner's response? If things had played out as you'd suggest, then we would have have had people complaining about the "plot hole" of Gordon informing Mayor Eyeliner and having his attempts stymied as a result ("Don't do anything Gordon, that's a direct order!") when we've had two films of Gordon being canny in what he informs others about in order to get the Policing job done!

No, a post-911 American city would not have access to the Royal Marines Again, the rules on States of Emergency are things you can easily look up. A police commissioner having SUSPICIONS of an underground army would in no way be deemed a sufficient basis to send in the National Guard. If Gordon suspected an urgent situation but KNEW (as he would) that Mayor Eyeliners would not "escalate" matters without proof, then would he not indeed respond with the sources available to him? Do you really think it's more plausible for Gordon to ask Mayor Eyeliners to send in the national guard (even although Gordon would know Mayor Eyeliner wouldn't do so without proof), getting the brush off, and then acting as he does anyway? A bit anticlimatic from a dramatic perspective and with the same net effect no? People have noted that it's a bit dumb in Dark Knight when Harvey Dent explains the RICO act, which Gordon would already know. A pointless drama killing scene of

Gordon: I think there's an underground army, send in the National Guard
Mayor Eyeliners: I'd need far more proof than that Gordon, and dammit you know it! Now get out of my office I've got a beautician's appointment in an hour

would be considerably worse, and would not even serve the audience/story in a manner that can justify the throwaway RICO line in DK.

Does "no more dead cops" not ring a bell We would have lots of scenes of blackgate prisoners gunning down the police with automatic weapons.

(in reply to Fluke Skywalker)
Post #: 1601
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 12/8/2012 8:38:29 PM   
chris kilby

 

Posts: 1189
Joined: 31/3/2010

quote:

ORIGINAL: cerebusboy

NB as a fan of the Glorious Glasgow Rangers, kudos on the blue text!



Ha, ha, ha - yer team goat stuffed last season. Stuffed? Ah mean liquidated.

(Sorry. Couldn't resist. Let me assure you, that like Ulysses Everett McGill, I remain... unaffiliated. I fecking HATE fitba' me - I support Albion Rovers. Boom and, indeed, boom. )

(in reply to cerebusboy)
Post #: 1602
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 12/8/2012 8:42:21 PM   
cerebusboy


Posts: 1552
Joined: 1/5/2006

quote:

ORIGINAL: chris kilby


quote:

ORIGINAL: cerebusboy

NB as a fan of the Glorious Glasgow Rangers, kudos on the blue text!



Ha, ha, ha - yer team goat stuffed last season. Stuffed? Ah mean liquidated.

(Sorry. Couldn't resist. Let me assure you, that like Ulysses Everett McGill, I remain... unaffiliated. I fecking HATE fitba' me - I support Albion Rovers. Boom and, indeed, boom. )




Hey, if Batman can come back from a broken back the Glorious Glasgow Rangers can return, again, to Glory!


(in reply to chris kilby)
Post #: 1603
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 12/8/2012 8:45:42 PM   
chris kilby

 

Posts: 1189
Joined: 31/3/2010

quote:

ORIGINAL: cerebusboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: chris kilby


quote:

ORIGINAL: cerebusboy

NB as a fan of the Glorious Glasgow Rangers, kudos on the blue text!



Ha, ha, ha - yer team goat stuffed last season. Stuffed? Ah mean liquidated.

(Sorry. Couldn't resist. Let me assure you, that like Ulysses Everett McGill, I remain... unaffiliated. I fecking HATE fitba' me - I support Albion Rovers. Boom and, indeed, boom. )




Hey, if Batman can come back from a broken back the Glorious Glasgow Rangers can return, again, to Glory!




It'll take more than Tom Conti to sort that lot out. Gandalf, maybe. Or Dr Manhattan...

(in reply to cerebusboy)
Post #: 1604
RE: The Dark Knight Rises - 13/8/2012 12:15:33 AM   
Sutty


Posts: 3540
Joined: 6/6/2006
From: the front row
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ca-wmCcVzTU

worth a listen.

_____________________________

"Lord, make me your instrument of peace. Where there is hatred, let me bring love.
Where there is darkness, light."

"When you're pushed, killin's as easy as breathin'"

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 1605
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 13/8/2012 1:13:01 AM   
Lazarus munkey


Posts: 1651
Joined: 20/3/2006
From: out of nowhere

quote:

ORIGINAL: cerebusboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lazarus munkey


quote:

ORIGINAL: cerebusboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lazarus munkey


quote:

ORIGINAL: Fluke Skywalker


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lazarus munkey


quote:

ORIGINAL: Fluke Skywalker


[
And we have to remember that for many years Nicholson's Joker was the definitive one.


The only competition was the tv one.
I never understood the fuss over Nicholson's performance. It's good but hampered by the mess of a film around it in which it doesn't sit particularly comfortably. Then again, I've never understood the fuss over Burton.


Burton is slightly overrated I agree - his Sweeney Todd movie was great though but I find a lot of his movies a bit soulless - I think his Batman ones are some of his best.

He's like Ridley Scott; a visualist capable of greatness but utterly dependant on the quality of the script. I really like Edward Scissorhands, Big Fish and Corpse Bride and a couple of others have been ok but all of his films have an air of chaos about them.



'Visualist' always seemed a weird term to use in the pejorative sense in regard to a director though. Film is a visual medium. Would we damn a poet for being "wordy" ?



Visualist wasn't a pejorative, just a description of where their talents lie. Film is a visual medium but not solely, if an understanding of visuals was the only skill a director needed, Tarsem would be the greatest director of all time.

Incidentally, yes, you could damn a poet for being too wordy.



How exactly? ''Wordy'' isn't the same thing as florid or purple or needlessly verbose. Post-Hemingway hard-boiled type prose is at least as affected as the writing of (say) Edmund White. And, anyway, as a great poet (famously featured in a pish film) once wrote:

What but tall tales, the luck of verbal playing,
Can trick his lying nature into saying
That love, or truth, in any serious sense,
Like orthodoxy, is a reticence?




I didn't realise that I needed to put 'too' in bold but the explanation was suitably patronising.

_____________________________

"Because I got the answers"

Last 5 seen
Chronicle 4/5
The Amazing Spider-Man 3/5
Young Adult 4/5
21 Jump Street 4/5
The Apartment 5/5

(in reply to cerebusboy)
Post #: 1606
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 13/8/2012 7:55:23 AM   
jonson


Posts: 8057
Joined: 30/9/2005
I'm not sure if this is the review thread any more, but here goes.

I loved it, the best of the 3 for me. I know there are some plot holes but I was aware before I went in it was a fantasy/fiction/superhero film, so I didn't take offence by a bit of artistic license involved.
Very surprised to read it was 2h 44m long, it didn't seem that at all, so job done!

Bane was good (despite his voice going a bit silly at times) his physical presence was immense, and I liked Anne Hathaway as Cat Woman, very well done, not sure about the "Robin" bit at the end, they'd managed to get that far without too much cheese then blew the cheddarometer off the wall in less than 10 seconds, which was a shame.

5/5

_____________________________

I've got all the Barbie ones!!!

Yeah but you're old. Really old. Old. Old. Old. Old.

(in reply to Lazarus munkey)
Post #: 1607
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 13/8/2012 8:22:14 AM   
cerebusboy


Posts: 1552
Joined: 1/5/2006

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lazarus munkey


quote:

ORIGINAL: cerebusboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lazarus munkey


quote:

ORIGINAL: cerebusboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lazarus munkey


quote:

ORIGINAL: Fluke Skywalker


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lazarus munkey


quote:

ORIGINAL: Fluke Skywalker


[
And we have to remember that for many years Nicholson's Joker was the definitive one.


The only competition was the tv one.
I never understood the fuss over Nicholson's performance. It's good but hampered by the mess of a film around it in which it doesn't sit particularly comfortably. Then again, I've never understood the fuss over Burton.


Burton is slightly overrated I agree - his Sweeney Todd movie was great though but I find a lot of his movies a bit soulless - I think his Batman ones are some of his best.

He's like Ridley Scott; a visualist capable of greatness but utterly dependant on the quality of the script. I really like Edward Scissorhands, Big Fish and Corpse Bride and a couple of others have been ok but all of his films have an air of chaos about them.



'Visualist' always seemed a weird term to use in the pejorative sense in regard to a director though. Film is a visual medium. Would we damn a poet for being "wordy" ?



Visualist wasn't a pejorative, just a description of where their talents lie. Film is a visual medium but not solely, if an understanding of visuals was the only skill a director needed, Tarsem would be the greatest director of all time.

Incidentally, yes, you could damn a poet for being too wordy.



How exactly? ''Wordy'' isn't the same thing as florid or purple or needlessly verbose. Post-Hemingway hard-boiled type prose is at least as affected as the writing of (say) Edmund White. And, anyway, as a great poet (famously featured in a pish film) once wrote:

What but tall tales, the luck of verbal playing,
Can trick his lying nature into saying
That love, or truth, in any serious sense,
Like orthodoxy, is a reticence?




I didn't realise that I needed to put 'too' in bold but the explanation was suitably patronising.


I'm sorry if you felt my reply was patronising - that wasn't my intention - but you've still not explained what you mean by the "too" or "wordy". If you're going to state that poets can be too wordy then it would be reasonable for you to elaborate on your argument and/or cite examples. Flat out assertions get us nowhere. If you WEREN'T invoking purple prose style ornate, empty verbosity then what kind of writing WERE you thinking of?

(in reply to Lazarus munkey)
Post #: 1608
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 13/8/2012 8:29:49 AM   
cerebusboy


Posts: 1552
Joined: 1/5/2006

quote:

ORIGINAL: jonson

I'm not sure if this is the review thread any more, but here goes.




we're trying to beat Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull!

(in reply to jonson)
Post #: 1609
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 13/8/2012 8:36:06 AM   
cerebusboy


Posts: 1552
Joined: 1/5/2006

quote:

ORIGINAL: jonson

I'm not sure if this is the review thread any more, but here goes.

I loved it, the best of the 3 for me. I know there are some plot holes but I was aware before I went in it was a fantasy/fiction/superhero film, so I didn't take offence by a bit of artistic license involved.
Very surprised to read it was 2h 44m long, it didn't seem that at all, so job done!

Bane was good (despite his voice going a bit silly at times) his physical presence was immense, and I liked Anne Hathaway as Cat Woman, very well done, not sure about the "Robin" bit at the end, they'd managed to get that far without too much cheese then blew the cheddarometer off the wall in less than 10 seconds, which was a shame.

5/5



Surely DKR deliberately saved up its acceptable-cheesiness quotient so it could be used at the ending?

Many iteratrions of Robin can be cheesy (although Damian Wayne Robin is superb), but I felt Nolan managed to have his cake and eat it too by just including a reference to a name in the Nolanverse. I don't see how any of the alternatives would have worked. In Batman Begins it's established that Batman realistically dresses up as a Bat to scare criminals (a form of weaponised fear) , and it would have been more problematic to try and do a proper "Robin-begins" style subplot, aside from the issues of running time. Technically the best comic analogy for Blake is Az-Bats, but he's a crap character who most of the audience wouldnt' have heard of, so 'Robin' was pretty much the only term to use.



(in reply to jonson)
Post #: 1610
RE: The Dark Knight Rises - 13/8/2012 8:38:49 AM   
cerebusboy


Posts: 1552
Joined: 1/5/2006

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sutty

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ca-wmCcVzTU

worth a listen.



Is that taken from the podcasts? Smith did a two-part (like, 3 hour!) review of DKR, one half on "Fatman on Batman" and the other on "Smodcast". The dude's Bane impression is brilliant (and his Miranda Tate is sexy too!)

(in reply to Sutty)
Post #: 1611
RE: Really, really disappointing - 13/8/2012 8:39:09 AM   
cerebusboy


Posts: 1552
Joined: 1/5/2006

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bazza83

Title says it all. Really, really disappointed.


How come?
Post #: 1612
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 13/8/2012 8:41:29 AM   
cerebusboy


Posts: 1552
Joined: 1/5/2006

quote:

ORIGINAL: chris kilby


quote:

ORIGINAL: cerebusboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: chris kilby


quote:

ORIGINAL: cerebusboy

NB as a fan of the Glorious Glasgow Rangers, kudos on the blue text!



Ha, ha, ha - yer team goat stuffed last season. Stuffed? Ah mean liquidated.

(Sorry. Couldn't resist. Let me assure you, that like Ulysses Everett McGill, I remain... unaffiliated. I fecking HATE fitba' me - I support Albion Rovers. Boom and, indeed, boom. )




Hey, if Batman can come back from a broken back the Glorious Glasgow Rangers can return, again, to Glory!




It'll take more than Tom Conti to sort that lot out. Gandalf, maybe. Or Dr Manhattan...




He is blue!
Hey, did you know that both King George V and King George VI (as played by Colin Firth!) visited Ibrox? Cellic just get Subo and Rod Stewart

(in reply to chris kilby)
Post #: 1613
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 13/8/2012 11:21:59 AM   
Cool Breeze


Posts: 1617
Joined: 9/11/2011
From: The Internet
This thread.Jesus christ wtf?

(in reply to cerebusboy)
Post #: 1614
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 13/8/2012 12:46:17 PM   
waltham1979


Posts: 1012
Joined: 18/3/2008
From: San-Diago, which is German for 'Whales virgina'...
Personally I quite liked the CGI rodent things at the begining - thought they were funny as hell and I loved Shia The Beef in it as well. When he was swinging through the trees with the Monkeys!? Funny!!

_____________________________

It's a funny world we live in. Speaking of which, do you know how I got these scars?

(in reply to Cool Breeze)
Post #: 1615
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 13/8/2012 1:08:38 PM   
Fluke Skywalker


Posts: 9540
Joined: 23/4/2006
From: the dark side of the sun

quote:

ORIGINAL: cerebusboy


Dude, your excessive bright colours are making things a bit hard to follow! You're the Joel Schumaker of email formatting

Come on it makes it more interesting - here's a new one for ya in Celtic colours

I don't want to do a (Cable-style!) trawl through all the old messages, but you referred repeatedly to sending in the army. Did you do so knowing that Gordon could not so, and if so why did we have analogies about London etc rather than discussing the facts about chain of command in US contexts

I referred to escalating the matter which would have been a logical series of events, National Guard or Army would have been considered if there's actually an underground army operating in a city.

You claim that there should have been a scene of Gordon taking things further. But you also seem to take at least some of my points on the nature of Gordon and Mayor Eyeliners character. If Gordon DID inform Mayor Eyeliner, then do you not thing that Mayor Eyeliner would have told him not to do anything until he knows more?

The scene would have made sense regardless of the outcome because then at least you can see Gordon's motivation. That said it's like your saying the chain of command is so rigid and strict that Gordon has access to absolutely no one else higher up than the Mayor? If Gordon is rebuffed and is genuinely concerned there's bound to be more than one avenue for him. You're focusing purely on the Mayor's character while forgetting the Mayor is not exactly the POTUS.

Furthermore, do you not think that GORDON would know that that would be Mayor Eyeliner's response? If things had played out as you'd suggest, then we would have have had people complaining about the "plot hole" of Gordon informing Mayor Eyeliner and having his attempts stymied as a result.

That's of course perfectly possible knowing us internet bods - but it's way less of a plot hole than him not informing anyone at all.

No, a post-911 American city would not have access to the Royal Marines Again, the rules on States of Emergency are things you can easily look up.

An American city would actually have access to more than we do considering a) 9/11 and b) the fact that you are allowed to own weapons in this country. The cops are armed, SWAT, FBI, National Guard, biggest army in the world. Nolan knew that Bane would get destroyed in a real world situation so had to contrive the cops getting trapped scenario.


A police commissioner having SUSPICIONS of an underground army would in no way be deemed a sufficient basis to send in the National Guard.

But it's serious enough to send every single police officer in the city underground leaving it completely unpoliced? If he informed the higher ups about this hairbrained scheme they would have drafted in some help or at least attempted to


If Gordon suspected an urgent situation but KNEW (as he would) that Mayor Eyeliners would not "escalate" matters without proof, then would he not indeed respond with the sources available to him?

He might suspect Mayor Eyeliner would rebuff him but without asking he cannot know for certain. In a court of law Gordon would look like a fool under questioning.

Prosecutor :
"So Commissioner Gordon, the reason you chose to send every police officer in Gotham underground without informing the Mayor is because you felt he would rebuff any requests for help"

Gordon
"From my experience the Mayor has proved an obstacle to me in previous investigations so I felt it was a pointless exercise"

Prosecutor
"But did you even make the attempt considering you were about to leave Gotham City completely unpoliced?"

Gordon
"No, but...."

Prosecutor
"No further questions"





(in reply to cerebusboy)
Post #: 1616
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 13/8/2012 1:39:31 PM   
Dirk Miggler


Posts: 822
Joined: 14/1/2009
Gordan probably thought with full force of the law, "we'll be dunking donuts by lunch time !"

Isn't it quite well established in the film that the criminal element of Gotham is pretty much non existent, hence no Batman for 8 years.

That's enough for me for it not to be an issue, no matter how ludicrous someone thinks the plan might be the film does its best to explain the situation and the reasons for it, so I don't really see it has a plot hole.

(in reply to Fluke Skywalker)
Post #: 1617
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 13/8/2012 2:02:52 PM   
cerebusboy


Posts: 1552
Joined: 1/5/2006

quote:

ORIGINAL: Cool Breeze

This thread.Jesus christ wtf?



"Know your limitations"
"Threads about Batman have no limitations"...


(in reply to Cool Breeze)
Post #: 1618
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 13/8/2012 2:05:33 PM   
cerebusboy


Posts: 1552
Joined: 1/5/2006

quote:

ORIGINAL: waltham1979

Personally I quite liked the CGI rodent things at the begining - thought they were funny as hell and I loved Shia The Beef in it as well. When he was swinging through the trees with the Monkeys!? Funny!!



I thought it was great fun - and better than Temple of Doom! Not as good as the Star Wars prequels though. I hope Attack of the Clones gets its Five Stars back at the 3-D rerelease.


(in reply to waltham1979)
Post #: 1619
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 13/8/2012 2:31:38 PM   
chris kilby

 

Posts: 1189
Joined: 31/3/2010
quote:

ORIGINAL: cerebusboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: jonson

I'm not sure if this is the review thread any more, but here goes.




we're trying to beat Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull!



I thought we were beating ourselves.


< Message edited by chris kilby -- 13/8/2012 2:35:19 PM >

(in reply to cerebusboy)
Post #: 1620
Page:   <<   < prev  52 53 [54] 55 56   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Film Forums] >> Film Reviews >> RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batman Silly? Page: <<   < prev  52 53 [54] 55 56   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


 
Movie News  |  Empire Blog  |  Movie Reviews  |  Future Films  |  Features  |  Video Interviews  |  Image Gallery  |  Competitions  |  Forum  |  Magazine  |  Resources
 
Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.094