Register  |   Log In  |  
Sign up to our weekly newsletter    
Follow us on   
Search   
Forum Home Register for Free! Log In Moderator Tickets FAQ Users Online

RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batman Silly?

 
Logged in as: Guest
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Film Forums] >> Film Reviews >> RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batman Silly? Page: <<   < prev  49 50 [51] 52 53   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 10/8/2012 4:20:24 PM   
Fluke Skywalker


Posts: 9540
Joined: 23/4/2006
From: the dark side of the sun

quote:

ORIGINAL: cerebusboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Fluke Skywalker



At the point you realise there's a dangerous madman with an underground army operating in your city any self respecting leader would call the White House and bring in the troops. You wouldn't call up every single damn cop in the city and send them underground - the word here is 'army' as well. You don't send cops against an army, you send an army against them.


Who is the 'you' in this scenario? Gordon? Mayor Eyeliner? 'Get the White House on the line' is far more of an unrealistic movie cliche (''Uh, Mr President, you've got some cop in Gotham on line 1. Says there's some dudes in his sewers") than what actually happens.

Gordon doesn't have the power to send in the army. He has cops, which is what he sends.


Gordon has (you would hope) the intelligence to look at a situation and make a smart decision - he patently makes one of dumbest ones in any of the Nolan movies.

You guys have been arguing that he sends the cops down there because there's an army of baddies - now it's 'some dudes in the sewers' - if it's just some random bods pissing about in the sewers you don't call up every single cop in Gotham.

Either they are major threat or they are not - if they are a major threat you escalate the matter which is what Gordon should have done.

(in reply to cerebusboy)
Post #: 1501
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 10/8/2012 4:22:49 PM   
Fluke Skywalker


Posts: 9540
Joined: 23/4/2006
From: the dark side of the sun

quote:

ORIGINAL: cerebusboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Fluke Skywalker



If you're asking why the Government doesn't immediately get involved AFTER the police get trapped in the sewer the answer is there's no time. The police are trapped, the bomb goes off at the football game, the bridges are blown, the General dude starts flights and phones the President.



And, to go to my own point, you see that the person in DKR who contacts the White House is a very senior member of the military who does so after CONFIRMATION of a nuclear threat. That's plausible. A police commissioner phoning up to get the National Guard because he SUSPECTS an underground army is not.




And sending the entire police force of a city underground because he suspects there is an underground army operating is plausible? It's not in any way shape or form

(in reply to cerebusboy)
Post #: 1502
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 10/8/2012 4:26:17 PM   
cerebusboy


Posts: 1552
Joined: 1/5/2006

quote:

ORIGINAL: Fluke Skywalker


quote:

ORIGINAL: cerebusboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Fluke Skywalker



At the point you realise there's a dangerous madman with an underground army operating in your city any self respecting leader would call the White House and bring in the troops. You wouldn't call up every single damn cop in the city and send them underground - the word here is 'army' as well. You don't send cops against an army, you send an army against them.


Who is the 'you' in this scenario? Gordon? Mayor Eyeliner? 'Get the White House on the line' is far more of an unrealistic movie cliche (''Uh, Mr President, you've got some cop in Gotham on line 1. Says there's some dudes in his sewers") than what actually happens.

Gordon doesn't have the power to send in the army. He has cops, which is what he sends.


Gordon has (you would hope) the intelligence to look at a situation and make a smart decision - he patently makes one of dumbest ones in any of the Nolan movies.

You guys have been arguing that he sends the cops down there because there's an army of baddies - now it's 'some dudes in the sewers' - if it's just some random bods pissing about in the sewers you don't call up every single cop in Gotham.

Either they are major threat or they are not - if they are a major threat you escalate the matter which is what Gordon should have done.



You're avoiding the question. Even IF Gordon DOES think that there's a big army under the sewers then that doesn't necessarily mean he has the authority to send in the National Guard. Do you really think a cop gets to decide to send in the Army?

(in reply to Fluke Skywalker)
Post #: 1503
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 10/8/2012 4:28:07 PM   
cerebusboy


Posts: 1552
Joined: 1/5/2006

quote:

ORIGINAL: Fluke Skywalker


quote:

ORIGINAL: cerebusboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Fluke Skywalker



If you're asking why the Government doesn't immediately get involved AFTER the police get trapped in the sewer the answer is there's no time. The police are trapped, the bomb goes off at the football game, the bridges are blown, the General dude starts flights and phones the President.



And, to go to my own point, you see that the person in DKR who contacts the White House is a very senior member of the military who does so after CONFIRMATION of a nuclear threat. That's plausible. A police commissioner phoning up to get the National Guard because he SUSPECTS an underground army is not.




And sending the entire police force of a city underground because he suspects there is an underground army operating is plausible? It's not in any way shape or form


It's "plausible" in the sense of "decision that it's his to make". It's a bit silly saying Gordon could have sent in the army if he doesn't have the authority to do so, no? You're asking for the "impossible" instead of the "implausible"!


(in reply to Fluke Skywalker)
Post #: 1504
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 10/8/2012 4:30:04 PM   
cerebusboy


Posts: 1552
Joined: 1/5/2006

quote:

ORIGINAL: Fluke Skywalker



Gordon has (you would hope) the intelligence to look at a situation and make a smart decision - he patently makes one of dumbest ones in any of the Nolan movies.





It SEEMS dumb because of the consequences. Do you really think Gordon should have been thinking "man, I'd better hold lots of units off in case there's a bunch of explosives, established over a period of months, big enough to trap every cop in the city down in the sewers"?

(in reply to Fluke Skywalker)
Post #: 1505
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 10/8/2012 4:32:04 PM   
Fluke Skywalker


Posts: 9540
Joined: 23/4/2006
From: the dark side of the sun
He has the authority to contact higher powers and inform them of the situation - why is this not a logicial move if you expect an army to be forming up underground? Are you trying to tell me this would make less sense than sending every cop in Gotham underground

(in reply to cerebusboy)
Post #: 1506
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 10/8/2012 4:32:50 PM   
Fluke Skywalker


Posts: 9540
Joined: 23/4/2006
From: the dark side of the sun

quote:

ORIGINAL: cerebusboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Fluke Skywalker



Gordon has (you would hope) the intelligence to look at a situation and make a smart decision - he patently makes one of dumbest ones in any of the Nolan movies.





It SEEMS dumb because of the consequences. Do you really think Gordon should have been thinking "man, I'd better hold lots of units off in case there's a bunch of explosives, established over a period of months, big enough to trap every cop in the city down in the sewers"?


It is dumb regardless of them getting trapped because there's no one policing the city for starters!

(in reply to cerebusboy)
Post #: 1507
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 10/8/2012 4:36:27 PM   
cerebusboy


Posts: 1552
Joined: 1/5/2006

quote:

ORIGINAL: Fluke Skywalker

He has the authority to contact higher powers and inform them of the situation - why is this not a logicial move if you expect an army to be forming up underground? Are you trying to tell me this would make less sense than sending every cop in Gotham underground


But this is addressed in the movie. Let's say the Mayor has the authority to send in the National Guard (although it's more plausible that he the 'authority' to contact someone who can make that call and be listened to). When in the movie do you think this should have happened? You'd agree that its highly likely that, even for the sake of argument the Mayor decided to go on Gordon's hunch and request the National Guard, that THEY would require solid proof - not "the Mayor says the Commisioner says that he SUSPECTS an underground army" style hunches?

(in reply to Fluke Skywalker)
Post #: 1508
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 10/8/2012 4:37:58 PM   
cerebusboy


Posts: 1552
Joined: 1/5/2006

quote:

ORIGINAL: Fluke Skywalker


quote:

ORIGINAL: cerebusboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Fluke Skywalker



Gordon has (you would hope) the intelligence to look at a situation and make a smart decision - he patently makes one of dumbest ones in any of the Nolan movies.





It SEEMS dumb because of the consequences. Do you really think Gordon should have been thinking "man, I'd better hold lots of units off in case there's a bunch of explosives, established over a period of months, big enough to trap every cop in the city down in the sewers"?


It is dumb regardless of them getting trapped because there's no one policing the city for starters!




It's a "calling all units" potential terrorist threat in an otherwise (because of the Dent Act) relatively crime-free Gotham. It wold certainly take precedence over handing out parking tickets or staking out the donut shop

(in reply to Fluke Skywalker)
Post #: 1509
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 10/8/2012 4:47:14 PM   
Fluke Skywalker


Posts: 9540
Joined: 23/4/2006
From: the dark side of the sun

quote:

ORIGINAL: cerebusboy


It's a "calling all units" potential terrorist threat in an otherwise (because of the Dent Act) relatively crime-free Gotham. It wold certainly take precedence over handing out parking tickets or staking out the donut shop


But you're contradicting your self, on one hand your arguing it's a 'calling all units' potential terrorist threat which would equate to a guaranteed escalation to higher powers in any logical universe, and then in your other post you say he's just suspecting an underground army with no hard proof - why is that a 'calling all units potential terrorist threat'?

In either instance it's a dumb move to send all the cops down there, you either send a decent force (but not all of them) to check out the sewers or you call in for assistance from the government.

And are you telling me that Gotham is so crime free you can afford to take every single police officer off the streets? It's an invitation to a crime spree!


(in reply to cerebusboy)
Post #: 1510
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 10/8/2012 4:51:06 PM   
cerebusboy


Posts: 1552
Joined: 1/5/2006

quote:

ORIGINAL: Fluke Skywalker


quote:

ORIGINAL: cerebusboy


It's a "calling all units" potential terrorist threat in an otherwise (because of the Dent Act) relatively crime-free Gotham. It wold certainly take precedence over handing out parking tickets or staking out the donut shop


But you're contradicting your self, on one hand your arguing it's a 'calling all units' potential terrorist threat which would equate to a guaranteed escalation to higher powers in any logical universe, and then in your other post you say he's just suspecting an underground army with no hard proof - why is that a 'calling all units potential terrorist threat'?

In either instance it's a dumb move to send all the cops down there, you either send a decent force (but not all of them) to check out the sewers or you call in for assistance from the government.

And are you telling me that Gotham is so crime free you can afford to take every single police officer off the streets? It's an invitation to a crime spree!




But we're talking about what decisions can actually be made. If GORDON thinks it's a potential terrorist threat then he can call all units correct? What are his options in that situation? If he phoned up Mayor Eyeliner, the Mayor (who we already seeing pissed with the press because he just wants to chillax and watch some american fitba) would still want some proof before sending in the National Guard, agreed?

the POLICE get the "calling all units" message, it would take a while for people to realise that there's no police around (do YOU know where your nearest police officers are right now? I don't, and I'm in Gotham-style Glasgow! )


(in reply to Fluke Skywalker)
Post #: 1511
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 10/8/2012 4:52:31 PM   
cerebusboy


Posts: 1552
Joined: 1/5/2006

quote:

ORIGINAL: Fluke Skywalker


quote:

ORIGINAL: cerebusboy


It's a "calling all units" potential terrorist threat in an otherwise (because of the Dent Act) relatively crime-free Gotham. It wold certainly take precedence over handing out parking tickets or staking out the donut shop


But you're contradicting your self, on one hand your arguing it's a 'calling all units' potential terrorist threat which would equate to a guaranteed escalation to higher powers in any logical universe, and then in your other post you say he's just suspecting an underground army with no hard proof - why is that a 'calling all units potential terrorist threat'?

In either instance it's a dumb move to send all the cops down there, you either send a decent force (but not all of them) to check out the sewers or you call in for assistance from the government.

And are you telling me that Gotham is so crime free you can afford to take every single police officer off the streets? It's an invitation to a crime spree!





And I'm talking about what decisions can actually be made in the circumstances. If Gordon can just send the army in at will he would have let them take care of the Joker

(in reply to Fluke Skywalker)
Post #: 1512
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 10/8/2012 4:54:48 PM   
cerebusboy


Posts: 1552
Joined: 1/5/2006

quote:

ORIGINAL: Fluke Skywalker


quote:

ORIGINAL: cerebusboy


It's a "calling all units" potential terrorist threat in an otherwise (because of the Dent Act) relatively crime-free Gotham. It wold certainly take precedence over handing out parking tickets or staking out the donut shop


But you're contradicting your self, on one hand your arguing it's a 'calling all units' potential terrorist threat which would equate to a guaranteed escalation to higher powers in any logical universe,


Emphasis on "potential". Gordon does not have enough information to phone up Homeland Security (or whoever) and state DEFINITIVELY that there's an underground army. And if he does think that it's a potential terrorist threat, but one that can be neutralised with 3000 cops, then don't you think Gordon would indeed make that call?

(in reply to Fluke Skywalker)
Post #: 1513
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 10/8/2012 4:58:25 PM   
Fluke Skywalker


Posts: 9540
Joined: 23/4/2006
From: the dark side of the sun

quote:

ORIGINAL: cerebusboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Fluke Skywalker


quote:

ORIGINAL: cerebusboy


It's a "calling all units" potential terrorist threat in an otherwise (because of the Dent Act) relatively crime-free Gotham. It wold certainly take precedence over handing out parking tickets or staking out the donut shop


But you're contradicting your self, on one hand your arguing it's a 'calling all units' potential terrorist threat which would equate to a guaranteed escalation to higher powers in any logical universe, and then in your other post you say he's just suspecting an underground army with no hard proof - why is that a 'calling all units potential terrorist threat'?

In either instance it's a dumb move to send all the cops down there, you either send a decent force (but not all of them) to check out the sewers or you call in for assistance from the government.

And are you telling me that Gotham is so crime free you can afford to take every single police officer off the streets? It's an invitation to a crime spree!




But we're talking about what decisions can actually be made. If GORDON thinks it's a potential terrorist threat then he can call all units correct? What are his options in that situation? If he phoned up Mayor Eyeliner, the Mayor (who we already seeing pissed with the press because he just wants to chillax and watch some american fitba) would still want some proof before sending in the National Guard, agreed?

the POLICE get the "calling all units" message, it would take a while for people to realise that there's no police around (do YOU know where your nearest police officers are right now? I don't, and I'm in Gotham-style Glasgow! )




Come on now your arguing that it's fine to remove all the cops from your city because no one will notice

In terms of decisions that can be made in the circumstances it's pretty clear :

If you know there's an underground army operating you escalate it to a higher power.
If you suspect there's an underground army operating you still inform a higher power and send a cop force down the sewers to investigate.

What you don't do is send every single cop in the city down the sewers! If you saw something like this in a non-Batman film you'd think it was dumb - admit it

(in reply to cerebusboy)
Post #: 1514
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 10/8/2012 5:18:19 PM   
cerebusboy


Posts: 1552
Joined: 1/5/2006

quote:

ORIGINAL: Fluke Skywalker


quote:

ORIGINAL: cerebusboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Fluke Skywalker


quote:

ORIGINAL: cerebusboy


It's a "calling all units" potential terrorist threat in an otherwise (because of the Dent Act) relatively crime-free Gotham. It wold certainly take precedence over handing out parking tickets or staking out the donut shop


But you're contradicting your self, on one hand your arguing it's a 'calling all units' potential terrorist threat which would equate to a guaranteed escalation to higher powers in any logical universe, and then in your other post you say he's just suspecting an underground army with no hard proof - why is that a 'calling all units potential terrorist threat'?

In either instance it's a dumb move to send all the cops down there, you either send a decent force (but not all of them) to check out the sewers or you call in for assistance from the government.

And are you telling me that Gotham is so crime free you can afford to take every single police officer off the streets? It's an invitation to a crime spree!




But we're talking about what decisions can actually be made. If GORDON thinks it's a potential terrorist threat then he can call all units correct? What are his options in that situation? If he phoned up Mayor Eyeliner, the Mayor (who we already seeing pissed with the press because he just wants to chillax and watch some american fitba) would still want some proof before sending in the National Guard, agreed?

the POLICE get the "calling all units" message, it would take a while for people to realise that there's no police around (do YOU know where your nearest police officers are right now? I don't, and I'm in Gotham-style Glasgow! )




Come on now your arguing that it's fine to remove all the cops from your city because no one will notice

In terms of decisions that can be made in the circumstances it's pretty clear :

If you know there's an underground army operating you escalate it to a higher power.
If you suspect there's an underground army operating you still inform a higher power and send a cop force down the sewers to investigate.

What you don't do is send every single cop in the city down the sewers! If you saw something like this in a non-Batman film you'd think it was dumb - admit it



No, I'm pointing out that a Commisioner would not be precluded from making a "calling all units" call because of fear of it calling an impromptu crime spree!

I'd think having a police commisioner phone up the White House or call in the National Guard would be considerably dumberer

(in reply to Fluke Skywalker)
Post #: 1515
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 10/8/2012 5:25:12 PM   
Fluke Skywalker


Posts: 9540
Joined: 23/4/2006
From: the dark side of the sun

quote:

ORIGINAL: cerebusboy

I'd think having a police commisioner phone up the White House or call in the National Guard would be considerably dumberer


What it's more dumb to inform the government about an underground army operating in your city than to arbitrarily send every single cop in the city down the sewers without telling anyone higher up first? Maybe the reason he didn't do it was because he knew he risked being removed from his post for being insane. He's insane in the mem-Bane!!!

YOU KNOW IT'S DUMB - YOU KNOW IT!!!!

(in reply to cerebusboy)
Post #: 1516
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 10/8/2012 5:26:58 PM   
cerebusboy


Posts: 1552
Joined: 1/5/2006

quote:

ORIGINAL: Fluke Skywalker


If you suspect there's an underground army operating you still inform a higher power and send a cop force down the sewers to investigate.




How do you think that conversation would go?
GORDON: I suspect there's an underground army
MAYOR EYELINER : What evidence do you have?
GORDON: Er, not much

etc

And as Commissioner, Gordon has duty of care of the welfare of his men. You do not send a couple of units down if you have suspicion of an ARMY (i.e. lots of guys with automatic weapons who would easily kill a mere taskforce)

(in reply to Fluke Skywalker)
Post #: 1517
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 10/8/2012 5:30:34 PM   
cerebusboy


Posts: 1552
Joined: 1/5/2006

quote:

ORIGINAL: Fluke Skywalker


quote:

ORIGINAL: cerebusboy

I'd think having a police commisioner phone up the White House or call in the National Guard would be considerably dumberer


What it's more dumb to inform the government about an underground army operating in your city than to arbitrarily send every single cop in the city down the sewers without telling anyone higher up first? Maybe the reason he didn't do it was because he knew he risked being removed from his post for being insane. He's insane in the mem-Bane!!!

YOU KNOW IT'S DUMB - YOU KNOW IT!!!!


It's not arbitary! And, come on, based on the evidence of all the movies does Gordon really seem like a guy who'd run to Mayor Eyelashes, and does Mayor Eyelashes seem like someone who would act on a mere hunch of Gordon's? If we're going by the book then Gordon should have arrested Batman!

And they don't tell the Mayor because they know he wouldn't want panic. He's a politician, the police have a job to do with whatever resources they have available. We're even told Matthew Modine joked about crocodiles in the sewer! If Gordon had went to Mayor Eyelashes with no proof the Mayor would have told him tae get tae fuck (er, in so many words )



(in reply to Fluke Skywalker)
Post #: 1518
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 10/8/2012 5:49:53 PM   
chris kilby

 

Posts: 1189
Joined: 31/3/2010
"I never thought this thing would go the distance."

(Lex Luthor, Superman II)

(in reply to cerebusboy)
Post #: 1519
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 10/8/2012 6:11:40 PM   
chris kilby

 

Posts: 1189
Joined: 31/3/2010
quote:

ORIGINAL: Fluke Skywalker


quote:

ORIGINAL: AxlReznor

Really? I was thinking we'd spent a long time entering pedantic, nitpicky, joyless territory pointing out flaws that don't exist if you a) pay attention to the movie you're watching (this isn't a phenomenon unique to Batman... it's frustratingly common) and b) remember you're watching a blockbuster action movie and not some slice-of-life drama.


I never walked away from BB or TDK thinking there were some seriously dumb moments in those films ,


Well you really weren't paying attention then:

BATMAN BEGINS
How did Alfred get The Batman down off that roof after he got gassed by The Scarecrow?

Why didn't that 'microwave emitter' thingie not cook everyone who was annywhere near it while it was vapurising the city's water supply?

What? Every riot cop in the city? Really? No, that's just dumb.

THE DARK KNIGHT
What becomes of The Joker and his hostages after Bats dives out the window after Rachel?

How could Gordon plan to fake his own death unless he knew in advance The Joker was going to shoot the Mayor at point blank range? Why not just arrest him then?

How did Bats know where Dent took The Joker's goon to interrogate him?

Why didn't Gordon just pin Dent's crimes on The Joker? There were no witnesses, it's not like The Joker's denials would have been believed and ultimately he was responsible!

And the real biggie: how come no-one ever seems to twig that either The Batman has a massive industrial organisation (with military contracts up the kazoo) backing him, he's the richest guy in the city or both? Or simply say: "Hang on a minute! I know you! You're Bruce Wayne - one of the richest and therefore most famous men in the world - in a bat-themed gimp suit which doesn't begin to disguise your distinctive mouth and teeth and putting on a none-too-convincing Clint Eastwood growl and I claim my five bucks!" Or something like that. Oh, I know - is it something to do with the willing suspension of disbelief, by any chance...?

(I could go on. But where would be the fun in that...?)

quote:

Any right minded ruthless baddie would have taken the cops out - the reason they were left alive was not because Bane never considered Batman would return, it's because Nolan knew Batman would return and needed the cops for a punchup with Bane's men.


Well, no shit, Sherlock! You'll be telling us that 007 always gets issued with just the right gadgets he'll need later to complete his mission next!






< Message edited by chris kilby -- 10/8/2012 6:33:33 PM >

(in reply to Fluke Skywalker)
Post #: 1520
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 10/8/2012 6:16:39 PM   
chris kilby

 

Posts: 1189
Joined: 31/3/2010

quote:

ORIGINAL: Fluke Skywalker

By the way having not ever read Batman comics what do people think about Bane onscreen and would there be anything in the comic book version of the character you would have liked to have seen.

And apologies if I've pissed anyone off here with me attacking TDKR - it's still a great film it's just because it's Nolan/ Bale that I feel the need to have a go at it, expectations are high!


Yeah, I'd kinda noticed. I admire your honesty, though. It takes a big man to admit when he's wrong and... I'm not a big man.

(in reply to Fluke Skywalker)
Post #: 1521
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 10/8/2012 6:24:02 PM   
chris kilby

 

Posts: 1189
Joined: 31/3/2010

quote:

ORIGINAL: AxlReznor

quote:

ORIGINAL: Fluke Skywalker

By the way having not ever read Batman comics what do people think about Bane onscreen and would there be anything in the comic book version of the character you would have liked to have seen.

And apologies if I've pissed anyone off here with me attacking TDKR - it's still a great film it's just because it's Nolan/ Bale that I feel the need to have a go at it, expectations are high!


Bane was absolutely amazing in the movie. He's a great character in the comics, but he's a bit cheesy in the luchadore mask and everything.

In the movie he's got a far better motivation, too. In the comics he just heard about Batman whilst in jail, and decided he wanted to break him and take over Gotham. Just to prove that he could it seems. It's all a bit arbritary. It would have been cool if he went about breaking Batman in the same way he did in the comics, though... breaking out the prisoners as the start of his plan to wear him down whilst he runs around bringing them all in, then when he's at his weakest point attacking Wayne Manor. But then I suppose in this movie Batman started at his weakest point, so that would have all been pretty pointless.

At first I was skeptical of Tom Hardy as the character, just as I was skeptical of Heath Ledger as Joker and Anne Hathaway as Catwoman. All three of them absolutely blew me away with their performances from start to finish.


You'd think after all this time (and the all-too-predictable howls of embarrassingly premature fanboy outrage which initially greeted Heath Ledger's casting as The Joker) that everyone would realise that Nolan knows what he's doing casting-wise. In all his films he hasn't put so much as an extra wrong yet. Not even the Coens cast their films better.

But then I hear premature overreaction is a problem which afflicts a lot of online fanboys

(in reply to AxlReznor)
Post #: 1522
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 10/8/2012 6:28:33 PM   
cerebusboy


Posts: 1552
Joined: 1/5/2006

quote:

ORIGINAL: chris kilby


quote:

ORIGINAL: AxlReznor

quote:

ORIGINAL: Fluke Skywalker

By the way having not ever read Batman comics what do people think about Bane onscreen and would there be anything in the comic book version of the character you would have liked to have seen.

And apologies if I've pissed anyone off here with me attacking TDKR - it's still a great film it's just because it's Nolan/ Bale that I feel the need to have a go at it, expectations are high!


Bane was absolutely amazing in the movie. He's a great character in the comics, but he's a bit cheesy in the luchadore mask and everything.

In the movie he's got a far better motivation, too. In the comics he just heard about Batman whilst in jail, and decided he wanted to break him and take over Gotham. Just to prove that he could it seems. It's all a bit arbritary. It would have been cool if he went about breaking Batman in the same way he did in the comics, though... breaking out the prisoners as the start of his plan to wear him down whilst he runs around bringing them all in, then when he's at his weakest point attacking Wayne Manor. But then I suppose in this movie Batman started at his weakest point, so that would have all been pretty pointless.

At first I was skeptical of Tom Hardy as the character, just as I was skeptical of Heath Ledger as Joker and Anne Hathaway as Catwoman. All three of them absolutely blew me away with their performances from start to finish.


You'd think after all this time (and the all-too-predictable howls of embarrassingly premature fanboy outrage which initially greeted Heath Ledger's casting as The Joker) that everyone would realise that Nolan knows what he's doing casting-wise. In all his films he hasn't put so much as an extra wrong yet. Not even the Coens cast their films better.

But then I hear premature overreaction is a problem which afflicts a lot of online fanboys



Amen. I don't think I'd even seen a single Ann Hathaway film before DKR, and I'd only seen Marion Cotillard in Nolan's Inception, but now both are up there with Scarlett Johansson and Natalie Portman in my mental movie star porn theatre! (that sounded less sad in my head )

(in reply to chris kilby)
Post #: 1523
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 10/8/2012 6:36:00 PM   
AxlReznor

 

Posts: 1095
Joined: 2/12/2010
From: Great Britain

quote:

ORIGINAL: chris kilby


quote:

ORIGINAL: AxlReznor

quote:

ORIGINAL: Fluke Skywalker

By the way having not ever read Batman comics what do people think about Bane onscreen and would there be anything in the comic book version of the character you would have liked to have seen.

And apologies if I've pissed anyone off here with me attacking TDKR - it's still a great film it's just because it's Nolan/ Bale that I feel the need to have a go at it, expectations are high!


Bane was absolutely amazing in the movie. He's a great character in the comics, but he's a bit cheesy in the luchadore mask and everything.

In the movie he's got a far better motivation, too. In the comics he just heard about Batman whilst in jail, and decided he wanted to break him and take over Gotham. Just to prove that he could it seems. It's all a bit arbritary. It would have been cool if he went about breaking Batman in the same way he did in the comics, though... breaking out the prisoners as the start of his plan to wear him down whilst he runs around bringing them all in, then when he's at his weakest point attacking Wayne Manor. But then I suppose in this movie Batman started at his weakest point, so that would have all been pretty pointless.

At first I was skeptical of Tom Hardy as the character, just as I was skeptical of Heath Ledger as Joker and Anne Hathaway as Catwoman. All three of them absolutely blew me away with their performances from start to finish.


You'd think after all this time (and the all-too-predictable howls of embarrassingly premature fanboy outrage which initially greeted Heath Ledger's casting as The Joker) that everyone would realise that Nolan knows what he's doing casting-wise. In all his films he hasn't put so much as an extra wrong yet. Not even the Coens cast their films better.

But then I hear premature overreaction is a problem which afflicts a lot of online fanboys



I wasn't outraged. A lot of people were outraged, but my skepticism went down to: "Really? That doesn't sound right, but whatever".

I myself had to remind a lot of people that were dead against Anne Hathaway doing it because she doesn't have the right image for Catwoman that this is why they call it "acting", and they should wait until seeing it to ultimately judge. It's not wrong to wonder how something that doesn't sound right is going to work, no? We all make mistakes from time to time, yes? Surely Christopher Nolan's due one by now... bastard hasn't made one up until now.

_____________________________

"It's amazing how many supposed 'plot holes' turn out to now be plot holes if you'd just pay attention", Me

(in reply to chris kilby)
Post #: 1524
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 10/8/2012 8:37:58 PM   
cerebusboy


Posts: 1552
Joined: 1/5/2006

quote:

ORIGINAL: chris kilby

"I never thought this thing would go the distance."

(Lex Luthor, Superman II)



Hmm, actually there's actually a sad relative paucity of posts from yourself today dude.... I know non-fanboys have lives on Friday night, but I thought that you had Batman-style devotion to the cause!

(in reply to chris kilby)
Post #: 1525
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 10/8/2012 8:48:42 PM   
chris kilby

 

Posts: 1189
Joined: 31/3/2010
No, just a five-year old with chickenpox which means I've been stuck in the hoose aw week!

(More like Rorschach levels of self-loathing, mate...)

< Message edited by chris kilby -- 10/8/2012 8:52:01 PM >

(in reply to cerebusboy)
Post #: 1526
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 10/8/2012 8:54:22 PM   
cerebusboy


Posts: 1552
Joined: 1/5/2006

quote:

ORIGINAL: chris kilby

No, just a five-year old with chickenpox which means I've been stuck in the hoose aw week!

(More like Rorschach levels of self-loathing, mate...)



Sorry to hear that. Although, on the bright side, surely a five year old is of an age to be introduced to Batman?

(in reply to chris kilby)
Post #: 1527
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 10/8/2012 9:15:53 PM   
chris kilby

 

Posts: 1189
Joined: 31/3/2010
Oh, you name it - Batman, Spider-Man, The Avengers, Ben Ten, Darth Maul, Cad Bane, and even, would you believe, "that blotchy-faced guy"! (My desktop image is that Springfield Punx spoof with all the Marvel and DC characters, Simpsons-style!) Get 'em when they're young, eh?

(in reply to cerebusboy)
Post #: 1528
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 11/8/2012 1:49:06 AM   
Darth Marenghi


Posts: 2977
Joined: 10/10/2010
From: Manchester

quote:

ORIGINAL: AxlReznor


I wasn't outraged. A lot of people were outraged, but my skepticism went down to: "Really? That doesn't sound right, but whatever".

I myself had to remind a lot of people that were dead against Anne Hathaway doing it because she doesn't have the right image for Catwoman that this is why they call it "acting", and they should wait until seeing it to ultimately judge. It's not wrong to wonder how something that doesn't sound right is going to work, no?


Very much so, but I think with Hathaway they could have cut her some more slack - my reaction was that she wasn't a name anyone expected but she was clearly a good actress. And after thinking about it some more, she does have a kind of 1940s look about her that could hark back to the original version of the character.

_____________________________

Invisible Text for SPOILERS: "color=#F1F1F1" Spoiler text "/color" , then change the quotation marks to square brackets.


(in reply to AxlReznor)
Post #: 1529
RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batm... - 11/8/2012 1:22:55 PM   
Fluke Skywalker


Posts: 9540
Joined: 23/4/2006
From: the dark side of the sun

quote:

ORIGINAL: cerebusboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Fluke Skywalker


If you suspect there's an underground army operating you still inform a higher power and send a cop force down the sewers to investigate.




How do you think that conversation would go?
GORDON: I suspect there's an underground army
MAYOR EYELINER : What evidence do you have?
GORDON: Er, not much

etc

And as Commissioner, Gordon has duty of care of the welfare of his men. You do not send a couple of units down if you have suspicion of an ARMY (i.e. lots of guys with automatic weapons who would easily kill a mere taskforce)


A duty of care to the welfare of the city? No cops in the city at all? Makes no sense!

You are contradicting yourself - if you suspect there's an army you don't send every cop in the city underground. If you know there's an army you don't send every single cop underground you call in the army or national guard.

Either way you don't send every single cop in the city underground


quote:

ORIGINAL: chris kilby

quote:

ORIGINAL: Fluke Skywalker


quote:

ORIGINAL: AxlReznor

Really? I was thinking we'd spent a long time entering pedantic, nitpicky, joyless territory pointing out flaws that don't exist if you a) pay attention to the movie you're watching (this isn't a phenomenon unique to Batman... it's frustratingly common) and b) remember you're watching a blockbuster action movie and not some slice-of-life drama.


I never walked away from BB or TDK thinking there were some seriously dumb moments in those films ,


Well you really weren't paying attention then:

BATMAN BEGINS
How did Alfred get The Batman down off that roof after he got gassed by The Scarecrow?

Why didn't that 'microwave emitter' thingie not cook everyone who was annywhere near it while it was vapurising the city's water supply?

What? Every riot cop in the city? Really? No, that's just dumb.

THE DARK KNIGHT
What becomes of The Joker and his hostages after Bats dives out the window after Rachel?

How could Gordon plan to fake his own death unless he knew in advance The Joker was going to shoot the Mayor at point blank range? Why not just arrest him then?

How did Bats know where Dent took The Joker's goon to interrogate him?

Why didn't Gordon just pin Dent's crimes on The Joker? There were no witnesses, it's not like The Joker's denials would have been believed and ultimately he was responsible!

And the real biggie: how come no-one ever seems to twig that either The Batman has a massive industrial organisation (with military contracts up the kazoo) backing him, he's the richest guy in the city or both? Or simply say: "Hang on a minute! I know you! You're Bruce Wayne - one of the richest and therefore most famous men in the world - in a bat-themed gimp suit which doesn't begin to disguise your distinctive mouth and teeth and putting on a none-too-convincing Clint Eastwood growl and I claim my five bucks!" Or something like that. Oh, I know - is it something to do with the willing suspension of disbelief, by any chance...?

(I could go on. But where would be the fun in that...?)

quote:

Any right minded ruthless baddie would have taken the cops out - the reason they were left alive was not because Bane never considered Batman would return, it's because Nolan knew Batman would return and needed the cops for a punchup with Bane's men.


Well, no shit, Sherlock! You'll be telling us that 007 always gets issued with just the right gadgets he'll need later to complete his mission next!



I've got Batfans picking holes in the other movies as well

And it's as if there's flaws in the other films it somehow excuses the flaws in this one

All movies have flaws you can find, even the best of all time. In most cases you can forgive them or overlook them - but when they are as big as they are in the TDKR you have to call them. It's a good film but has a few biggies I'm afraid.

On the note of Anne Hathaway watch Love and Other Drugs - I'd always been 50-50 about her until I saw that movie and then realised she'd be great as Catwoman because she's really talented.

(in reply to cerebusboy)
Post #: 1530
Page:   <<   < prev  49 50 [51] 52 53   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Film Forums] >> Film Reviews >> RE: Are Realistic Super-Heroes an Oxymoron aka: Is Batman Silly? Page: <<   < prev  49 50 [51] 52 53   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


 
Movie News  |  Empire Blog  |  Movie Reviews  |  Future Films  |  Features  |  Video Interviews  |  Image Gallery  |  Competitions  |  Forum  |  Magazine  |  Resources
 
Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.094