great_badir
Posts: 4172
Joined: 6/10/2005 From: A breaking rope bridge in the middle of the jungle
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: NCC1701A quote:
ORIGINAL: jonson I guess the closest Speilberg got was propbably Poltergeist for a horror film anyway, although Directing duties wasn't him. I dont know what warrants an 18 certificate nowadays, as most 15's show extreme violence and bad language. To get to the next bracket I imagine you're talking sexual violence, really extreme horror, very adult themese - none of which a director like Spielberg would do, or needs to do. It would be such a departure from his usual vision, I mean, he made adult themed films like Jaws, Schindlers List, Munich without the need to overpush the boundaries. I think some films need an 18 classification, but I'd say a lot of (but not all) 18 films are really mostly down to the director trying to be a bit naughty, a bit like the uncool kid in class showing off. The great film-makers don't need to do that. Even those who are firmly in the 18 bracket (Kubrick, Verhoeven, Romero, Stone, Carpenter) only are because that's their genre. It's not about pushing the boundaries more that their vision and type of film required that level of violence,sex, bad language etc. quote:
Ridley Scott too, I think. Alien Ridley Scott also directed Hannibal which was an 18. Black Rain was also an 18 originally.
_____________________________
FAVE FILMS BO BOMBS
|