doc1014
Posts: 1
Joined: 13/7/2012
|
Ok, no joke I only joined this forum because I wanted to reply to this thread, since it's not too old and I have some thoughts and feelings about it. Anyone who's suggested they should remake The Running Man according to the Stephen King story is right. If you haven't read it, don't think you have an opinion on it,because you don't. It's barely 100 pages long, and you should go read it right now. If Stephen King, Ray Bradbury, Aldous Huxley and George Orwell had gotten together to collaborate on a projective future shock tale instead of separately writing The Running Man, Fahrenheit 451, Brave New World and 1984, they'd have produced a wretchedly accurate picture of our world today and where it's headed, sooner and not later. My only disagreement is that the ending would/ should be changed. Fuck 9/11 sympathy and sensitivity. That kind of susceptibility to appeal to emotion is part of what allowed that event to become such a dominant part of our terrible fear culture. It's the same reason another excellent social commentary that should be a meticulously developed major motion picture isn't; Chuck Palahniuk's Survivor. Film is the modern novel as much as the modern novel is the modern novel. Media is, and should be, important, and these are important works. The Running Man is one of the most profoundly disturbing, honest and accurate futuristic stories I ever read. It was written in 1982, just before I was born, and it is about the world I am living in and entering as an adult. I read it when I was around 12 or 13, and it's stuck with me since. No other Arnold Schwarzenegger movie ever needs to be revisited, including Total Recall. Think harder, be smarter.
|