Professor Moriarty
Posts: 8583
Joined: 6/10/2005 From: the waters of Casablanca
|
Quite interesting that David Platt is busy pointing out that Edin Dzeko is not a super sub when quite obviously this is how Man City deploy him in the majority of games. And the same for Hernandez at Utd. We've had super subs before, Fairclough or Ronny Rosenthal both spring to mind. And I wondered if its such a bad thing. I guess no footballer sets out to not be in the starting XI, but is it so bad being the guy your team turns to when they need a goal? Being the player that the manager turns to when he needs something a bit extra or the one the supporters are chanting to bring on if they need a goal in the last 10 minutes? As it becomes more common to have big squads, I wonder if having plan B warming up is such a bad thing. I'm pretty sure that in baseball, for example, being the pitcher who is brought on because he can close out a game is looked on as being a real specialty that is vital for the team. Again, I know he wouldn't go there, but imo the last 10 minutes of the Chelsea v. Liverpool game yesterday, Andy Carroll is on the bench and you have a different dynamic as Liverpool were pushing forward for the winner.
|