Olaf
Posts: 23390
Joined: 26/2/2007 From: 41°N 93°W
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Larry of Arabia quote:
ORIGINAL: st3veebee quote:
ORIGINAL: maffew I don't think any bands are overrated, because it's an impossible thing to quantify. If millions of people like a band, then that band aren't overrated, they're just successful, and if you disagree with the fact that they should be successful, that doesn't make them overrated, it just means that you specifically disagree.. how can people possibly be wrong for liking something? I don't like U2, but I wouldn't say they are overrated. They're just shit, and a lot of people like shit. Overrated doesn't mean anything when you're discussing peoples opinions. I guess you could look at it another way, which I've just thoughts of in that some people undeservedly get praise and fame for doing something that others did years before.. Skrillex comes to mind on that one, he gets the fame while the underground stuff that he ripped off remains underground (i don't really know much about that, just using it as an example) that would make him overrated and his peers that no one's heard of underrated. But that's not really what people have been saying in this thread.. I don't see why people get in such a huff about the term overrated. In all the cases I mentioned (can't speak for anone else) I chose bands that I believe don't deserve the merit they currently or once had.: therefore to me they are overrated. All we are doing here is stating bands that have achieved a certain amount of success that you feel they did not deserve because of lack of talent, repetition, stealing songs..whatever. and also YOU'RE OVERRATED I did a thread a while ago about picking 5 overrated and 5 underrated tracks by your favourite bands, and people had the same problem i.e. how can you judge something to be overrated. But then the same people turned around and said listing your favourite underrated tracks was a great idea, like judging what's underrated wasn't the exact mirror of how you judge what's overrated. It's pretty obvious what the difference is though (in terms of motivation). Naming some underrated songs is a fun exercise where people name the songs they like that don't get as much recognition as an artist's better-known songs, whereas 'overrated' implies a much more negative concept. They're based around the same principle I suppose, but the fact that every artist has, by nature, many more 'underrated' songs than 'overrated' songs (the same way that there will always be more 'underrated' bands than 'overrated' ones) means that it actually remains a discussion about music - and a more expansive one at that, given the wider range of discussion - instead of a discussion of people's opinions of music. I mean, the exact same bands come up every time when people say 'overrated' because a wider listening public 'rates' a relatively small amount of groups. It's a term that can't really go anywhere, beyond people saying 'lol you're wrong' whereas a discussion of underrated bands/songs can be quite illuminating.
_____________________________
I tried to groan, Help! Help! But the tone that came out was that of polite conversation. Empire Top 100 Albums Poll 2013: CLICK HERE
|