jobloffski
Posts: 1836
Joined: 30/9/2005 From: elsewhere
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Lazarus munkey I don't think it's bad, it's just a crushing disappointment. Dull characters shaken through a plot colander and left to flounder. The ambiguity in Blade Runner is the character motivation, we are almost always aware of what happened, it's the why that we ponder. The only fact we debate is the origin of Deckard. Prometheus attempts to add vagueness by removing fact and the audience is asked to hypothesise as to the events that took place and then derive meaning from our theories on those events. It just forgot to make the quest interesting. All of this theorising masks the film's biggest flaw, the characters. I cared about the crew of the Nostromo. They were 'real' people. I cared about the replicants in Blade Runner, they were effectively children. David aside, the characters are one-note and a waste of talent. Theron does well but succumbs to the most predictable character 'twist' in recent memory. If the script fails, Scott fails. He's proven this time and time again. It's entirely subjective as to whether the script fails. Thinking about the 'why' of events in this film is what has given me the enjoyment I've derived from it. I'm looking forward to seeing it again immensely, and re-viewing Shaw's ludicrous optimism at the start through the prism of 'that scene' where she 'receives the agonies of Prometheus' torn open abdomen' for her curiosity and desire to look her creators in the eye. I have no problem whatsoever with a film about a search for answers that descends into chaos and confusion (that's the meat and drink of new discoveries you have to digest in whatever field you work and you never get the answers to specific questions without some stumbles into the murk or unpredicted/unwelcome factors entering the equation and this aspect of the film, even if people don't like it narratively, PERFECTLY embodies the process of searching for the new, and eventually what is reached is either what you set out to find, or what you actually find, so, bring on the sequel to play it out!!!)), or with a robot that acts without conscience just to see what happens (and later in the series becomes 'robot with a specific evil agenda...robot with behavioural inhibitors that prevent it harming humans, etc). In it's own right or as 'containing thematic/incidental elements from ALL subsequent 'canon' films', I find Prometheus to be good enough for me. And a good contrast to the characterisation style to ALL the subsequent films, all of which are different from film to film anyway. Damn, I even love saying the name of the film...Prom...etheus...hmmm :-)
< Message edited by jobloffski -- 28/6/2012 12:07:27 PM >
_____________________________
Yes, dreamers dream and doers do. But if dreamers DON'T dream, doers don't have anything TO do. Everything that is only here because people exist, only exists because someone thought of it., or in other words, dreamed it.
|