RE: RE:

Follow @empiremagazine

Forum Home

Register for Free!

Log In

Moderator Tickets

FAQ

Users Online

RE: RE:

Logged in as: Guest

Printable Version

All Forums >> [Film Forums] >> Movie News >> RE: RE:

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: RE: - 25/5/2012 4:41:48 PM

foolishearthling

Posts: 16
Joined: 20/12/2011

Double post joy.

< Message edited by foolishearthling -- 25/5/2012 4:45:17 PM >

(in reply to Wild about Wilder)

Post #: 31

RE: RE: - 25/5/2012 4:44:34 PM

foolishearthling

Posts: 16
Joined: 20/12/2011

quote:

Heard it on a film programme on radio might've been Front Row or Kermode & Mayo can't remember which & sorry should've said the total mentioned was for the UK my bad .
But looked it up & according to pofodder.com Toy Story3 & Kung Fu Panda were also out performed, so who's telling the truth because as we know the film companies wouldn't lie about a thing like this WOULD THEY???

Despicable Me was �14m of it's �20m in 3D (UK). Toy Story 3 was �55m of it's �74m in 3D.

Kung Fu Panda 2 was a lot lower because 3D popularity has declined in family films since then, but still about 50/50. It's rare for a film to be worse than 50% 3D - I think Cars 2 was weighted towards 2D but that's because the 3D screens were busy with Transformers, Harry Potter and Captain America.

I wouldn't trust Mr Kermode to give an unbiased view of anything to do with 3D.

(in reply to Cool Breeze)

Post #: 32

Oddly appropiate - 27/5/2012 7:29:43 PM

pottyaboutpotter1