quote:

ORIGINAL: Timon

So... Avengers 2 may end with The Hulk being exiled Planet Hulk style eh?

Discuss.

http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=99859

quote:

ORIGINAL: Timon

I think they're going to insinuate that Dr. Strange/Illumanti/Thanos or whoever they want will manipulate the Hulk to essentially commit some sort of atrocity that means keeping him around is just too much of a liability.


OR maybe he's sucking through some galactic wormhole in an accident and ends up on another Planet.

They could do it any number of ways.

I'm just concerned that if they do do Planet Hulk that a) it'll be really expensive due to the amount of FX b) people will tire of the Hulk as he won't be used sparingly c) Mark Ruffalo won't have much to do.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Artoo

quote:

ORIGINAL: Timon

I think they're going to insinuate that Dr. Strange/Illumanti/Thanos or whoever they want will manipulate the Hulk to essentially commit some sort of atrocity that means keeping him around is just too much of a liability.


OR maybe he's sucking through some galactic wormhole in an accident and ends up on another Planet.

They could do it any number of ways.

I'm just concerned that if they do do Planet Hulk that a) it'll be really expensive due to the amount of FX b) people will tire of the Hulk as he won't be used sparingly c) Mark Ruffalo won't have much to do.

I think that'll be the main issue if there are any. The Hulk's appearance in Avengers was so great because it was little more than an extended cameo (of the monster at least).

quote:

ORIGINAL: Timon
So... Avengers 2 may end with The Hulk being exiled Planet Hulk style eh?
Discuss.
http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=99859

quote:

ORIGINAL: Artoo
at the end of Norton's Hulk movie and of course in The Avengers it was apparent that Banner had the Hulk under control? I don't doubt Marvel Studios could work the storyline to suit this development but it just seems to be contrary to the current chain of events that Marvel have already worked so hard to set up.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Invader_Ace

quote:

ORIGINAL: Artoo
at the end of Norton's Hulk movie and of course in The Avengers it was apparent that Banner had the Hulk under control? I don't doubt Marvel Studios could work the storyline to suit this development but it just seems to be contrary to the current chain of events that Marvel have already worked so hard to set up.

Disagree.
At the end of Norton's all we saw was that he was using meditation as way to stay calm, although, yeah,  it is implied that he has a certain degree of control or access to the Hulk in the final seconds.  In Avengers, Banner says that he no longer fights against the Hulk, but that he is always angry, then immediatly hulks out, which you can take as you say, that he is in control or just as easily take to mean that more than ever the Hulk is always waiting just below the surface.

[END SPOILERS]

Fighter jets that are firing 50mm cannons at him, building that are used as a means to an end for the Hulk to get to higher ground and the Thor thing - well that was just for comic effect! I'm of the opinion that Banner does have Hulk under control as it's clear he can change back and forth as he pleases and works well within a team (as he would say at a job interview). That doesn't mean however that he cant and wont lose control somewhere down the line - if the Planet Hulk thing is to be believed this is the route they will go down I reckon.

The only thing that casts a shadow of doubt for me is the part of Avengers where Banner gets caught up in the explosion on the Hellicarrier and sdeemingly turns into the Hulk against his will and proceeds to chase after Black Widow etc etc. I'm not sure what to make of that part given the end of Norton's Hulk and the end of The Avengers??

< Message edited by Artoo -- 5/2/2013 4:40:49 PM >

_____________________________

Hey, get some beer and some.....cleaning products!

(in reply to Invader_Ace)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Artoo

quote:

ORIGINAL: Invader_Ace

quote:

ORIGINAL: Artoo
at the end of Norton's Hulk movie and of course in The Avengers it was apparent that Banner had the Hulk under control? I don't doubt Marvel Studios could work the storyline to suit this development but it just seems to be contrary to the current chain of events that Marvel have already worked so hard to set up.

Disagree.
At the end of Norton's all we saw was that he was using meditation as way to stay calm, although, yeah,  it is implied that he has a certain degree of control or access to the Hulk in the final seconds.  In Avengers, Banner says that he no longer fights against the Hulk, but that he is always angry, then immediatly hulks out, which you can take as you say, that he is in control or just as easily take to mean that more than ever the Hulk is always waiting just below the surface.

Also, look at his behavious while he is the Hulk, sure he beats up a load of aliens and saves Iron Man, but he is still not above smashing the shit out of random buildings or fighter jets, or sucker punching Thor, just for summat to do.

quote:

Leaked toys show an Iron Man Deep Space Suit and early word is that his end of film sting will point to him lining up with the Guardinas of the Galaxy, as has recently happened in the comics [END SPOILERS]

Fighter jets that are firing 50mm cannons at him, building that are used as a means to an end for the Hulk to get to higher ground and the Thor thing - well that was just for comic effect! I'm of the opinion that Banner does have Hulk under control as it's clear he can change back and forth as he pleases and works well within a team (as he would say at a job interview). That doesn't mean however that he cant and wont lose control somewhere down the line - if the Planet Hulk thing is to be believed this is the route they will go down I reckon.

The only thing that casts a shadow of doubt for me is the part of Avengers where Banner gets caught up in the explosion on the Hellicarrier and sdeemingly turns into the Hulk against his will and proceeds to chase after Black Widow etc etc. I'm not sure what to make of that part given the end of Norton's Hulk and the end of The Avengers??

quote:

ORIGINAL: musht

quote:

ORIGINAL: Artoo

quote:

ORIGINAL: Invader_Ace

quote:

ORIGINAL: Artoo
at the end of Norton's Hulk movie and of course in The Avengers it was apparent that Banner had the Hulk under control? I don't doubt Marvel Studios could work the storyline to suit this development but it just seems to be contrary to the current chain of events that Marvel have already worked so hard to set up.

Disagree.
At the end of Norton's all we saw was that he was using meditation as way to stay calm, although, yeah,  it is implied that he has a certain degree of control or access to the Hulk in the final seconds.  In Avengers, Banner says that he no longer fights against the Hulk, but that he is always angry, then immediatly hulks out, which you can take as you say, that he is in control or just as easily take to mean that more than ever the Hulk is always waiting just below the surface.

Fighter jets that are firing 50mm cannons at him, building that are used as a means to an end for the Hulk to get to higher ground and the Thor thing - well that was just for comic effect! I'm of the opinion that Banner does have Hulk under control as it's clear he can change back and forth as he pleases and works well within a team (as he would say at a job interview). That doesn't mean however that he cant and wont lose control somewhere down the line - if the Planet Hulk thing is to be believed this is the route they will go down I reckon.

The only thing that casts a shadow of doubt for me is the part of Avengers where Banner gets caught up in the explosion on the Hellicarrier and sdeemingly turns into the Hulk against his will and proceeds to chase after Black Widow etc etc. I'm not sure what to make of that part given the end of Norton's Hulk and the end of The Avengers??

I think point was that Loki had a little influence in that incident

Something to do with the staff that they had in the lab you mean? When Banner was unwittingly tooling himself up with it!

< Message edited by Artoo -- 5/2/2013 4:39:56 PM >

_____________________________

Hey, get some beer and some.....cleaning products!

(in reply to musht)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Invader_Ace

Quick dudes, edit your posts, you have quoted my Iron Man 3 spoilers!

quote:

ORIGINAL: Artoo

quote:

ORIGINAL: Invader_Ace

Quick dudes, edit your posts, you have quoted my Iron Man 3 spoilers!

Oops! Done

quote:

ORIGINAL: Artoo

The casting for Peter Quill a.k.a Star Lord in the upcoming Guardians of The Galaxy has been announced. Some bloke called Chris Pratt (snigger) who we will probably only have seen in Zero Dark Thirty. I haven't seen the film so I dont know what he's like as an actor. Anyone care to comment??

http://latino-review.com/2013/02/05/chris-pratt-star-lord-guardians-galaxy/

quote:

ORIGINAL: musht

So it looks like we have a Drax the Destroyer in Jason Momoa. Not familiar with the character but I thought Momoa did a great job as Khal Drogo especially given that had very little dialogue and yet managed to craft a believable character.

http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Could-Game-Thrones-Jason-Momoa-Joining-Guardians-Galaxy-35793.html

quote:

ORIGINAL: Harry Tuttle

Yeah it'd be great to have Spider-Man and Wolverine in an Avengers film. Like you say though, it's unlikely to happen. I do look forward to the possibility of decent Daredevil and Punisher films though. There's plenty of great material to mine for both characters. For Daredevil you've got a wealth of material from Miller's classic run to what Mark Waid is currently doing and for Punisher you've got plenty of Garth Ennis' material to work with as well as Greg Rucka's most recent run which is winding down at the moment with War Zone.

quote:

ORIGINAL: SWOTBM

New Iron Man 3 trailer:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ke1Y3P9D0Bc

So much win