Register  |   Log In  |  
Sign up to our weekly newsletter    
Follow us on   
Search   
Forum Home Register for Free! Log In Moderator Tickets FAQ Users Online

RE: Marvel Cinematic Universe

  		Logged in as: Guest
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Film Forums] >> Future Films >> RE: Marvel Cinematic Universe Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Marvel Cinematic Universe - 22/9/2012 12:32:07 PM   
spark1

 

Posts: 5860
Joined: 18/11/2006
'game/thrones' authour wants 'dr strange' and feige talks thanos-


http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/comics/news/a407360/game-of-thrones-george-rr-martin-would-write-doctor-strange.html

http://www.mania.com/feige-talks-thanos-avengers_article_134214.html

and no 'hulk' movie til after A2-


http://www.scifinow.co.uk/news/no-new-hulk-movie-until-after-avengers-2/


< Message edited by spark1 -- 22/9/2012 12:33:35 PM >

(in reply to 12 Space Monkeys)
Post #: 91
RE: Marvel Cinematic Universe - 15/10/2012 3:14:47 PM   
musht


Posts: 1220
Joined: 21/1/2009
From: Oireland
 So, how do we all feel about Agent Coulson being brought back for the SHIELD TV series? Does it lessen the impact of his death in the Avengers, or will this be a series based pre-Avengers?

I personally am delighted he'll be back, I don't care of it's based before or after Avengers. Comic book characters "die" and come back all the time, do they not? I'll be interested to see how they do bring him if that's to be case.

I'm not a reader of the comics (movie bandwagoner) so what heroes/villains do the comic readers want/expect to crop up in this series?

_____________________________

"SAVE ME, BARRY!!"

"What the hell are Regionals!?"

(in reply to spark1)
Post #: 92
RE: Marvel Cinematic Universe - 16/10/2012 12:29:06 AM   
fuzzy


Posts: 1790
Joined: 30/10/2007
From: Grizzly Flats
quote:

ORIGINAL: musht

So, how do we all feel about Agent Coulson being brought back for the SHIELD TV series? Does it lessen the impact of his death in the Avengers, or will this be a series based pre-Avengers?

I personally am delighted he'll be back, I don't care of it's based before or after Avengers. Comic book characters "die" and come back all the time, do they not? I'll be interested to see how they do bring him if that's to be case.

I'm not a reader of the comics (movie bandwagoner) so what heroes/villains do the comic readers want/expect to crop up in this series?


Personally, I'd prefer it to be a prequel. Set even before the events of Iron Man and charting SHIELD's exploits leading up to the film arcs. That way they can easily avoid the inclusion of movie characters and just keep it more grounded in SHIELD's more Earthbound threats. Inclusion of street level bad-guys and heroes would be cool - hell, Marvel have the rights to enough of them now. Luke Cage, Punisher, Iron Fist... SHIELD were obviously aware of 'heroes' leading up to the events of the movies, whose to say there's not more heroes on SHIELD's books than Hawkeye and BW.

_____________________________

Last 5 films:
Chronicle: 3/5
Star Trek - Into Darkness: 4/5
Resident Evil - Retribution: 2/5
Sherlock Holmes - A Game of Shadows: 3/5
Total Recall (2012): 3/5

(in reply to musht)
Post #: 93
RE: Marvel Cinematic Universe - 16/10/2012 2:04:44 AM   
porntrooper

 

Posts: 2516
Joined: 6/9/2006
From: Sheffield
quote:

ORIGINAL: musht

So, how do we all feel about Agent Coulson being brought back for the SHIELD TV series? Does it lessen the impact of his death in the Avengers, or will this be a series based pre-Avengers?

I personally am delighted he'll be back, I don't care of it's based before or after Avengers. Comic book characters "die" and come back all the time, do they not? I'll be interested to see how they do bring him if that's to be case.

I'm not a reader of the comics (movie bandwagoner) so what heroes/villains do the comic readers want/expect to crop up in this series?


It has to be a prequel though doesnt it? If it's set post Avengers it wont make sense, as any threat SHIELD deal with on the show should be easily dealt with by the Avengers. If it was set post AVengers viewers would always be going "But why doesn't Iron Man/Thor/Cap/Hulk just show up and sort this shit out?". A prequel will make most sense.

_____________________________

"I've got an idea for a special infiltration technique. It involves draining a man of his blood and replacing it with Tizer."

(in reply to musht)
Post #: 94
RE: Marvel Cinematic Universe - 16/10/2012 9:30:09 AM   
Bad Ash

 

Posts: 57
Joined: 13/2/2012
I heard a rumour that Coulson was gonna be brought back to life by S.H.I.E.L.D using robotics and computer technology and that he would become The Vision! I actually heard that was gonna be the extra bit on the end of The Avengers and that he was going to be rebuilt by S.H.I.E.L.D with the added help of Tony Stark and Bruce Banner (that apparently where the two of them were going together at the end of Avengers), but that turned out to be BS. It would be great if it were true though! Vision is a great character!

_____________________________

I know where the bastard sleeps!

(in reply to porntrooper)
Post #: 95
RE: Marvel Cinematic Universe - 16/10/2012 11:11:19 AM   
Harry Tuttle


Posts: 7619
Joined: 12/11/2005
From: Sometime in the future.
quote:

ORIGINAL: porntrooper


quote:

ORIGINAL: musht

So, how do we all feel about Agent Coulson being brought back for the SHIELD TV series? Does it lessen the impact of his death in the Avengers, or will this be a series based pre-Avengers?

I personally am delighted he'll be back, I don't care of it's based before or after Avengers. Comic book characters "die" and come back all the time, do they not? I'll be interested to see how they do bring him if that's to be case.

I'm not a reader of the comics (movie bandwagoner) so what heroes/villains do the comic readers want/expect to crop up in this series?


It has to be a prequel though doesnt it? If it's set post Avengers it wont make sense, as any threat SHIELD deal with on the show should be easily dealt with by the Avengers. If it was set post AVengers viewers would always be going "But why doesn't Iron Man/Thor/Cap/Hulk just show up and sort this shit out?". A prequel will make most sense.


You could say the same thing about all the solo films from here on in though. SHIELD will deal with street level threats I'd imagine, things too small to even bother a single Avenger with let alone the whole crew. I'd like to see Carol Danvers (preferably in her new Captain Marvel guise), Luke Cage, Daredevil, Iron Fist and a few minor characters get an introduction personally, possibly with a view to introducing them into mainstream Avenger territory (Danvers and Cage especially).

I agree that a prequel makes most sense though but that's mainly because of Coulson being in it.

< Message edited by Harry Tuttle -- 16/10/2012 11:22:37 AM >

_____________________________

Acting...Naturaaal

Your knowledge of scientific biological transmogrification is only outmatched by your zest for kung-fu treachery!

Blood Island. So called because it's the exact shape of some blood

(in reply to porntrooper)
Post #: 96
RE: Marvel Cinematic Universe - 16/10/2012 12:08:28 PM   
Timon


Posts: 14551
Joined: 30/9/2005
From: Bristol
 Michael Jai White for Black Panther! Come on, you know it would be awesome.

Yeah, I don't think the SHIELD series would deal with anything major - just regular terrorist/villain threats. Something that doesn't require the Avengers. Perhaps sorting out Leader's creation from The Incredible Hulk? The fallout of assorted aliens pottering around New York post-Avengers?



_____________________________

"I put no stock in religion. By the word 'religion', I have seen the lunacy of fanatics of every denomination be called 'The Will of God'. Holiness is in right action and courage on behalf of those who cannot defend themselves."

Twitter: @timonsingh

(in reply to Harry Tuttle)
Post #: 97
RE: Marvel Cinematic Universe - 16/10/2012 1:11:44 PM   
Harry Tuttle


Posts: 7619
Joined: 12/11/2005
From: Sometime in the future.
 Black Panther's not a character that I've ever found interesting personally, if MJW was to play any character I'd rather it was Luke Cage. At 44 he's probably getting on a bit for that though.

_____________________________

Acting...Naturaaal

Your knowledge of scientific biological transmogrification is only outmatched by your zest for kung-fu treachery!

Blood Island. So called because it's the exact shape of some blood

(in reply to Timon)
Post #: 98
RE: Marvel Cinematic Universe - 16/10/2012 1:35:15 PM   
Timon


Posts: 14551
Joined: 30/9/2005
From: Bristol
 After seeing him in Blood and Bone recently, I believe that man can do anything.

_____________________________

"I put no stock in religion. By the word 'religion', I have seen the lunacy of fanatics of every denomination be called 'The Will of God'. Holiness is in right action and courage on behalf of those who cannot defend themselves."

Twitter: @timonsingh

(in reply to Harry Tuttle)
Post #: 99
RE: Marvel Cinematic Universe - 18/10/2012 12:49:28 PM   
fuzzy


Posts: 1790
Joined: 30/10/2007
From: Grizzly Flats
 Hugo Weaving not interested in revisting Red Skull...

http://comicbook.com/blog/2012/10/18/hugo-weaving-not-interested-in-returning-as-red-skull/

I can see them bringing the character back - too big to leave dead IMO. But if Weaving really wants to get out of the contract - Marvel will simply recast I guess.

Any ideas on a possible replacement if that happens?

_____________________________

Last 5 films:
Chronicle: 3/5
Star Trek - Into Darkness: 4/5
Resident Evil - Retribution: 2/5
Sherlock Holmes - A Game of Shadows: 3/5
Total Recall (2012): 3/5

(in reply to Timon)
Post #: 100
RE: Marvel Cinematic Universe - 18/10/2012 9:45:01 PM   
Marwood

 

Posts: 2617
Joined: 1/10/2005
From: Only The Shadow knows
quote:

ORIGINAL: fuzzy

Hugo Weaving not interested in revisting Red Skull...

http://comicbook.com/blog/2012/10/18/hugo-weaving-not-interested-in-returning-as-red-skull/

I can see them bringing the character back - too big to leave dead IMO. But if Weaving really wants to get out of the contract - Marvel will simply recast I guess.

Any ideas on a possible replacement if that happens?


Kevin Bacon's been thrown around a lot on other boards, personally I think that would be a good pick.

I'd be surprised if the Skull doesn't return but I wouldn't expect to see him again until Phase 3, Phase 2's overarching lead up to Avengers 2 is allegedly going to involve Thanos (I wonder if he'll be revealed as a shadowy presence or secret leader of the Thor: The Dark World threat as well as his apparent role in Guardians of the Galaxy) which may not leave much room for the Skull as a big bad anytime soon. Cap 2 doesn't seem to feature him in any way, neither will Iron Man 3.

_____________________________

Bilbo: What about the Ewoks? They were rubbish.

Tim: Yeah but Jar Jar Binks makes the Ewoks look like f***ing Shaft!

(in reply to fuzzy)
Post #: 101
RE: Marvel Cinematic Universe - 19/10/2012 1:04:45 PM   
Timon


Posts: 14551
Joined: 30/9/2005
From: Bristol
 If Ant-Man is coming out after The Avengers 2, does that mean he'll not appear in the sequel OR will he have a Hawkeye-sized role that will be expanded in his own film?

Hopefully they won't overload the Avengers sequel with new characters, the last thing we want is it to become an X-Men 3. Couple new characters, make it smaller and more personal and Whedon would be on to a winner. Perhaps a team death?

_____________________________

"I put no stock in religion. By the word 'religion', I have seen the lunacy of fanatics of every denomination be called 'The Will of God'. Holiness is in right action and courage on behalf of those who cannot defend themselves."

Twitter: @timonsingh

(in reply to Marwood)
Post #: 102
RE: Marvel Cinematic Universe - 19/10/2012 2:20:27 PM   
fuzzy


Posts: 1790
Joined: 30/10/2007
From: Grizzly Flats
quote:

ORIGINAL: Timon

If Ant-Man is coming out after The Avengers 2, does that mean he'll not appear in the sequel OR will he have a Hawkeye-sized role that will be expanded in his own film?

Hopefully they won't overload the Avengers sequel with new characters, the last thing we want is it to become an X-Men 3. Couple new characters, make it smaller and more personal and Whedon would be on to a winner. Perhaps a team death?


I think Ant-Man has to be introduced in some shape or form before his main movie, although an original avenger in the comics, he'll still be unfamiliar to the wider moviegoing audience. Here's a link to an interview with Kevin Feige where he said Hank Pym would've had a name check in Thor, but it was later removed (scroll to the bit between the 2nd pic of Feige and Thor poster). http://collider.com/kevin-feige-interview-thor-avengers-iron-man-3-ant-man-doctor-strange/88459/


Personally, I'd prefer not to have an Avenger's funeral so early in the process. I can understand the emotional impact and drive that would have for the characters (they did it with Coulson) and they've done it in the comics enough, but it would surely be financial suicide to off one of their big hitters, even at the sequel stage.

_____________________________

Last 5 films:
Chronicle: 3/5
Star Trek - Into Darkness: 4/5
Resident Evil - Retribution: 2/5
Sherlock Holmes - A Game of Shadows: 3/5
Total Recall (2012): 3/5

(in reply to Timon)
Post #: 103
RE: Marvel Cinematic Universe - 19/10/2012 2:26:49 PM   
Timon


Posts: 14551
Joined: 30/9/2005
From: Bristol
 Nah, go all Wrath of Khan and then have The Avengers III: The Search for (insert deceased Avenger name).



_____________________________

"I put no stock in religion. By the word 'religion', I have seen the lunacy of fanatics of every denomination be called 'The Will of God'. Holiness is in right action and courage on behalf of those who cannot defend themselves."

Twitter: @timonsingh

(in reply to fuzzy)
Post #: 104
RE: Marvel Cinematic Universe - 19/10/2012 2:32:11 PM   
fuzzy


Posts: 1790
Joined: 30/10/2007
From: Grizzly Flats
quote:

ORIGINAL: Timon

Nah, go all Wrath of Khan and then have The Avengers III: The Search for (insert deceased Avenger name).




     I guess they all came back from the dead one time or another anyway - no reason why it can't happen in the movie universe.

_____________________________

Last 5 films:
Chronicle: 3/5
Star Trek - Into Darkness: 4/5
Resident Evil - Retribution: 2/5
Sherlock Holmes - A Game of Shadows: 3/5
Total Recall (2012): 3/5

(in reply to Timon)
Post #: 105
RE: Iron Man 3 - 21/10/2012 5:54:13 PM   
Vadersville


Posts: 2928
Joined: 30/9/2005
Everyone seen the teaser for the trailer?

_____________________________

Confusion is a way of life, not a state of mind

(in reply to fuzzy)
Post #: 106
RE: Iron Man 3 - 21/10/2012 8:13:51 PM   
Titanm21


Posts: 1170
Joined: 18/10/2006
From: The Womb
 God Yes

_____________________________

www.TrailerHouseMusings@Blogspot.com

Join us for all the latest trailers in the world of Gaming, TV and Movies [also Facebook and Twitter]

(in reply to Vadersville)
Post #: 107
RE: Iron Man 3 - 21/10/2012 8:55:11 PM   
Vadersville


Posts: 2928
Joined: 30/9/2005
I feel a bit silly, having actually watched what is a trailer for a trailer.... But yeah, looks awesome!

_____________________________

Confusion is a way of life, not a state of mind

(in reply to Titanm21)
Post #: 108
RE: Marvel Cinematic Universe - 22/10/2012 1:41:01 PM   
Timon


Posts: 14551
Joined: 30/9/2005
From: Bristol
quote:

ORIGINAL: fuzzy

Hugo Weaving not interested in revisting Red Skull...

http://comicbook.com/blog/2012/10/18/hugo-weaving-not-interested-in-returning-as-red-skull/

I can see them bringing the character back - too big to leave dead IMO. But if Weaving really wants to get out of the contract - Marvel will simply recast I guess.




Apparently Natalie Portman tried to get out of her contractual obligations to return for the sequel after Patty Jenkins was dropped as director, but Marvel cracked the whip and she's back, but apparently not that happy about it.


_____________________________

"I put no stock in religion. By the word 'religion', I have seen the lunacy of fanatics of every denomination be called 'The Will of God'. Holiness is in right action and courage on behalf of those who cannot defend themselves."

Twitter: @timonsingh

(in reply to fuzzy)
Post #: 109
RE: Iron Man 3 - 22/10/2012 2:14:51 PM   
primebhoy


Posts: 875
Joined: 7/5/2008
From: Scotland
quote:

ORIGINAL: Vadersville

Everyone seen the teaser for the trailer?


Got a link?


_____________________________

'Old Man your about one C**t hair away from hillbilly heaven' - Blade II

(in reply to Vadersville)
Post #: 110
RE: Iron Man 3 - 22/10/2012 3:24:59 PM   
Vadersville


Posts: 2928
Joined: 30/9/2005
Clicky

_____________________________

Confusion is a way of life, not a state of mind

(in reply to primebhoy)
Post #: 111
RE: Marvel Cinematic Universe - 22/10/2012 3:29:09 PM   
Vadersville


Posts: 2928
Joined: 30/9/2005

quote:

ORIGINAL: Timon


quote:

ORIGINAL: fuzzy

Hugo Weaving not interested in revisting Red Skull...

http://comicbook.com/blog/2012/10/18/hugo-weaving-not-interested-in-returning-as-red-skull/

I can see them bringing the character back - too big to leave dead IMO. But if Weaving really wants to get out of the contract - Marvel will simply recast I guess.




Apparently Natalie Portman tried to get out of her contractual obligations to return for the sequel after Patty Jenkins was dropped as director, but Marvel cracked the whip and she's back, but apparently not that happy about it.



Really? That's ever so gutting. I really liked her character in Thor and was looking forward to seeing her role develop in Thor 2. Hope she doesn't do a half-arsed phoned-in performance now. They obviously knew they were gonna use her again, hence why her absence is explained away in The Avengers.

_____________________________

Confusion is a way of life, not a state of mind

(in reply to Timon)
Post #: 112
RE: Marvel Cinematic Universe - 22/10/2012 4:17:46 PM   
Dannybohy


Posts: 1039
Joined: 7/1/2009
I like to see a new HULK with Ruffalo! couldnt give a donkeys left testicle about the other sequels for these characters , happy to only see them in the Avengers from now on.

_____________________________

'I don't need someone like Dannybohy pointing out all the problems with TDKR, I know they are there and enjoyed it anyway' -Anonymous

(in reply to Marwood)
Post #: 113
RE: Marvel Cinematic Universe - 22/10/2012 4:56:26 PM   
Vadersville


Posts: 2928
Joined: 30/9/2005
You know, Pre-Avengers, Thor was the film I enjoyed the most but having recently re-watched them all, (including the Avengers), the Avenger I most want to see more of is Captain America. I think a huge part of that, is down to Chris Evans' portrayal. I also can't wait to see how the character is handled now that he's going to have to settle into a different era. If you haven't seen the "Man out of time" deleted scenes featuring Steve from The Avengers, go watch them, you'll see exactly what I mean.

_____________________________

Confusion is a way of life, not a state of mind

(in reply to Dannybohy)
Post #: 114
RE: Marvel Cinematic Universe - 22/10/2012 7:47:17 PM   
Titanm21


Posts: 1170
Joined: 18/10/2006
From: The Womb
 Teaser 2

_____________________________

www.TrailerHouseMusings@Blogspot.com

Join us for all the latest trailers in the world of Gaming, TV and Movies [also Facebook and Twitter]

(in reply to Vadersville)
Post #: 115
RE: Marvel Cinematic Universe - 23/10/2012 4:00:29 AM   
porntrooper

 

Posts: 2516
Joined: 6/9/2006
From: Sheffield
 Is there anything as annoying as teasers for trailers? Just fucking so annoying!


Anyway, interested to see what the trailer brings tomorrow. Have no idea about the Mandarin or his history as a character, but the look seems a little odd to me. Still, at least it doesnt appear to be just a generic man in a robotic suit to go up against Iron Man. Only issue so far..... Downy Jnr's new Stark haircut. What the fuck?!

_____________________________

"I've got an idea for a special infiltration technique. It involves draining a man of his blood and replacing it with Tizer."

(in reply to Titanm21)
Post #: 116
IM 3 TRAILER - 23/10/2012 8:43:21 AM   
DONOVAN KURTWOOD


Posts: 7728
Joined: 6/10/2005
From: PLANET G
 trailers out:

http://www.joblo.com/movie-news/the-full-first-trailer-for-iron-man-3-is-epic-dark-thrilling-and-will-leave-you-begging-for-more

_____________________________

Pack your bags, we're going on a guilt trip!

(in reply to porntrooper)
Post #: 117
RE: IM 3 TRAILER - 23/10/2012 8:46:12 AM   
DONOVAN KURTWOOD


Posts: 7728
Joined: 6/10/2005
From: PLANET G
 Looks cool, although i think they show a bit too much of the house being destroyed at the end, as in, too much trailer time.

_____________________________

Pack your bags, we're going on a guilt trip!

(in reply to DONOVAN KURTWOOD)
Post #: 118
RE: Marvel Cinematic Universe - 23/10/2012 9:23:14 AM   
giggity

 

Posts: 246
Joined: 4/3/2012
Looks like The Iron Knight Rises. Not that that's a bad thing but it's worth pointing out the similarities.

(in reply to Emyr Thy King)
Post #: 119
RE: Marvel Cinematic Universe - 23/10/2012 9:26:25 AM   
DONOVAN KURTWOOD


Posts: 7728
Joined: 6/10/2005
From: PLANET G
 Not seen Dark Knight Rises, this looks about ten times better though

_____________________________

Pack your bags, we're going on a guilt trip!

(in reply to giggity)
Post #: 120
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Film Forums] >> Future Films >> RE: Marvel Cinematic Universe Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


 
Movie News  |  Empire Blog  |  Movie Reviews  |  Future Films  |  Features  |  Video Interviews  |  Image Gallery  |  Competitions  |  Forum  |  Magazine  |  Resources
 
Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.063