Hood_Man
Posts: 11270
Joined: 30/9/2005
|
I liked it, probably give it something like 3-4/5. The airship sequence was far too long, it just wasn't that interesting a location to occupy so much time with, but it was otherwise a really enjoyable film. Also, I get that it's an ensemble piece and that they were all going to be given plenty of screen time, but by being so fair and equal I thought it ended up with everyone involved being almost a guest star in their own film. I feel that there should still be one character who the story revolves around, even if it's only slightly more so than anyone else. Saying that, I was pleased with the character development that was there. Thor was an important character on account of the main villain being his brother (I loved their scene on the mountain, reminding us that if not by blood but in spirit, Loki is his brother and he cares for him), Banner was treated well due his need to be introduced to audiences (or re-introduced as it were) with a wonderfully timid and mild mannered performance from Ruffalo, and Tony Stark seemed to have returned to his Iron Man 1 best. However, I don't think all the characters were actually ready for an Avengers film yet. It's no surprise that the characters I identified with easiest were Tony Stark, Pepper Potts, Nick Fury, and Agent "Phil" Coulson, on account of them being the most established in the Marvel film universe. Captain America by comparison, I didn't give two hoots about. He's dashing, handsome, heroic, brave, super strong etc, but I really know nothing about him. He had a love interest in the first film who he'll never see again (presumably), he's from a different place in time and perhaps doesn't belong in the modern world, but apart from having a bit of a temper when working out I can't see how it's affected him. To go back to my earlier point about ensembles, I would assume that Captain America being "The First Avenger" means he would be the first choice to lead the Avengers into battle, which I concede he did but, apart from him being called "Captain" America, and apart from him being a war hero, I don't know why he's the first choice. Why not Thor, ruler of his own kingdom and about to go to battle against his brother? That's perhaps an unfair criticism since this film has a lot to get through, and it really should be up to other films to establish these guys, but I still think it suffers as a result and I really do believe that Captain America needed one more film before they made this one. So just to remind everyone at this point, I did say I liked it To go against the grain a bit my favourite part of this film was the first act. No time wasting, just straight into the story with a big bang (a huge bang even), re-introducing these beloved characters as quickly as it was effective. Captain America as the conflicted super soldier taking it out on gym equipment (I just wish he'd had more to do!), Thor flying in to take his misbehaving brother home (once again I loved that scene on the mountain between he and Loki), Stark being cool, Nick Fury being also cool, and I really enjoyed the Iron Man vs Thor fight too. Lots of laughs, some witty one liners here and there, lots of fun. Not without its flaws but still one of the best blockbusters I've seen in a long time. I might go and see it again tomorrow in fact (You can probably tell I lost interest in writing the review not too long ago )
|