great_badir
Posts: 4178
Joined: 6/10/2005 From: A breaking rope bridge in the middle of the jungle
|
Back on topic... I agree that, on the available evidence, Merchant generally provides the smarter, funnier and less obvious material of the two. Compare what both of them have written alone over the years (and here I'm referring to stuff in newspapers/blogs etc, as well as their respective solo stand-up efforts), and what they each come up with in podcasts and commentaries, it's fairly obvious where the real brains of the outfit are. Agreed, together they do seem to bring out the best in each other, but there's quite a chasm between them as individual comedians. What I mean by that is, now we've had several years of different types of material from them, you can go back to old episodes of The Office and Extras and you can start to pick out bits that are identifiable as RG writing on his own, and bits that are identifiable as SM writing on his own (don't ask me to specify, cos I can't off the top of my head right now - it's just an observation I've made having latterly re-watched some episodes of each after listening to the podcasts and XFM stuff, and seeing both of their stand-up material). As for Derek (the show) - again, it's quite good and it's good to see RG attempting something a bit more dramatic, but I still think he's not right for the part of Derek. Whereas Karl, even though not as good an actor as RG (and RG is only okay, if not mediocre), just fits into his role perfectly (mainly, I guess, cos RG has basically written Dougie as an extension of Karl's own persona). And Kev - whether you like the character or the actor, just what the hell is he doing there? Unless something more interesting comes along later in the series for him, it just seems like RG's written an arbitrary character so a mate of his can be in the show. Completely pointless. But Kerry Godliman - brilliant, brilliant, brilliant.
_____________________________
FAVE FILMS BO BOMBS
|