RE: Batman after Nolan

Follow @empiremagazine

Forum Home

Register for Free!

Log In

Moderator Tickets

FAQ

Users Online

RE: Batman after Nolan

Logged in as: Guest

Printable Version

All Forums >> [Film Forums] >> Future Films >> RE: Batman after Nolan

Page: << < prev 5 6 7 8 [9]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Batman after Nolan - 19/10/2012 11:07:01 AM

Timon

Posts: 14545
Joined: 30/9/2005
From: Bristol

If I was a betting man, I'd put money on Joe Manganiello being Superman for the JLA movie (if they do go with two Supermans). He was apparently down to the last two for Man of Steel, but couldn't get out of True Blood commitments so Cavil got the role. Plus with roles in HIMYM, Magic Mike and True Blood, I'd say he'd be a safe bet.

Arnie Hammer will probably get Batman for JLA and I doubt they'll do another Batman reboot till after JLA comes out in 2015.

_____________________________

"I put no stock in religion. By the word 'religion', I have seen the lunacy of fanatics of every denomination be called 'The Will of God'. Holiness is in right action and courage on behalf of those who cannot defend themselves."

Twitter: @timonsingh

(in reply to Dirk Miggler)

Post #: 241

RE: Batman after Nolan - 19/10/2012 1:03:59 PM

Invader_Ace

Posts: 1524
Joined: 31/7/2008

quote:

ORIGINAL: Timon
if they do go with two Supermans

This would be a terrible, terrible idea. Either have Cavill as Superman or jetison him for any Stand-alone Superman sequels. Two actors playing the same role might be the kind of thing that flew in the 50s, but not now.

Also, I don't think the previous "no-tie in" confirmations are worth anything to be honest. It's such a vague term, it could just mean, no references to a wider universe, which would be fine.

Think they'll keep Reynolds for Lantern or go with a different actor or lantern? Maybe John Stewart like in the Cartoons?

(in reply to Timon)

Post #: 242

RE: Batman after Nolan - 19/10/2012 1:06:59 PM

Timon

Posts: 14545
Joined: 30/9/2005
From: Bristol

quote:

ORIGINAL: Invader_Ace

quote:

ORIGINAL: Timon
if they do go with two Supermans

This would be a terrible, terrible idea.�

But it appears to be the way they're going...

From Synder: "It doesn�t. Like what Chris Nolan is doing and what I�m doing with Superman, what they�ll do with Justice League will be it�s own thing with it�s own Batman and [�] Superman. We�ll be over here with our movie and they�ll kind of get to do it twice which is kind of cool.�

http://screenrant.com/justice-league-movie-superman-benm-108489/

_____________________________

"I put no stock in religion. By the word 'religion', I have seen the lunacy of fanatics of every denomination be called 'The Will of God'. Holiness is in right action and courage on behalf of those who cannot defend themselves."

Twitter: @timonsingh

(in reply to Invader_Ace)

Post #: 243

RE: Batman after Nolan - 23/10/2012 4:34:14 PM

Dannybohy

Posts: 952
Joined: 7/1/2009

i don't see anything wrong with two versions of Superman. The way I see it! the more version we get the more chance we mighteventually get a good one!! . Looking forward to a JLA version Superman and Batman for sure! much more likely we will get decent versions! Just so long as Nolan doesn't get involved and bore the Superpants off it!

< Message edited by Dannybohy -- 23/10/2012 4:35:38 PM >

_____________________________

�If you hate Nolan I pity you'
-Anonymous Nolan fan

(in reply to Timon)

Post #: 244