Grahame-Smith Updates On Beetlejuice 2

Follow @empiremagazine

Forum Home

Register for Free!

Log In

Moderator Tickets

FAQ

Users Online

Grahame-Smith Updates On Beetlejuice 2

Logged in as: Guest

Printable Version

All Forums >> [Film Forums] >> Movie News >> Grahame-Smith Updates On Beetlejuice 2

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Grahame-Smith Updates On Beetlejuice 2 - 13/2/2012 10:25:50 AM

Empire Admin

Posts: 26334
Joined: 29/6/2005

Post your comments on this article

Post #: 1

- 13/2/2012 10:25:50 AM

shitneck

Posts: 68
Joined: 3/8/2007

So this really is just a shit story? We've known for years that MK was interested but nobody else was, and there is still no story, script or funding. And we knew months ago that there was nothing new other than MK was "Really excited" and todays "Update" hasn't shed any more light on this.
So this isn't really an update is it??

(in reply to Empire Admin)

Post #: 2

Tim Burton sucks - 17/2/2012 11:24:35 PM

Adsyboy

Posts: 10
Joined: 11/6/2008

That's right, he does. He was good back in the day with Batman, Scissorhands, Beetlejuice, but these days he's just a jumped up little ponce waddling around with silly hair, making films with as much emotional depth as beautifully constructed McVities biscuit. He couldn't even remake Planet of the Apes well. Charlie and the Chocolate Factory was a right steaming pile of monkey balls. As for Michael Keaton, you've got to love him, but I'm not surprised he's excited about this as he's hardly been storming the box office lately. If he's been excited about it all these years, how come he's not got some cracking ideas himself? Why does this guy have to come up with on "a couple of story ideas". It sounds smelly to me, but if they can match madness of the first one and if they can give Burton a damn good kicking before hand, so that he gets a bit of his old anger back, then sure, who wouldn't want to see Beetlejuice 2. Is he gonna have a really small head though?

< Message edited by Adsyboy -- 17/2/2012 11:28:00 PM >

(in reply to Empire Admin)

Post #: 3