superdan
Posts: 7216
Joined: 31/7/2008
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: jonson A Top 100 footballers of all time would be Pele and Maradona, and then the rest, I don't think there's any question of that. I sit near a bloke who insists John Charles is the greatest players he's ever seen bar none (and he's been watching football since the 50's) but I can honestly say hand on heart I've never seen a second of footage of him. Did he ever play at a World Cup? No. I've put Zola ahead of Cantona. Madness, possibly, but Zola used to make me cry, he was that brilliant, he played with a massive smile on his face, and he had some of the most delicate touches I've ever seen. He is my favourite Premiership player of all time, but certinaly not the best. Corleone's list above (and no offence intended) is a far more accurate Top 30 list, and from what I've "heard", his Top 10 looks about spot on. However, was Stanley Matthews better than Dennis Bergkamp? I'd argue not, but many people will say otherwise. Messi better than George Best? Of course he is. Best wouldn't last 70 minutes at the pace nowadays, but then again Alex Ferghsuon wouldn't let him play pissed, so he'd be a completely different player. I'm sticking with my favourite players, players I've watched live, players who made me jump around, it's far more interesting. quote:
What in the name of holy shit is Paul Gascoigne doing in all these lists? He's the best English player I've ever seen, in my opinion. He had his problems and could and should have done more in his career, but if we had a player with half his talent in the last 10 years we'd have done a bit more internationally. Agree with this. I couldn't really vote for players who I've only read about, and besides if we followed the convention this would be a list just like all the other 100 Greatest Footballer lists. Pele/Maradona at the top and so on. Perhaps we should get older relatives to cast their votes, my stepdad's list would be wildly different from mine (it'd have Jimmy Greaves at #1 for a start).
|