fuzzy
Posts: 1786
Joined: 30/10/2007 From: Grizzly Flats
|
As much as I enjoyed it, the inconsistencies with the previous films still annoy me. And I can't even look at it as a reboot as there are still nods to the first 2 films at least - the very fact that they used lesser known characters and set it in the 60s is evidence alone that it was always designed as a fully-fledged prequel, but as soon as Singer and Vaughn came on board so did their egos and thats why we have the prequel/reboot mess. I'm not saying they did a bad job with the film, far from it, it's probably the best Xmen since no. 2 - but was it so hard for them to just stick to the whole prequel thing? I understand that the pre-production was a complete mess with so many changes - but the one thing the studio set in stone was the characters, and Vaughn and Singer had carte blanche on pretty much everything else, so from there on in it was always going to be confused. I just wish the studio had known what they were doing from the start and stuck to it. Reboot, fine, set it in present day with a recast and some new mutants, even follow the original comic line-up. Prequel, fine, set it in the 70/80s (60s is too bigger gap) with younger versions and new mutants - and link it with what's already been established. Unfortunately, as entertaining as it was, we got some weird hybrid and the sequel will no doubt continue the trend. I just would've liked to have seen one or the other, done well. Sadly, I don't think that will happen for a while yet.
_____________________________
Last 5 films: Sinister: 2.5/5 Snow White and the Huntsman: 3.5/5 The Hole (2009): 3/5 The Innkeepers: 2.5/5 Breaking Dawn Pt2: 2.5/5
|